用户名: 密码: 验证码:
企业组织行为特征对技术联盟绩效的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着技术创新周期的缩短、网络外部性的增强、技术复杂性和融合性的加大,企业仅靠自身的资源很难获得持续的竞争优势。以技术联盟为平台进行合作创新已成为企业技术战略的重要选择,而联盟绩效与联盟企业的组织行为特征密切相关。因此,从企业组织行为的角度来审视技术联盟运作,探讨企业在技术联盟中的适应性行为,对提升企业及产业的竞争力具有重要的意义。对此,本文以企业技术联盟的运作机制为研究主体,从微观层面进行了尝试性的研究工作。
     本研究首先从企业双向关系层面切入,抽取影响企业技术联盟运作的主要组织行为特征因素,构建模型研究信任、承诺、交流沟通、冲突降低、保护主义、文化协同、共同愿景、合作等组织行为特征变量对技术联盟绩效的影响作用;其次,从企业个体组织层面,实证研究发展型组织文化、企业家精神如何促进企业外部知识管理能力,进而影响企业联盟网络嵌入性收益的过程,明确企业网络能力差异性的来源;最后,审视技术联盟伙伴关系共同演化过程,构建了技术联盟企业的行为协调机制及网络能力提升机制。
     基于以上研究论证工作,本文得出如下主要结论:(1)联盟企业间的信任、承诺、交流沟通、冲突降低、文化协同对技术联盟合作有着显著的正向影响;保护主义、共同愿景对技术联盟合作的影响并不显著;联盟伙伴合作对技术联盟绩效有显著的正向影响,从而从双向关系层面阐释了企业组织行为特征对技术联盟绩效的影响作用。
     (2)企业文化是企业个体层面上的组织行为特征中影响联盟企业知识管理行为及网络能力的关键因素。发展型文化、企业家精神与企业外部知识保存能力、吸收能力有着显著的正向关系;企业的外部知识保存能力、吸收能力对企业网络嵌入性收益有着显著正向影响;企业外部知识管理能力具有中介作用。发展型企业文化、企业家精神必须通过外部知识管理能力这一中介变量,才能对网络嵌入性收益有较大的正向影响效果。
     (3)技术联盟演化周期可划分为起始、结构化和绩效实现阶段。适应于联盟关系演化各阶段,包含了伙伴选择、法律协调、关系资本协调、交流环境优化、管理系统协调、网络租金协调的协调机制框架,可有效调节企业交互行为。企业可通过构建创新组织文化,培育外部知识保存及吸收能力,以此促进知识共享和学习,实现企业联盟网络能力的提升。
As the technological innovation cycle became shorter, the externalities of network, the complexity and integration of technology increased, the enterprises are difficult to achieve sustained competitive advantage on its own resources alone. The technological alliance as a platform for cooperation and innovation has become an important option for enterprises'technology strategy, while the alliance's performance is closely related to enterprises'organizational behaviors. Therefore, it is of importance to examine the operation of technological alliance and explore the enterprises'adaptive behaviors in technological alliance from the view of organizational behavior. By taking the operating mechanism of enterprises technological alliance as the main research subject, the paper does a tentative research work at micro level.
     Firstly, at interfirm relations level, the paper extracts the main organizational behavior attributes affecting on enterprises technological alliances'operations, and establishes a model on the technological alliance performance relevance of enterprises' organizational behavioral attributes, included trust, commitment, communication, conflict reduction, protectionism, culture synergy, shared vision and cooperation. Secondly, at the individual firm level, the paper has an empirical research on the process that the external knowledge management capacity are correlated with the different dimensions of organizational developmental culture culture and entrepreneurship, and hence to promote the benefits from network embeddedness, and finds the source of differences in network capacity. Finally, the evolution process of alliance partnership is surveyed, and the partnership coordination and networking capabilities enhancement mechanisms for enterprises in technological alliance are established.
     Through theoretical exploration and quantitative analysis, some important conclusions are drawn as follows:(1) trust, commitment, communication, conflict reduction, culture synergy between enterprises in alliance positively and significantly correlates with cooperation. Protectionism and shared vision has no significantly relationship with cooperation. Cooperation positively and significantly correlates with alliance performance. The results show that the technological alliance performance relevance of enterprises' organizational behavioral attributes at interfirm relations level.
     (2) Organizational culture is an important determinant at the firm level that can influence knowledge management behavior and network competence. Developmental culture, entrepreneurship both strongly and positively affect enterprises' external knowledge retention competence and absorptive competence, while external knowledge retention competence and absorptive competence have significant positive impact on enterprises' benefits from network embeddedness. External knowledge management competence mediates the relationship between developmental culture and benefits from network embeddedness. Developmental culture and entrepreneurship can have greater positive effects on benefits only through external knowledge management capability as an intermediary variable.
     (3) Evolution cycle of technological alliance can be divided into initiation, structuration and performance achievement phases. A framework for behavior coordination mechanism adapting to the various evolution stages of alliances are proposed, which consists of partner selection, legal coordination, relationship capital coordination, exchange climate optimization, management system coordination, network rents coordination. It can effectively coordinate enterprises'interactive behaviors. Enterprises can protomote knowledge sharing and learning through developing innovation organizational culture and enhancing external knowledge retention and absorptive competence, hence to improve network competence.
引文
[1]Adobor, H. Trust as sense making:the microdynamics of trust in interfirm alliances [J].Journal of Business Research,2005,58 (3):330-337.
    [2]Alesina, A.& La Ferrara, E. Who trusts others? [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2002,85 (2):207-234.
    [3]Anderson, E. Two firms, one frontier:on assessing joint venture performance [J]. MIT Sloan management Review,1990,31 (2):19-30.
    [4]Antoncic, B.& Prodan, I. Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance:Testing a model on manufacturing firms [J]. Technovation,2008, 28(5):257-265.
    [5]Arend, R.J.& Amit, R. Selection in Strategic Alliance Activity:Effects on Firm Performance in the Computing Industry [J]. European Management Journal,2005, 23(4):361-381.
    [6]Augustine, M. S.& Cooper, C. D. Getting the Most from Strategic Partnering:A Tale of Two Alliances [J]. Organizational Dynamics,2009,38(1):37-51.
    [7]Awazu, Y. Managing technology alliances:The case for knowledge management [J]. International Journal of Information Management,2006,26(6):484-493.
    [8]Baron, R. M.& Kenny, D. A. The mediator-moderator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182
    [9]Bayona, C. et al. Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D:an empirical analysis of Spanish firms [J]. Research Policy,2001,30 (8):1289-1307.
    [10]Becker, W.& Dietz, J. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry [J]. Research Policy,2004,33 (2):209-223.
    [11]Beckman T. A methodology for knowledge management [A]. Harmza, M H. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, ASC [C]. Banff:IASTED ACT Press,1997.
    [12]Belderbos, R. et al. Cooperative R&D and firm performance [J]. Research Policy, 2004,33(10):1477-1492.
    [13]Beneito, P. The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models [J]. Research Policy,2006,35(4):502-517.
    [14]Beugelsdijk, S. et al. Organizational culture, alliance capabilities and social capital (working paper) [Z]. Tilburg:Tilburg University,2004.
    [15]Beugelsdijk, S. et al.. A dyadic approach to the impact of differences in organizational culture on relationship performance [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2009,38(3):312-323.
    [16]Bhaduri, S.& Worch, H., Education, Experience, and the Cognitive Capacity of Entrepreneurs:Some Econometric Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry [EB/OL]. http://www.druid.dk/index.php?id=21,2005
    [17]Bilancini, E.& Boncinelli, L. The co-evolution of cooperation and defection under local interaction and endogenous network formation [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2009,70(1-2):186-195.
    [18]Birchall, J. What motivates members to participate in co-operative and mutual businesses? A theoretical model and some findings [J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,2004,75 (3):465-495.
    [19]Bjomskov, C. The multiple facets of social capital [J]. European Journal of Political Economy,2006,22 (1):22-40.
    [20]Bonte, W.& Keilbach, M. Concubinage or marriage? Informal and formal cooperation for innovation [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2005, 23 (3-4):279-302.
    [21]Bourdieu, P. the Social Space & the Genesis of Groups [J]. Theory and Society, 1985,14(6):723-744.
    [22]Brown, J. S.& Eisenhardt, K. M. Competing on the Edge-Strategy as Structured Chaos [J]. Long Range Planning,1998,31(5):786-789.
    [23]Biichel, B. Framework of Joint Venture Development:Theory-building through Qualitative Research [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2000,37 (5):637-661.
    [24]Buchel, B. Managing Partner Relations in Joint Venture [J]. MIT Sloan Management Review,2003,44 (4):91-95.
    [25]Buyukozkan, G. et al. Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2008,113(1):148-158.
    [26]Caloghirou, Y. et al. Internal capability and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? [J]. Technovation,2004, 24(1):29-39
    [27]Caloghirou, Y. et al. The performance of research partnerships [J]. Managerial and Decision Economics,2003,24 (2-3):85-99.
    [28]Cannon, J. P.& Perreault, W. D. Buyer-seller relationships in business markets [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1999,36(3):439-460.
    [29]Chang, S.C. et al. The effect of alliance experience and intellectual capital on the value creation of international strategic alliances [J]. Omega,2008,36 (2):298-316.
    [30]Chang, Y.C. Benefits of cooperation on innovative performance:evidence from integrated circuits and biotechnology firms in the UK and Taiwan [J]. R & D Management,2003,33 (4):425-437.
    [31]Chen, C. J.& Lin, B. W. The effect of environment knowledge attribute, organizational climate, and firm characteristics on knowledge sourcing decisions [J]. R&D Management,2004,34 (2):137-146.
    [32]Clark, K.& Sefton, M. The Sequential Prisoner's Dilemma:Evidence on Reciprocation [J]. The Economic Journal,2001,111 (468):51-68.
    [33]Cohen, W. M.& Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152
    [34]Cullen, J. B. et al. Success through commitment and trust:the soft side of strategic alliance management [J]. Journal of World Business,2000,35 (3):223-240.
    [35]Das, T. K.& Teng, B. S. A risk perception model of alliance structuring [J]. Journal of International Management,2001,7(1):1-29.
    [36]DeCarolis, D.M.& Deeds, D.L. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance:an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20:953-968.
    [37]DeCourcy, J. Cooperative R&D and strategic trade policy [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics,2005,38(2):546-573.
    [38]Denison, D. R. Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons,1990
    [39]de Man, A. P. et al. Managing dynamics through robust alliance governance structures:The case of KLM and Northwest Airlines [J]. European Management Journal,2010, In Press, Corrected Proof.
    [40]Dhanarag, C.& Parkhe, A. Orchestrating innovation networks [J]. Academy of Management Review,2006,31(3):659-669.
    [41]Dittrich, K. et al. Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks:The case of IBM [J]. Research Policy,2007,36 (10):1496-1511.
    [42]Dollingers, M. J. Entrepreneur ship:Strategies and Resources [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,2003.
    [43]Douma, M. U. et al. Strategic Alliances Management the Dynamics of Fit [J]. Long Range Planning,2000,33(4):579-598.
    [44]Draulans, J. et al. Building alliance capability:management techniques for superior alliance performance [J]. Long Range Planning,2003,36(2):151-166.
    [45]Emanuela, T.& David, K. Strategic alliances and models of collaboration [J]. Management Decision,2005,43(1):123-148.
    [46]Emden, Z. et al. Learning from experience in international alliances:antecedents and firm performance implications [J]. Journal of Business Research,2005,58(7): 883-892.
    [47]Escribano, A. et al. Managing external knowledge flows:The moderating role of absorptive capacity [J]. Research Policy,2009,38(1):96-105.
    [48]Faems, D. et al. The role of inter-organizational collaboration within innovation strategies:towards a portfolio approach [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2004,22 (3):221-235.
    [49]Famuyiwa, O. et al. An integrated fuzzy-goal-programming-based framework for selecting suppliers in strategic alliance formation [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2008,113(2):862-875.
    [50]Fosfuri, A.& Tribo, J. A. Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance [J]. Omega,2008,36(2):173-187
    [51]Freidheim, C. F. The Trillion-Dollar Enterprise:How the Alliance Revolution Will Transform Global Business [M]. New York:Perseus Books,2000.
    [52]Freeman, C. Network of innovators:A synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy,1991,20(5):499-514.
    [53]Fryxell, G.E. et al. After the Ink Dries:the Interaction of Trust and Control in US-based International Joint Ventures [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2002,39 (6):865-886.
    [54]Garcia-Canal, E. et al. Technological flows and choice of joint ventures in technology alliances [J]. Research Policy,2008,37(1):97-114.
    [55]George, G. et al. The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance:A study of biotechnology firms [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research,2001,12(2):205-226
    [56]George, G. et al. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance:a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2002,17:577-609.
    [57]Gill, J.& Butler, R. J. Managing Instability in Cross-Cultural Alliances [J]. Long Range Planning,2003,36(6):543-563.
    [58]Glaister, K.W.& Buckley, P.J. Measures of Performance in UK International Alliances [J]. Organization Studies,1998,19 (1):89-118.
    [59]Grant, R. M.& Baden-Fuller, C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliance [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2004,41(1):61-84.
    [60]Gregory, B. T. et al. Organizational culture and effectiveness:A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes [J]. Journal of Business Research,2009,62(7): 673-679
    [61]Gudmundson, D. et al. Innovation in small businesses:culture and ownership structure do matter [J].Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship,2003,8 (1): 1-17.
    [62]Gulati, R. Alliances and networks [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19 (4):293-317.
    [63]Gulati, R. Managing network resources:alliances, affiliations and other relational assets [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2007.
    [64]Gulati, R. et al. Breaking up is never easy:planning for exit in a Strategic alliance [J]. California Management Review,2008,50(4):147-163.
    [65]Hagedoorn, J. et al. Research partnerships [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(4-5): 567-586
    [66]Hamel, G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances [J]. Strategic management journal,1991, 12(4):83-103.
    [67]Helfat, C. E.& Lieberman, M. B., The birth of capabilities:market entry and the importance of pre-history [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2002,11(4):725-760
    [68]Hoang, H.& Antoncic, B. Network-based research in entrepreneurship:a critical review [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2003,18(2):165-187.
    [69]Hoffmann, W. H.& Schaper-Rinkel, W. Acquire or ally? A strategy framework for deciding between acquisition and cooperation [J]. Management International Review, 2001,41(2):131-159.
    [70]Inkpen, A.C.& Currall, S.C. The Coevolution of Trust, Control, and Learning in Joint Ventures [J]. Organization Science,2004,15 (5):586-599.
    [71]Inkpen, A. C.& Tsang, E. W. K. Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer [J]. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(1):146-165
    [72]INSEAD & Booz, Allen & Hamilton. Innovation:Is Global the Way Forward? [R], Fontainebleau:INSEAD,2006.
    [73]Ireland, R. D.& Webb, J. W. Strategic entrepreneurship:Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation [J]. Business Horizons,2007,50(1):49-59.
    [74]Jansen, J. J. P. et al. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity:how do organizational antecedents matters? [J].Academy of Management Journal,2005, 48(6):999-1015
    [75]Jiang, X.& Li, Y. An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance:The case of alliances [J]. Research Policy,2009,38(2): 358-368.
    [76]Kale, P. et al. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success:the role of the alliance function [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002, 23(8):747-767.
    [77]Kandemir, D. et al. Alliance Orientation:Conceptualization, Measurement, and Impact on Market Performance [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2006,34(3):324-340.
    [78]Kauser, S.& Shaw, V. The influence of behavioral and organizational characteristics on the success of international strategic alliances [J]. International Marketing Review,2004.21(1):17-52.
    [79]Kelley, D. J.& Rice, M.P. Advantage beyond founding. Strategic use of technologies [J].Journal of Business Venturing,2002,17(1):41-57.
    [80]Kelley, D. J. et al. Intra-organizational networking for innovation-based corporate entrepreneurship [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009,24(3):221-235.
    [81]Kelly, M. J. et al. Managing alliance relationships:key challenges in the early stages of collaboration [J]. R & D Management,2002,32 (1):11-22.
    [82]Khanna, T. et al. The dynamics of learning alliances:Competition, cooperation and relative scope [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19 (3):193-210.
    [83]Kim, C.& Song, J. Creating new technology through alliances:An empirical investigation of joint patents [J]. Technovation,2007,27 (8):461-470.
    [84]Kim, L. The dynamics of Samsung's technological learning in semiconductors [J]. California Management Review.1997,39(3):86-100.
    [85]Kim, T. Y. et al. Framing interorganizational network change:a network inertia perspective [J]. Academy of Management Review,2006,31(3):704-720
    [86]Kogut, B.& Zander, U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1993,24 (4):625-645.
    [87]Kopelman, S. The effect of culture and power on cooperation in commons dilemmas: Implications for global resource management [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2009,108(1):153-163.
    [88]Krogh, G. et al. Making the Most of Your Company's Knowledge:A Strategic Framework [J]. Long Range Planning,2001,34 (4):421-439.
    [89]Kumar, R.& Nti, K.O. Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics:a process and outcome discrepancy model [J]. Organization Science,1998,9(3): 356-367.
    [90]Lancaster, A.& Lages, L. F. The relationship between buyer and a B2B e-marketplace:Cooperation determinants in an electronic market context [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2006,35(6):774-789.
    [91]Lavie, D. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms:an extension of the resource-based view [J]. Academy of Management Review,2006,31(3):638-658.
    [92]Lee, J. et al. A hidden cost of strategic alliances under Schumpeterian dynamics [J]. Research Policy,2010,39(2):229-238.
    [93]Lee, S. C. et al. The Effect of Knowledge Protection, Knowledge Ambiguity, and Relational Capital on Alliance Performance [J]. Knowledge and Process Management,2007,14(1):58-69.
    [94]Lee, Y.& Cavusgil, S.T. Enhancing alliance performance:The effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance [J]. Journal of Business Research,2006,59 (8):896-905.
    [95]Leiblein, M. J.& Reuer, J. J. Building a foreign sales base:the roles of capabilities and alliances for entrepreneurial firms [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2004, 19(2):285-307.
    [96]Lichtenthaler, U. Relative capacity:Retaining knowledge outside a firm's boundaries [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2008,25(3):200-212
    [97]Liebowitz, J. Knowledge Retention:Strategies and Solutions [M]. New York:CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group,2008
    [98]Lin, W. B. Factors affecting the correlation between interactive mechanism of strategic alliance and technological knowledge transfer performance [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research,2007,17(2):139-155.
    [99]Link, A. N. et al. An analysis of policy initiatives to promote strategic research partnerships [J]. Research Policy,2002,31(8-9):1459-1466
    [100]Loof, H.& Heshmati, A. Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity:a firm-level innovation study [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2002, 76(1):61-85.
    [101]Lunnan, R.& Haugland, S.A. Predicting and measuring alliance performance:a multidimensional analysis [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29 (5):545-556.
    [102]Luo, Y. D. Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23 (10):903-919.
    [103]Luo, Y. Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29 (1):27-46.
    [104]Man, T.W.Y. et al.The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises:a conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2002,17(2):123-142
    [105]Marsh, S. J.& Stock, G. N. Creating dynamic capability:the role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2006,23(5):422-436.
    [106]McEvily, B.& Marcus, A. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26(11):1033-1055.
    [107]McEvily, B. et al. Trust as an Organizing Principle [J]. Organization Science,2003, 14(1):91-103.
    [108]Mesquita, L. F. et al. Comparing the resource-based and relational views:knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008, 29(9):913-941.
    [109]Michael, L.& Andrew, K. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004, 25(4):331-345.
    [110]Minbaeva, D. et al. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2003,34(6):586-599.
    [111]Moatti, V. Learning to expand or expanding to learn? The role of imitation and experience in the choice among several expansion modes [J]. European Management Journal,2009,27(1):36-46.
    [112]Mohr, A.T. A multiple constituency approach to IJV performance measurement [J]. Journal of World Business,2006,41 (3):247-260.
    [113]Mohr, J.& Spekman, R. Characteristics of partnership success:Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15 (2):135-152.
    [114]Morgan, R.M.& Hunt, S.D. The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing [J]. Journal of Marketing,1994,58 (3):20-38.
    [115]Mumford, M. D. et al, Leading creative people:Orchestrating expertise and relationships [J]. The Leadership,2002,13(6):705-750
    [116]Muthusamy, S. K., White, M. A. and Carr, A. An empirical examination of the role of social exchanges in alliance performance [J]. Journal of Managerial Issues,2007, 19(1):53-75.
    [117]Nevis, E. C. et al. Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems [J]. MIT Sloan Management Review,1995,36(2):73-85.
    [118]Newbert, S. L. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm:an assessment and suggestions for future research [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007,28(2):121-146.
    [119]Nielsen, B. B. Determining international strategic alliance performance:A multidimensional approach [J]. International Business Review,2007,16 (3):337-361.
    [120]Nonaka, I.& Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-creating company:How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995.
    [121]Norman, P. M. Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances:Resource and relational characteristics [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research,2002,13 (2): 177-202.
    [122]NSF. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008 [R]. Arlington, VA:NSF,2008.
    [123]Ojah, K. Costs, valuation, and long-term operating effects of global strategic alliances [J]. Review of Financial Economics,2007,16 (1):69-90.
    [124]Ojah, K.& Monplaisir, L. Investors' valuation of global product design and development [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2003,34 (5):457-472.
    [125]Okamuro, H. Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses:The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics [J]. Research Policy,2007,36 (10):1529-1544.
    [126]Orsenigo, L. et al. Technological change and network dynamics:Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry [J]. Research Policy,2001,30(3):485-508
    [127]Osborn, R.N.& Baughn, C. C. Forms of Interorganizational Governance for Multinational Alliances [J]. The Academy of Management Journal,1990,33 (3):503-519
    [128]Oxley, J. E.& Sampson, R. C. The Scope and Governance of International R&D Alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25 (8-9):723-750.
    [129]Ozgen, E.& Baron, R. A., Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2007,22(2):174-192
    [130]Ozman M. Knowledge integration and network formation [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2006,73(9):1121-1143
    [131]Parkhe, A. Messy research, methodological predispositions, and theory development in international joint ventures [J]. Academy of Management Review,1993,18 (2): 227-268.
    [132]Probert, D.& Radnor, M. Technology roadmapping:Frontier experiences from industry-academia consortia [J]. Research Technology Management,2003,46(2): 27-31.
    [133]Provan, K.G.& Kenis, P. Modes of Network Governance:Structure, Management, and Effectiveness [J]. Journal Public Administration Theory and Review,2008,18 (2):229-252.
    [134]Rahman, N. Duality of Alliance Performance [J]. Journal of American Academy of Business,2006,10 (1):305-311.
    [135]Rank, O. N. Formal structures and informal networks:Structural analysis in organizations [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management,2008,24(2):145-161.
    [136]Reagans, R.& McEvily, B. Network structure and knowledge transfer:the effects of cohesion and range [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48(2):240-267.
    [137]Reich, B. H. Management knowledge and learning in it projects:a conceptual framework and guidelines for practice [J]. Project Management Journal,2007,38(2): 5-17.
    [138]Revilla, E. et al. Towards a knowledge management and learning taxonomy for research joint ventures [J]. Technovation,2005,25(11):1307-1316
    [139]Ritter, T. et al. A firm's ability to manage in business networks:a review of concepts [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2004,33(3):175-183.
    [140]Ritter, T.& Gemunden, H. G. The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success [J]. Journal of Business Research,2004,57(5):548-556
    [141]Robson, M.J. et al. Behavioral attributes and performance in international strategic alliances:Review and future directions [J]. International Marketing Review,2006, 23 (6):585-609.
    [142]Robson, M.J. et al. Factors Influencing International Joint Venture Performance: Theoretical Perspectives, Assessment, and Future Directions [J]. Management International Review,2002,42 (4):385-418.
    [143]Rothaermel, F. T.& Deeds, D. L. Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2006,21(4):429-460
    [144]Sadowski, B.& Duysters, G. Strategic technology alliance termination:An empirical investigation [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2008,25(4): 305-320.
    [145]Saebi, T.& Dong, Q. Strategic motivations for Sino-Western alliances:a comparative analysis of Chinese and Western alliance formation drivers (working Paper) [Z]. United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology,2008.
    [146]Saritas, O.& Oner, M. A. Systemic Analysis of UK Foresight Results Joint Application of Integrated Management Model and Roadmapping [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2004,71(1-2):27-65.
    [147]Sarkar, M.B. et al. The Influence of Complementarity, Compatibility, and Relationship Capital on Alliance Performance [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2001,29 (4):358-373.
    [148]Schumacher, C. Trust--a source of success in strategic alliances [J]. Schmalenbach Business Review,2006,58 (3):259-278.
    [149]Seppanen, R. et al. Measuring inter-organizational trust-A critical review of the empirical research in 1990-2003 [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2007,36(2): 249-265
    [150]Shane, S. Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurship Opportunities [J]. Organization Science,2000, 11(4):448-469
    [151]Shane, S. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship:The Individual-Opportunity Nexus [M]. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing,2003
    [152]Shane, S.& Venkataraman, S. The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research [J]. Academy of Management Review,2000,25 (1):217-226
    [153]Shenkar,O. Cultural distance revisited:Toward a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences [J].Journal of International Business Studies,2001,32 (3):519-535.
    [154]Sher, P.J.& Yang, P.Y. The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance:the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry [J]. Technovation,2005,25 (1):33-43.
    [155]Silipo, D.B.& Weiss, A. Cooperation and competition in an R&D market with spillovers [J]. Research in Economics,2005,59 (1):41-57.
    [156]Simonin, B. L. An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2004, 35 (4):407-427.
    [157]Sirmon, D. G.& Lane, P. J. A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2004,35 (4):306-319.
    [158]Subramaniam, M.& Youndt, M. A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities [J]. Academy of Management,2005,48 (3):450-463.
    [159]Teng, B. S. Corporate Entrepreneurship Activities through Strategic Alliances:A Resource-Based Approach toward Competitive Advantage [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2007,44 (1):119-142.
    [160]Teng, B. S.& Das T. K. Governance structure choice in strategic alliances:The roles of alliance objectives, alliance management experience, and international partners [J]. Management Decision,2008,46(5):725-742.
    [161]Tsai, K. H. Collaborative networks and product innovation performance:Toward a contingency perspective [J]. Research Policy,2009,38(5):765-778.
    [162]Tsai, W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(5):996-1004.
    [163]Tsai, W.& Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation:an empirical study of intra-firm networks [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1998,41(1):464-476. [164] Tsang, E. W. K. Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy:Learning-by-doing and learning myopia [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(4):835-854. [165] Tsang, E.W.K. et al. Knowledge Acquisition and Performance of International Joint Ventures in the Transition Economy of Vietnam [J]. Journal of International Marketing,2004,12 (2):82-103. [166] UNESCO. World Science Report 2005 [R]. Paris:UNESCO,2005. [167] Viklamo, T.& Keil, T. Strategic Partnering in High-velocity Environments Lessons from a Case Study [J]. Technovation,2003,23(3):194-204. [168] Volberda H.W.& Lewin, A.Y. Co-evolutionary Dynamics Within and Between Firms:From Evolution to Co-evolution [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2003, 40(8):2111-2136 [169] Vonortas, N. S. Cooperation in Research and Development [M]. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1997 [170] Wadeson, N., Projects as Search Processes [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2005,23(6):421-427 [171] Wahyuni, S. et al. Managing international strategic alliance relationships [J]. Thunderbird International Business Review,2007,49(6):671-687. [172] Walter, J. et al. Disentangling Alliance Management Processes:Decision Making, Politicality, and Alliance Performance [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2008, 45(3):530-560. [173] White, S.& Lui S. S.-Y. Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26(10):913-932. [174] Wiklund, J.& Shepherd, D. A. The Effectiveness of Alliances and Acquisitions:The Role of Resource Combination Activities [J]. Entrepreneurship:Theory & Practice, 2009,33(1):193-212. [175] Wilson, J.& Hynes, N. Co-evolution of firms and strategic alliances:Theory and empirical evidence [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2009 76(5): 620-628 [176] Wittmann, C. M. et al. Explaining alliance success:Competences, resources, relational factors, and resource-advantage theory [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2009,38(7):743-756.
    [177]Wong; A. et al. Social face for innovation in strategic alliances in China:the mediating roles of resource exchange and reflexivity [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2007,28 (8):961-978.
    [178]Xia, T.& Roper, S. From capability to connectivity--Absorptive capacity and exploratory alliances in biopharmaceutical firms:A US-Europe comparison [J]. Technovation,2008,28(11):776-785.
    [179]Ybarra, C. E.& Turk, T. A. The evolution of trust in information technology alliances [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2009,20(1): 62-74.
    [180]Yli-Renko, H. et al. Social capital, knowledge acquisition and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22 (6/7):587-613.
    [181]Yli-Renko, H. et al. Social capital, knowledge, and the international growth of technology-based new firms, International Business Review,2002,11(3):279-304.
    [182]Zahra, S. A.& Hayton, J. C. The effect of international venturing on firm performance:The moderating influence of absorptive capacity [J]. Journal of Business Venturing 2008,23(2):195-220.
    [183]Zahra, S. A., George, G. Absorptive capacity:a review, reconceptualization, and extension [J]. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):185-203.
    [184]Zeybek, A.Y. et al. Perceived cultural congruence's influence on employed communication strategies and resultant performance:a transitional economy international joint venture illustration [J]. International Business Review,2003,12 (4):499-521.
    [185]Zollo, M.& Winter, S. Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities [J]. Organization Science,2002,13(3),339-351.
    [186][法]布尔迪厄著.包亚明译.文化资本与社会炼金术[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
    [187]常荔等.论基于战略联盟的关系资本的形成[J].外国经济与管理,2002,24(7):29-33.
    [188]陈菲琼.企业知识联盟——理论与实证研究[M].上海:商务印书馆,2003.
    [189]陈学光.企业网络能力——网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2008.
    [190]陈衍泰等.开放式创新文化与企业创新绩效关系的研究——来自江浙沪闽四地的数据实证[J].科学学研究,2007,25(3):567-572.
    [191]冯进路.企业联盟知识转移与技术创新[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2007.
    [192][美]弗兰西斯科·福山著.李宛蓉译.信任——社会道德与繁荣的创造[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,1998.
    [193]葛顺奇.跨国公司技术战略与发展中国家技术模式选择[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2004.
    [194]顾新等.社会资本及其在知识链中的作用[J].科研管理,2003,24(5):44-48.
    [195]贺小刚等.核心能力理论的拓展:企业家能力与竞争绩效的关系研究[J].科研管理,2007,28(4):141-147.
    [196]霍云福等.企业创新网络研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(10):50-53.
    [197]胡平波.网络组织合作创新中知识共享及协调机制[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2009.
    [198]李红玲,钟书华.企业技术联盟成本及其分配[J].科研管理,2001,22(4):92-98.
    [199]李顺才,李伟.基于知识根植性视角的联盟协作创新研究[J].研究与发展管理,2007,19(1):1-5.
    [200]李顺才等.企业家先验知识、创新认知与创新力关系研究——关于企业家创新行为的理论分析框架[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(5):174-178.
    [201]李永锋,司春林.合作创新战略联盟中企业间相互信任问题的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2007,19(6):52-60.
    [202]林泽炎,刘理晖.转型时期中国企业家胜任特征的探索性研究[J].管理世界,2007(1):98-104.
    [203]刘学等.信任、关系、控制与研发联盟绩效——基于中国制药产业的研究[J].南开管理评论,2008,11(3):44-50.
    [204]龙勇等.技能型战略联盟基于信任的知识获取和合作效应实证研究[J],研究与发展管理,2006,18(5):36-43.
    [205]卢福财,胡平波.网络租金及其形成机理分析[J].中国工业经济,2006(6):84-90.
    [206]罗炜,唐元虎.企业合作创新的模式及其选择[J].科学学研究,2001,19(4):103-108.
    [207]马刚.基于战略网络视角的产业区企业竞争优势实证研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2004.
    [208]邱皓政,林碧芳.结构方程模型的原理与应用[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2009.
    [209]史会斌等.企业家导向对联盟绩效的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(3):65-68.
    [210]水常青,许庆瑞.企业创新文化理论研究述评[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(3):138-142.
    [211][美]斯蒂芬·P·罗宾斯著.孙建敏,李原等译.组织行为学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
    [212]邬爱其.企业创新网络构建与演进的影响因素实证研究[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1):62-70.
    [213]谢洪明等.企业文化、学习与创新绩效的关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(3):73-77.
    [214]徐金发,许强,王勇.企业的网络能力剖析[J].外国经济与管理,2001,23(11):21-25.
    [215]徐艳梅,韩福荣.对中外合营企业稳定性的分析及评价[J].中国软科学,2000(6):54-59.
    [216]薛澜,沈群红.战略技术联盟研究的基本问题及其新进展[J].经济学动态,2001(6):21-27.
    [217]叶飞,徐学军.动态联盟的绩效评价指标体系及其评价方法[J].中国软科学,2000(9):33-37.
    [218]曾德明等.技术标准联盟成员的谈判与联盟治理结构研究[J].中国软科学,2007(3):16-21
    [219]张坚.企业技术联盟绩效评价体系的比较和发展趋势分析[J].科研管理,2006,27(1):29-34.
    [220]张坚.企业技术联盟的绩效评价[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007
    [221]张利飞等.技术标准联盟治理的本质分析[J].科学学研究,2007,25(4):687-690.
    [222]张延峰.战略联盟中信任、控制对合作风险的影响及其组合绩效研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007.
    [223]张运生,张利飞.高技术产业技术标准联盟治理模式分析[J].科研管理,2007,28(6):93-97.
    [224]郑胜华.透视企业联盟能力:基于动态能力的S-IPL分析框架[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007.
    [225]周文.分工、信任与企业成长[M].北京:商务印书馆,2009.
    [226]周子敬.结构方程模式(SEM):精通LISREL[M].台北:全华科技图书,2006.
    [227]朱凌.创新型企业文化的结构与重建[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2008.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700