用户名: 密码: 验证码:
公共项目公私伙伴关系合作机理与监管政策研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
PPP (Public-private partnerships)模式是介于外包和私有化之间并结合了两者特点的一种公共产品提供方式。PPP模式下公共部门和私人企业共同参与公共项目的建设和运营,共同分担风险,发挥各自的优势以便更好地为社会提供公共服务。由于人们对PPP模式合作机理的认识不够深入,加之PPP模式实施周期长,可以模仿的实例较少,在一定程度上限制了PPP模式的推广和应用。本文在讨论PPP模式的经济特性和公共项目公私合作形成机制的基础上,研究PPP项目的产权结构与效率的关系,PPP项目的风险分摊机理,以及PPP项目的组织演化机理;建立了PPP模式的项目治理结构,以及处于困境PPP项目的管理决策方法;提出了
     PPP项目风险分担方式与风险管理方法,以及PPP项目政府监管政策与制度保障。最后以水务项目和公路项目公私合作为例进行PPP项目合作机理的例证分析。PPP模式与一般合同承包相比较具有其经济特性:联合投入,社会福利的帕累托次优性,社会成本节约大于社会福利损失,政府职能的双重性及PPP项目产权的明晰性等。通过分析PPP模式的经济特性,需要重新界定公共部门在PPP项目中的作用,科学设计PPP项目的治理机制,提升公共服务的供给水平。
     研究PPP模式合作机理的主要理论依据包括:公共项目区分理论,有效竞争理论,可竞争市场理论,激励性规制理论和PPP模式选择的资金价值理论。
     推行PPP模式必须设计科学的合作机制。为实现公共项目的投资效益,应建立收益公平分配机制和利益补偿机制,公私合作的双赢机制,以及公私合作功能与利益协调机制。考虑公共项目及准公共品的公益性,应该兼顾效率与公平,建立科学的激励机制与市场监督机制。为了控制道德风险,应该建立公私合作道德风险自律机制,提高道德风险成本,提高投资者的退出成本。
     关于PPP项目产权结构的研究表明:当私人公司控股时,社会成本节约水平取决于利润分配比例的高低;当国家控股时,社会福利损失较小,但私人公司努力程度低于理想水平。政府应根据公私合作带来社会成本的节约与社会福利损失的大小来选择合理的产权结构,对排它成本高的公共项目主要由政府供给。论文建立了PPP模式下项目治理的一般框架,即建立产权明晰,剩余索取权与控制权基本对应,政府监督、合同约束和社会监督相结合的项目治理结构。
     根据能力原则和损失原则,论文讨论了PPP项目典型风险的识别与风险分担方式,对可转移风险建立了风险分担机制,运用模糊综合评价法计算公私双方风险分摊系数及基于风险的利益分配方法。为有效控制PPP项目的风险,应该建立公私合作双方风险协同管理平台。
     由于公共基础设施PPP模式的实施时间长,合作中难免出现困境,本论文分析了PPP模式组织演变的一般过程。提出公私双方相互作用的利益均衡及稳定性,由双方的相互贡献系数及独立投资效用增长率共同决定,当一方对另一方贡献为正,则双方积极合作。研究表明,政府对处于困境PPP项目进行挽救的依据是破产的社会成本大于挽救补贴的社会成本。
     政府应根据项目的不同性质建立监管与规制方法,确立科学的监管途径。为了有效进行价格监管,本论文建立了公共项目PPP模式下价格形成机制的框架。论文应用Baron-Myserson理论,基于服务质量和成本建立了社会福利最大并满足私人企业参与约束和相容约束的激励机制设计模型,以诱导私人公司显示成本与质量的真实信息,并以成本与服务质量来制定管制价格。为了顺利推行PPP模式,提出应该建立的相关制度保障体系。文章以水务项目和公路项目公私合作为例进行PPP项目管理组织、定价机制、风险分担与项目回购的例证分析。
Public-private partnerships are a way of public product provision, which is between service outsourcing and privatization and combines the characteristics of the two management styles. Under ppp mode, the public sector and private enterprises participate in public construction projects and operations, share the risks, and exert their own advantages to provide better provision of public services together. The understandings about cooperation mechanism of the PPP mode that people have are not deep enough, in addition to long-term implementation of PPP model and fewer examples that can be imitated, so to some extent, this way has limited the promotion and application of the PPP model. At the basis of PPP model’s economic characteristics and the formation mechanism of public-private partnerships in public projects, this paper will research on the relationship of the structure of property rights and social efficiency of PPP project, risk-sharing mechanism, and mechanism of microstructure evolution; set up management structure of PPP and the policy decision on saving the projects in a difficult situation; advance the risk-sharing and management method of PPP projects, government regulatory policy and institution security system. Finally, a water project and highway project about public-private partnerships are taken as an example to carry out PPP projects empirical analysis of the mechanism.
     Compared with the general contracts, PPP model has its economic characteristics, including united inputs, social welfare’s Pareto sub-optimal,social cost savings which are greater than the loss of social welfare, the twofold duty of the government and PPP project’s property rights is distinct etc. By analyzing the economic characteristics of PPP, it is necessary to redefine the role of the public sector in public-private partnerships, manage PPP projects targeted and enhance the level of the supply of public services.
     Main theoretical basis of cooperation mechanism on PPP model includes the distinction theory of public projects, the theory of effective competition, the theory about the competitive market , the theory of incentive regulation and the theory of funding value of PPP model’s selection.
     It is required to design a scientific co-operation mechanism to implement PPP model. For the realization of project’s investment returns, it is necessary to set up the mechanism of the income’s equitable distribution and benefits compensation, the win-win cooperate mechanism,the mechanism of the function of public-private partnership and benefit’s coordinate. Considering the public welfare of public projects and quasi-public goods, it should take into account efficiency and equity,set up a prompting mechanism and a science market monitoring mechanism to the project company. In order to control the risk of moral hazard, it also should set up the self-regulatory mechanism on moral hazard of public-private partnerships, enhance the costs of moral hazard and exiting to the investor.
     The research on PPP project’s structure of property rights has shown that: when it is hold by a private company, the level of cost savings depends on the level of the ratio of profit distribution. When it is hold by the government, the welfare loss is smaller, however, the effort of private companies is lower than the optimal level. Based on cost savings brought about by public-private partnerships and the size of social welfare’s loss, government should select the structure of property rights reasonably ,and the high cost is mainly provided by the government. This paper has set up the general framework of the project governance under the PPP model, and has set up the project management structure, which makes property rights identified clearly, makes residual claim and controls over basic corresponding, and has a combination of government supervision, social supervision and contract constraints.
     In accordance with the principle of capacity and the principle of losses, this paper has discussed the PPP projects’identification of typical risk and approaches of risk-sharing, set up a risk-sharing mechanism for the risk which could be transferred, calculated the risk-sharing coefficient of both public and private and the distribution methods of interests based on the risk with the use of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. In order to control the risks of PPP projects effectively, a public-private collaborative risk management platform should be set up.
     Because of the long time of public infrastructure of PPP models’implementation, it is inevitable that there are difficulties in co-operation; this paper has analyzed the general process of the PPP model’s evolution. The interests of balance and stability interacted between public and private are determined by the contribution coefficient of each other and the effectiveness growth rate of independent investment together, when one side’s contribution is positive to the other side, then the two sides are very cooperative. The studies have shown that the foundation that government saves the projects in a difficult situation is that administrative costs of bankruptcy are greater then administrative costs of saving-subsidies.
     The government should set up supervision and regulation methods according the different nature of the project, determine the scientifical supervision way. In order to supervise price effectively, the thesis sets up the pricing mechanism. Using the Baron-Myserson theory, a prompting mechanism model which realizes the maximum of social welfare and satisfies to private enterprise participating in restriction and consistent restriction is built, induces private enterprise to show the true information of cost and quality,and constitute controlled price by cost and quality. The thesis raised that the implementation of PPP models is required to set up security system related institution. This paper has carried out empirical analysis about PPP’s management organizations, pricing mechanisms , risk-sharing and buy-back of project with the example of a water supply project and highway about public-private partnerships.
引文
[1] David Hall,Robin de la Motte,Steve Davis. Terminology of Public–private partnerships [J]. Public Services International Research Unit,2003, 6: 23-28.
    [2] Ramina Sami i,Luk N Van Wassenhove,Shantanu Bhattacharya. An innovative public- private partnerships: New approach to development[J] .World Development,2002,30 (6): 991-1008.
    [3] David J Spielman,K1aus von Grebmer. Public-Private Partnerships in agriculture research: An analysis of challenges facing industry and the consultative group on international agricultural research [R]. Environment and Production Technology Division,2004:13.
    [4] Shafiful Azam Ahmed , Mansoor A1i. Partnerships for solid waste management in developing countries: Linking theories to realities[J] .Habitat International,2004, 28 (3): 467-479.
    [5]李秀辉,张世英. PPP:一种新的项目融资方式[J].中国软科学,2002, 17(2): 51-54.
    [6] E.S.萨瓦斯[美].民营化与公私部门的伙伴关系[M].中国人民大学出版社,2002:105-107.
    [7]龙新民,陈湘满,张萤.西方公共产品私人提供实验研究最新进[J].湘谭大学学报(哲社版),2006, 5: 53-57.
    [8] Scharle, P. PPP in transport infrastruction development as a social game [J]. Innovation , 2002, 15 (3): 32-38.
    [9] Shubik, M. Game Theory in the Social Sciences (Concepts and Solutions)[M]. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1982: 45-51.
    [10]刘晓君,张宏.基于BOT与TOT的基础设施项目融资模式—TBT[J].西安建筑科技大学学报,2004, 1: 22-25.
    [11]刘新平,王守清.试论PPP项目的风险分配原则和框架[J].建筑经济,2006, 2: 59-64.
    [12]彭桃花,赖国锦. PPP模式的风险分析与对策[J].中国工程咨询,2004, 7: 11-13.
    [13]冯蔚东,陈剑.虚拟企业中的风险分析与监控[J].中国管理科学,2001, 9(5):24-31.
    [14] Miao chang . International experience of PPP for urban enviromental infrastructure, and its application to China[J]. International Review for Enviromental Strategies. 2003, 4(2): 223-248.
    [15] Darrin Grimsey,Mervyn K.Lewis.Evaluating the risk of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects[J].International Journal of Project Management,2002, 20: 107-118.
    [16] Li Bing, A. Akintoye , P.J. Edwards ,C. Hardcaste. The allocation of risk in PPP/FPIconstruction projects in the UK [J]. International Journal of project management, 2005, 23 : 25-35.
    [17]王雪青,喻刚,邴兴国. PPP项目融资模式风险分担研究[J].软科学, 2007, 21(6): 39-42.
    [18]刘江华.项目融资风险分担研究[J].工业技术经济,2006, 8: 125-127.
    [19]范小军,赵一,钟根元.基础项目融资风险的分担比例研究[J].管理工程学报,2007, 21(1): 98-101.
    [20] Arturo OLivera, Risk allocation in infrastructure financing [J] .The Journal of Project Finance, 1997, 2 : 38-42.
    [21] Mc Comick ,R . Risk allocation: towards a standardizd approach? [J] .Infrastructure Journal, 1999,11:52-62.
    [22] Zhang WR,Wang SQ,Tiong RLK,Ting SK,Ashley D. Risk management of Shanghai’s privately financed Yan’an Donglu tunnels[J]. Eng Construct Architect Manage ,1998, 5(4): 399-409.
    [23] Hambros, SG. Public–private partnerships for highways: experience, structure, financing [J]. Applicability and Comparative Assessment, 1999, 18: 32-36
    [24] Hood, John; Mc Garvey, Neil. Managing the risks of public-private partnerships in Scottish local government [J].Policy Studies , 2002, 23(1): 21-35.
    [25] Jorge L. Ricaurte,Carlos A. Arboleda, Feniosky Pena-Mora. Civil engineers in Public-Private Partnerships and as master planners for infrastructure development[J]. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 2008, 8(4): 276-286.
    [26]李正图.混合所有制公司制企业的制度选择和制度安排研究[J].上海经济研究, 2005, 5:19-27.
    [27]于国安.基础设施特许权合约设计的经济分析[D].河海大学博士学位论文,2004, 5:43-52.
    [28]刘灿.试论我国自然垄断行业放松规制的所有制度[J].经济评论,2004, 4: 55-59.
    [29]张晖.开放条件下的市场结构变化与国有经济改革[J].经济评论,2006, 6: 105-114.
    [30]袁义才.公共产品的产权经济学分析[J].江汉论坛,2003, 34(6): 25-28.
    [31]赵俊怀.论我国地方公共产品供给民营化[J].经济体制改革,2003, 21(6): 26-29.
    [32] David Martimort, Jerome Pouyet. To build or not to build: Normative and positive theories of public-private partnerships[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2008, 26(2): 393-411.
    [33] Shepsle, K. A. Game theory, structure, and sequence: the contributions of Reinhard Selten to political analysis[C]. Competition and Cooperation, Russell Sage Foundation, 1999: 256–272.
    [34] Grout, P. The economics of the Private Finance Initiative[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1997, 13(4): 53–67.
    [35]谈毅.创业投资过程中的团队生产、监控与激励[J].科研管理, 2004, 25(9): 132-139.
    [36] Eric Maskin,Jean Tirole . Public-private partnerships and government spending limits[J]. International journal of industrial organization, 2008, 26(2): 412-420.
    [37]危启才,李楚霖.论不完全信息下公共产品的自愿供给效率[J].经济数学, 2005, 19(2): 136-143.
    [38]谢贞发.民营化改革的所有权结构选择[J].财经研究,2005, 31(7): 40-50.
    [39]汪秋明.自然垄断产业国有企业民营化的均衡分析[J].财经研究,2005, 31(2): 60-65.
    [40]王自力.公用事业民营化:理论盲点与政策建议[J].改革,2004, 17(3): 19-21.
    [41]王灏.市轨道交通项目PPP模式的结构分析[J].中国投资,2004, 22(7): 110-113.
    [42]汪应洛,李垣,刘益.企业柔性战略-跨世纪战略管理研究与实践的前沿[J].管理科学学报, 1998, 7(1): 24-27.
    [43] Sah R.K. and J. E. Stiglitz. The architecture of economic systems : Hierarchies and polyarchies [J] . American Economic Review , 1986 ,76 :716 - 727.
    [44] Brander J . A. ,Amit R. ,Antweiler W. . Venture capital syndication :improved venture selection versus the value- added hypothesis [J] . Journal of Economics and Management Strategy ,2002 ,11 (3) :423 - 452.
    [45] Arping S. The role of convertibles in syndicated venture financing [J]. Journal of Business Venturing ,2002 , 2 : 139 - 154.
    [46] Casamatta C. Financing and advising : optimal financial contracts with venture capitalists [J] . Journal of Finance , 2003 , 58(5):2059 - 2086.
    [47] Carol Jacobson,Sang Ok Choi. Success factors: public works and public-private partnerships [J].International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2008, 22(6): 637-657.
    [48] Sorenson O. , Stuart T. E. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments [J] . American Journal of Sociology ,2001 , 106 : 1546 -1588.
    [49]谢科范,彭华涛.联合风险投资的风险不守恒分析[J].财经理论与实践, 2004, 3:43-46.
    [50]杨其静.创业者的最优融资契约安排研究[J].经济科学, 2004, 4 : 33-45.
    [51]张新立,杨德礼.风险资本联合投资的激励契约设计[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(1):106-111
    [52]叶文辉.城市公共产品供给的市场化与公共服务的效率改善[J].江西社会科学,2004,4: 26-28.
    [53] Ho,S.P. Bid compensation decision model for projects with costly bid preparation[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2005,131(2):151-159.
    [54] Anderlini, L., and Felli,L. Costly bargaining and renegotiation[J]. Econometrica,2001,69(2):377-411.
    [55] Ho,S.P., and A.M.ASCE. Model for financial renegotiation in Public-private-partnership projects and its policy implications: game theoretic view [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2006,132(7):678-688.
    [56]马晓莉,刘春江,段涛.公用事业特许经营项目的拍卖机制设计及定价研究[J].商场现代化, 2007, 3: 25-27.
    [57]刘晓君.城市污水资源化特许经营项目的政府监管[J].水利经济, 2006, 3: 52-53.
    [58]杨学英.基础设施特许经营项目政府保证的价值研究[J].武汉大学学报(工学版)[J], 2005, 4: 129-132.
    [59]邹小燕.单边开放电力市场中长期合同的谈判博弈模型[J].预测, 2006, 25(5): 65-69.
    [60]张新立,陈辉.基于实物期权的风险投资退出决策模型研究[J].运筹与管理, 2007, 16(4): 116-119.
    [61]谈毅,冯宗宪,邵丰.风险资本退出时机选择与企业股权价值的评估[J].中国软科学, 2002, 17(5): 44-47.
    [62]苏永江,李湛.风险投资项目的退出问题研究[J].预测, 2001, 20(4): 38-39.
    [63]吴正武,裘孟荣,袁飞.风险资本退出时机和退出方式的确定原理[J].商业研究, 2002, 20:6-9.
    [64]刘少波,蒋海.风险投资进入与退出的信息经济学分析[J].财贸经济, 2000, 3: 36-40.
    [65]庄永强.实物期权理论及其在城市污水处理BOT项目决策中的应用研究[D].中国海洋大学硕士论文, 2005, 3: 76-80.
    [66]孟庆春,王涛.基于博弈分析的国有资本进退机制研究[J].山东大学学报(社会科学版), 2007,5: 92-97.
    [67]陈京良.我国转轨时期的政府规制[M] .财政经济出版社,2000.
    [68]王俊豪.我国政府管理制体制改革[M].经济科学出版, 1999: 2-8.
    [69]王学庆.垄断性行业的政府管制问题研究[J]管理世界, 2003 , 8: 63-73.
    [70]王俊豪,周小梅.中国自然垄断产业民营化改革政府管规制政策[M].经济管理出版社,2004:85-88.
    [71]吕志勇,陈宏民.我国自然垄断产业市场化改节的几个关键问题研究[J].产业经济,2003,8:57-63.
    [72]陈宏平,陇小渝.规制的困惑:规制政策的动态演变及其成本分析[J].西南师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1999, 1: 10-15.
    [73]史普博.管制与市场[M].余晖译.上海:上海人民出版社,1999:15-16.
    [74]于良春.论自然垄断与自然垄断产业的政府规制[J].中国工业经济,2004,22(2): 27-33.
    [75]仇保兴.西方公用行业管制模式演变历程及启示[J].城市发展研究,2004, 11(2): 4-17.
    [76]肖兴志.自然垄断产业规制改革模式研究[ M].东北财经大学出版社,2003: 85-87.
    [77]谢地.政府规制经济学[M].高等教育出版社, 2003.
    [78]常欣.放松管制与规制重建:中国基础设施引入竟争后的政府行为分析[J].经济理论与经济管理, 2001, 11: 10-15.
    [79]陈富良.中国政府规制体制:改革路径与目标模式[J].改革,2001, 14(4): 19-23.
    [80]仇保兴,王俊豪.中国市政公用事业监管体制研究[M].中国社会科学版,2006.
    [81]常欣.新阶段中国垄断性行业改革的三线推进战略[J].中国工业经济,2004, 22(2):34-41.
    [82]张会恒.我国公用事业政府规制的有效性研究[M].中国科学技术大学出版社,2007.
    [83] Baron, D. , R, Myerson . Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs [J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50: 911-930.
    [84] Lewis,T,and D Sappington. Countervailing incentives in agency problems[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1989, 2 : 294-313.
    [85] Baron D P, Besanko D. Regulation and information in a continuing relationship[J]. Information Economics of Policy, 1984, 1: 447-470.
    [86]欧阳芳锐,王先甲.政府对一类风险回避型垄断企业价格管制的激励机制设计与分析[J].系统工程,2004, 23(1):65-69.
    [87]杨波,唐小我,马永开.不完全信息下的垄断企业规制定价研究[J].中国管理科学,2004, 12(6): 104-109.
    [88]刘伟,唐小我,马永开.基于价格上限管制下上下游垄断企业的福利分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005, (25)6: 101-106.
    [89]王先甲,韩东,王广民.基于可竞争市场理论的输电市场管制机制设计[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007, 27(6): 111-116.
    [90]王燕.价格规制合同设计中信息租金与配置效率的协调方式[J].中国工业经济, 2004,22 (8) : 62-68.
    [91]李晓明,胡长顺,曹军念.收费公路经营及政府公共管制的理论与方法[J].中国软科学, 2003, 18(6) : 134-142.
    [92]卞彬.论公用事业行业垄断价格的特征与规制[J].经济体制改革, 2007, 25 (1): 34-37.
    [93] Meren, A. Quality assurance in competitively tendered contracts [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2000, 34: 99-111.
    [94] Favaloro,EJ. Standardization, regulation, quality assurance and emerging technologies in hemostasis: issues, controversies, benefits, and limitations [J]. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2007, 33(3): 290-297.
    [95] Rukihiro Kidokoro. The effects of price regulation in contracting out transport sevices[J].Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2003, 37(1): 111-132.
    [96]纪嘉伦,李福志,沈彩霞,向凯.铁路保价运输管理与服务质量评价指标体系[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2001, 21(6): 114-117.
    [97]章俊元,胡鸿飞.论交通运输服务质量环及其动力机制[J].武汉交通科技大学学报,1999, 23(4): 430-433.
    [98]袁持平.政府管制的经济分析[M].北京:人民出版社,2005: 100-108.
    [99]王灏.城市轨道交通投融资问题研究-政府民间合作(PPP)模式的创新与实践[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2006: 80-94.
    [100] Robinson B. Paying the proper price to manage risk. Balance sheet [M]. MCB university press,2001:5-6.
    [101]张万宽.公私伙伴关系对中国政府管理的挑战及对策研究[J].中国行政管理,2008,24(1):46-48.
    [102]余晖,秦虹.中国城市公用事业绿皮书NO.1公私合作制的中国试验[R].上海人民出版社,2005: 106-121.
    [103]赵宇,李洪波,张宗益.垄断行业的进入博弈及管制绩效评价研究[J].系统工程学报,2006, 22 (6): 606-612.
    [104] Alchian A, H. Demsetz. Production, Information costs and economic organization [J]. American Economic Review, 1972, 62: 77 - 95.
    [105]卫国红.我国风险投资公司制衡机制研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2003, 7: 55-58。
    [106]党兴华,权小锋,杨敏利.风险投资委托代理关系中的监控与激励博弈分析[J].科研管理,2007, 28 (1): 155-159.
    [107]袁竞峰,邓小鹏,李启明,汪文雄. PPP模式立法规制及其在我国的应用研究[J].建筑经济,2007, 3:95-99.
    [108]邓小鹏,申立银,李启明. PPP模式在香港基础设施建设中的应用研究及其启示[J].建筑经济,2006, 9: 14-18.
    [109] Nilsson, J.-E. Should roads be commercialized?Asymmetric and incomplete modeling of public institutions with a transport sector application [R]. San Jose, CA, Centre for Research on Transportation and society Working Paper , 1996 : 4-16.
    [110]任志涛.自然垄断产业的公私伙伴关系研究[D].天津大学博士论文,2004, 12: 117-131.
    [111]赵长茂,李东序.市政公用事业市场化改革的依据和途径[M].中共中央党校出版社, 2008:27-30.
    [112]王梅,刘运,陆勇雄,邵颖红.市政工程公私合作项目(PPP)投融资决策研究[M].经济科学出版社,2008:22-23
    [113]王雨本.国有企业股份化改造的再认识[J].经济研究参考, 2002,80(16):2-6.
    [114]杨小康,李小光.国有股减持、国有企业改革与改善上市公司治理[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002,19(2):12-14.
    [115]王忠明.学会退出:兼及国企改革中一些普遍误读之伪证[J].煤炭企业管理,2003,12:18-20.
    [116]王佳,杨之曙.为什么可以用市场化的方式解决国有股减持问题?[R].清华大学课题研究工作报告,2002.
    [117]李涛.混合所有制公司中的国有股权[J]经济研究,2002,8:19-27.
    [118]彭少阳,刘宁.出让国企产权与盘活国有资产[N].中国证券报,2003,2,14.
    [119] Su Dongwei,Belton M Fleisher. An Empirical investigation of underpricing in chinese IPOs[J]. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 1999, 7 (1):173-202.
    [120] Cao Yuanzheng, Yingyi Qing, Barry R Weingast. From federalism,chinese style to privatization, chinese style[J] . Economics of Transition, 1999, 7 (1): 103-131.
    [121] Varian H R. Microeconomic Analysis[M]. New York,Norton, 1992.
    [122] Matsumura T. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly[J]. Journal of Public Economics,1998, 70 (3): 473-483.
    [123] Ramamurti R. Why haven’t development countries privatized deeper and faster?[J].World Development,1999, 27(1): 137-155.
    [124] Stoughton N M, Zechner J. IPO-mechanisms, monitoring and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1998, 49(1): 45-77.
    [125]江淑贞.公营事业民营化多阶段释股之研究[D].台湾中山大学博士论文,2001.
    [126] Hart O. Firms,contracts,and financial structure[M]. Oxford University Press,1995.
    [127] Hart O, A Schleifer,R WV shny. The Proper scope of government: Theory and application to prisons[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997,112 (4): 1157-1161.
    [128] Besley T,Ghatak M. Government versus private ownerships of public goods[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2001, 116 (6): 1343-1372.
    [129] IPPR. Building Better Partnerships: the Final report of the commission on Public-Private partnerships[R]. Institute for Public Policy Research, London, 2001.
    [130] Juan Pablo Castro .Water services in Latin America: experiences with public-private partnerships[J]. International Journal of Water, 2008, 4(3): 235-257.
    [131] Viscusi,W. K , J. M. Vernon and J.E. Harrington, Jr. Economics of regulation and antitrust [M]. The MIT Press , 2000: 448-449.
    [132] Aghion P, Tirole J. Formal and real authority in organizations[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997 (105): 1-29.
    [133]严玲,尹贻林.公共项目治理[M].天津大学出版社, 2006: 122-126.
    [134]张朋柱,叶红心,薛耀文,刘人境等.合作博弈理论与应用[M].上海交通大学出版社,2006: 73-76.
    [135] Hirsch, Smale.微分方程,动力系统和线性代数[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 1986.
    [136] Ho,S.P.,and Liu,L.Y. Analytical model for analyzing construction claims and opportunistic bidding [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2004,130(1):94-104.
    [137]吕志勇,陈宏民.我国自然垄断产业市场改革的几个关键问题研究[J].产业经济,2003.8:57-63.
    [138]苏素.公用事业间接管制定价[J].重庆大学学报,2004, 5:155-158.
    [139] Hansen,R.G.Auctions with contingent payments[J].The American Economic Review,1984, 75(4):862-865
    [140] Samuelson,W.Bargaining under asymmetric information [J]. Econometrica,1984, 52(4):995-1006.
    [141] Eshien Chong ,Freddy Huet, Stephane Saussier. Public-Private Partnerships and prices: Evidence from water distribution in France [J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2006, 29(1):149-169.
    [142]李莉,杨文胜,谢阳群.信息不对称下电子商务市场质量相关定价决策分析[J].管理评论,2005, 17(5): 17-23.
    [143]李莉,杨文胜,蔡淑琴.质量敏感需求下网络营销企业质量相关定价决策[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006, 26(2): 19-26.
    [144]丁世龙,张金隆.采用差别定价方法确定居民电价的研究[J].价格理论与实践,2006, 7: 23-24.
    [145] Bhargara H,Sundaresan S. Contingency pricing for information goods and services under industrywide performance standard[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems , 2003, 20(2): 113 -136.
    [146]李晓明,胡长顺,曹军念.收费公路经营及政府公共管制的理论与方法[J].中国软科学, 2003, 18(6): 134-142.
    [147] Laffont , J. J. , and Tirole, J. . Using cost observation to regulate firms [J]. Journal of Political Economy , 1986 , 94 : 614- 641.
    [148]张宇,唐小我,马永开.规制定价研究[J].软科学,2003,17(5): 2-15.
    [149] Stanley B,Paul E,Madhav V.Information,contracting,and quality costs[J].Management Science,2000,46(6):776-789.
    [150] Ell Starbird S.Penalties,rewards, and inspection:Provisions for quality in supply chain contracts[J] Journal of the Operational Research Society,2001,52(1):109-115.
    [151] Reyniers D,Tapiero C. The delievery and control of quality in supplier-producercontracts[J].Management Science,1995,41(1):1581—1589.
    [152] Gorbet C,Groote X.A supplier’s optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information[J].Management Science,2000,46(3):445-450.
    [153]杜波,孙利宇.浅谈集团项目管理中质量风险的控制与防范[J].土木工程学报,2003,3:90-94.
    [154]王恩军.实行监理制后政府公共部门如何主动降低工程质量风险[J].中国建材科技,2005(1):38-39.
    [155]纪学斌.监理单位工程质量风险的防范[J].施工技术,2003,32(12):31-32
    [156]黄本笑.工程建设监理制的信息经济学解释[J].建筑施工,2003,7:42-45.
    [157]许星剑,仉巍,郭晓宇.特许经营中目标分歧的经济学解释[J] .预测,2004,23(3):20-35.
    [158] Stanley B,Baul E,Madhav V. Performance measurement and design in supply chains[J]. Management Science,2001,47(1):173-188.
    [159]黄小原,卢震.非对称信息条件下供应链的生产策略[J].中国管理科学,2002, 10(2): 35-40.
    [160]塞申,汤普生著,陈子玉,陈燕庆译.最优化管理[M].北京:宇航出版社,1988.
    [161]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000: 242-245.
    [162] Gransberg,Douqlas, D;Molenaar, keith. Analysis of owner’s Design and construction Quality management: Approaches in Design /Build projects[J] . Journal of Managment in Engineering , 2004, 20(6): 162-169.
    [163] Ferreia,M.L.Ribeiro;Roqerson,J.H . The quality management role of the owner in different types of contract for process plant [J]. Total Quality management ,1999, 10(3): 401-411.
    [164]周建中.重庆水务集团改革的调查及建议[J].重庆行政, 2001, 6: 31-33.
    [165] Meine Pieter van Dij. Public-private partnerships in basic service delivery: impact on the poor, examples from the water sector in India[J]. International Journal of Water, 2008, 4(3): 216-234.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700