企业劳动规章的法律效力研究
|
摘要
在现实劳动关系中,企业劳动规章往往是决定劳动者权利义务和劳动条件的最为主要依据,并呈取代劳动合同、集体合同之势;由于其系企业单方制定与变更却具有约束劳动关系相对方的法律效力,因此,有关企业劳动规章法律效力的问题一直是劳动法领域的一个重要争点。
在我国大陆地区,对企业劳动规章法律效力问题的学术整理比较晚,无论是学说还是立法都很不成熟。本文从对有关企业劳动规章法律性质各学说、各国企业劳动规章法律制度与立法模式的梳理入手,以平衡企业的生产经营需要与劳动者的合法权益保护、协调企业劳动规章制定主体的单方性与劳动合同、劳动关系的契约性为主线,紧紧围绕着企业劳动规章具有法律效力的依据、法律性质与立法模式、有效与生效要件、无效与不生效的原因及法律后果、企业劳动规章的保障机制等基本问题展开论述。在此基础上,文章主要提出了以下学术观点:其一,企业劳动规章在内容上应区分为狭义劳动条件部分与行为规则部分,在法律性质其具有多元性;其二,在内容二分的基础上,根据劳动合同订立阶段、劳动关系存续期间劳动者法律地位、双方法律关系的根本不同,对企业劳动规章的制定与生效程序作不同的法律安排;其三,将企业劳动规章的有效与生效、无效与不生效加以区分,注意到二者细微而又本质的差别。
With the scale enlargement of the modern enterprises, the increasing number of employee and the complex of the labor division and coorporation, the contractual nature of labor relations confronts with more and more serious challenges. According to the contractual nature of labor relations, the related items in the labor relations, especially these related to the private interests of the labor directly, should be agreed by contract based on the negotiation. However, for the meeds of enterprise management and convenience and the costs saving, almost without exception, the modern enterprises tend to regulate the working conditions and rights and obligations of both employers and employees, which should be agreed by labor contract, by enterprise labor regulations unilaterally as the basis of contract and labor relations. As a result, labors have no choice except accept or refuse about the changes of labor regulations made by the enterprise. Therefore, enterprise can decide the contents of the labor contract and the working conditions unilaterally and the enterprise labor regulations become the main basis which regulate the workers rights and obligations. While, there are several questions arising: what kind of status of enterprise labor regulations in labor law? What is the legal basis on which it binds both relatives in labor relations? What are the relations among it and labor contracts and collective contracts? How to protect the labors' legitimate rights and interests? How to indicate the contractual nature of labor relations? etc.
There are divergent views rather than consensus opinion about these questions. Given these confusions, this dissertation clarified the legitimate effectiveness basis, the necessities to "be effective" and "in force", legitimate contents and "invalidity" and "not rectification" of enterprise labor regulations, aimed at balancing the necessities of production and the protection of workers' rights, and coordinating the unilateral nature of the labor regulations' maker and the contractual nature of labor relations, and try to explore the legal effects and related issues of labor regulations in-depth.
The dissertation can be divided into six chapters as follows:
Chapter one introduces the conception and connotation of enterprise labor regulations. Having been influenced by the long-term plan economy, there are various views in China about the conception and connotation of labor regulations, and it's relations with labor contract, labor discipline, and command and management of enterprise, etc. This chapter points out that labor regulations bind the behaviour of workers and enterprise during the working process. It has dual purpose and function that is not only ensuring the realization of enterprises' productive purpose, but also protecting the workers' legitimate rights and interests.
Chapter two narrates the legal nature and legislative model of enterprise labor regulations and demonstrates the evidences that the labor regulations have its legal effects. The chapter firstly analyses the different theories about the legal nature of labor regulations, then gets two basic conclusions: the direct reason for the legal nature of labor regulations is the contradiction between the dominant position of private enterprises and the legal effects of labor regulations, that is, the paradox of the reality that the enterprises can make or change the labor regulations unilaterally and the legal effects of labor regulations; the fundamental reason is the contradiction between the necessities of the enterprises' production and management and the protection of the workers' rights and interests. The second parts narrates the legal nature and the formulation and process to be in force of labor regulations. It maintains that the two basic elements of labor regulations are the requirements of the enterprises and the protection of the labors' rights, that is, labor regulations had been composed of the effective parts of the contract which based on the consensual decision of the employers and employees and the authorized legally binding parts which had been produced by the business management, thus the legal nature of it is multiple. As for its formulation and process to be in force, based upon the dichotomization of contents, in order to coordinate the relation of labor regulations and contract and maximum respect to the contractual nature of labor relations, this article makes different arrangements to the formulation and process to be in force of labor regulations according to the phase of labor contract, workers' legal status during the existence of labor relations and the fundamental difference of their legal relations. Parts three analyses our contemporary legal system of labor regulations, points out that the fully-authorized legislative model which is adopted in our country easily leads to an imbalance between employers and employees and the imaginary of labor contract, and advocates the implementation of limited-authorized legislative model based on the correct recognize of labor regulations.
Chapter three narrates the necessities needed when the labor regulations are to "be effective" and to "be in force" for the first time in academia. The chapter firstly distinguishes the difference of labor regulations between "be effective" and "be in force", they have natural distinction. To "be effective" means the labor regulations that companies formulate or change is in conformity with the law and therefore has legal effectiveness. To "be in force" means the effective labor regulations can bind workers' requirements legally in reality. The effective labor regulations may not come into force, but the valid labor regulations should be certainly effective. Part two analyses the effective necessities of labor regulations from the maker, contents and process, etc. The third parts analyses the "in force" necessities of labor regulations, including the ordinary necessities and special necessities. The former represents the public process of the labor regulations. The latter represents in the stage of the labor relationships continue to exist, the enterprise has the right to make changes to the labor rules, but if the changes are adverse to the labors, they have to be consented by the labors, otherwise, they will be ineffective on the existing workers.
Chapter four introduces the concrete contents of the legal effectiveness of labor regulations from the effectiveness scope and level, and points out that labor contracts and collective contracts take precedence over the labor regulations in the legal effect of hierarchy; However, if labor regulations is more favorable to workers than the labor contracts and collective contracts, they will have priority to apply the provisions of labor regulations.
In response to the third chapter, chapter five narrates the reasons why the labor regulations is "invalid" and "not rectification", the legal consequences, and the specific ways to find the invalid labor regulations, that is, the workers' appeals process and the judicial relief procedures. "Invalid" means the labor regulations has no legal effect by itself, while "not rectification" represents that the enterprise should not force its legal effect on workers. The reason for "Invalid" includes the maker, contents and making process, on the other hand, the reason for "not rectification" Includes: first, enterprises had not make announcement publicly in accordance with the law. Second, during the existence of labor relations, the changes which are adverse to workers had not been consent with the collective labors.
Chapter six talks about the protection mechanism of labor regulations, that is labor discipline and the enterprises' punishment rights. The chapter discusses the existence legal bases of the enterprises' punishment rights firstly, then points out that the reason why the law granted the enterprises punishment rights. That is based on the consideration about the needs of enterprise production and management and labor relations. Part two discusses how to limit the enterprises punishment rights. First, there must be legal punishment system in the company. Second, the implementation of punishment must have legitimacy, that is, workers' violations must comply with the relevant disciplinary requirements, punishment measures must be appropriate, punishment procedures must be legitimate. Parts three further points out that we should perfect the enterprises' punishment rights, the disciplinary system of supervision and relief procedures, in particular, improve the way of judicial relief. The last part advocates to reconstruct the enterprise punishment system of our country according to the requirements of market economy, in specific, first, to respect the contractual nature of labor relations and give the enterprise the necessary disciplinary autonomy, and gradually realize the transform from business discipline to the default relief. Second, to improve the disciplinary process, the main role of implementation must be neutral, labors must have the right to defense and the means to seek judicial relief, punishment action must be built on the foundation of truth on the public, in writing and be bound by the principle of limitation. At last, to remodel the type of enterprise disciplinary according to the requirements of market economy, to distinguish the enterprise punishment and administrative action, and remove the right to fine of companies and other types of economic punishments.
在我国大陆地区,对企业劳动规章法律效力问题的学术整理比较晚,无论是学说还是立法都很不成熟。本文从对有关企业劳动规章法律性质各学说、各国企业劳动规章法律制度与立法模式的梳理入手,以平衡企业的生产经营需要与劳动者的合法权益保护、协调企业劳动规章制定主体的单方性与劳动合同、劳动关系的契约性为主线,紧紧围绕着企业劳动规章具有法律效力的依据、法律性质与立法模式、有效与生效要件、无效与不生效的原因及法律后果、企业劳动规章的保障机制等基本问题展开论述。在此基础上,文章主要提出了以下学术观点:其一,企业劳动规章在内容上应区分为狭义劳动条件部分与行为规则部分,在法律性质其具有多元性;其二,在内容二分的基础上,根据劳动合同订立阶段、劳动关系存续期间劳动者法律地位、双方法律关系的根本不同,对企业劳动规章的制定与生效程序作不同的法律安排;其三,将企业劳动规章的有效与生效、无效与不生效加以区分,注意到二者细微而又本质的差别。
With the scale enlargement of the modern enterprises, the increasing number of employee and the complex of the labor division and coorporation, the contractual nature of labor relations confronts with more and more serious challenges. According to the contractual nature of labor relations, the related items in the labor relations, especially these related to the private interests of the labor directly, should be agreed by contract based on the negotiation. However, for the meeds of enterprise management and convenience and the costs saving, almost without exception, the modern enterprises tend to regulate the working conditions and rights and obligations of both employers and employees, which should be agreed by labor contract, by enterprise labor regulations unilaterally as the basis of contract and labor relations. As a result, labors have no choice except accept or refuse about the changes of labor regulations made by the enterprise. Therefore, enterprise can decide the contents of the labor contract and the working conditions unilaterally and the enterprise labor regulations become the main basis which regulate the workers rights and obligations. While, there are several questions arising: what kind of status of enterprise labor regulations in labor law? What is the legal basis on which it binds both relatives in labor relations? What are the relations among it and labor contracts and collective contracts? How to protect the labors' legitimate rights and interests? How to indicate the contractual nature of labor relations? etc.
There are divergent views rather than consensus opinion about these questions. Given these confusions, this dissertation clarified the legitimate effectiveness basis, the necessities to "be effective" and "in force", legitimate contents and "invalidity" and "not rectification" of enterprise labor regulations, aimed at balancing the necessities of production and the protection of workers' rights, and coordinating the unilateral nature of the labor regulations' maker and the contractual nature of labor relations, and try to explore the legal effects and related issues of labor regulations in-depth.
The dissertation can be divided into six chapters as follows:
Chapter one introduces the conception and connotation of enterprise labor regulations. Having been influenced by the long-term plan economy, there are various views in China about the conception and connotation of labor regulations, and it's relations with labor contract, labor discipline, and command and management of enterprise, etc. This chapter points out that labor regulations bind the behaviour of workers and enterprise during the working process. It has dual purpose and function that is not only ensuring the realization of enterprises' productive purpose, but also protecting the workers' legitimate rights and interests.
Chapter two narrates the legal nature and legislative model of enterprise labor regulations and demonstrates the evidences that the labor regulations have its legal effects. The chapter firstly analyses the different theories about the legal nature of labor regulations, then gets two basic conclusions: the direct reason for the legal nature of labor regulations is the contradiction between the dominant position of private enterprises and the legal effects of labor regulations, that is, the paradox of the reality that the enterprises can make or change the labor regulations unilaterally and the legal effects of labor regulations; the fundamental reason is the contradiction between the necessities of the enterprises' production and management and the protection of the workers' rights and interests. The second parts narrates the legal nature and the formulation and process to be in force of labor regulations. It maintains that the two basic elements of labor regulations are the requirements of the enterprises and the protection of the labors' rights, that is, labor regulations had been composed of the effective parts of the contract which based on the consensual decision of the employers and employees and the authorized legally binding parts which had been produced by the business management, thus the legal nature of it is multiple. As for its formulation and process to be in force, based upon the dichotomization of contents, in order to coordinate the relation of labor regulations and contract and maximum respect to the contractual nature of labor relations, this article makes different arrangements to the formulation and process to be in force of labor regulations according to the phase of labor contract, workers' legal status during the existence of labor relations and the fundamental difference of their legal relations. Parts three analyses our contemporary legal system of labor regulations, points out that the fully-authorized legislative model which is adopted in our country easily leads to an imbalance between employers and employees and the imaginary of labor contract, and advocates the implementation of limited-authorized legislative model based on the correct recognize of labor regulations.
Chapter three narrates the necessities needed when the labor regulations are to "be effective" and to "be in force" for the first time in academia. The chapter firstly distinguishes the difference of labor regulations between "be effective" and "be in force", they have natural distinction. To "be effective" means the labor regulations that companies formulate or change is in conformity with the law and therefore has legal effectiveness. To "be in force" means the effective labor regulations can bind workers' requirements legally in reality. The effective labor regulations may not come into force, but the valid labor regulations should be certainly effective. Part two analyses the effective necessities of labor regulations from the maker, contents and process, etc. The third parts analyses the "in force" necessities of labor regulations, including the ordinary necessities and special necessities. The former represents the public process of the labor regulations. The latter represents in the stage of the labor relationships continue to exist, the enterprise has the right to make changes to the labor rules, but if the changes are adverse to the labors, they have to be consented by the labors, otherwise, they will be ineffective on the existing workers.
Chapter four introduces the concrete contents of the legal effectiveness of labor regulations from the effectiveness scope and level, and points out that labor contracts and collective contracts take precedence over the labor regulations in the legal effect of hierarchy; However, if labor regulations is more favorable to workers than the labor contracts and collective contracts, they will have priority to apply the provisions of labor regulations.
In response to the third chapter, chapter five narrates the reasons why the labor regulations is "invalid" and "not rectification", the legal consequences, and the specific ways to find the invalid labor regulations, that is, the workers' appeals process and the judicial relief procedures. "Invalid" means the labor regulations has no legal effect by itself, while "not rectification" represents that the enterprise should not force its legal effect on workers. The reason for "Invalid" includes the maker, contents and making process, on the other hand, the reason for "not rectification" Includes: first, enterprises had not make announcement publicly in accordance with the law. Second, during the existence of labor relations, the changes which are adverse to workers had not been consent with the collective labors.
Chapter six talks about the protection mechanism of labor regulations, that is labor discipline and the enterprises' punishment rights. The chapter discusses the existence legal bases of the enterprises' punishment rights firstly, then points out that the reason why the law granted the enterprises punishment rights. That is based on the consideration about the needs of enterprise production and management and labor relations. Part two discusses how to limit the enterprises punishment rights. First, there must be legal punishment system in the company. Second, the implementation of punishment must have legitimacy, that is, workers' violations must comply with the relevant disciplinary requirements, punishment measures must be appropriate, punishment procedures must be legitimate. Parts three further points out that we should perfect the enterprises' punishment rights, the disciplinary system of supervision and relief procedures, in particular, improve the way of judicial relief. The last part advocates to reconstruct the enterprise punishment system of our country according to the requirements of market economy, in specific, first, to respect the contractual nature of labor relations and give the enterprise the necessary disciplinary autonomy, and gradually realize the transform from business discipline to the default relief. Second, to improve the disciplinary process, the main role of implementation must be neutral, labors must have the right to defense and the means to seek judicial relief, punishment action must be built on the foundation of truth on the public, in writing and be bound by the principle of limitation. At last, to remodel the type of enterprise disciplinary according to the requirements of market economy, to distinguish the enterprise punishment and administrative action, and remove the right to fine of companies and other types of economic punishments.
引文
①辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1989:1627.
②常凯.劳动关系学[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2005:267.
①王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:180.
②李坤刚.关于企业内部劳动规则立法的思考[J].安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2001(3):68.
①黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:136—143.
②王能君.工作规则不利益变更之法律效力——最高法院88年度台上字第1696号民事判决评释[J].载:林山田教授退休祝贺论文集[C].台北:元照出版公司,2004:429.
③黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:136.
④列宁全集[M],第27卷.北京:人民出版社,1955:246.
①肖龙海.用人单位劳动规章制度及其立法模式探讨[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,1999(4):34.
②黄越钦.从劳工法探讨企业管理规章之性质[J].政大法律评论,1978(17):54.
③李洙德.定型化劳动契约之研究[D].台北:中国文化大学中山学术研究所,2002:252.
④李洙德.定型化劳动契约之研究[D].台北:中国文化大学中山学术研究所,2002:252.
①郑尚元.劳动合同法的制度与理念[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008:341.
①[日]西村健一郎.劳动法讲义之三:劳动法[M].东京:有斐阁,1993:210.
①王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:160.
②张立新.用人单位内部劳动规则浅析[J].内蒙古大学学报:人文社会科学版,1999年(6):105.;北京新吉宇劳动保障咨询中心.企业劳动规章[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2003:26—27.
①将法律渊源分为正式渊源与非正式渊源的当首推美国学者博登海默。其认为:将法的渊源划分为这两大类别是恰当的和可欲求的。所谓正式渊源,是指那些可以从体现为权威性法律文件的明确文本形式中得到的渊源;所谓非正式渊源,是指那些具有法律意义的资料和值得考虑的事项,而这些资料和事项尚未在正式法律文件中得到权威性的或至少是明文的阐述和体现。(参见:[美]博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:414—415.)
②胡玉鸿,彭东.试论法律社会渊源的理论基础[J].中国法学,2001(3):48.
③陈福生.当代中国自制规章论纲[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2007(2):6.
④梁兴国.单位规章对法律实效之影响[J].政法论坛,2006(5):187.
①[日]松岗三郎.劳动法——权利的历史和理论[M].东京:弘文堂,1994:90.
②董保华.劳动关系调整的法律机制[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2000:340.
③吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002:333.
①[美]D·哈特.企业、合同与财务结构[M].费方域,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:2.
②黄越钦.从劳工探讨企业管理规章之性质[J].政大法律评论,1978(17):69.
③黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:146.
④参见:台湾《劳动契约法》(未施行)第10条。
①吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002:338.
②黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:145.
③[日]渡边章.劳动给付义务与形成权的理论[J].载:有泉亨古稀纪念[M].东京:有斐阁,1976:74.
①黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:145.
②黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:145.
③黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:145.
④黄程贯.劳动法[M].台北:国立空中大学出版社,1996:448.
⑤黄越钦.论劳动契约[J].载:台湾“司法院”司法业务研究会.民事法律专题研究[M]:三.台北:司法周刊杂志社,1986:13.
①吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002:359.
①董保华.劳动关系调整的法律机制[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2000:164.
①[美]D·哈特.企业、合同与财务结构[M].费方域,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:2.
②董保华.劳动关系调整的法律机制[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2000:163.
③[美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:45—46.
④Joseph J. Martocchio. Employee Benefits: A Premier for Human Resource Professionals[M].New York: McGraw Hill, 2003:14.
①颜雅伦,蔡淑娟.知识经济下之劳雇关系与企业竞争力[M].台北:思益科技法律事务所,2002:148.
②杨继春.企业规章制度的性质与劳动者的违纪惩处[J].法学杂志,2003(5):47.
①[日]日本劳动省劳动基准局.解释通览劳动基准法[M].东京:综合劳动研究所,1986:290.
②[日]宫岛尚史.就业规则论[M].东京:日本信山社出版株式会社,1997:154—157.转引自:丝钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].司法研究年报2003(11):279.
③日本民法第92条:于存有不违反法令中有关公共秩序规定之习惯场合,如认为法律行为当事人有依该习惯之意思时,从其习惯。
④台北地方法院1984年度劳上诉字第38号判决。转引自:刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].元照出版公司,2000:268.
①高圣平.用人单位劳动规章制度的性质辨析—简评《劳动合同法(草案)》的相关条款[J].法学2006(10):157.
②合同法第39条第1款:采用格式条款订立合同的,提供格式条款的一方应当遵循公平原则确定当事人之间的权利和义务,并采取合理的方式提请对方注意免除或限制其责任的条款,按照对方的要求,对该条款予以说明。
①[美]伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].王军,等,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1990:137.
②黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:138—139.
③[美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:45—46.
①刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000:266.
②史探径.劳动法[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1990:236.
③刘志鹏.工作规则之法律性质及其不利益变更之效力[J].转引自:刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000:263.
④丝钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].司法研究年报,2003(11):280.
①[美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:45.
②高圣平.用人单位劳动规章制度的性质辨析[J].法学,2006(5):156.
①黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:143.
②林更生.对工作规则法律性质的几点初步想法——评最高法院八十年第二二四三号判决[J].月旦法学杂志,2002(91):23.
①胡立峰.劳动规章制度法律性质之“法律规范说”检讨[J].西南政法大学学报,2008(5):25.
②[美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:46.
③刘志鹏.劳动法解读[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000:109.
①常凯.劳权论[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2004:64.
②梁上上.股东表决权:公司所有与公司控制的连接点[J].中国法学,2005(3):109.
③[美]博登海默.法理学——法律哲学和法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:379.
①中国大百科全书编辑委员会.中国大百科全书·法学卷[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1984:87.
②沃克.牛津法律大辞典[M].李双元,等,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1989:236.
③王全兴.劳动法学[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001:261.
①丝钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].司法研究年报,2003(11):280.
②周旺生.立法学教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:177.
③邓世豹.授权立法的法理思考[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2002:77.
④张文显.法理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999:269.
⑤朱力宇,张曙光.立法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:77.
⑥《合同法》第8条:依法成立的合同,对当事人具有法律约束力;当事人应当按照约定履行自己的义务,不得擅自变更或解除合同。
①杨通轩.工作规则法律性质之探讨——最高法院八十一年度台上字第二四九二号及八十四年度台上字地一一四三号民事判决评释[J].载:台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M]:三.台北:元照出版公司,2000:91—92.
①[日]浅井清信.日本劳动法原理[M].东京:有斐阁,1987:221.
①杨通轩.工作规则法律性质之探讨——最高法院八十一年度台上字第二四九二号及八十四年度台上字地一一四三号民事判决评释[J].载:台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M]:三.台北:元照出版公司,2000:85.
②杨通轩.工作规则法律性质之探讨——最高法院八十一年度台上字第二四九二号及八十四年度台上字地一一四三号民事判决评释[J].载:台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M]:三.台北:元照出版公司,2000:85.
③台湾劳资关系协进会.订立工作规则指引[M].1986:101.
①《法国劳动法典》.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:55—56.
①王益英.外国劳动法和社会保障法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:499—500.
①韩延斌.《最高人民法院关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的理解与适用[J].载:唐德华.民事审判指导与参考[M]:第6卷.北京:法律出版社,2001:84.
①王全兴.劳动法学[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001:262.
①法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:55—56.
①张静.个体与权威:如何建立二者的联系[J].载:张静.国家与社会[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1988:184.
②刘坚军.单位中国——社会调控体现重构中的个人、组织与国家[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2000:2.
①李汉林.中国单位社会——议论、思考与研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004:2.
①常凯.劳动关系·劳动者·劳动权[M].北京:中国劳动出版社,1995:231.
①法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:55—56.
①李洙德.定型化劳动契约之研究[D].台北:中国文化大学中山学术研究所,2001:245.
①黄立.民法总则[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:7.
②周伟.宪法权利和司法救济研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2003:1.
③[法]戴尔马斯·玛蒂.基本权利和自由[M].巴黎:法国ESSAIS出版社,2002:9.转引自:郑爱青.《保护劳动者在企业中的公民基本权利—法国劳动法点对公民基本权利的保护及其对我国劳动立法的启示[EB/OL].[2007—12—26].http://www.ldbzfxorg/lunwen/5.htm.
①法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:19.
①[美]迈克尔·D·贝勒斯.程序正义——向个人的分配[M].邓海平,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2005:4.
①王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:200.
②林大钧.美商企业劳工参与制度之探讨[J].劳工之友,1988:(450):7.
①王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:200.
①黄程贯.劳动法[M].台北:国立空中大学出版社,1996:457—458.
②藩锡凤.如何确保劳资纠纷权益[M].台北:世潮出版有限公司,1999:305
①回沪明,高圣平.劳动法及配套规定新释新解[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2004:331.
①刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2002:287.
②黄程贯.劳动法[M].台北:国立空中大学出版社,1996:455.
③吴奎新.攸关权益——工作规则[J].律师法律杂志,1991:(44):32—33.
①“秋北巴士”事件,日本最大判昭和43(1968)年12月25日最高裁判所民事判例集22卷13号3459;转引自:刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2002:274.
②刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2002:288.
③吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002:297.
①郑尚元.论劳动争议诉讼程序之完善—兼评最高人民法院法释[2001]14号[J].南京大学法律评论,2003(1):139.
①陈自强.民法讲义Ⅱ契约之内容与消灭[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:48.
①石美遐.我国企业内部劳动规则立法的几点初步建议[J].中国劳动,1999(7):13.
②赵德淳.论用人单位内部劳动规则的法律效力[J].辽宁师范大学学报:社会科学版,2001(2):14.
③董保华.劳动合同研究[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2005:180—181.
④王俊英,宋新潮.论用人单位劳动规章的法律效力[J].河北法学,2003(5):104.
①[德]奥托·迈耶.德国行政法[M].刘飞,译.上海:商务印书馆,2002:72.
①谈海圣.从内部规章制度立法现状看劳动者权益保护[J].苏州科技学院学报:社会科学版,2004(2):58.
①周永坤.宪政与权力[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2008:430—431.
②王利明.司法改革研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2001:8.
①[美]R.M.昂格尔.现代社会中的法律[M].吴玉章,周汉华,译.南京:译林出版社,2001:180—181.
①湛中乐.高等教育与行政诉讼[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:178.
①[苏]A·E·帕歇尔斯特尼克.巩固社会主义劳动纪律是苏维埃法的首要任务之一[J].载:劳动法论文选译[M].郭寿康,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1956:155.
②黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:183.
①思钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].司法研究年报,2003(11):349.
②台湾劳动法学会.劳动基准法释义[M].台北:新学林出版股份有限公司,2005:352.
③黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:183.
①黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:183.
①[法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神[M]:上册.张雁深,译.上海:商务印书馆,1963:156.
①台湾地区基隆地方法院简易庭民事判决1992年度简字第1号[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
②参见:台“行政院劳工委员会”八十六年六月十七日台(八六)劳动二字第零二四九七号函;八十二年五月十七日台(八二)劳动二字第二四五五二号函;七十八年六月二十三日台(七八)劳动三字第一五一五一号函。
③台北地方法院民事判决2002年劳诉字第138号[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
①关怀.劳动法[M].北京:中国人大出版社,2001:255.
②王全兴.劳动法学[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2005:253.
①台湾“最高法院”1982年台上字第1786号判决[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
①王泽鉴.捣毁私娼馆、正当防卫与损害赔偿[J].载:王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究[M]:8.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998:211.
①台北地方法院民事判决2001年劳上字第13号[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
①杨继春.企业规章制度的性质与劳动者为继承处法理初探[J].法学杂志,2003(5):29.
②法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:57.
①台湾“高等法院”92年度劳上易字第29号判决[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
①王昌硕,李志芳.论巩固劳动纪律[J].北京政法学院学报,1982:(4):77.
①许建宇.重构我国企业职工惩罚制度的法律思考[J].杭州大学学报,1994(4):89.
②董保华.劳动制度改革的法学探索[J].中国法学,1992(5):81.
①董保华.劳动制度改革的法学探索[J].中国法学,1992(5):80.
①劳办发[1994]376号《关于除名职工重新参加工作后工龄计算问题的复函》[Z].[2008—07—12].http://www.51labour.com/LawCenter/.
①法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:58.
①许建宇.社会法视野中的劳动权[J].载:林嘉.劳动法评论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:91.
②冯彦君.劳动法[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,1999:349.
[1]史尚宽.劳动法原论[M].台北:正大印书馆,1934.
[2]史尚宽.民法总论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000.
[3]黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
[4]焦兴铠.劳工法论丛[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[5]吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002.
[6]黄程贯.劳动法[M].台北:国立空中大学出版社,1996.
[7]刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[8]刘志鹏.劳动法解读[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[9]刘志鹏,黄程贯.劳动法裁判选集[M].台北:月旦出版社股份有限公司,1985.
[10]黄立.民法总则[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[11]藩锡凤.如何确保劳资纠纷权益[M].台北:世潮出版有限公司,1999.
[12]王泽鉴.民法总论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[13]王泽鉴.法律思维与民法实例[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[14]王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.
[15]曾世雄.民法总则之现在与未来[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[16]陈自强.民法讲义[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[17]韩忠谟.法学绪论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[18]黄茂荣.法学方法与现代民法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[19]陈新民.行政法新论[M].台北:三民书局,1997.
[20]颜雅伦,蔡淑娟.知识经济下之劳雇关系与企业竞争力[M].台北:思益科技法律事务所,2002.
[21]台湾劳动法学会.劳动基准法释义[M].台北:新学林出版股份有限公司,2005.
[22]台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[23]冯彦君.劳动法[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,1999.
[24]王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[25]董保华.劳动关系调整的法律机制[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2000.
[26]董保华.劳动合同研究[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2005.
[27]常凯.劳动关系·劳动者·劳动权[M].北京:中国劳动出版社,1995.
[28]常凯.劳权论[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2004.
[29]王昌硕.劳动法教程[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1995.
[30]郑尚元.劳动法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007.
[31]郑尚元.劳动合同法的制度与理念[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008.
[32]北京新吉宇劳动保障咨询中心.企业劳动规章[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2003.
[33]史探径.劳动法[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1990.
[34]回沪明,高圣平.劳动法及配套规定新释新解[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2004.
[35]周旺生.立法学教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
[36]邓世豹.授权立法的法理思考[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2002.
[37]张文显.法理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.
[38]朱力宇,张曙光.立法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[39]陶大镛.社会发展史[M].北京:人民出版社,1982.
[40]王益英.外国劳动法和社会保障法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[41]唐德华.民事审判指导与参考[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.
[42]杨景宇.中华人民共和国劳动合同法解读[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2007.
[43]信春鹰.中华人民共和国劳动合同法释义[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[44]张静.国家与社会[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1988.
[45]刘坚军.单位中国——社会调控体现重构中的个人、组织与国家[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2000.
[46]李汉林.中国单位社会——议论、思考与研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
[47]周伟.宪法权利和司法救济研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2003.
[48]周永坤.宪政与权力[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2008.
[49]周永坤.规范权力——权力的法理研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2006.
[50]王利明.司法改革研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.
[51]湛中乐.高等教育与行政诉讼[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[52]关怀.劳动法[M].北京:中国人大出版社,2001.
[53]林燕玲.国际劳工标准[M].北京:中国工人出版社,2002.
[54]常凯.劳动关系学[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2005.
[55]刘旭.国际劳工标准概述[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2003.
[56]林晓云,等.美国劳动雇用法[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[57]王家宠.国际劳动公约概要[M].北京:中国劳动出版社,1991.
[58]黎建飞.劳动法的理论与实践[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004.
[59]杨燕绥.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2004.
[60]苏号朋.格式合同条款研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学,2004.
[61]许明月.劳动法学[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2003.
[62]罗豪才.中国司法审查制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1993.
[63]中国大百科全书编辑委员会.中国大百科全书·法学卷[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1984.
[64]刘有锦.国际劳工法概要[M].北京:劳动人事出版社,1985.
[65]法国劳动法典[M].罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996.
[66][美]D·哈特.企业、合同与财务结构[M].费方域,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
[67][美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.
[68][美]博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.
[69][美]伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].王军,等,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1990.
[70][美]迈克尔·D·贝勒斯.程序正义——向个人的分配[M].邓海平,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[71][美]R.M.昂格尔.现代社会中的法律[M].吴玉章,周汉华,译.南京:译林出版社,2001.
[72][美]罗伯特·A·高尔曼.劳动法基本教程——劳工联合与集体谈判[M].马静,王增森,李妍,刘鹏飞,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
[73][英]沃克.牛津法律大辞典[M].李双元,等,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1989.
[74][法]戴尔马斯·玛蒂.基本权利和自由[M].巴黎:法国ESSAIS出版社,2002.
[75][法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神[M].张雁深,译.上海:商务印书馆,1963.
[76][法]卢梭.社会契约论[M].何兆武,译.上海:商务印书馆,1963.
[77][德]卡尔·拉伦茨.德国民法通论[M].王晓晔,等,译.北京:法律出版社,2003.
[78][德]迪特尔·施瓦布.民法导论[M].郑冲,译.北京:法律出版社,2006.
[79][德]W·杜茨.劳动法[M].张国文,译.北京:法律出版社,2003.
[80][德]奥托·迈耶.德国行政法[M].刘飞,译.上海:商务印书馆,2002.
[81][日]西村健一郎等.劳动法讲义之三:劳动法[M].东京:有斐阁,1993.
[82][日]松岗三郎.劳动法——权利的历史和理论[M].东京:弘文堂,1994.
[83][日]东京大学劳动法研究会.注释劳动基准法下卷[M].东京:有斐阁,2003.
[84][日]日本劳动省劳动基准局.解释通览劳动基准法[M].东京:综合劳动研究所,1986.
[85][日]宫岛尚史.就业规则论[M].东京:日本信山社出版株式会社,1997.
[86][日]有泉亨.劳动基准法[M].东京:有斐阁,1983.
[87][日]浅井清信.日本劳动法原理[M].东京:有斐阁,1987.
[88][日]下井隆史.劳动基准法[M].东京:有斐阁,1990.
[89][日]管野和夫.劳动法[M].东京:弘文堂,2005.
[1]李坤刚.关于企业内部劳动规则立法的思考[J].安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2001(3).
[2]肖龙海.用人单位劳动规章制度及其立法模式探讨[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,1999(4).
[3]张立新.用人单位内部劳动规则浅析[J].内蒙古大学学报:人文社会科学版,1999(6).
[4]胡玉鸿,彭东.试论法律社会渊源的理论基础[J].中国法学,2001(3).
[5]陈福生.当代中国自制规章论纲[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2007(2).
[6]梁兴国.单位规章对法律实效之影响[J].政法论坛,2006(5).
[7]杨继春.企业规章制度的性质与劳动者的违纪惩处[J].法学杂志,2003(5).
[8]高圣平.用人单位劳动规章制度的性质辨析—简评《劳动合同法(草案)》的相关条款[J].法学,2006(5).
[9]石美遐.对我国企业内部劳动规则立法的几点初步建议[J].中国劳动,1999(7).
[10]石美遐.用人单位劳动规章制度及其立法模式探讨[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,1999(4).
[11]张宝钢.对企业规章制度建设中若干问题的思考[J].北京市工会干部学院学报,2006(12).
[12]滕晓春,孟师.从习惯到契约:用人单位内部劳动规则的演进[J].研究生法学,2007(1).
[13]胡立峰.劳动规章制度法律性质之“法律规范说”检讨[J].西南政法大学学报,2008,(5).
[14]梁上上.股东表决权:公司所有与公司控制的连接点[J].中国法学,2005(3).
[15]伍奕.关于用人单位劳动规章制度的立法思考[J].海南大学学报:人文社会科学版,2003(2).
[16]王全兴,吴文方.《最高人民法院关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的不足及其完善建议[J].法学,2000(10).
[17]李强.国家能力与国家权力的悖论[J].中国书评,1998(2).
[18]王沪宁.从单位到社会:社会调控体系的再造[J].公共行政与人力资源,1995(1).
[19]杨卫国.人与单位的变迁[J].百科知识,2003(7).
[20]路风.单位:一种特殊的社会组织形式[J].中国社会科学,1989(1).
[21]袁铁铮.日本企业内部的劳动力管理[J].中国劳动,1999(6).
[22]郑尚元.论劳动争议诉讼程序之完善—兼评最高人民法院法释[2001]14号[J].南京大学法律评论,2003(1).
[23]郭道晖.多元社会中法的本质与功能——第二次亚洲法哲学大会述评[J].中外法学,1999(3).
[24]赵德淳.论用人单位内部劳动规则的法律效力[J].辽宁师范大学学报:社会科学版,2001(2).
[25]王俊英,宋新潮.论用人单位规章制度的法律效力[J].河北法学,2003(5).
[26]谈海圣.从内部规章制度立法现状看劳动者权益保护[J].苏州科技学院学报:社会科学版,2004(2).
[27]王昌硕,李志芳.论巩固劳动纪律[J].北京政法学院学报,1982(4).
[28]许建宇.重构我国企业职工惩罚制度的法律思考[J].杭州大学学报,1994(4).
[29]许建宇.社会法视野中的劳动权[J].载:林嘉.劳动法评论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[30]董保华.劳动制度改革的法学探索[J].中国法学,1992(5).
[31]丁文联.试论劳动合同附合化[J].法商研究,1996(6).
[32]路风.中国单位体制的起源和形成[J].中国社会科学季刊,1993(5).
[33]郑爱青.和谐社会视野下劳动关系调整的法律思考——从用人单位和劳动者的基本劳动权利和劳动义务角度[J].法学家,2007(2).
[34]郑爱青.法国劳动合同立法的启示[J].法学杂志,2002(5).
[35]黄越钦.从劳工法探讨企业管理规章之性质[J].政大法律评论,1978(17).
[36]丝钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].(台)司法研究年报,2003(11).
[37]林更生.对工作规则法律性质的几点初步想法——评最高法院八十年第二二四三号判决[J].月旦法学杂志,2002(91).
[38]杨通轩.工作规则法律性质之探讨——最高法院八十一年度台上字第二四九二号及八十四年度台上字第一一四三号民事判决评释[J].载:台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M]:三.台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[39]林大钧.美商企业劳工参与制度之探讨[J].劳工之友,1988(450).
[40]吴奎新.攸关权益——工作规则[J].律师法律杂志,1991(44).
[41][日]小畋敏昭.日本的企业劳动规章[J].国际劳工评论,1988(5).
[42]李洙德.定型化劳动契约之研究[D].台北:中国文化大学中山学术研究所,2002.
[43]张宇佳.工作规则之劳动法分析[D].北京:中国政法大学民商经济法学院,2006.
[44]唐柳.企业劳动规章之理性构架[D].北京:中国政法大学民商经济法学院,2006.
[45]陈亚.用人单位规章制度的法律性质及立法模式探讨[D].上海:华东政法大学,2007.
[46]赵玲玲.劳动规章制度研究——以解雇保护为目的[D].长春:吉林大学法学院,2007.
[47]于帮存.单位规章制度的法例分析[D].苏州:苏州大学法学院,2008.
[1]Araki, Takashi. Labor and Employment Law in Japan[M]. Japan Institute of Labor, 2002.
[2]Arup, Christopher. Labour law and labour market regulation: essays on the construction, constitution and regulation of labour markets and work relationships[M]. Federation Press, 2006.
[3]American Arbitration Association. National Rules for the Resolution of Employment Disputes: Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules[M]. American Arbitration Association, 1999.
[4]Ayusawa, Iwao Frederick. International Labor Legislation[M]. Columbia University, 1920.
[5]Bernstein, David E. . Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations, and the Courts from Reconstruction to the New Deal[M]. Duke University Press, 2001.
[6]Bernstein, Merton C.. Private Dispute Settlement; Cases and Materials on Arbitration[M]. Free Press, 1968.
[7]Bradlaugh, Charles, John Mackinnon Robertson. Labor and Law[M]. R. Forder, 1891.
[8]Biagi, Marco. Job Creation and Labour Law: From Protection Towards Pro-action[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2000.
[9]Biagi, Marco, Roger Blanpain, Manfred Weiss. Changing Industrial Relations & Modernisation of Labour Law: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Professor Marco Biagi[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2003.
[10]Blanpain, Roger, Takashi Araki & Shinya Ouchi. Labour Law in Motion: Diversification of the Labour Force & Terms and Conditions of Employment[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2004.
[11]Blanpain, Roger & Ruth Ben-Israel. Labour law, human rights and social justice[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2001.
[12]Blanpain, Roger edite. Labour Relations in Different Countries: Labour Relationsat the European Level; Labour Relations in the Multinational Enterprise[M]. Kluwer, 1976.
[13]Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States. Labor Laws of the United States, with Decisions of Courts Relating Thereto: With Decisions of Courts Relating Thereto[M]. G.P.O., 1914.
[14]Cooney, Sean, Richard Mitchell & Zhu Ying. Law and labour market regulation in East Asia[M]. Routledge, 2002.
[15]Cox, Archibald, Derek Curtis Bok & Robert A. Gorman. Cases and materials on labor law[M]. Foundation Press, 1981.
[16]Commons, John Rogers & John Bertram Andrews, American Bureau of Industrial Research. Principles of Labor Legislation[M]. Harper, 1916.
[17]Daly, John Charles & Thomas R. Donahue. Labor law reform?: A round table, held on March 21, 1978, and sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C.[M]. The Institute, 1978.
[18]Edwards, Alejandra Cox . Labor Regulations and Industrial Relations in Indonesia[M]. World Bank, Poverty and Social Policy Dept., 1996.
[19]Gold, Michael Evan. An Introduction to Labor Law[M]. Cornell University Press, 1998.
[20]Gregory, David L.. Labor and the Constitution: Labor and Property, Privacy, Discrimination and International Relations[M]. Taylor & Francis, 1999.
[21]Gregory, Charles Oscar. Labor and the Law[M]. Norton, 1961.
[22]Granick, David. Job Rights in the Soviet Union: Their Consequences[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[23]Getman, Julius G. & John D. Blackburn. Labor Relations: Law, Practice, and Policy[M]. Foundation Press, 1983.
[24]Goldman, Alvin L. . The Supreme Court and Labor-management Relations Law[M]. Lexington Books, 1976.
[25]Hasan, Rana, Devashish Mitra & K. V. Ramaswamy. Trade reforms, labor regulations and labor-demand elasticities: empirical evidence from India[M].National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003.
[26]Hasan, Rana. The Impact of Trade and Labor Market Regulations on Employment and Wages: Evidence from Developing Countries[M]. East-West Center, 2001.
[27]Hasselbalch, Ole, Monica Smith, Per Jacobsen & Sylvia van Oosten-Rosman. Labour Law in Denmark[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2005.
[28]Herman, E. Edward & Gordon S. Skinner. Labor Law: Cases, Text, and Legislation[M]. Random House, 1972.
[29]Hovenkamp, Herbert. Enterprise and American Law, 1836-1937[M]. Harvard University Press, 1991.
[30]Illinois State Labor Relations Board. The Illinois Public Labor Relations Act And, Rules and Regulations[M]. Illinois State Labor Relations Board and Illinois Local Labor Relations Board, 1987.
[31]Kitching, John William. Labour Regulation in the Small Service Sector Enterprise(Ph. D Thesis) [M]. Kingston University, 1997.
[32]Keller, William L. & Timothy J. Darby. International labor and employment laws[M]. BNA Books, 2003.
[33]Liddle, Jeffrey L. & Michael F. Marino. Labor and Employment in New York: A Guide to Employment Laws, Regulations, and Practices[M]. LEXIS Law Pub., 1997.
[34]Mathews, Robert Elden & Clyde W. Summers. Labor Relations and the Law[M]. Little, Brown, 1953.
[35]Meltzer, Bernard D. Labor Law: Cases, Materials, and Problems[M]. Little, Brown, 1970.
[36]Morriss, Andrew P. & Samuel Estreicher. Cross-border Human Resources, Labor and Employment Issues: Proceedings of the New York University 54th Annual Conference on Labor[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2005.
[37]Nea, lAlan C.. European Labour Law and Social Policy: Cases and Materials[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2002.
[38]Ontario Labour Relations Board. The Labour Relations Act: Rules of Procedure, Regulations and Practice Notes[M]. Queen's Printer, 1973.
[39]Peck, Jamie. Work-place: the social regulation of labor markets[M]. Guilford Press, 1996.
[40]Smith, Russell Andrew, Leroy S. Merrifield & Theodore J. St. Antoine. Labor Relations Law: Cases and Materials[M]. Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1979.
[41]Strand, Jon. Layoffs, Labor Productivity and Worker Seniority Rules: An Analysis of Some "micro-micro", Institutional and Long-run Equilibrium Aspects of Implicit Contract Theory[M]. Institute of Economics, University of Oslo, 1983.
[42]Seweryński, Micha?. Collective Agreements and Individual Contracts of Employment[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2003.
[43]Sugeno, Kazuo. Japanese Employment and Labor Law. Translated by Leo Kanowitz[M]. Carolina Academic Press, 2002.
[44]Song, Sang-hy?n. Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Korea. Kyung Mun Sa Pub[M]. Co., 1983.
[45]Wright, Martyn. Work Regulation Under Changing Relative Power: A Study of British Workplace Industrial Relations 1979-91(Ph. D.Thesis) [M].University of Cambridge, 1995.
[46]Ahlering, Beth & Simon Deakin. "Labor Regulation, Corporate Governance, and Legal Origin: A Case of Institutional Complementarity?"[J]. Law & Society Review. Amherst: Dec 2007. Vol. 41, Iss. 4; p. 865.
[47]Aicher, John G Jr.. "Drafting and administering employee welfare benefit plans go". Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC. Jan 1995[J]. Vol. 49, Iss. 1; p. 70.
[48]Ash, Philip. "Law and Regulation of Preemployment Inquiries"[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Spring, 1991).
[49]Battista, Andrew. "American Politics-Capital, Labor, and State: The Battle for American Labor Markets from the Civil War to the New Deal"[J]. The American Political Science Review. Menasha: Mar 2002. Vol. 96, Iss. 1; p. 216.
②常凯.劳动关系学[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2005:267.
①王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:180.
②李坤刚.关于企业内部劳动规则立法的思考[J].安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2001(3):68.
①黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:136—143.
②王能君.工作规则不利益变更之法律效力——最高法院88年度台上字第1696号民事判决评释[J].载:林山田教授退休祝贺论文集[C].台北:元照出版公司,2004:429.
③黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:136.
④列宁全集[M],第27卷.北京:人民出版社,1955:246.
①肖龙海.用人单位劳动规章制度及其立法模式探讨[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,1999(4):34.
②黄越钦.从劳工法探讨企业管理规章之性质[J].政大法律评论,1978(17):54.
③李洙德.定型化劳动契约之研究[D].台北:中国文化大学中山学术研究所,2002:252.
④李洙德.定型化劳动契约之研究[D].台北:中国文化大学中山学术研究所,2002:252.
①郑尚元.劳动合同法的制度与理念[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008:341.
①[日]西村健一郎.劳动法讲义之三:劳动法[M].东京:有斐阁,1993:210.
①王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:160.
②张立新.用人单位内部劳动规则浅析[J].内蒙古大学学报:人文社会科学版,1999年(6):105.;北京新吉宇劳动保障咨询中心.企业劳动规章[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2003:26—27.
①将法律渊源分为正式渊源与非正式渊源的当首推美国学者博登海默。其认为:将法的渊源划分为这两大类别是恰当的和可欲求的。所谓正式渊源,是指那些可以从体现为权威性法律文件的明确文本形式中得到的渊源;所谓非正式渊源,是指那些具有法律意义的资料和值得考虑的事项,而这些资料和事项尚未在正式法律文件中得到权威性的或至少是明文的阐述和体现。(参见:[美]博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:414—415.)
②胡玉鸿,彭东.试论法律社会渊源的理论基础[J].中国法学,2001(3):48.
③陈福生.当代中国自制规章论纲[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2007(2):6.
④梁兴国.单位规章对法律实效之影响[J].政法论坛,2006(5):187.
①[日]松岗三郎.劳动法——权利的历史和理论[M].东京:弘文堂,1994:90.
②董保华.劳动关系调整的法律机制[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2000:340.
③吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002:333.
①[美]D·哈特.企业、合同与财务结构[M].费方域,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:2.
②黄越钦.从劳工探讨企业管理规章之性质[J].政大法律评论,1978(17):69.
③黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:146.
④参见:台湾《劳动契约法》(未施行)第10条。
①吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002:338.
②黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:145.
③[日]渡边章.劳动给付义务与形成权的理论[J].载:有泉亨古稀纪念[M].东京:有斐阁,1976:74.
①黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:145.
②黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:145.
③黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:145.
④黄程贯.劳动法[M].台北:国立空中大学出版社,1996:448.
⑤黄越钦.论劳动契约[J].载:台湾“司法院”司法业务研究会.民事法律专题研究[M]:三.台北:司法周刊杂志社,1986:13.
①吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002:359.
①董保华.劳动关系调整的法律机制[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2000:164.
①[美]D·哈特.企业、合同与财务结构[M].费方域,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:2.
②董保华.劳动关系调整的法律机制[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2000:163.
③[美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:45—46.
④Joseph J. Martocchio. Employee Benefits: A Premier for Human Resource Professionals[M].New York: McGraw Hill, 2003:14.
①颜雅伦,蔡淑娟.知识经济下之劳雇关系与企业竞争力[M].台北:思益科技法律事务所,2002:148.
②杨继春.企业规章制度的性质与劳动者的违纪惩处[J].法学杂志,2003(5):47.
①[日]日本劳动省劳动基准局.解释通览劳动基准法[M].东京:综合劳动研究所,1986:290.
②[日]宫岛尚史.就业规则论[M].东京:日本信山社出版株式会社,1997:154—157.转引自:丝钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].司法研究年报2003(11):279.
③日本民法第92条:于存有不违反法令中有关公共秩序规定之习惯场合,如认为法律行为当事人有依该习惯之意思时,从其习惯。
④台北地方法院1984年度劳上诉字第38号判决。转引自:刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].元照出版公司,2000:268.
①高圣平.用人单位劳动规章制度的性质辨析—简评《劳动合同法(草案)》的相关条款[J].法学2006(10):157.
②合同法第39条第1款:采用格式条款订立合同的,提供格式条款的一方应当遵循公平原则确定当事人之间的权利和义务,并采取合理的方式提请对方注意免除或限制其责任的条款,按照对方的要求,对该条款予以说明。
①[美]伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].王军,等,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1990:137.
②黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:138—139.
③[美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:45—46.
①刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000:266.
②史探径.劳动法[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1990:236.
③刘志鹏.工作规则之法律性质及其不利益变更之效力[J].转引自:刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000:263.
④丝钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].司法研究年报,2003(11):280.
①[美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:45.
②高圣平.用人单位劳动规章制度的性质辨析[J].法学,2006(5):156.
①黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:143.
②林更生.对工作规则法律性质的几点初步想法——评最高法院八十年第二二四三号判决[J].月旦法学杂志,2002(91):23.
①胡立峰.劳动规章制度法律性质之“法律规范说”检讨[J].西南政法大学学报,2008(5):25.
②[美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:46.
③刘志鹏.劳动法解读[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000:109.
①常凯.劳权论[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2004:64.
②梁上上.股东表决权:公司所有与公司控制的连接点[J].中国法学,2005(3):109.
③[美]博登海默.法理学——法律哲学和法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:379.
①中国大百科全书编辑委员会.中国大百科全书·法学卷[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1984:87.
②沃克.牛津法律大辞典[M].李双元,等,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1989:236.
③王全兴.劳动法学[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001:261.
①丝钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].司法研究年报,2003(11):280.
②周旺生.立法学教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:177.
③邓世豹.授权立法的法理思考[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2002:77.
④张文显.法理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999:269.
⑤朱力宇,张曙光.立法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:77.
⑥《合同法》第8条:依法成立的合同,对当事人具有法律约束力;当事人应当按照约定履行自己的义务,不得擅自变更或解除合同。
①杨通轩.工作规则法律性质之探讨——最高法院八十一年度台上字第二四九二号及八十四年度台上字地一一四三号民事判决评释[J].载:台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M]:三.台北:元照出版公司,2000:91—92.
①[日]浅井清信.日本劳动法原理[M].东京:有斐阁,1987:221.
①杨通轩.工作规则法律性质之探讨——最高法院八十一年度台上字第二四九二号及八十四年度台上字地一一四三号民事判决评释[J].载:台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M]:三.台北:元照出版公司,2000:85.
②杨通轩.工作规则法律性质之探讨——最高法院八十一年度台上字第二四九二号及八十四年度台上字地一一四三号民事判决评释[J].载:台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M]:三.台北:元照出版公司,2000:85.
③台湾劳资关系协进会.订立工作规则指引[M].1986:101.
①《法国劳动法典》.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:55—56.
①王益英.外国劳动法和社会保障法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:499—500.
①韩延斌.《最高人民法院关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的理解与适用[J].载:唐德华.民事审判指导与参考[M]:第6卷.北京:法律出版社,2001:84.
①王全兴.劳动法学[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001:262.
①法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:55—56.
①张静.个体与权威:如何建立二者的联系[J].载:张静.国家与社会[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1988:184.
②刘坚军.单位中国——社会调控体现重构中的个人、组织与国家[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2000:2.
①李汉林.中国单位社会——议论、思考与研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004:2.
①常凯.劳动关系·劳动者·劳动权[M].北京:中国劳动出版社,1995:231.
①法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:55—56.
①李洙德.定型化劳动契约之研究[D].台北:中国文化大学中山学术研究所,2001:245.
①黄立.民法总则[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:7.
②周伟.宪法权利和司法救济研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2003:1.
③[法]戴尔马斯·玛蒂.基本权利和自由[M].巴黎:法国ESSAIS出版社,2002:9.转引自:郑爱青.《保护劳动者在企业中的公民基本权利—法国劳动法点对公民基本权利的保护及其对我国劳动立法的启示[EB/OL].[2007—12—26].http://www.ldbzfxorg/lunwen/5.htm.
①法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:19.
①[美]迈克尔·D·贝勒斯.程序正义——向个人的分配[M].邓海平,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2005:4.
①王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:200.
②林大钧.美商企业劳工参与制度之探讨[J].劳工之友,1988:(450):7.
①王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:200.
①黄程贯.劳动法[M].台北:国立空中大学出版社,1996:457—458.
②藩锡凤.如何确保劳资纠纷权益[M].台北:世潮出版有限公司,1999:305
①回沪明,高圣平.劳动法及配套规定新释新解[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2004:331.
①刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2002:287.
②黄程贯.劳动法[M].台北:国立空中大学出版社,1996:455.
③吴奎新.攸关权益——工作规则[J].律师法律杂志,1991:(44):32—33.
①“秋北巴士”事件,日本最大判昭和43(1968)年12月25日最高裁判所民事判例集22卷13号3459;转引自:刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2002:274.
②刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2002:288.
③吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002:297.
①郑尚元.论劳动争议诉讼程序之完善—兼评最高人民法院法释[2001]14号[J].南京大学法律评论,2003(1):139.
①陈自强.民法讲义Ⅱ契约之内容与消灭[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:48.
①石美遐.我国企业内部劳动规则立法的几点初步建议[J].中国劳动,1999(7):13.
②赵德淳.论用人单位内部劳动规则的法律效力[J].辽宁师范大学学报:社会科学版,2001(2):14.
③董保华.劳动合同研究[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2005:180—181.
④王俊英,宋新潮.论用人单位劳动规章的法律效力[J].河北法学,2003(5):104.
①[德]奥托·迈耶.德国行政法[M].刘飞,译.上海:商务印书馆,2002:72.
①谈海圣.从内部规章制度立法现状看劳动者权益保护[J].苏州科技学院学报:社会科学版,2004(2):58.
①周永坤.宪政与权力[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2008:430—431.
②王利明.司法改革研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2001:8.
①[美]R.M.昂格尔.现代社会中的法律[M].吴玉章,周汉华,译.南京:译林出版社,2001:180—181.
①湛中乐.高等教育与行政诉讼[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:178.
①[苏]A·E·帕歇尔斯特尼克.巩固社会主义劳动纪律是苏维埃法的首要任务之一[J].载:劳动法论文选译[M].郭寿康,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1956:155.
②黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:183.
①思钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].司法研究年报,2003(11):349.
②台湾劳动法学会.劳动基准法释义[M].台北:新学林出版股份有限公司,2005:352.
③黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:183.
①黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:183.
①[法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神[M]:上册.张雁深,译.上海:商务印书馆,1963:156.
①台湾地区基隆地方法院简易庭民事判决1992年度简字第1号[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
②参见:台“行政院劳工委员会”八十六年六月十七日台(八六)劳动二字第零二四九七号函;八十二年五月十七日台(八二)劳动二字第二四五五二号函;七十八年六月二十三日台(七八)劳动三字第一五一五一号函。
③台北地方法院民事判决2002年劳诉字第138号[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
①关怀.劳动法[M].北京:中国人大出版社,2001:255.
②王全兴.劳动法学[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2005:253.
①台湾“最高法院”1982年台上字第1786号判决[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
①王泽鉴.捣毁私娼馆、正当防卫与损害赔偿[J].载:王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究[M]:8.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998:211.
①台北地方法院民事判决2001年劳上字第13号[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
①杨继春.企业规章制度的性质与劳动者为继承处法理初探[J].法学杂志,2003(5):29.
②法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:57.
①台湾“高等法院”92年度劳上易字第29号判决[Z].[2008—05—17].http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw:8000/.
①王昌硕,李志芳.论巩固劳动纪律[J].北京政法学院学报,1982:(4):77.
①许建宇.重构我国企业职工惩罚制度的法律思考[J].杭州大学学报,1994(4):89.
②董保华.劳动制度改革的法学探索[J].中国法学,1992(5):81.
①董保华.劳动制度改革的法学探索[J].中国法学,1992(5):80.
①劳办发[1994]376号《关于除名职工重新参加工作后工龄计算问题的复函》[Z].[2008—07—12].http://www.51labour.com/LawCenter/.
①法国劳动法典.罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996:58.
①许建宇.社会法视野中的劳动权[J].载:林嘉.劳动法评论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:91.
②冯彦君.劳动法[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,1999:349.
[1]史尚宽.劳动法原论[M].台北:正大印书馆,1934.
[2]史尚宽.民法总论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000.
[3]黄越钦.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
[4]焦兴铠.劳工法论丛[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[5]吕荣海.劳动法法源及其适用关系之研究[M].台北:蔚理有限公司,2002.
[6]黄程贯.劳动法[M].台北:国立空中大学出版社,1996.
[7]刘志鹏.劳动法理论与判决研究[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[8]刘志鹏.劳动法解读[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[9]刘志鹏,黄程贯.劳动法裁判选集[M].台北:月旦出版社股份有限公司,1985.
[10]黄立.民法总则[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[11]藩锡凤.如何确保劳资纠纷权益[M].台北:世潮出版有限公司,1999.
[12]王泽鉴.民法总论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[13]王泽鉴.法律思维与民法实例[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[14]王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.
[15]曾世雄.民法总则之现在与未来[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[16]陈自强.民法讲义[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[17]韩忠谟.法学绪论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[18]黄茂荣.法学方法与现代民法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[19]陈新民.行政法新论[M].台北:三民书局,1997.
[20]颜雅伦,蔡淑娟.知识经济下之劳雇关系与企业竞争力[M].台北:思益科技法律事务所,2002.
[21]台湾劳动法学会.劳动基准法释义[M].台北:新学林出版股份有限公司,2005.
[22]台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M].台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[23]冯彦君.劳动法[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,1999.
[24]王全兴.劳动法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[25]董保华.劳动关系调整的法律机制[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2000.
[26]董保华.劳动合同研究[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2005.
[27]常凯.劳动关系·劳动者·劳动权[M].北京:中国劳动出版社,1995.
[28]常凯.劳权论[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2004.
[29]王昌硕.劳动法教程[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1995.
[30]郑尚元.劳动法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007.
[31]郑尚元.劳动合同法的制度与理念[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008.
[32]北京新吉宇劳动保障咨询中心.企业劳动规章[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2003.
[33]史探径.劳动法[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1990.
[34]回沪明,高圣平.劳动法及配套规定新释新解[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2004.
[35]周旺生.立法学教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
[36]邓世豹.授权立法的法理思考[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2002.
[37]张文显.法理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.
[38]朱力宇,张曙光.立法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[39]陶大镛.社会发展史[M].北京:人民出版社,1982.
[40]王益英.外国劳动法和社会保障法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[41]唐德华.民事审判指导与参考[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.
[42]杨景宇.中华人民共和国劳动合同法解读[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2007.
[43]信春鹰.中华人民共和国劳动合同法释义[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[44]张静.国家与社会[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1988.
[45]刘坚军.单位中国——社会调控体现重构中的个人、组织与国家[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2000.
[46]李汉林.中国单位社会——议论、思考与研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
[47]周伟.宪法权利和司法救济研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2003.
[48]周永坤.宪政与权力[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2008.
[49]周永坤.规范权力——权力的法理研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2006.
[50]王利明.司法改革研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.
[51]湛中乐.高等教育与行政诉讼[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[52]关怀.劳动法[M].北京:中国人大出版社,2001.
[53]林燕玲.国际劳工标准[M].北京:中国工人出版社,2002.
[54]常凯.劳动关系学[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2005.
[55]刘旭.国际劳工标准概述[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2003.
[56]林晓云,等.美国劳动雇用法[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[57]王家宠.国际劳动公约概要[M].北京:中国劳动出版社,1991.
[58]黎建飞.劳动法的理论与实践[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004.
[59]杨燕绥.劳动法新论[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2004.
[60]苏号朋.格式合同条款研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学,2004.
[61]许明月.劳动法学[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2003.
[62]罗豪才.中国司法审查制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1993.
[63]中国大百科全书编辑委员会.中国大百科全书·法学卷[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1984.
[64]刘有锦.国际劳工法概要[M].北京:劳动人事出版社,1985.
[65]法国劳动法典[M].罗结珍,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1996.
[66][美]D·哈特.企业、合同与财务结构[M].费方域,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
[67][美]麦克尼尔.新社会契约论[M].雷喜宁,潘勤,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.
[68][美]博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.
[69][美]伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].王军,等,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1990.
[70][美]迈克尔·D·贝勒斯.程序正义——向个人的分配[M].邓海平,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[71][美]R.M.昂格尔.现代社会中的法律[M].吴玉章,周汉华,译.南京:译林出版社,2001.
[72][美]罗伯特·A·高尔曼.劳动法基本教程——劳工联合与集体谈判[M].马静,王增森,李妍,刘鹏飞,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
[73][英]沃克.牛津法律大辞典[M].李双元,等,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1989.
[74][法]戴尔马斯·玛蒂.基本权利和自由[M].巴黎:法国ESSAIS出版社,2002.
[75][法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神[M].张雁深,译.上海:商务印书馆,1963.
[76][法]卢梭.社会契约论[M].何兆武,译.上海:商务印书馆,1963.
[77][德]卡尔·拉伦茨.德国民法通论[M].王晓晔,等,译.北京:法律出版社,2003.
[78][德]迪特尔·施瓦布.民法导论[M].郑冲,译.北京:法律出版社,2006.
[79][德]W·杜茨.劳动法[M].张国文,译.北京:法律出版社,2003.
[80][德]奥托·迈耶.德国行政法[M].刘飞,译.上海:商务印书馆,2002.
[81][日]西村健一郎等.劳动法讲义之三:劳动法[M].东京:有斐阁,1993.
[82][日]松岗三郎.劳动法——权利的历史和理论[M].东京:弘文堂,1994.
[83][日]东京大学劳动法研究会.注释劳动基准法下卷[M].东京:有斐阁,2003.
[84][日]日本劳动省劳动基准局.解释通览劳动基准法[M].东京:综合劳动研究所,1986.
[85][日]宫岛尚史.就业规则论[M].东京:日本信山社出版株式会社,1997.
[86][日]有泉亨.劳动基准法[M].东京:有斐阁,1983.
[87][日]浅井清信.日本劳动法原理[M].东京:有斐阁,1987.
[88][日]下井隆史.劳动基准法[M].东京:有斐阁,1990.
[89][日]管野和夫.劳动法[M].东京:弘文堂,2005.
[1]李坤刚.关于企业内部劳动规则立法的思考[J].安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2001(3).
[2]肖龙海.用人单位劳动规章制度及其立法模式探讨[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,1999(4).
[3]张立新.用人单位内部劳动规则浅析[J].内蒙古大学学报:人文社会科学版,1999(6).
[4]胡玉鸿,彭东.试论法律社会渊源的理论基础[J].中国法学,2001(3).
[5]陈福生.当代中国自制规章论纲[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2007(2).
[6]梁兴国.单位规章对法律实效之影响[J].政法论坛,2006(5).
[7]杨继春.企业规章制度的性质与劳动者的违纪惩处[J].法学杂志,2003(5).
[8]高圣平.用人单位劳动规章制度的性质辨析—简评《劳动合同法(草案)》的相关条款[J].法学,2006(5).
[9]石美遐.对我国企业内部劳动规则立法的几点初步建议[J].中国劳动,1999(7).
[10]石美遐.用人单位劳动规章制度及其立法模式探讨[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,1999(4).
[11]张宝钢.对企业规章制度建设中若干问题的思考[J].北京市工会干部学院学报,2006(12).
[12]滕晓春,孟师.从习惯到契约:用人单位内部劳动规则的演进[J].研究生法学,2007(1).
[13]胡立峰.劳动规章制度法律性质之“法律规范说”检讨[J].西南政法大学学报,2008,(5).
[14]梁上上.股东表决权:公司所有与公司控制的连接点[J].中国法学,2005(3).
[15]伍奕.关于用人单位劳动规章制度的立法思考[J].海南大学学报:人文社会科学版,2003(2).
[16]王全兴,吴文方.《最高人民法院关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的不足及其完善建议[J].法学,2000(10).
[17]李强.国家能力与国家权力的悖论[J].中国书评,1998(2).
[18]王沪宁.从单位到社会:社会调控体系的再造[J].公共行政与人力资源,1995(1).
[19]杨卫国.人与单位的变迁[J].百科知识,2003(7).
[20]路风.单位:一种特殊的社会组织形式[J].中国社会科学,1989(1).
[21]袁铁铮.日本企业内部的劳动力管理[J].中国劳动,1999(6).
[22]郑尚元.论劳动争议诉讼程序之完善—兼评最高人民法院法释[2001]14号[J].南京大学法律评论,2003(1).
[23]郭道晖.多元社会中法的本质与功能——第二次亚洲法哲学大会述评[J].中外法学,1999(3).
[24]赵德淳.论用人单位内部劳动规则的法律效力[J].辽宁师范大学学报:社会科学版,2001(2).
[25]王俊英,宋新潮.论用人单位规章制度的法律效力[J].河北法学,2003(5).
[26]谈海圣.从内部规章制度立法现状看劳动者权益保护[J].苏州科技学院学报:社会科学版,2004(2).
[27]王昌硕,李志芳.论巩固劳动纪律[J].北京政法学院学报,1982(4).
[28]许建宇.重构我国企业职工惩罚制度的法律思考[J].杭州大学学报,1994(4).
[29]许建宇.社会法视野中的劳动权[J].载:林嘉.劳动法评论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[30]董保华.劳动制度改革的法学探索[J].中国法学,1992(5).
[31]丁文联.试论劳动合同附合化[J].法商研究,1996(6).
[32]路风.中国单位体制的起源和形成[J].中国社会科学季刊,1993(5).
[33]郑爱青.和谐社会视野下劳动关系调整的法律思考——从用人单位和劳动者的基本劳动权利和劳动义务角度[J].法学家,2007(2).
[34]郑爱青.法国劳动合同立法的启示[J].法学杂志,2002(5).
[35]黄越钦.从劳工法探讨企业管理规章之性质[J].政大法律评论,1978(17).
[36]丝钰云,许必奇.论劳资争议类型与处理机制[J].(台)司法研究年报,2003(11).
[37]林更生.对工作规则法律性质的几点初步想法——评最高法院八十年第二二四三号判决[J].月旦法学杂志,2002(91).
[38]杨通轩.工作规则法律性质之探讨——最高法院八十一年度台上字第二四九二号及八十四年度台上字第一一四三号民事判决评释[J].载:台湾劳动法学会.劳动法裁判选辑[M]:三.台北:元照出版公司,2000.
[39]林大钧.美商企业劳工参与制度之探讨[J].劳工之友,1988(450).
[40]吴奎新.攸关权益——工作规则[J].律师法律杂志,1991(44).
[41][日]小畋敏昭.日本的企业劳动规章[J].国际劳工评论,1988(5).
[42]李洙德.定型化劳动契约之研究[D].台北:中国文化大学中山学术研究所,2002.
[43]张宇佳.工作规则之劳动法分析[D].北京:中国政法大学民商经济法学院,2006.
[44]唐柳.企业劳动规章之理性构架[D].北京:中国政法大学民商经济法学院,2006.
[45]陈亚.用人单位规章制度的法律性质及立法模式探讨[D].上海:华东政法大学,2007.
[46]赵玲玲.劳动规章制度研究——以解雇保护为目的[D].长春:吉林大学法学院,2007.
[47]于帮存.单位规章制度的法例分析[D].苏州:苏州大学法学院,2008.
[1]Araki, Takashi. Labor and Employment Law in Japan[M]. Japan Institute of Labor, 2002.
[2]Arup, Christopher. Labour law and labour market regulation: essays on the construction, constitution and regulation of labour markets and work relationships[M]. Federation Press, 2006.
[3]American Arbitration Association. National Rules for the Resolution of Employment Disputes: Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules[M]. American Arbitration Association, 1999.
[4]Ayusawa, Iwao Frederick. International Labor Legislation[M]. Columbia University, 1920.
[5]Bernstein, David E. . Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations, and the Courts from Reconstruction to the New Deal[M]. Duke University Press, 2001.
[6]Bernstein, Merton C.. Private Dispute Settlement; Cases and Materials on Arbitration[M]. Free Press, 1968.
[7]Bradlaugh, Charles, John Mackinnon Robertson. Labor and Law[M]. R. Forder, 1891.
[8]Biagi, Marco. Job Creation and Labour Law: From Protection Towards Pro-action[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2000.
[9]Biagi, Marco, Roger Blanpain, Manfred Weiss. Changing Industrial Relations & Modernisation of Labour Law: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Professor Marco Biagi[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2003.
[10]Blanpain, Roger, Takashi Araki & Shinya Ouchi. Labour Law in Motion: Diversification of the Labour Force & Terms and Conditions of Employment[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2004.
[11]Blanpain, Roger & Ruth Ben-Israel. Labour law, human rights and social justice[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2001.
[12]Blanpain, Roger edite. Labour Relations in Different Countries: Labour Relationsat the European Level; Labour Relations in the Multinational Enterprise[M]. Kluwer, 1976.
[13]Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States. Labor Laws of the United States, with Decisions of Courts Relating Thereto: With Decisions of Courts Relating Thereto[M]. G.P.O., 1914.
[14]Cooney, Sean, Richard Mitchell & Zhu Ying. Law and labour market regulation in East Asia[M]. Routledge, 2002.
[15]Cox, Archibald, Derek Curtis Bok & Robert A. Gorman. Cases and materials on labor law[M]. Foundation Press, 1981.
[16]Commons, John Rogers & John Bertram Andrews, American Bureau of Industrial Research. Principles of Labor Legislation[M]. Harper, 1916.
[17]Daly, John Charles & Thomas R. Donahue. Labor law reform?: A round table, held on March 21, 1978, and sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C.[M]. The Institute, 1978.
[18]Edwards, Alejandra Cox . Labor Regulations and Industrial Relations in Indonesia[M]. World Bank, Poverty and Social Policy Dept., 1996.
[19]Gold, Michael Evan. An Introduction to Labor Law[M]. Cornell University Press, 1998.
[20]Gregory, David L.. Labor and the Constitution: Labor and Property, Privacy, Discrimination and International Relations[M]. Taylor & Francis, 1999.
[21]Gregory, Charles Oscar. Labor and the Law[M]. Norton, 1961.
[22]Granick, David. Job Rights in the Soviet Union: Their Consequences[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[23]Getman, Julius G. & John D. Blackburn. Labor Relations: Law, Practice, and Policy[M]. Foundation Press, 1983.
[24]Goldman, Alvin L. . The Supreme Court and Labor-management Relations Law[M]. Lexington Books, 1976.
[25]Hasan, Rana, Devashish Mitra & K. V. Ramaswamy. Trade reforms, labor regulations and labor-demand elasticities: empirical evidence from India[M].National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003.
[26]Hasan, Rana. The Impact of Trade and Labor Market Regulations on Employment and Wages: Evidence from Developing Countries[M]. East-West Center, 2001.
[27]Hasselbalch, Ole, Monica Smith, Per Jacobsen & Sylvia van Oosten-Rosman. Labour Law in Denmark[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2005.
[28]Herman, E. Edward & Gordon S. Skinner. Labor Law: Cases, Text, and Legislation[M]. Random House, 1972.
[29]Hovenkamp, Herbert. Enterprise and American Law, 1836-1937[M]. Harvard University Press, 1991.
[30]Illinois State Labor Relations Board. The Illinois Public Labor Relations Act And, Rules and Regulations[M]. Illinois State Labor Relations Board and Illinois Local Labor Relations Board, 1987.
[31]Kitching, John William. Labour Regulation in the Small Service Sector Enterprise(Ph. D Thesis) [M]. Kingston University, 1997.
[32]Keller, William L. & Timothy J. Darby. International labor and employment laws[M]. BNA Books, 2003.
[33]Liddle, Jeffrey L. & Michael F. Marino. Labor and Employment in New York: A Guide to Employment Laws, Regulations, and Practices[M]. LEXIS Law Pub., 1997.
[34]Mathews, Robert Elden & Clyde W. Summers. Labor Relations and the Law[M]. Little, Brown, 1953.
[35]Meltzer, Bernard D. Labor Law: Cases, Materials, and Problems[M]. Little, Brown, 1970.
[36]Morriss, Andrew P. & Samuel Estreicher. Cross-border Human Resources, Labor and Employment Issues: Proceedings of the New York University 54th Annual Conference on Labor[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2005.
[37]Nea, lAlan C.. European Labour Law and Social Policy: Cases and Materials[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2002.
[38]Ontario Labour Relations Board. The Labour Relations Act: Rules of Procedure, Regulations and Practice Notes[M]. Queen's Printer, 1973.
[39]Peck, Jamie. Work-place: the social regulation of labor markets[M]. Guilford Press, 1996.
[40]Smith, Russell Andrew, Leroy S. Merrifield & Theodore J. St. Antoine. Labor Relations Law: Cases and Materials[M]. Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1979.
[41]Strand, Jon. Layoffs, Labor Productivity and Worker Seniority Rules: An Analysis of Some "micro-micro", Institutional and Long-run Equilibrium Aspects of Implicit Contract Theory[M]. Institute of Economics, University of Oslo, 1983.
[42]Seweryński, Micha?. Collective Agreements and Individual Contracts of Employment[M]. Kluwer Law International, 2003.
[43]Sugeno, Kazuo. Japanese Employment and Labor Law. Translated by Leo Kanowitz[M]. Carolina Academic Press, 2002.
[44]Song, Sang-hy?n. Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Korea. Kyung Mun Sa Pub[M]. Co., 1983.
[45]Wright, Martyn. Work Regulation Under Changing Relative Power: A Study of British Workplace Industrial Relations 1979-91(Ph. D.Thesis) [M].University of Cambridge, 1995.
[46]Ahlering, Beth & Simon Deakin. "Labor Regulation, Corporate Governance, and Legal Origin: A Case of Institutional Complementarity?"[J]. Law & Society Review. Amherst: Dec 2007. Vol. 41, Iss. 4; p. 865.
[47]Aicher, John G Jr.. "Drafting and administering employee welfare benefit plans go". Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC. Jan 1995[J]. Vol. 49, Iss. 1; p. 70.
[48]Ash, Philip. "Law and Regulation of Preemployment Inquiries"[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Spring, 1991).
[49]Battista, Andrew. "American Politics-Capital, Labor, and State: The Battle for American Labor Markets from the Civil War to the New Deal"[J]. The American Political Science Review. Menasha: Mar 2002. Vol. 96, Iss. 1; p. 216.