中国IPO市场承销商行为研究
摘要
2011年我国股票市场创建整整二十个年头。伴随着改革开放,我国股票首次发行市场(IPO市场)也走过了不平凡的发展历程。在这个时期,我国IP0市场的股票发行制度进行了重大改革,经历了由行政审批制、核准通道制、核准保荐制的演变过程,证监会对新股的发行定价方式与定价方法也进行了频繁的变革,伴随着向市场化渐进改革的步伐,我国股票发行制度不断走向成熟,IPO市场主承销商行为也逐渐得以规范。但在IPO新股承销的实践中,依旧存在诸多问题,如部分上市保荐人不够尽职,承销商首发申请被否数量增加,IPO市场市盈率偏高,首日上市跌破发行价案例增加等,距高效、规范、理想的市场化运作愿景还相差甚远。
在学术研究方面,国内学者对A股IPO市场承销商的研究起步很晚,研究内容比较宽泛,多集中于承销商声誉、承销商与IPO抑价关系方面,而全面研究承销商行为的文献较少,尤其是在承销商的业务对象选择、定价决策的心理、承销业务中形成的风格等方面的研究成果相当匮乏,国内的承销商行为理论研究与IPO承销业务的现实状况还有较大差距,对此领域的认识急需进一步拓展、加深。
为此,本文以2001-2010年为研究窗口期,针对IPO市场的主承销商行为,应用理论分析、比较分析、实证分析、规范分析等方法,从6个视角对主承销商的行为进行了研究,较系统的总结了承销商在1PO市场中的相关行为。
文章以主承销商在IPO过程中扮演的角色为主线,以其承销行为为核心,通过实证,揭示了我国主承销商在A股IPO发行与承销领域的多种行为,依次总结了主承销商的业务对象选择行为、承销商的业务风格与特点；主承销商发行定价中所反应的公司信息、发行定价时的心理锚定、锚点弱化行为；主承销商在IPO过程中的上市包装行为。主要内容如下。
通过对主承销商的注册地址与其承销IPO公司注册地址的统计分析,发现承销商与IPO企业配对并未受地域限制,主承销商并不存在固定的承销地域。多年来,主承销商的行业性体现比较突出,其业务对象的选择明显受到了各自专长(行业)的影响。承销商的本地业务完成量则因地区而异,IPO企业资源丰富地区承销商的本地业务占比较大。承销商的业务量与其注册资本正相关。
在对主承销商风格的实证中发现,近10年来我国IPO新股承销方式比较单一承销商承担了较大的发行风险,单一的承销方式不利于IPO市场风险分散,不利于IPO市场承销业务方式的多元化发展。在推出公司IPO股票发行业务时,主承销并没有对市场时机进行考虑。发行制度的改变对承销商业务风格影响不大,承销商实力与其承销业务规模对称,实力雄厚承销商的业务风格极大的影响了整个承销领域的业务风格。在总体上承销商行为有“业务量与注册资本与保荐(推荐)次数正相关、保荐(推荐)成功率负相关”的特征,不同实力的承销商对发行抑价程度没有显著差异。
第5章应用主成分分析法,通过对反映IPO公司经营实体信息的34个财务指标提取并回归,检验了主承销商的发行定价中对公司上市前三年经营信息的含量及变化情况,针对主承销商的发行定价对公司规模、盈利能力、发展能力、风险状况、抗风险能力、经营费用等指标的解释能力进行了分析,用最近10年的发行定价对IPO公司信息反映情况进行观察,逐年分析,总结了不同板块、不同股权结构、不同市场状态下定价信息含量情况,认为,发行制度会在短期内对承销商发行定价中的公司信息含量产生负面影响；承销商在定价时对股权结构、市场状态敏感；对不同板块的上市公司在定价时的公司信息含量不同。
在对不同承销经验的主承销商IPO定价对公司信息含量检验时还发现,经验丰富的承销商在发行定价中反映IPO公司实体经营信息反而比经验较少的承销商弱。为了解释这种现象,文章将计量回归的残差标进行了准化,然后结合承销商自身的特征进行了分析,认为在制定发行价格时,不同经验的承销商对公司价值组成的两部分判断可能存在差异,在定价中赋予了不同的权重,这样就导致了IPO定价中反映公司实体经营信息的情况出现了区别。相对来说,经验丰富的承销商比经验欠缺承销商在对公司价值的未来预期方面综合性更强。
第7章对IPO市场主承销商的发行定价心理锚定、锚定弱化现象进行了实证总结,发现在实行市场化定价(累计询价制)以来,新股IPO过程中主承销商对股票的定价选择依然存在锚定行为——对市盈率、市净率的价格锚定现象明显,但不同的板块对两个指标锚定的紧密程度不同,有锚定目标分离的特征。
从时间序列上看,在两板块中主承销商定价选择对两指标的锚点并不固定(近年来总体有上升趋势),表现出动态锚定特点。实证也证明了中小板上市公司的发行市盈率、市净率锚值低于创业板,但到2010年上半年两板块对市净率倍数的锚定开始接近。
研究认为,IPO市场表现出对固定锚点的锚定弱化并不是对锚定现象的否定,相反,却是承销商定价行为与市场环境高度融合后对锚定的一种深化,是在更深层次上的锚定表现。
在分析中,加深了对IPO市场锚定行为双刃剑作用的认识。认为主承销商IPO市场定价的锚定行为有利于维持新股发行定价的稳定,使投资者可以对IPO首日超额收益保持稳定的心理预期,但这种锚定在主承销商之间也成为攀比的指标,它的存在反而不利于IPO市场优化定价机制,从而影响市场长期发展,成为破坏市场效率提高的潜在因素。
通过比对不同状况下的上市公司样本,找出了涉及包装行为的主承销商分布特征。研究表明,如果新上市公司出现了首日跌破发行价、上市后短期内宣布改变投资方向、上市两年之内主营业务大幅下滑等现象,那么主承销商极有可能对IPO公司进行了包装上市活动。实证表明,不同类型主承销商与上市公司首日跌破发行价、改变了投资方向、短期业绩发生变脸之间存在稳定的关系。在剔除干扰因素后,估计了主承销商对IPO公司上市包装而导致的二级市场投资者对低质量上市公司价值高估水平。实证结果显示,受主承销商的包装影响,首日跌破发行价的新股在二级市场被投资者高估约为100%；业绩变脸的新股在二级市场高估水平为27.8%；首日跌破发行价且宣布了改变投资方向的新股在二级市场高估水平为44.7%；首日跌破发行价且发生了业绩变脸的上市价格在二级市场高估水平约52.4%；宣布改变投资方向且发生了业绩变脸的公司高估水平为25.86%。而兼具首日跌破发行价、改变了投资方向、短期业绩发生变脸的新上市公司在IPO时价格在二级市场高估水平为51.9%。在分析中还证实了发行制度改革使二级市场投资者对IPO公司的价值判断得到了校正,他们受发行人、主承销商上市包装行为的影响明显减弱,显然,逐渐健全的市场制度产生了积极作用。
本文的创新主要体现在三方面：①对IPO承销商自身特征与其业务对象进行了匹配研究,得出了承销商在承销业务时有各自行业专长的结论。②从残差角度对主承销商的发行定价进行了分析,发现价格回归残差与主承销商的自身特征存在稳定的联系。③提出了承销商对IPO公司定价时对不同板块存在不同的锚定目标,并用锚定效应、锚值弱化对承销商的承销心理、价格决策行为进行了实证检验。
本文存在一些局限性,IPO市场承销商行为是一个十分广泛的课题,限于时间与精力,只选择了承销商的部分行为进行了实证研究,加之数据获取困难,未能对承销商其它行为进行涵盖,尤其是未能对承销商是否存在托市行为进行深入研究则成为本文的遗憾。
In China, stock market has been created 20 years. For these twenty years, with reforming and opening up, China's capital market had an extraordinary development process. Chinese IPO market share issuance system has carried on the important reforms, Experienced from Administrative Examine and Approve System, Approve Channel System, to Approved Sponsor System. Methods of Setting IPO Price also changed frequently, with the progressive reforms in Stock Issuance System, Stock issuance system continues to mature, and IPO market main underwriter'behavior also gradually get specifications.
In view of IPO underwriting practice, there has problems, such as few IPO guarantors less due diligence, so many underwriter's application were denied, the soar up of the IPO prices, the issue price flops, so, there still has a far way to an efficient market.
In academic research, Chinese scholars'research on A-share IPO underwriter's started lately, The research more focused on comparative broad underwriter's reputation, the relationship between underwriter and IPO price, the relationship between underwriter and IPO price devaluation.
Thought there had so many literatures, system researches on underwriters behavior is few, and fewer can give readers a comprehensive conclusion about IPO underwriters' behavior.
Therefore, the article takes year 2001-2010 as window period to research the behaviors of IPO market main underwriters, using theoretical analysis, empirical analysis, comparative analysis and normative analysis, the article studied different perspectives on the main underwriter, and systematically summarized the behaviors of the underwriters in Chinese IPO market.
Following the order of lead underwriters in IPO, through the multiple perspectives of empirical study, the author analyses the behavior of main underwriter in A-share IPO, in turn, summarizes the business choice behavior, issuing pricing behavior, psychological anchors in pricing, Gradually loosening from the early anchor point, window dress behaviors of main underwriters in IPO market, then, summing up the underwriters business style. brief content as follows.
Through statistical comparisons of registered address between main underwriters and issuers, the author found the main underwriters does not exist fixed business region, so, the pairing of underwriters and issuers should not limited by region.
It shows the main underwriters have prominent area in industries; selections of clientele are clearly influenced by its profession. The underwriter's local business accomplishment amounts are vary by region, in the rich IPO resources region, the underwriters underwritered more local issuing. And there is a clear positive relation between their registered capital and volume of business.
Using Principal Component Analysis, the article compares issuing price and market price of IPO company, the result shows the explanatory ability of issuing price is stranger than market price in reflecting of the issuer'operating information which based on 34 financial index. After yearly observation of explanatory ability, the author summarizes phenomena related different industries, different equity structure, different market condition.
In empirical test we found the rich experience underwriters'IPO pricing reflects the company's financial information less than those of lack of experience underwriters.
In order to make the phenomenon clear, the paper analysis the regression residuals and explained:during pricing process, different experience underwriters endowed different weights to composed parts. Relatively speaking, experienced underwriters' IPO prices are more comprehensive than inexperienced underwriters.
Chapter 6 conducting an empirical summary from behavioral finance view of IPO market, the paper find main underwriters has the effect of psychological anchor in issuance pricing, it also shows phenomena of gradually loosening from the early anchor point. In market-oriented pricing IPO process, main underwriters still has the behavior of price anchoring. Obviously they rely on PE ratio and PA ratio, but in different industries the anchoring degree is different.
From the time series, there are common behaviors in the main underwriters' pricing processes, their pricing options do have anchoring effect. But the anchor points have dynamic characteristics.
Then, the author tests anchoring effect in IPO progress on recent five years by listed companies'IPO pricing data, finds that there do have significantly anchoring effect in Small Plate and Growth Enterprises Market, this research also shows the Small Plate's IPO pricing anchor is more closer on PE than on PB; on the contrary, GEM's anchoring target is tightly on PB.
The paper also shows the behavior of loosing anchor point in underwrite isn't deny of the anchor effect, instead, it is a deeper anchor performance.
The paper put light on double-edged sword effect of IPO market anchor. On the one hand, main underwriters'pricing anchoring behavior in IPO market conducive to the stability of the IPO price, it can keep investors in stable psychological expected, on the other hand, this kind of anchor compare with the higher in PE ratio and PA ratio, it do harm to long-term stability in the market, they are destruction factors to market efficiency. Using hindsight measures, The article also reasoning in three conditions that main underwriters and listed companies may have window dressed when they were in IPO process.
This article finds influenced by main underwriters'window dressing, those whose first closing price were under issue price would overestimate about 100% by investors in the secondary market; those whose Performance decline in short terms would overestimate a level of 27.8% in the secondary market; those who announced investment direction changes would overestimate level for 44.7% in the secondary market; the issuers which first closing price were under issue price and Performance decline in short terms would overestimate a level about 52.4%; the issuers which have all the three characters would overestimate a level about 51.9%.
The study had proved the reforms to the rule give a correct rectify to secondary market investors when they make evaluation to an IPO company. During years of practices the evaluation influence from the issuer and main underwriter to investors getting weak. Obviously, gradually effective market system produced a positive role.
The empirical test found that the contracts between main underwriters and issuer almost in the same mode in recent 10 years. This would lay underwriters in a larger issuance risk, potential risks also do harm to IPO market. When there are new issues launch on the market, the underwriters didn't consider the environment of the capital market.
The change in IPO rule influence main underwriter little, the volume of underwriter's capital and its business scale are symmetrical, big underwriter's business style has greatly influenced the whole underwriters'business style. Different underwriters'price devaluation in IPO did not show difference in empirical test in study period.
The innovations in this paper are in three point:first, from different angles the author summarized IPO market underwriters business behavior characteristics, the main underwriters'business style has also refined. Second, from the perspective of regression residual, the paper analyzed the relation between issuance price and character of main underwriters. Third, analysis the psychological anchor effect of main underwriter in IPO pricing, the phoneme of loosen from anchor point was also discussed.
Through the writing, I found there existed some shortages, For limitations in data collection ability, I failed to research main underwriters'behavior thoroughly in some areas which I interested in. Limited to personal qualification, I found behaviors of main underwriters was not fully understand. The paper was broad to spare, and lack of depth.
在学术研究方面,国内学者对A股IPO市场承销商的研究起步很晚,研究内容比较宽泛,多集中于承销商声誉、承销商与IPO抑价关系方面,而全面研究承销商行为的文献较少,尤其是在承销商的业务对象选择、定价决策的心理、承销业务中形成的风格等方面的研究成果相当匮乏,国内的承销商行为理论研究与IPO承销业务的现实状况还有较大差距,对此领域的认识急需进一步拓展、加深。
为此,本文以2001-2010年为研究窗口期,针对IPO市场的主承销商行为,应用理论分析、比较分析、实证分析、规范分析等方法,从6个视角对主承销商的行为进行了研究,较系统的总结了承销商在1PO市场中的相关行为。
文章以主承销商在IPO过程中扮演的角色为主线,以其承销行为为核心,通过实证,揭示了我国主承销商在A股IPO发行与承销领域的多种行为,依次总结了主承销商的业务对象选择行为、承销商的业务风格与特点；主承销商发行定价中所反应的公司信息、发行定价时的心理锚定、锚点弱化行为；主承销商在IPO过程中的上市包装行为。主要内容如下。
通过对主承销商的注册地址与其承销IPO公司注册地址的统计分析,发现承销商与IPO企业配对并未受地域限制,主承销商并不存在固定的承销地域。多年来,主承销商的行业性体现比较突出,其业务对象的选择明显受到了各自专长(行业)的影响。承销商的本地业务完成量则因地区而异,IPO企业资源丰富地区承销商的本地业务占比较大。承销商的业务量与其注册资本正相关。
在对主承销商风格的实证中发现,近10年来我国IPO新股承销方式比较单一承销商承担了较大的发行风险,单一的承销方式不利于IPO市场风险分散,不利于IPO市场承销业务方式的多元化发展。在推出公司IPO股票发行业务时,主承销并没有对市场时机进行考虑。发行制度的改变对承销商业务风格影响不大,承销商实力与其承销业务规模对称,实力雄厚承销商的业务风格极大的影响了整个承销领域的业务风格。在总体上承销商行为有“业务量与注册资本与保荐(推荐)次数正相关、保荐(推荐)成功率负相关”的特征,不同实力的承销商对发行抑价程度没有显著差异。
第5章应用主成分分析法,通过对反映IPO公司经营实体信息的34个财务指标提取并回归,检验了主承销商的发行定价中对公司上市前三年经营信息的含量及变化情况,针对主承销商的发行定价对公司规模、盈利能力、发展能力、风险状况、抗风险能力、经营费用等指标的解释能力进行了分析,用最近10年的发行定价对IPO公司信息反映情况进行观察,逐年分析,总结了不同板块、不同股权结构、不同市场状态下定价信息含量情况,认为,发行制度会在短期内对承销商发行定价中的公司信息含量产生负面影响；承销商在定价时对股权结构、市场状态敏感；对不同板块的上市公司在定价时的公司信息含量不同。
在对不同承销经验的主承销商IPO定价对公司信息含量检验时还发现,经验丰富的承销商在发行定价中反映IPO公司实体经营信息反而比经验较少的承销商弱。为了解释这种现象,文章将计量回归的残差标进行了准化,然后结合承销商自身的特征进行了分析,认为在制定发行价格时,不同经验的承销商对公司价值组成的两部分判断可能存在差异,在定价中赋予了不同的权重,这样就导致了IPO定价中反映公司实体经营信息的情况出现了区别。相对来说,经验丰富的承销商比经验欠缺承销商在对公司价值的未来预期方面综合性更强。
第7章对IPO市场主承销商的发行定价心理锚定、锚定弱化现象进行了实证总结,发现在实行市场化定价(累计询价制)以来,新股IPO过程中主承销商对股票的定价选择依然存在锚定行为——对市盈率、市净率的价格锚定现象明显,但不同的板块对两个指标锚定的紧密程度不同,有锚定目标分离的特征。
从时间序列上看,在两板块中主承销商定价选择对两指标的锚点并不固定(近年来总体有上升趋势),表现出动态锚定特点。实证也证明了中小板上市公司的发行市盈率、市净率锚值低于创业板,但到2010年上半年两板块对市净率倍数的锚定开始接近。
研究认为,IPO市场表现出对固定锚点的锚定弱化并不是对锚定现象的否定,相反,却是承销商定价行为与市场环境高度融合后对锚定的一种深化,是在更深层次上的锚定表现。
在分析中,加深了对IPO市场锚定行为双刃剑作用的认识。认为主承销商IPO市场定价的锚定行为有利于维持新股发行定价的稳定,使投资者可以对IPO首日超额收益保持稳定的心理预期,但这种锚定在主承销商之间也成为攀比的指标,它的存在反而不利于IPO市场优化定价机制,从而影响市场长期发展,成为破坏市场效率提高的潜在因素。
通过比对不同状况下的上市公司样本,找出了涉及包装行为的主承销商分布特征。研究表明,如果新上市公司出现了首日跌破发行价、上市后短期内宣布改变投资方向、上市两年之内主营业务大幅下滑等现象,那么主承销商极有可能对IPO公司进行了包装上市活动。实证表明,不同类型主承销商与上市公司首日跌破发行价、改变了投资方向、短期业绩发生变脸之间存在稳定的关系。在剔除干扰因素后,估计了主承销商对IPO公司上市包装而导致的二级市场投资者对低质量上市公司价值高估水平。实证结果显示,受主承销商的包装影响,首日跌破发行价的新股在二级市场被投资者高估约为100%；业绩变脸的新股在二级市场高估水平为27.8%；首日跌破发行价且宣布了改变投资方向的新股在二级市场高估水平为44.7%；首日跌破发行价且发生了业绩变脸的上市价格在二级市场高估水平约52.4%；宣布改变投资方向且发生了业绩变脸的公司高估水平为25.86%。而兼具首日跌破发行价、改变了投资方向、短期业绩发生变脸的新上市公司在IPO时价格在二级市场高估水平为51.9%。在分析中还证实了发行制度改革使二级市场投资者对IPO公司的价值判断得到了校正,他们受发行人、主承销商上市包装行为的影响明显减弱,显然,逐渐健全的市场制度产生了积极作用。
本文的创新主要体现在三方面：①对IPO承销商自身特征与其业务对象进行了匹配研究,得出了承销商在承销业务时有各自行业专长的结论。②从残差角度对主承销商的发行定价进行了分析,发现价格回归残差与主承销商的自身特征存在稳定的联系。③提出了承销商对IPO公司定价时对不同板块存在不同的锚定目标,并用锚定效应、锚值弱化对承销商的承销心理、价格决策行为进行了实证检验。
本文存在一些局限性,IPO市场承销商行为是一个十分广泛的课题,限于时间与精力,只选择了承销商的部分行为进行了实证研究,加之数据获取困难,未能对承销商其它行为进行涵盖,尤其是未能对承销商是否存在托市行为进行深入研究则成为本文的遗憾。
In China, stock market has been created 20 years. For these twenty years, with reforming and opening up, China's capital market had an extraordinary development process. Chinese IPO market share issuance system has carried on the important reforms, Experienced from Administrative Examine and Approve System, Approve Channel System, to Approved Sponsor System. Methods of Setting IPO Price also changed frequently, with the progressive reforms in Stock Issuance System, Stock issuance system continues to mature, and IPO market main underwriter'behavior also gradually get specifications.
In view of IPO underwriting practice, there has problems, such as few IPO guarantors less due diligence, so many underwriter's application were denied, the soar up of the IPO prices, the issue price flops, so, there still has a far way to an efficient market.
In academic research, Chinese scholars'research on A-share IPO underwriter's started lately, The research more focused on comparative broad underwriter's reputation, the relationship between underwriter and IPO price, the relationship between underwriter and IPO price devaluation.
Thought there had so many literatures, system researches on underwriters behavior is few, and fewer can give readers a comprehensive conclusion about IPO underwriters' behavior.
Therefore, the article takes year 2001-2010 as window period to research the behaviors of IPO market main underwriters, using theoretical analysis, empirical analysis, comparative analysis and normative analysis, the article studied different perspectives on the main underwriter, and systematically summarized the behaviors of the underwriters in Chinese IPO market.
Following the order of lead underwriters in IPO, through the multiple perspectives of empirical study, the author analyses the behavior of main underwriter in A-share IPO, in turn, summarizes the business choice behavior, issuing pricing behavior, psychological anchors in pricing, Gradually loosening from the early anchor point, window dress behaviors of main underwriters in IPO market, then, summing up the underwriters business style. brief content as follows.
Through statistical comparisons of registered address between main underwriters and issuers, the author found the main underwriters does not exist fixed business region, so, the pairing of underwriters and issuers should not limited by region.
It shows the main underwriters have prominent area in industries; selections of clientele are clearly influenced by its profession. The underwriter's local business accomplishment amounts are vary by region, in the rich IPO resources region, the underwriters underwritered more local issuing. And there is a clear positive relation between their registered capital and volume of business.
Using Principal Component Analysis, the article compares issuing price and market price of IPO company, the result shows the explanatory ability of issuing price is stranger than market price in reflecting of the issuer'operating information which based on 34 financial index. After yearly observation of explanatory ability, the author summarizes phenomena related different industries, different equity structure, different market condition.
In empirical test we found the rich experience underwriters'IPO pricing reflects the company's financial information less than those of lack of experience underwriters.
In order to make the phenomenon clear, the paper analysis the regression residuals and explained:during pricing process, different experience underwriters endowed different weights to composed parts. Relatively speaking, experienced underwriters' IPO prices are more comprehensive than inexperienced underwriters.
Chapter 6 conducting an empirical summary from behavioral finance view of IPO market, the paper find main underwriters has the effect of psychological anchor in issuance pricing, it also shows phenomena of gradually loosening from the early anchor point. In market-oriented pricing IPO process, main underwriters still has the behavior of price anchoring. Obviously they rely on PE ratio and PA ratio, but in different industries the anchoring degree is different.
From the time series, there are common behaviors in the main underwriters' pricing processes, their pricing options do have anchoring effect. But the anchor points have dynamic characteristics.
Then, the author tests anchoring effect in IPO progress on recent five years by listed companies'IPO pricing data, finds that there do have significantly anchoring effect in Small Plate and Growth Enterprises Market, this research also shows the Small Plate's IPO pricing anchor is more closer on PE than on PB; on the contrary, GEM's anchoring target is tightly on PB.
The paper also shows the behavior of loosing anchor point in underwrite isn't deny of the anchor effect, instead, it is a deeper anchor performance.
The paper put light on double-edged sword effect of IPO market anchor. On the one hand, main underwriters'pricing anchoring behavior in IPO market conducive to the stability of the IPO price, it can keep investors in stable psychological expected, on the other hand, this kind of anchor compare with the higher in PE ratio and PA ratio, it do harm to long-term stability in the market, they are destruction factors to market efficiency. Using hindsight measures, The article also reasoning in three conditions that main underwriters and listed companies may have window dressed when they were in IPO process.
This article finds influenced by main underwriters'window dressing, those whose first closing price were under issue price would overestimate about 100% by investors in the secondary market; those whose Performance decline in short terms would overestimate a level of 27.8% in the secondary market; those who announced investment direction changes would overestimate level for 44.7% in the secondary market; the issuers which first closing price were under issue price and Performance decline in short terms would overestimate a level about 52.4%; the issuers which have all the three characters would overestimate a level about 51.9%.
The study had proved the reforms to the rule give a correct rectify to secondary market investors when they make evaluation to an IPO company. During years of practices the evaluation influence from the issuer and main underwriter to investors getting weak. Obviously, gradually effective market system produced a positive role.
The empirical test found that the contracts between main underwriters and issuer almost in the same mode in recent 10 years. This would lay underwriters in a larger issuance risk, potential risks also do harm to IPO market. When there are new issues launch on the market, the underwriters didn't consider the environment of the capital market.
The change in IPO rule influence main underwriter little, the volume of underwriter's capital and its business scale are symmetrical, big underwriter's business style has greatly influenced the whole underwriters'business style. Different underwriters'price devaluation in IPO did not show difference in empirical test in study period.
The innovations in this paper are in three point:first, from different angles the author summarized IPO market underwriters business behavior characteristics, the main underwriters'business style has also refined. Second, from the perspective of regression residual, the paper analyzed the relation between issuance price and character of main underwriters. Third, analysis the psychological anchor effect of main underwriter in IPO pricing, the phoneme of loosen from anchor point was also discussed.
Through the writing, I found there existed some shortages, For limitations in data collection ability, I failed to research main underwriters'behavior thoroughly in some areas which I interested in. Limited to personal qualification, I found behaviors of main underwriters was not fully understand. The paper was broad to spare, and lack of depth.
引文
①见邵新建、巫和懋《中国IPO中的机构投资者配售、锁定制度研究》,管理世界2009(10),P29。
①见中国证券监督管理委员会第273次主席办公会议审议通过的《关于修改<证券发行与承销管理办法>的决定》,已于2010年11月1日开始施行。
②提供有效报价的询价对象不足可能导致发行中止(发行股票数量小于4亿股,提供有效报价的询价对象应超过20家,4亿股以上应超过50家)
③ Loughran、Tim和Jay R. Ritter,2004, Why has IPO under-pricing changed over time? Financial Management 33,5-37。
① Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny, A Survey of Corporate Governance, The Journal of Finance, Vol.52, No.2 (Jun.,1997), pp.737-783。
见Adrian R. Pagan, Kirill A. Sossounov. A Simple Framework for Analyzing Bull and Bear Markets[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol.18, No.1 (Jan.-Feb.,2003), pp.23-46.
① Francis Galton(1886).Family Likeness in Stature.Proceedings of Royal Society.1886.40,42-72.
② James M.Poterba and Lawrence H.Summers(1988).Mean reversion in stock prices:Evidence and implication.Journal of Financial Economics,22,27-59。
①参考Gujarati《计量经济学基础》,2008年8月第5次印刷,人大出版社,P46。
①黄春铃,《管理世界》2005年第7期,P126。
[1]Adrian R. Pagan,Kirill A. Sossounov.,2003,A Simple Framework for Analyzing Bull and Bear Markets[J] Journal of Applied Econometrics,Vol.18,No.1,pp.23-46.
[2]Aggarwal, Rajesh K.,Laurie Krigman,Kent L.Womack.2002, Strategic IPO underpricing, information momentum, and lockup expiration selling, Journal of Financial Economics,66,pp.105-137.
[3]Allen,F. and G. H. Faulhaber.1989,Signaling by underpricing in the IPOmarket, Journal of Financial Economics,23,pp.303-323.
[4]Alexander Ljungqvist and William J. Wilhelm,Jr.,2005,Does Prospect Theory Explain IPO Market Behavior? [J]. The Journal of Finance,8,pp.1759-1790.
[5]Altinkilic.Oya.and Robert S. Hansen.2000,Are there economies of scale in underwriting fees? Evidence of rising external financing costs, Review of Financial Studies,13,pp.191-218.
[6]Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny,Jun.,1997, A Survey of Corporate Governance,The Journal of Finance,Vol.52,No.2,pp.737-783。
[7]Baron,D.P.,1982,A model of the demand for investment banking advising anddistribution[J], Journal of Finance,37,pp.955-976.
[8]Barry,Christopher,Christopher Muscarella.and Michael Vetsuypens.1991,Underwriter warrants, underwriter compensation, and the costs of goingpublic[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,29,pp.113-136
[9]Beatty,Randolph P.,and Jay R. Ritter.1986,Investment banking,reputation,and the underpricing of initial public offerings,Journal of Financial Economics,15, pp.213-232.
[10]Beatty,R. P.,1989,Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial publicofferings, Accounting Review,64,pp.693-709.
[11]Beatty, Randolph P., Howard Bunsis,and John R. M. Hand.1998,The indirect economic penalties in SEC investigations of underwriters,Journal of Financial Economics,50,pp.151-186.
[12]Benveniste,Lawrence M.,and Paul A.Spindt.1989,How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues,Journal of Financial Economics,24, pp.343-361.
[13]Benveniste,Lawrence M.,Walid Y. Busaba and William J. Wilhelm,Jr.,1996,Price stabilization as a bonding mechanism in new equity issues[J].Journal of Financial Economics,42,pp.223-255.
[14]Benveniste,Lawrence M.,Walid Y. Busaba,and William J. Wilhelm Jr.,2002, Information exter-nalities and the role of underwriters in primary equity markets[J], Journal of Financial Interme-diation,11,pp.61-86.
[15]Benveniste,Lawrence M.,Alexander Ljungqvist,William J. Wilhelm Jr.,and Xiaoyun Yu.2003,Evidence of information spillovers in the production of investment banking services [J] Journal of Finance,58,pp.577-608.
[16]Bipin B. Ajinkya.Prem C. Jain.1989, The Behavior of Dally Stockmarket Trading Volume [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, pp:331-359.
[17]Booth, James R., and Richard L. Smith Ⅱ.1986, Capital raising, underwriting, and the certification hypothesis[J], Journal of Financial Economics,15,pp.261-281.
[18]Brav,Alon,and Paul A. Gompers.1997,Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings:Evidence from venture and nonventure capital-backed companies[J], Journal of Finance,52,pp.1791-1821.
[19]Brewer, N. T.,& Chapman, G. B.,2002, The fragile of basic anchoring effect[J]. Journal of Decision Making[J],15,pp.65-77.
[20]Carter,Richard B.,and Steven Manaster.1990,Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation [J], Journal of Finance,45,pp.1045-1067.
[21]Carter,Richard B.,1992,Underwriter reputation and repetitive public offeringsfJ], Journal of Finan-cial Research,15,pp.341-354.
[22]Chapman,G.B.,& Johnson,E.J.,1994,The limits of anchoring[J]. Journal of Behavioral Division Making,7,pp.223-242.
[23]Chapman,G.B.,& Johnson,E.J.,1999,Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,79,pp.115-153.
[24]Chapman,G. B.,and Johnson,E. J.,2002,Incorporating the Irrelevant:Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value,Cambridge University Press,pp.120-138.
[25]Chen, Zhiwu, and Peng Xiong.2001,Discounts on Illiquid Stocks:Evidence from China,Working Paper,No.00256,Yale International Center for Finance.
[26]Chen,A.,R. C. Y. Chen and K. L. Pan.,2002,The performance of initial publicofferings conditioning on issue information:The case of Taiwan,Asia Pacific Management Review 7 (2):167-190.
[27]Chen,A.,C. C. Hung and C. S. Wu.2002,The underpricing and excess returns ofinitial public offerings in Taiwan based on noisy trading:A stochastic frontiermodel, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,18 (2),pp.11-138.
[28]Chowdhry,Bhagwan,and VikramNanda.,1996,Stabilization,syndication and pricing of IPOs [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,31,pp.25-42.
[29]Cliff,Michael T.,and David J. Denis.2004,Do IPO firms purchase analyst coverage with under-pricing? Journal of Finance,59,pp.2871-2901.
[30]Corwin, Shane A., and Paul A. Schultz.2005,The role of IPO underwriting syndicates:Pricing, information production,and underwriter competition Journal of Finance,60. pp.443-486.
[31]Craig Burnside.1998,Solving asset pricing model with Gaussian shocks [J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,22,pp.329-340.
[32]David Chambers & Elroy dimson.2008,IPO Underpricing Over the Very Long Run,working paper,Oxford University,
[33]De Bondt,Werner F M & Thaler, Richard.1985,Does the Stock Market Overreact? [J]. Journal of Finance,3,pp.793-805.
[34]Dunbar,Craig G.2000,Factors affecting investment bank initial public offering market share,Journal of Financial Economics,55,pp.3-41.
[35]Edelen,Roger M.,and Gregory B. Kadlec.2003, Comparable-firm returns, issuer surplus and the pricing and withdrawal of IPOs,Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
[36]Engle R F and Granger C W J.,1987,Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing[J]. Econometrics,55,pp.251-276.
[37]Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French.1993,Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,33, PP.3-56.
[38]Fabio Canova and Gianni De Niclo.,2003,The properties of the equity premium and the risk-free rate:Investigation across time and countries[J]. IMF Staff Papers,50 (2),pp.222-249.
[39]Fernando,Chitru S.,Vladimir A. Gatchev,and Paul A. Spindt.2003,Wanna dance? How firms and underwriters choose each other? working paper,Tulane University.
[40]Flannery M.J.& K.P. Rangan.2006,Partial Adjustment toward Target Capital Structures[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,79,pp.469-506.
[41]Gertner, Robert.1993, Game Shows and Economic Behavior:Risk Taking on Card sharks [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,102,pp.507-521.
[42]George,T. J. and Chuan-yang Hwang.2004,The 52-week High and Momentum Investing[J]. Journal of Finance,59,pp.2145-2175.
[43]Gilbert,D. T.,Pelham,B. W.,and Krull,D. S.,1988,On Cognitive Busyness:When Person Perceivers Meet Person Receivers [J], Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54,pp.733-740.
[44]Gregory C. Chow and Lihui Zheng.2002,Equity premium and consumption sensitivity when the consumer-investor allows for unfavorable circumstances[J]. Journal of Dynamics & Control,26,pp.1417-1429.
[45]Griffin,d.,and A.Tversky.1992,The weighing of evidence and the determinants of over-confidence [J].Cognitive Psychology 24,pp.411-435.
[46]Grinblatt,M. and C. Y. Hwang,1989,Signaling and the pricing of new issues,Journal of Finance,44,pp.393-420.
[47]Gurdip S.Bakshi and Zhiwu chen.1996,The spirit of capitalism and stock-market prices[J]·America Economic Review,86 (1),pp.133-157.
[48]Hanley, Kathleen.1993,The under-pricing of initial public offerings and the partial adjustment phenomenon,Journal of Financial Economics,34,pp.231-250.
[49]Heckman,James.1979,Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 47,pp.153-162.
[50]Hunt-McCool,J.,Koh,S.C. and Francis,B.B.,1996,Testing for Deliberate Under-pricing in the IPO Pre-market:A Stochastic Frontier Approach[J]. Review of Financial Studies,9,pp.1251-69.
[51]Jay R., Ritter and Ivo Welch.2002,A Review of IPO Activity,Pricing,and Allocations[J]. The Journal of Finance.8,pp.1795-1828
[52]Jenkinson,Tim and Alexander Ljungqvist.2001,Going Public:The Theory and Evidence on How Companies Raise Equity Finance,2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, New York)
[53]Jones,C.P.,and R. H. Litzenberger.1970,Quarterly earnings reports and intermediate stock price trends[J]. Journal of Finance,25,pp.143-148.
[54]Kahneman,d.,and A. Tversky.1979,Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometric,47,pp.263-291.
[55]Krigman,L.,and W. H. Shaw,and K. L.Womack.1999,The persistence of IPO mispricing and the predictive power of flipping,Journal of Finance,Vol.LIV,NO.3, pp.1015-1044.
[56]Krigman,Laurie,Wayne H. Shaw, and Kent L. Womack.2001,Why do firms switch underwriters? Journal of Financial Economics,60,pp.245-284.
[57]Ljungqvist, Alexander, Vikram Nanda,and Rajsingh.2001,Hot markets, investor sentiment,and IPO pricing,Working paper,New York University.
[58]Ljungqvist,Alexander,and William J. Wilhelm.2003,IPO pricing in the dot-com bubble,Journal of Finance,58,pp.723-752.
[59]Loughran,Tim and Jay R. Ritter.2002,Why don't issuers get upset about leaving money on the table in IPOs? Review of Financial Studies,15,pp.413-443.
[60]Loughran,Tim and Jay R. Ritter.2004,Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management,33,pp.5-37.
[61]Mark J. Flannerya, Kasturi P. Rangan.2006,Partial adjustment toward target capital structures [J] Journal of Financial Economics,79,pp.469-506.
[62]Mehra,Rajnish and Edward Prescott.1985,The equity premium puzzle [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,15,pp.145-161.
[63]Mok,H. M. K. and Hui, Y.V.1998,Under-pricing and Aftermarket Performance of IPO in Shanghai,China',Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 6:453-474.
[64]Morck,R.,A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny.1988,Management ownership and marketvaluation:An empirical analysis,Journal of Finance Economics,20,pp.293-315.
[65]Muscarella,C. and M. Vetsuypens.1989,A simple test of Baron's model ofIPO underpricing[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,24,pp.125-135.
[66]Mussweiler,T.,2001,Sentencing under uncertainty:Anchoring effects in the court room. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,31,pp.1535-1551.
[67]Nanda,Vikram and YoungKeol Yun.1997,Reputation and financial intermediation: An empirical investigation of the impact of IPO mis-pricing on underwriter market value, Journal of Financial Intermediation 6,pp.39-63.
[68]Nicholas,Barberis and Ming,Huang.2001,Mental Accounting,Loss Aversion,and Individual Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Finance,117,pp.1247-1292.
[69]Petersen,Mitchell A.,and Raghuram G. Rajan.1994,The benefits of lending relationships:Evi-dence from small business data[J]. Journal of Finance,49,pp. 3-37.
[70]Petersen, Mitchell A., and Raghuram G. Rajan.1995,The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110,pp.407-443.
[71]Quattrone,G. A.,Lawrence,C. P.,Finkel,S. E.,and Andrus,D. C.,1981,Explorations in Anchoring:The Effects of Prior Range,Anchor Extremity,and Suggestive Hints[J]. Working paper,Stanford University.
[72]Ritter,J.,1984,The Hot Issue,Market of 1980[J]. Journal of Business,57,pp.215-240.
[73]Rock, K.1986, Why New Issues Are Underpriced[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,15, pp.1051-1069.
[74]Ritter,J.,1987,The Costs of Going Public[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,19, pp.269-281.
[75]Ritter,J.1991,The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings[J]. Journal of Finance,46, pp.3-27.
[76]Ritter,Jay and Ivo Welch.2002,A review of IPO activity,Pricing,and allocations [J]. Journal of Finance,57,pp.1795-1828.
[77]Roll R.1988,R2 [J]. Journal of Finance,43,pp.541-566.
[78]Rock,Kevin.1986,Why new issues are underpriced[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,15,pp.187-212.
[79]Shefrin, Hersh M., and Meir Statman.1984, Explaining investor preferences for cash dividends[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,13,pp.253-282.
[80]Slovic,P. and S. Lichtenstein.1971,Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,6,pp.649-744.
[81]Slovic,p.,1972,Psychological study of human judgment:implications for investment decision making[J]. Journal of Finance,27,pp.779-799.
[82]Stoughton,N. M.,and Josef Zechner.1998,IPO Mechanisms, Monitoring and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,49,pp.45-77.
[83]Thaler,Richard.1980,Toward a positive theory of consumer choice[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1,pp.39-60.
[84]Thaler,Richard.1985,Mental accounting and consumer choice[J]. Marketing Science,4, pp.199-214.
[85]Thaler, Richard H and Eric J Johnson.1990,Gambling with the house money and trying to break even:The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice [J].Management Science,36,pp.643-660.
[86]Tinic,S.,1988, Anatomy of initial public offerings of common stock[J]. Journal ofFinance 43,pp.789-822.
[87]Titman,S. and B. Trueman.1986,Information quality and the valuation of new issues[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,8,pp.159-172.
[88]Tversky,A. and Kahneman,D.,1974,Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases[J].Science,185,pp.1124-1130.
[89]Tversky,Amos and Daniel Kahneman.1992,Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5,pp.297-323.
[90]Weil P.1989, The equity puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle[J]. Journal of Monetary Economy,24,pp.401-421.
[91]Welch, I.,1989, Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings[J]. Journal of Finance 44,pp.421-449.
[92]Willenborg, M.,1999, Empirical Analysis of the Economic Demand for Auditing in the Initial Public Offerings Market[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,Vol.37 No.1, pp.225-237.
[93]Wilson,T. D.,Houston,C. E.,Eitling,K. M.,& Brekke,N.1996,A new look at anchoring effects:basic anchoring and its antecedents [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,125,pp.387-402.
[94]高雷,任慧玉.掌握股市——行为金融学与定量预测之应用研究[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,2005年9月第1版.
[95]国家证券从业资格考试研究组.证券发行与承销[M].北京：中国民主法制出版社,2007年9月第1版.
[96]韩泽县,任有泉.投资者情绪与证券市场收益[M].北京：中国时代经济出版社,2006年4月第1版
[97]李心丹.行为金融学——理论与中国的证据[M].上海：上海三联书店.2003年第1版.
[98]刘力、张圣平.信念、偏好与行为金融学[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2007年3月第1版.
[99]陆剑清.行为金融学[M].上海：立信会计出版社,2009年1月第1版.
[100]饶育蕾,刘达锋.行为金融学[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,2003年1月第1版.
[101]童艳,刘煜辉.中国IPO定价效率与发行定价机制研究[M],北京：中国金融出版社,2010年1月第1版.
[102]吴冲锋,穆启国.资产定价研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2008年1月第1版.
[103]谢风华.市值管理[M].北京：清华大学出版社,,2008年10月第1版.
[104]薜斐.投资者情绪与投资者行为研究[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,2008年1月第1版.
[105]杨春鹏.非理性金融[M].北京：科学出版社,2008年5月第1版.
[106]袁明哲.股票定价模型[M].北京：经济科学出版社,,2006年1月第1版.
[107]沃伦·巴菲特,劳伦斯A·坎宁安,陈鑫译.致股东们的一封信[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2007年2月第1版.
[108]张圣平.偏好、信念、信息与证券价格[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2002年11月第1版.
[109]周孝华,熊虎.发行机制、投资者行为、后市流动性与IPO价格[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社,2009年5月第1版.
[110]饶宏斌,曾艳.公司上市案例评析[M].北京：中国方正出版社,2007年1月第1版.
[111]白雪梅,赵松山.协整及误差修正模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1998(8)：39-42.
[112]白仲光.现代金融学的发展——金融不确定性与信息不对称性研究演进[J].经济问题,2002(6)：40-43.
[113]边泓,曲兴华.会计信息在投资决策中长期锚定效应研究——对计量观实证方法的改进[J].财经研究,2009(1)：48-58.
[114]曹凤歧,董秀良.我国IPO定价合理性的实证分析[J],财经研究,2006(6)：4-14.
[115]陈安琳,林士哲.初次发行市场承销商市场占有率之研究[J],中华管理评论,2002(10)：73-89.
[116]陈彦斌,周业安.行为资产定价理论综述[J].经济研究,2004(6)：117-127.
[117]陈有禄.对我国T+I交易制度下IPO抑价和高换手问题的探析,改革与战略,2008(11)：108-110.
[118]陈彦斌,周业安.行为资产定价理论综述[J].经济研究,2004(6)：117-127.
[119]陈磊,曾勇.基于股市下跌背景的处置效应研究[J].管理评论,2005(3)：24-29.
[120]陈方正,刘建桥.我国证券机构对股市框架依赖的实证分析,2006(3)：5-10.
[121]邓召明.我国股票发行定价效率实证研究,[J],南开经济研究,2001(6)：60-64.
[122]段进东,陈海明.我国新股发行定价的信息效率实证研究[J].金融研究,2004(2)：5-13.
[123]冯素玲,曹家和.行为金融理论视角下的投资者行为分析[J].山东社会科学,2009(05)：91-93.
[124]冯用富,董艳,袁泽波,杨仁眉.基于的R2中国股市私有信息套利分析[J].经济研究,2009(8)：50-59.
[125]池丽旭,庄新田,王健.基于IPO交易量对我国投资者处置效应的研究[J].管理学报,2008(1)：118-122.
[126]丁松良.中国新股长期走势实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2003(3)：55-62.
[127]高鸿祯.关于上海股市效率性的探讨[J].厦门大学学报(哲社版),1996(4)：102-105.
[128]韩德宗,徐剑刚.沪深股票市场相关性的实证研究[J].统计研究,1995(1)：62-66.
[129]韩杨.新规则下的新股发行抑价券商决策模型[J].南开经济研究,2001(4)：56-58.
[130]何剑.承销商作用与中国股市IPO抑价[J].广东商学院学报,2008(5)：68-72.
[131]侯宇,叶冬艳.机构投资者、知情人交易和市场效率[J].金融研究,.2008(4)131-145.
[132]胡旭阳.我国新股发行制度准市场化改革效果的实证分析——一个从新股抑价角度的考察[J].财经论丛,2005(3)：70-74.
[133]胡志强,璩潞.股权分置改革与IPO配置效率的实证研究[J].经济管理,2008,(16)：26-32.
[134]黄春铃,石桂峰.证券监管者声誉和承销商声誉的关联性研究[J].经济经纬,2006(5)：116-119.
[135]黄峰,杨朝军.流动性风险与股票定价——来自我国股市的经验证据[J].管理世 界,2005(5)：30-48.
[136]李景.IPO询价制度效果——中国证券市场的实证研究[J].中国商界,2008(11)：4-5.
[137]李心丹,行为金融理论：研究体系及展望[J].金融研究,2005(1)：175-190.
[138]李忠民,姚昕.行为金融之展望理论研究述评[J].重庆工商大学学报,2007(1)：24-28.
[139]廖士光.中国股票市场定价效率研究——基于个股特有信息含量的视角[J].财经研究,2010(8)：68-77.
[140]廖理,汪毅慧.中国股票市场风险溢价研究[J].金融研究,2003(4)：23-31.
[141]林略,罗滕学.核准制下IPO价格行为的比较研究[J].华东经济管理,2010(11)：86-90.
[142]林珊.基于创业板IPO价格：上市公司、承销商与机构投资者的博弈分析[J].中国证券期货,2010(3)：P34-36.
[143]刘江会,尹伯成,易行健.我国证券承销商声誉与IPO企业质量关系的实证分析[J].财贸经济,2005(3)：9-16.
[144]刘晓峰.我国股市均值复归效应实证研究,商业时代,,2007(32)：79-80.
[145]刘志远,刘青.集体决策能抑制恶性增资吗——一个基于前景理论的实验研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(4)：13-20.
[146]李娟,徐文才.我国新股发行定价效率实证研究[J].企业经济,2003(6)：186-187.
[147]邱玉敏,李新路.投资者决策中的“框架依赖效应”[J].统计与决策,2008(23)：134-136.
[148]曲琛,周立明,罗跃嘉.锚定判断中的心理刻度效应：来自ERP的证据[J].心理学报,2008(6)：681-692.
[149]阮青松,余颖.期望理论及其对股本溢价的一个行为金融学解释[J].财经论丛,2005(3)：76-81.
[150]邵新建、巫和懋.中国IPO中的机构投资者配售、锁定制度研究[J].管理世界,2009(10)：28-41.
[151]施东晖.上海股票市场风险性实证研究[J].经济研究,1996(10)：44-48.
[152]宋敏,张俊喜,李春涛.股权结构的陷阱[J].南开管理评论,2004(1)：9-23.
[153]宋颂兴,金伟根.上海股市市场有效实证研究[J].经济学家,1995(4)：107-113.
[154]孙培源,施东晖.投资者总是风险厌恶吗?——来自中国股市的证据[N].证券市场导报,2002-09-06.
[155]孙青华,张世英.长记忆向量时间序列的非线性协整关系研究[J].天津大学学报, 2002(3)：327-331.
[156]田高良,王晓亮.我国A股IPO效率影响因素的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2007(5)：94-99.
[157]田高良,王晓亮.询价制下我国A股IPO效率实证研究[J].经济与管理研究,2007(3)：16-21.
[158]童勇,林洵子.行为金融与市场时机选择：来自中国资本市场的证据[J].企业经济,2009(10)：149-151.
[159]王鼎.股票市场羊群行为的激发机制探析[J],财经视点,2008(5)
[160]王家.开放式基金投资风格偏离对其投资者处置效应影响的实证研究[J].世界经济情况,2007(11)：74-78.
[161]王晋斌.新股申购预期超额报酬率的测试及其可能原因的解释[J].经济研究,1997(12)：17-24.
[162]王晓庄,白学军.判断与决策中的锚定效应[J].心理科学进展,2009(01)：37-43.
[163]王正位,赵冬青.2007发行管制条件下的股权再融资市场时机行为及其对资本结构的影响[J].南开管理评论,,2007(6)：40-47.
[164]文玉春.新股发行、价格确定与信息效率[J].金融发展研究,2009(7)：68-73.
[165]吴世农,许年行.资产的理性定价模型和非理性定价模型的比较研究[J].经济研究,2004(6)：105-116.
[166]吴世农.我国证券市场效率的分析[J].经济研究,1996(4)：13-19.
[167]吴世农,吴超鹏.盈余信息度量、市场反应与投资者框架依赖偏差分析[J].经济研究,2005(02)
[168]吴云.行为金融学视角下信用风险管理研究[J].经济研究导刊,2009,(05)：120-121.
[169]萧湘如,李玉惠.锚点个数与锚点一致性对定锚效果的影响[J].中华心理学刊,2000(42)：155-170.
[170]谢升峰,李家艳.IPO定价、分配与托市理论[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2003(6)：32-37.
[171]许年行,吴世农.我国上市公司股权分置改革中的锚定效应研究[J].经济研究,2007(1)：114-125.
[172]杨汉明.股权结构与公司综合业绩的实证研究[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(2)：108-114.
[173]杨汉明.股权集中度、现金股利与企业价值的实证分析[J].财贸经济,2008 (8)：67-72.
[174]杨记军,赵昌文.定价机制、承销方式与发行成本：来自中国IPO市场的证据[J].金融研究,2006(5)：51-60.
[175]杨明增,张继勋.审计判断中的锚定效应研究[J].审计研究,2007(4)：43-47.
[176]游家兴.市场信息效率的提高会改善资源配置效率吗?——基于R2的研究视角[J].数量经济技术经济研究,,2008(2)：110-121.
[177]郁韡君.我国IPO询价制度实施效果研究[J].证券市场导报,2005(9)：23-28.
[178]俞颖,佟德庆.我国新股发行定价效率的实证分析[J].2005(4)：57-59.
[179]俞乔.市场有效、周期异常与股价波动——对上海、深圳股票市场的实证分析[J].经济研究,1994(9)：43-50.
[180]于增彪,梁文涛.股票发行定价体制与新上市A股初始投资收益[J].经济研究,2004(8)：51-58.
[181]詹欣,叶可,陈伟忠.配股权对询价效率影响的博弈分析[J].同济大学学报2009(6)：847-850.
[182]张国兴.我国证券市场机构与个人投资者的博弈分析[J].中州学刊,2006(2)：55-57.
[183]张剑峰,金鼎.新股发行定价的财务影响因素分析--海股票市场的一个实证研究[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(3)：11-14.
[184]张慧,丁时勇,马锐.询价制IPO初始收益率实证研究[J].审计与经济研究,2008(4)：87-91.
[185]张树德.带有价格波动项的行为资产定价模型研究——投资与消费之间的均衡分析[J].财经研究,2005(11)：29-40.
[186]张祥建,郭岚.股权再融资与盈余管理行为的“羊群效应”[J].郑州大学学报(理学版),2006(01)：120-124.
[187]张宗成,苏振华.股指期货市场和股票市场价格关系及定价误差[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003(7)：109-112.
[188]张宗新,朱伟骅.中国证券市场系统性风险结构的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2005(12)：32-37.
[189]张慧,丁时勇,马锐.询价制IPO初始收益率实证研究[J].审计与经济研究,2008(4)：87-91.
[190]曹跃进.我国股票市场新股发行机制与效率的实证研究,同济大学博士学位论文2007年.
[191]高学哲.中国上市公司IPO定价研究,西安交大,产业经济学博士学位论文,2006年
[192]江洪波.中国A股IPO价格行为研究,上海交通大学,博士学位论文,2007年.
[193]林志皇.影响定锚效果的因素[D].台湾国立中正大学心理研究所硕士论文,2001年.
[194]刘江会.证券承销商声誉的理论与实证研究——基于中国证券发行市场的分析[D].复旦大学博士学位论文.2004年.
[195]孙自愿.基于抑价和溢价的IPO初始收益与长期走势问题研究,中国矿业大学博士学位论文,2009年.
[196]向朝进.IPO价格形成及短期价格调整研究,四川大学企业管理博士学位论文,2006年.
[197]熊维勤.我国IPO高抑价和询价发行机制研究[D].重庆大学博士学位论文,2007年.
[198]赵林茂.中国证券市场新股发行(IPO)效率研究,浙江大学博士学位论文,2005年.
①见中国证券监督管理委员会第273次主席办公会议审议通过的《关于修改<证券发行与承销管理办法>的决定》,已于2010年11月1日开始施行。
②提供有效报价的询价对象不足可能导致发行中止(发行股票数量小于4亿股,提供有效报价的询价对象应超过20家,4亿股以上应超过50家)
③ Loughran、Tim和Jay R. Ritter,2004, Why has IPO under-pricing changed over time? Financial Management 33,5-37。
① Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny, A Survey of Corporate Governance, The Journal of Finance, Vol.52, No.2 (Jun.,1997), pp.737-783。
见Adrian R. Pagan, Kirill A. Sossounov. A Simple Framework for Analyzing Bull and Bear Markets[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol.18, No.1 (Jan.-Feb.,2003), pp.23-46.
① Francis Galton(1886).Family Likeness in Stature.Proceedings of Royal Society.1886.40,42-72.
② James M.Poterba and Lawrence H.Summers(1988).Mean reversion in stock prices:Evidence and implication.Journal of Financial Economics,22,27-59。
①参考Gujarati《计量经济学基础》,2008年8月第5次印刷,人大出版社,P46。
①黄春铃,《管理世界》2005年第7期,P126。
[1]Adrian R. Pagan,Kirill A. Sossounov.,2003,A Simple Framework for Analyzing Bull and Bear Markets[J] Journal of Applied Econometrics,Vol.18,No.1,pp.23-46.
[2]Aggarwal, Rajesh K.,Laurie Krigman,Kent L.Womack.2002, Strategic IPO underpricing, information momentum, and lockup expiration selling, Journal of Financial Economics,66,pp.105-137.
[3]Allen,F. and G. H. Faulhaber.1989,Signaling by underpricing in the IPOmarket, Journal of Financial Economics,23,pp.303-323.
[4]Alexander Ljungqvist and William J. Wilhelm,Jr.,2005,Does Prospect Theory Explain IPO Market Behavior? [J]. The Journal of Finance,8,pp.1759-1790.
[5]Altinkilic.Oya.and Robert S. Hansen.2000,Are there economies of scale in underwriting fees? Evidence of rising external financing costs, Review of Financial Studies,13,pp.191-218.
[6]Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny,Jun.,1997, A Survey of Corporate Governance,The Journal of Finance,Vol.52,No.2,pp.737-783。
[7]Baron,D.P.,1982,A model of the demand for investment banking advising anddistribution[J], Journal of Finance,37,pp.955-976.
[8]Barry,Christopher,Christopher Muscarella.and Michael Vetsuypens.1991,Underwriter warrants, underwriter compensation, and the costs of goingpublic[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,29,pp.113-136
[9]Beatty,Randolph P.,and Jay R. Ritter.1986,Investment banking,reputation,and the underpricing of initial public offerings,Journal of Financial Economics,15, pp.213-232.
[10]Beatty,R. P.,1989,Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial publicofferings, Accounting Review,64,pp.693-709.
[11]Beatty, Randolph P., Howard Bunsis,and John R. M. Hand.1998,The indirect economic penalties in SEC investigations of underwriters,Journal of Financial Economics,50,pp.151-186.
[12]Benveniste,Lawrence M.,and Paul A.Spindt.1989,How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues,Journal of Financial Economics,24, pp.343-361.
[13]Benveniste,Lawrence M.,Walid Y. Busaba and William J. Wilhelm,Jr.,1996,Price stabilization as a bonding mechanism in new equity issues[J].Journal of Financial Economics,42,pp.223-255.
[14]Benveniste,Lawrence M.,Walid Y. Busaba,and William J. Wilhelm Jr.,2002, Information exter-nalities and the role of underwriters in primary equity markets[J], Journal of Financial Interme-diation,11,pp.61-86.
[15]Benveniste,Lawrence M.,Alexander Ljungqvist,William J. Wilhelm Jr.,and Xiaoyun Yu.2003,Evidence of information spillovers in the production of investment banking services [J] Journal of Finance,58,pp.577-608.
[16]Bipin B. Ajinkya.Prem C. Jain.1989, The Behavior of Dally Stockmarket Trading Volume [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, pp:331-359.
[17]Booth, James R., and Richard L. Smith Ⅱ.1986, Capital raising, underwriting, and the certification hypothesis[J], Journal of Financial Economics,15,pp.261-281.
[18]Brav,Alon,and Paul A. Gompers.1997,Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings:Evidence from venture and nonventure capital-backed companies[J], Journal of Finance,52,pp.1791-1821.
[19]Brewer, N. T.,& Chapman, G. B.,2002, The fragile of basic anchoring effect[J]. Journal of Decision Making[J],15,pp.65-77.
[20]Carter,Richard B.,and Steven Manaster.1990,Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation [J], Journal of Finance,45,pp.1045-1067.
[21]Carter,Richard B.,1992,Underwriter reputation and repetitive public offeringsfJ], Journal of Finan-cial Research,15,pp.341-354.
[22]Chapman,G.B.,& Johnson,E.J.,1994,The limits of anchoring[J]. Journal of Behavioral Division Making,7,pp.223-242.
[23]Chapman,G.B.,& Johnson,E.J.,1999,Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,79,pp.115-153.
[24]Chapman,G. B.,and Johnson,E. J.,2002,Incorporating the Irrelevant:Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value,Cambridge University Press,pp.120-138.
[25]Chen, Zhiwu, and Peng Xiong.2001,Discounts on Illiquid Stocks:Evidence from China,Working Paper,No.00256,Yale International Center for Finance.
[26]Chen,A.,R. C. Y. Chen and K. L. Pan.,2002,The performance of initial publicofferings conditioning on issue information:The case of Taiwan,Asia Pacific Management Review 7 (2):167-190.
[27]Chen,A.,C. C. Hung and C. S. Wu.2002,The underpricing and excess returns ofinitial public offerings in Taiwan based on noisy trading:A stochastic frontiermodel, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,18 (2),pp.11-138.
[28]Chowdhry,Bhagwan,and VikramNanda.,1996,Stabilization,syndication and pricing of IPOs [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,31,pp.25-42.
[29]Cliff,Michael T.,and David J. Denis.2004,Do IPO firms purchase analyst coverage with under-pricing? Journal of Finance,59,pp.2871-2901.
[30]Corwin, Shane A., and Paul A. Schultz.2005,The role of IPO underwriting syndicates:Pricing, information production,and underwriter competition Journal of Finance,60. pp.443-486.
[31]Craig Burnside.1998,Solving asset pricing model with Gaussian shocks [J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,22,pp.329-340.
[32]David Chambers & Elroy dimson.2008,IPO Underpricing Over the Very Long Run,working paper,Oxford University,
[33]De Bondt,Werner F M & Thaler, Richard.1985,Does the Stock Market Overreact? [J]. Journal of Finance,3,pp.793-805.
[34]Dunbar,Craig G.2000,Factors affecting investment bank initial public offering market share,Journal of Financial Economics,55,pp.3-41.
[35]Edelen,Roger M.,and Gregory B. Kadlec.2003, Comparable-firm returns, issuer surplus and the pricing and withdrawal of IPOs,Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
[36]Engle R F and Granger C W J.,1987,Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing[J]. Econometrics,55,pp.251-276.
[37]Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French.1993,Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,33, PP.3-56.
[38]Fabio Canova and Gianni De Niclo.,2003,The properties of the equity premium and the risk-free rate:Investigation across time and countries[J]. IMF Staff Papers,50 (2),pp.222-249.
[39]Fernando,Chitru S.,Vladimir A. Gatchev,and Paul A. Spindt.2003,Wanna dance? How firms and underwriters choose each other? working paper,Tulane University.
[40]Flannery M.J.& K.P. Rangan.2006,Partial Adjustment toward Target Capital Structures[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,79,pp.469-506.
[41]Gertner, Robert.1993, Game Shows and Economic Behavior:Risk Taking on Card sharks [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,102,pp.507-521.
[42]George,T. J. and Chuan-yang Hwang.2004,The 52-week High and Momentum Investing[J]. Journal of Finance,59,pp.2145-2175.
[43]Gilbert,D. T.,Pelham,B. W.,and Krull,D. S.,1988,On Cognitive Busyness:When Person Perceivers Meet Person Receivers [J], Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54,pp.733-740.
[44]Gregory C. Chow and Lihui Zheng.2002,Equity premium and consumption sensitivity when the consumer-investor allows for unfavorable circumstances[J]. Journal of Dynamics & Control,26,pp.1417-1429.
[45]Griffin,d.,and A.Tversky.1992,The weighing of evidence and the determinants of over-confidence [J].Cognitive Psychology 24,pp.411-435.
[46]Grinblatt,M. and C. Y. Hwang,1989,Signaling and the pricing of new issues,Journal of Finance,44,pp.393-420.
[47]Gurdip S.Bakshi and Zhiwu chen.1996,The spirit of capitalism and stock-market prices[J]·America Economic Review,86 (1),pp.133-157.
[48]Hanley, Kathleen.1993,The under-pricing of initial public offerings and the partial adjustment phenomenon,Journal of Financial Economics,34,pp.231-250.
[49]Heckman,James.1979,Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 47,pp.153-162.
[50]Hunt-McCool,J.,Koh,S.C. and Francis,B.B.,1996,Testing for Deliberate Under-pricing in the IPO Pre-market:A Stochastic Frontier Approach[J]. Review of Financial Studies,9,pp.1251-69.
[51]Jay R., Ritter and Ivo Welch.2002,A Review of IPO Activity,Pricing,and Allocations[J]. The Journal of Finance.8,pp.1795-1828
[52]Jenkinson,Tim and Alexander Ljungqvist.2001,Going Public:The Theory and Evidence on How Companies Raise Equity Finance,2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, New York)
[53]Jones,C.P.,and R. H. Litzenberger.1970,Quarterly earnings reports and intermediate stock price trends[J]. Journal of Finance,25,pp.143-148.
[54]Kahneman,d.,and A. Tversky.1979,Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometric,47,pp.263-291.
[55]Krigman,L.,and W. H. Shaw,and K. L.Womack.1999,The persistence of IPO mispricing and the predictive power of flipping,Journal of Finance,Vol.LIV,NO.3, pp.1015-1044.
[56]Krigman,Laurie,Wayne H. Shaw, and Kent L. Womack.2001,Why do firms switch underwriters? Journal of Financial Economics,60,pp.245-284.
[57]Ljungqvist, Alexander, Vikram Nanda,and Rajsingh.2001,Hot markets, investor sentiment,and IPO pricing,Working paper,New York University.
[58]Ljungqvist,Alexander,and William J. Wilhelm.2003,IPO pricing in the dot-com bubble,Journal of Finance,58,pp.723-752.
[59]Loughran,Tim and Jay R. Ritter.2002,Why don't issuers get upset about leaving money on the table in IPOs? Review of Financial Studies,15,pp.413-443.
[60]Loughran,Tim and Jay R. Ritter.2004,Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management,33,pp.5-37.
[61]Mark J. Flannerya, Kasturi P. Rangan.2006,Partial adjustment toward target capital structures [J] Journal of Financial Economics,79,pp.469-506.
[62]Mehra,Rajnish and Edward Prescott.1985,The equity premium puzzle [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,15,pp.145-161.
[63]Mok,H. M. K. and Hui, Y.V.1998,Under-pricing and Aftermarket Performance of IPO in Shanghai,China',Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 6:453-474.
[64]Morck,R.,A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny.1988,Management ownership and marketvaluation:An empirical analysis,Journal of Finance Economics,20,pp.293-315.
[65]Muscarella,C. and M. Vetsuypens.1989,A simple test of Baron's model ofIPO underpricing[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,24,pp.125-135.
[66]Mussweiler,T.,2001,Sentencing under uncertainty:Anchoring effects in the court room. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,31,pp.1535-1551.
[67]Nanda,Vikram and YoungKeol Yun.1997,Reputation and financial intermediation: An empirical investigation of the impact of IPO mis-pricing on underwriter market value, Journal of Financial Intermediation 6,pp.39-63.
[68]Nicholas,Barberis and Ming,Huang.2001,Mental Accounting,Loss Aversion,and Individual Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Finance,117,pp.1247-1292.
[69]Petersen,Mitchell A.,and Raghuram G. Rajan.1994,The benefits of lending relationships:Evi-dence from small business data[J]. Journal of Finance,49,pp. 3-37.
[70]Petersen, Mitchell A., and Raghuram G. Rajan.1995,The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110,pp.407-443.
[71]Quattrone,G. A.,Lawrence,C. P.,Finkel,S. E.,and Andrus,D. C.,1981,Explorations in Anchoring:The Effects of Prior Range,Anchor Extremity,and Suggestive Hints[J]. Working paper,Stanford University.
[72]Ritter,J.,1984,The Hot Issue,Market of 1980[J]. Journal of Business,57,pp.215-240.
[73]Rock, K.1986, Why New Issues Are Underpriced[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,15, pp.1051-1069.
[74]Ritter,J.,1987,The Costs of Going Public[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,19, pp.269-281.
[75]Ritter,J.1991,The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings[J]. Journal of Finance,46, pp.3-27.
[76]Ritter,Jay and Ivo Welch.2002,A review of IPO activity,Pricing,and allocations [J]. Journal of Finance,57,pp.1795-1828.
[77]Roll R.1988,R2 [J]. Journal of Finance,43,pp.541-566.
[78]Rock,Kevin.1986,Why new issues are underpriced[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,15,pp.187-212.
[79]Shefrin, Hersh M., and Meir Statman.1984, Explaining investor preferences for cash dividends[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,13,pp.253-282.
[80]Slovic,P. and S. Lichtenstein.1971,Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,6,pp.649-744.
[81]Slovic,p.,1972,Psychological study of human judgment:implications for investment decision making[J]. Journal of Finance,27,pp.779-799.
[82]Stoughton,N. M.,and Josef Zechner.1998,IPO Mechanisms, Monitoring and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,49,pp.45-77.
[83]Thaler,Richard.1980,Toward a positive theory of consumer choice[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1,pp.39-60.
[84]Thaler,Richard.1985,Mental accounting and consumer choice[J]. Marketing Science,4, pp.199-214.
[85]Thaler, Richard H and Eric J Johnson.1990,Gambling with the house money and trying to break even:The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice [J].Management Science,36,pp.643-660.
[86]Tinic,S.,1988, Anatomy of initial public offerings of common stock[J]. Journal ofFinance 43,pp.789-822.
[87]Titman,S. and B. Trueman.1986,Information quality and the valuation of new issues[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,8,pp.159-172.
[88]Tversky,A. and Kahneman,D.,1974,Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases[J].Science,185,pp.1124-1130.
[89]Tversky,Amos and Daniel Kahneman.1992,Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5,pp.297-323.
[90]Weil P.1989, The equity puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle[J]. Journal of Monetary Economy,24,pp.401-421.
[91]Welch, I.,1989, Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings[J]. Journal of Finance 44,pp.421-449.
[92]Willenborg, M.,1999, Empirical Analysis of the Economic Demand for Auditing in the Initial Public Offerings Market[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,Vol.37 No.1, pp.225-237.
[93]Wilson,T. D.,Houston,C. E.,Eitling,K. M.,& Brekke,N.1996,A new look at anchoring effects:basic anchoring and its antecedents [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,125,pp.387-402.
[94]高雷,任慧玉.掌握股市——行为金融学与定量预测之应用研究[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,2005年9月第1版.
[95]国家证券从业资格考试研究组.证券发行与承销[M].北京：中国民主法制出版社,2007年9月第1版.
[96]韩泽县,任有泉.投资者情绪与证券市场收益[M].北京：中国时代经济出版社,2006年4月第1版
[97]李心丹.行为金融学——理论与中国的证据[M].上海：上海三联书店.2003年第1版.
[98]刘力、张圣平.信念、偏好与行为金融学[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2007年3月第1版.
[99]陆剑清.行为金融学[M].上海：立信会计出版社,2009年1月第1版.
[100]饶育蕾,刘达锋.行为金融学[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,2003年1月第1版.
[101]童艳,刘煜辉.中国IPO定价效率与发行定价机制研究[M],北京：中国金融出版社,2010年1月第1版.
[102]吴冲锋,穆启国.资产定价研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2008年1月第1版.
[103]谢风华.市值管理[M].北京：清华大学出版社,,2008年10月第1版.
[104]薜斐.投资者情绪与投资者行为研究[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,2008年1月第1版.
[105]杨春鹏.非理性金融[M].北京：科学出版社,2008年5月第1版.
[106]袁明哲.股票定价模型[M].北京：经济科学出版社,,2006年1月第1版.
[107]沃伦·巴菲特,劳伦斯A·坎宁安,陈鑫译.致股东们的一封信[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2007年2月第1版.
[108]张圣平.偏好、信念、信息与证券价格[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2002年11月第1版.
[109]周孝华,熊虎.发行机制、投资者行为、后市流动性与IPO价格[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社,2009年5月第1版.
[110]饶宏斌,曾艳.公司上市案例评析[M].北京：中国方正出版社,2007年1月第1版.
[111]白雪梅,赵松山.协整及误差修正模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1998(8)：39-42.
[112]白仲光.现代金融学的发展——金融不确定性与信息不对称性研究演进[J].经济问题,2002(6)：40-43.
[113]边泓,曲兴华.会计信息在投资决策中长期锚定效应研究——对计量观实证方法的改进[J].财经研究,2009(1)：48-58.
[114]曹凤歧,董秀良.我国IPO定价合理性的实证分析[J],财经研究,2006(6)：4-14.
[115]陈安琳,林士哲.初次发行市场承销商市场占有率之研究[J],中华管理评论,2002(10)：73-89.
[116]陈彦斌,周业安.行为资产定价理论综述[J].经济研究,2004(6)：117-127.
[117]陈有禄.对我国T+I交易制度下IPO抑价和高换手问题的探析,改革与战略,2008(11)：108-110.
[118]陈彦斌,周业安.行为资产定价理论综述[J].经济研究,2004(6)：117-127.
[119]陈磊,曾勇.基于股市下跌背景的处置效应研究[J].管理评论,2005(3)：24-29.
[120]陈方正,刘建桥.我国证券机构对股市框架依赖的实证分析,2006(3)：5-10.
[121]邓召明.我国股票发行定价效率实证研究,[J],南开经济研究,2001(6)：60-64.
[122]段进东,陈海明.我国新股发行定价的信息效率实证研究[J].金融研究,2004(2)：5-13.
[123]冯素玲,曹家和.行为金融理论视角下的投资者行为分析[J].山东社会科学,2009(05)：91-93.
[124]冯用富,董艳,袁泽波,杨仁眉.基于的R2中国股市私有信息套利分析[J].经济研究,2009(8)：50-59.
[125]池丽旭,庄新田,王健.基于IPO交易量对我国投资者处置效应的研究[J].管理学报,2008(1)：118-122.
[126]丁松良.中国新股长期走势实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2003(3)：55-62.
[127]高鸿祯.关于上海股市效率性的探讨[J].厦门大学学报(哲社版),1996(4)：102-105.
[128]韩德宗,徐剑刚.沪深股票市场相关性的实证研究[J].统计研究,1995(1)：62-66.
[129]韩杨.新规则下的新股发行抑价券商决策模型[J].南开经济研究,2001(4)：56-58.
[130]何剑.承销商作用与中国股市IPO抑价[J].广东商学院学报,2008(5)：68-72.
[131]侯宇,叶冬艳.机构投资者、知情人交易和市场效率[J].金融研究,.2008(4)131-145.
[132]胡旭阳.我国新股发行制度准市场化改革效果的实证分析——一个从新股抑价角度的考察[J].财经论丛,2005(3)：70-74.
[133]胡志强,璩潞.股权分置改革与IPO配置效率的实证研究[J].经济管理,2008,(16)：26-32.
[134]黄春铃,石桂峰.证券监管者声誉和承销商声誉的关联性研究[J].经济经纬,2006(5)：116-119.
[135]黄峰,杨朝军.流动性风险与股票定价——来自我国股市的经验证据[J].管理世 界,2005(5)：30-48.
[136]李景.IPO询价制度效果——中国证券市场的实证研究[J].中国商界,2008(11)：4-5.
[137]李心丹,行为金融理论：研究体系及展望[J].金融研究,2005(1)：175-190.
[138]李忠民,姚昕.行为金融之展望理论研究述评[J].重庆工商大学学报,2007(1)：24-28.
[139]廖士光.中国股票市场定价效率研究——基于个股特有信息含量的视角[J].财经研究,2010(8)：68-77.
[140]廖理,汪毅慧.中国股票市场风险溢价研究[J].金融研究,2003(4)：23-31.
[141]林略,罗滕学.核准制下IPO价格行为的比较研究[J].华东经济管理,2010(11)：86-90.
[142]林珊.基于创业板IPO价格：上市公司、承销商与机构投资者的博弈分析[J].中国证券期货,2010(3)：P34-36.
[143]刘江会,尹伯成,易行健.我国证券承销商声誉与IPO企业质量关系的实证分析[J].财贸经济,2005(3)：9-16.
[144]刘晓峰.我国股市均值复归效应实证研究,商业时代,,2007(32)：79-80.
[145]刘志远,刘青.集体决策能抑制恶性增资吗——一个基于前景理论的实验研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(4)：13-20.
[146]李娟,徐文才.我国新股发行定价效率实证研究[J].企业经济,2003(6)：186-187.
[147]邱玉敏,李新路.投资者决策中的“框架依赖效应”[J].统计与决策,2008(23)：134-136.
[148]曲琛,周立明,罗跃嘉.锚定判断中的心理刻度效应：来自ERP的证据[J].心理学报,2008(6)：681-692.
[149]阮青松,余颖.期望理论及其对股本溢价的一个行为金融学解释[J].财经论丛,2005(3)：76-81.
[150]邵新建、巫和懋.中国IPO中的机构投资者配售、锁定制度研究[J].管理世界,2009(10)：28-41.
[151]施东晖.上海股票市场风险性实证研究[J].经济研究,1996(10)：44-48.
[152]宋敏,张俊喜,李春涛.股权结构的陷阱[J].南开管理评论,2004(1)：9-23.
[153]宋颂兴,金伟根.上海股市市场有效实证研究[J].经济学家,1995(4)：107-113.
[154]孙培源,施东晖.投资者总是风险厌恶吗?——来自中国股市的证据[N].证券市场导报,2002-09-06.
[155]孙青华,张世英.长记忆向量时间序列的非线性协整关系研究[J].天津大学学报, 2002(3)：327-331.
[156]田高良,王晓亮.我国A股IPO效率影响因素的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2007(5)：94-99.
[157]田高良,王晓亮.询价制下我国A股IPO效率实证研究[J].经济与管理研究,2007(3)：16-21.
[158]童勇,林洵子.行为金融与市场时机选择：来自中国资本市场的证据[J].企业经济,2009(10)：149-151.
[159]王鼎.股票市场羊群行为的激发机制探析[J],财经视点,2008(5)
[160]王家.开放式基金投资风格偏离对其投资者处置效应影响的实证研究[J].世界经济情况,2007(11)：74-78.
[161]王晋斌.新股申购预期超额报酬率的测试及其可能原因的解释[J].经济研究,1997(12)：17-24.
[162]王晓庄,白学军.判断与决策中的锚定效应[J].心理科学进展,2009(01)：37-43.
[163]王正位,赵冬青.2007发行管制条件下的股权再融资市场时机行为及其对资本结构的影响[J].南开管理评论,,2007(6)：40-47.
[164]文玉春.新股发行、价格确定与信息效率[J].金融发展研究,2009(7)：68-73.
[165]吴世农,许年行.资产的理性定价模型和非理性定价模型的比较研究[J].经济研究,2004(6)：105-116.
[166]吴世农.我国证券市场效率的分析[J].经济研究,1996(4)：13-19.
[167]吴世农,吴超鹏.盈余信息度量、市场反应与投资者框架依赖偏差分析[J].经济研究,2005(02)
[168]吴云.行为金融学视角下信用风险管理研究[J].经济研究导刊,2009,(05)：120-121.
[169]萧湘如,李玉惠.锚点个数与锚点一致性对定锚效果的影响[J].中华心理学刊,2000(42)：155-170.
[170]谢升峰,李家艳.IPO定价、分配与托市理论[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2003(6)：32-37.
[171]许年行,吴世农.我国上市公司股权分置改革中的锚定效应研究[J].经济研究,2007(1)：114-125.
[172]杨汉明.股权结构与公司综合业绩的实证研究[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(2)：108-114.
[173]杨汉明.股权集中度、现金股利与企业价值的实证分析[J].财贸经济,2008 (8)：67-72.
[174]杨记军,赵昌文.定价机制、承销方式与发行成本：来自中国IPO市场的证据[J].金融研究,2006(5)：51-60.
[175]杨明增,张继勋.审计判断中的锚定效应研究[J].审计研究,2007(4)：43-47.
[176]游家兴.市场信息效率的提高会改善资源配置效率吗?——基于R2的研究视角[J].数量经济技术经济研究,,2008(2)：110-121.
[177]郁韡君.我国IPO询价制度实施效果研究[J].证券市场导报,2005(9)：23-28.
[178]俞颖,佟德庆.我国新股发行定价效率的实证分析[J].2005(4)：57-59.
[179]俞乔.市场有效、周期异常与股价波动——对上海、深圳股票市场的实证分析[J].经济研究,1994(9)：43-50.
[180]于增彪,梁文涛.股票发行定价体制与新上市A股初始投资收益[J].经济研究,2004(8)：51-58.
[181]詹欣,叶可,陈伟忠.配股权对询价效率影响的博弈分析[J].同济大学学报2009(6)：847-850.
[182]张国兴.我国证券市场机构与个人投资者的博弈分析[J].中州学刊,2006(2)：55-57.
[183]张剑峰,金鼎.新股发行定价的财务影响因素分析--海股票市场的一个实证研究[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(3)：11-14.
[184]张慧,丁时勇,马锐.询价制IPO初始收益率实证研究[J].审计与经济研究,2008(4)：87-91.
[185]张树德.带有价格波动项的行为资产定价模型研究——投资与消费之间的均衡分析[J].财经研究,2005(11)：29-40.
[186]张祥建,郭岚.股权再融资与盈余管理行为的“羊群效应”[J].郑州大学学报(理学版),2006(01)：120-124.
[187]张宗成,苏振华.股指期货市场和股票市场价格关系及定价误差[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003(7)：109-112.
[188]张宗新,朱伟骅.中国证券市场系统性风险结构的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2005(12)：32-37.
[189]张慧,丁时勇,马锐.询价制IPO初始收益率实证研究[J].审计与经济研究,2008(4)：87-91.
[190]曹跃进.我国股票市场新股发行机制与效率的实证研究,同济大学博士学位论文2007年.
[191]高学哲.中国上市公司IPO定价研究,西安交大,产业经济学博士学位论文,2006年
[192]江洪波.中国A股IPO价格行为研究,上海交通大学,博士学位论文,2007年.
[193]林志皇.影响定锚效果的因素[D].台湾国立中正大学心理研究所硕士论文,2001年.
[194]刘江会.证券承销商声誉的理论与实证研究——基于中国证券发行市场的分析[D].复旦大学博士学位论文.2004年.
[195]孙自愿.基于抑价和溢价的IPO初始收益与长期走势问题研究,中国矿业大学博士学位论文,2009年.
[196]向朝进.IPO价格形成及短期价格调整研究,四川大学企业管理博士学位论文,2006年.
[197]熊维勤.我国IPO高抑价和询价发行机制研究[D].重庆大学博士学位论文,2007年.
[198]赵林茂.中国证券市场新股发行(IPO)效率研究,浙江大学博士学位论文,2005年.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |