用户名: 密码: 验证码:
复杂动态环境下多机器人的运动协调研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文研究了复杂动态环境下多机器人运动协调的关键技术。首先提出一种适用于组织大规模机器人群体的体系结构和协调机制,然后研究了多机器人的运动规划问题。由于系统内的机器人数目比较多,所以采用分级组织多机器人。多机器人的协调包括任务级协调和运动级协调,任务级协调采用显式通信和黑板结构相结合的方式;运动级协调由机器人自主进行,必要时可以与邻近的机器人通信协商。多机器人的运动规划采用耦合规划,即每个机器人先为自己规划出一条静态路径,然后采用冲突消解方法进行运动协调。本文提出了基于遗传算法的路径规划算法和多级冲突消解方法。为了验证提出算法的有效性,开发了基于KQML 通信的分布式仿真环境。仿真结果表明,路径规划算法满足实时性要求,冲突消解方法的协调效果良好。
With the development of DAI(Distributed Artificial Intelligence), someresearchers applied Multi-agent theories to Multi-robot system (MRS) and began toresearch Multi-robot technologies. Compared with a single-robot system, amulti-robot system involves some advantages as follows: wider application fields,inherent parallelism, higher efficiency, robustness, easier and cheaper to build,distributed sensor and cooperation, scalability, beneficial to study swarm intelligence.Accordingly, more and more researchers are interested in multi-robot systems.
    In the past two decades, multi-robot systems have improved greatly in theoryand application. Nowadays, MRS is applied in various fields, such as the cleanup oftoxic waste, planetary exploration, search and rescue missions, surveillance,cooperative transportation. With the increasing requirements, MRS will be applied tobroader fields. In following years, the major research directions on MRS will focuson enlarging the number of robots, improving the cooperation ability, studying theswarm intelligence. Environments of MRS will be changed from certain, structuredand static to uncertain, unstructured and dynamic. The results of study will beomereal applications. Therefore, it is very important to research MRS used into thecomplex and dynamic environments.
    This paper studies multi-robot motion coordination in an complex and dynamicenvironment based on object transportation domain. The main research work aboutthis dissertation is as follows:
    1. Propose a hybrid architecture for large-scale multi-robot systems. This
    architecture is composed of two sections. The hierarchical control of the architectureonly serves as task level while motion level of the robot adopts distributedarchitecture. Robots can plan motions and accomplish missions autonomously.During executing task, a robot can communicate with neighbor robots to coordinatetheir motions. The control information on task level is relatively little so that thecomputational load is low. Therefore, the proposed architecture can be applied to alarge-scale autonomous robot system. A coordination mechanism combined explicit communication and blackboard isput forward for above architecture. The explicit communication is used for the taskassignment and motion coordination with local robots. Blackboard is used for thefeedback of the task executive state. Because the task executive state should be fedback real-time, there is a lot of feedback information. After using blackboard,executive robots write state information real-time while other robots accessinformation based on requirements so as to reduce the communication load greatly. 2. Study multi-robot motion planning. Motion planning is one of most importantresearch issues in this paper. In many such applications of MRS, the basic demand isthat all robots are able to move from initial to goal positions efficiently, withoutcollisions with obstacles and other robots. The multi-robot motion planning iscomplicated by the presence of a dynamic environment in which obstacles and otherrobots are moving. It is a new and independent issue but not simple addition ofsingle-robot motion methods. This paper studies a large-scale MRS. In order toreduce the computation load, decoupled planning is adopted. That is, every robotplans own path and then resolves path conflict. Firstly, the path planning method based on GA (Genetic Algorithm) isproposeGA embodies complicated object by simple encoding and reproducingmechanism. Because GA is not confined by search space, it is able to applied tovarious fields, such as engineering optimization, autonomous control, patternrecognition, machine learning. The disadvantage of GA is slow so as to takes solarge memory space and much run time to evolve a lot of plans. Some improvement
    to GA is given in this paper. Chromosome is denoted by dynamic data structure–Linklist. The performance of the Genetic Algorithm has been increased greatly byusing knowledge-based operators and some active constraint is added to create aninitial population. The improved Genetic Algorithm satisfies real-time demand andcan be used on-line. Afterwards, a multi-level conflict resolution method is put forward. Thismethod adopts some simple rules to coordinate path and avoid obstacles. Simulationresults show that the effect of this method is good and it can be used in large-scalerobot systems. 3. Build a distributed multi-robot simulation system based on C/S structure.Because robot usually is expensive, simulation is necessary to research the robotsystem. After the algorithm is verified in simulation system, it can be applied to areal system to protect robots. Especially, simulation is necessary for a multi-robotsystem in complex and dynamic environments. Accordingly, the development of adistributed multi-robot simulation is discussed in this paper. This system cansimulate a multi-level robot system. Server is a central station and responsible forreceiving and assigning task. In addition, central station serves as a global monitor toshow the executive state of the system. The main thread of client side serves as agroup control robot and is responsible for assigning task received from the centralstation to an executive robot including this group. Other threads of client sideinstantiate executive robots. Each thread denotes a robot. After assigned a task,executive robots plan motion and accomplish task autonomously. The simulationsystem is developed based on Agent techniques and programmed with JAVA so thatit can run on various OS. Therefore, this simulation system is fit for large-scale robotsystems. 4. Extend KQML according to KQML syntax. Some performatives andcorresponding semantic parser are defined in JAVA. The extended KQML is appliedto the multi-robot simulation system and complete communication between robots. Due toutilizing KQML protocol , the openness and compatibility of the simulation system is
引文
[1] 战强,王树国,陈在礼,世界多机器人技术的研究现状,机器人技术与应用,1999,17(2), pp. 10-12.
    [2] H.Asama, A.Matsumoto, and Y.Ishida. Design of an autonomous and distributed robot system: ACTRESS. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tsukuba, 1989,pp. 283-290.
    [3] T. fukuda and S. Nakagawa. A dynamically reconfigurable robotic system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, Cambridge, MA, 1987, pp.588-595.
    [4] T. Arai, E. Pagello, L. E. Parker,Editorial: Advances in multi-robot systems, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2002,18(5), pp. 655-661.
    [5] W. Burgard, M. Moors, D. Fox, R. Simmons, and S. Thrun. Collaborative multi-robot exploration. In proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, 2000, pp. 476-481.
    [6] Y. U. Cao, A. S. Fukunaga, and A. B. Kahng. Cooperative mobile robotics: antecedents and directions. Autonomous Robots, 1997,4(1), pp.7-27.
    [7] G. Dudek, M. Jenkin, E. E. Milios, and D.Wilkes. A taxonomy for multiagent robotics. Autonomous Robots, 1996,3(4), pp.375-397.
    [8] R. C. Arkin. Behavior-based robotics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998
    [9] R. Smith. The contract net protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Trans. Computer, 1980, pp.1104-1113,
    [10]H. Asama, K. Ozaki, Y.Ishida et al. Collaborative team organization using communication in a decentralized robotic system. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ IROS, 1994, pp. 816-823.
    [11]K. Jin, P. Liang, and G. Beni. Stability of synchronized distributed control of discrete swarm structures. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICRA, 1994, pp. 1033-1038.
    [12]S. Hackwood and G.. Beni. Self-organization of sensors for swarm intelligence. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICRA, 1992, pp.819-829.
    [13]S. Hackwood and J. Wang. The engineering of cellular robotic systems. In IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, 1988, pp. 70-75.
    [14]L. E. Parker. Heterogeneous multi-robot cooperation. PhD thesis, MIT EFCS Dept., February, 1994
    [15]P. Caloud, W. Choi, J.C. Latombe, et al. Indoor automation with many mobile robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ IROS, 1990, pp. 67–72.
    [16]C. Hewitt. Viewing control structures as patterns of passing messages, Artifical Intelligence, 1977,8(3), pp. 323-364.
    [17]Marin L Minsky. Society of Mind, New York: Simon & Schuster,1986
    [18]P. Maes. Modeling adaptive autonomous agents. In C. G, Langton, editor, Artificial Life: An Overview, the MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995, pp.135-162.
    [19]S. Russell, P.Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice-Hall, 1995
    [20]M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The knowledge engineering Review, 1995,10(2), pp.115-152.
    [21]张克,邵长胜,强文义,基于面向Agent 技术的任务规划系统研究,高技术通迅,2002年第5期,pp.82-86.
    [22]G. Weiss and P. Dillenbourg. What is “multi”in multiagent learning? In P. Dillenbourg, editor, Collaborative learning, Cognitive and computational approaches, Pergamon Press, Oxford,1999, pp.64-80.
    [23]J.P. Muller, The right agent (architecture) to do the right thing, In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents V, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Paris, 1998, pp. 211-225.
    [24]L. Iocchi, D.Nardi, Massimiliano Salerno. Reactivity and Deliberation: a survey on Multi-Robot Systems, Electronic Edition (Springer LINK) BibTeX, 2001, pp. 9-34.
    [25]T. Balch. The impact of diversity on performance in multi-robot foraging. In Proceedings of Agents ’99, 1999, pp. 92-99.
    [26]D. Jung and A.Zelinsky. Grounded symbolic communication between heterogeneous cooperating robots. Autonomous Robots, 2000,8(3)pp. 269–292.
    [27]Maja J. Mataric. Learning social behavior. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 1997,(20), pp.191–204.
    [28]L. E. Parker. ALLIANCE: An architecture for fault tolerant multi-robot cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1998, 14(2), pp.220–240,.
    [29]F. Chantemargue and B. Hirsbrunner. A collective robotics application based on emergence and self-organization. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference for Young Computer Scientists (ICYCS’99), 1999, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/chantemargue99collective.html
    [30]C. Ronald Kube and E. Bonabeau. Cooperative transport by ants and robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2000, 30(1), pp.85–101.
    [31]L. E. Parker. Lifelong adaptation in heterogeneous multi-robot teams: Response to continual variation in individual robot performance. Autonomous Robots, 2000, 8(3), pp.239–267.
    [32]Fabrice R. Noreils. Toward a robot architecture integrating cooperation between mobile robots: Application to indoor environment. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1993, 12(1), pp.79–98.
    [33]R.Alami, S.Fleury, M.Herrb et al. Multi-robot cooperation in the MARTHA project, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 1998,5(1), pp.36-47.
    [34]L. E. Parker. Cooperative robotics for multi-target observation. Special Issue on Robotics Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1999,5 (1), pp.5-19.
    [35]M. Jenkin and G. Dudek. The paparazzi problem. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Takamatsu, Japan, 2000. Jenkin, M. and Dudek, G., The Paparazzi Problem, Proc. IEEE/RSJ IROS 2000, Takamatsu, Japan.
    [36]B. B. Werger and M. J. Mataric. Broadcast of local eligibility for multi-target observation. In Proceedings of DARS, 2000, pp. 347-356.
    [37]F. Brandt, W. Brauer, G. Weiβ, Task assignment in multi-agent systems based on vickery-type auctioning and leveled commitment contracting, In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95), 1995, pp. 73-80.
    [38]B. P. Gerkey M. J. Matari′c. Multi-robot task allocation: analyzing the complexity and optimality of key architectures. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Taipei, 2003, pp. 3862-3868.
    [39]Chris V. Jones and Maja J Mataric′, Towards a Multi-Robot Coordination Formalism, In Proceedings, 2nd International Workshop on the Mathemtaics and Algorithms of Social Insects, Atlanta, GA, pp. 60-67, 2003
    [40]B. Aronov, M. de Berg, Motion Planning for Multiple Robots. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry,1998, pp. 374-382.
    [41]J. Canny and J. Reif, New lower bound technique for robot motion planning problems. In 28th IEEE Symposium on Foundation of Computer Science, 1987, pp. 49-60.
    [42]J. Sanborn and J. Hendler, A model of reaction for planning in dynamic environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 1988, 3(2), pp. 95-101.
    [43]J.C. Latombe. Robot motion planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1991. ISBN 0-7923-9206-X.
    [44]P. Fiorini, Z. shiller, Motion Planning in dynamic environments using velocity obstacles. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1998,17( 7), pp. 760–772.
    [45]S.Kato, S. Nishiyama, J. Takeno, Coordinating Mobile Robots by Applying Traffic Rules, IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 1992, vol.3, pp. 1535-1541.
    [46]C. S. Oliver, M. Saptharishi, Multi-Robot Path Planning by Predicting Structure in a Dynamic Environment, IFAC 2000 Special Session on Collaboration and Data Fusion in Distributed Mobile Robotic Systems, 2000, pp. 593-598.
    [47]K. Azarm, G. Schmidt. Conflict-free motion of multiple mobile robots based on decentralized motion planning and negotiation. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1997, pp. 3526-3533.
    [48]Yi Guo, L. E. Parker, A distributed and optimal motion planning approach for multiple mobile robots, In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2612-2619.
    [49]S.Carpin, E. Pagello, A distributed algorithm for multi-robot motion planning. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996, pp. 2396-2401.
    [50]R. C. Arkin. Cooperation without communication: Multi-agent schema-based robot navigation. Journal of Robotic Systems, 1992, 9(3), pp.351-364.
    [51]S. Sen, M. Sekaran, and J. hale. Learning to coordinate without sharing information. In Proceedings of AAAI, 1994, pp. 426-431.
    [52]D. Gage. How to communicate to zillions of robots. In Mobile Robots VIII, SPIE, 1993, pp. 250–257.
    [53]S. Ichikawa, F. Hara, and H. Hosokai. Cooperative route-searching behavior of multi-robot system using hello-call communication. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ IROS, 1993, pp. 1149–1156.
    [54]J. Wang. On sign-board based inter-robot communication in distributed robotic systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ ICRA, 1994, pp.1045–1050.
    [55]J. Wang, S. Premvuti, and A. Tabbara. A wireless medium access protocol (csma/cd-w) for mobile robot based distributed robotic system. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ ICRA, 1995, pp. 2561–2566.
    [56]Y. Labrou and T. Finin, A proposal for a new KQML Specification. ARPA Knowledge Sharing Initiative, External Interfaces Working Group working paper, February 1997
    [57]高志军,颜国正,丁国清,颜德田,陈忠泽,多机器人协调与合作系统的研究现状和发展,光学精密工程,2001,9(2), pp. 99-103.
    [58]P. Enrico, D. Antonio. Cooperative behaviors in multi-robot systems through implicit communication. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 1999, 26(1), pp.65-77.
    [59]HorMaw-Kae. Coordinating multiple groups of robots for gating process. Robotics Systems, 1996,13(8), pp. 499-513.
    [60]Gary B. Parker. Co-evolving model parameters for anytime learning in evolutionary robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2000, 33, pp.13-30.
    [61]Kwang-Ju Lee, Byoung-Tak Zhang. Learning robot behaviors by evolving genetic programs, In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation. (IECON-2000), 2000, pp. 2867–2872.
    [62]A. C. Schultz. Using a genetic algorithm to learn strategies for collision avoidance and local navigation. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, 1991, pp. 213-225.
    [63]N. Stefano, F. Dario et al. How to evolve autonomous robots: different approaches in evolutionary robotics. Artificial Life IV, 1994, pp. 190-197.
    [64]Ming Tan, Multi-agent reinforcement learning: independent vs. cooperative agents,. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 1993, pp. 330-337.
    [65]J. A. Boyan and M.L.Littman, Packet routing in dynamically changing networks: a reinforcement learning approach, Advances in Neural Information Processing System, 1994,6, pp. 671-678.
    [66]P. Stone and M. Veloso, Team-Partitioned, Opaque-Transition Reinforcement Learning, In Proceedings of Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents '99), 1999, pp. 206-212.
    [67]M. Bowling, M. Veloso, Multi-agent Learning Using a Variable Learning Rate, Artificial Intelligence, 2002,136, pp. 215-250
    [68]L. Parker,M. J. Mataric,M. Veloso, T. Balch. Status of Robotics in the U.S. Workshop, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., July 21-22, 2004.
    [69]刘淑华,田彦涛,基于KQML 语言的多自主移动机器人仿真系统,机器人, 2005,27(4).
    [70]陈忠泽,林良明,颜国正,基于MAS(Multi-Agent System)的多机器人系统: 协作多机器人学发展的一个重要方向,机器人,2001, 23(4), pp.368-373.
    [71]D. Nardi. Coordination in Multi-Robot Systems, www.dis.uniroma1.it/~degiacom / CogRobCourse01/lec5part1.pdf
    [72]王艳红,基于多Agent 的敏捷化生产调度系统,博士论文,2003.
    [73]M. H?gele. State of the Art of Robotics Research, Working Group Meeting on Robotics, 2002.
    [74]R. A. Brooks. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 1986, 2(1), pp. 14-23.
    [75]B. Simmons, T. Smith et al. A layered architecture for coordination of mobile robots. Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata, Proceedings from the 2002 NRL Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, May, 2002.
    [76]R. Simmons. Structured control for autonomous robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1996, 10(1), pp.34-43.
    [77]O. Khatib. Force strategies for cooperative tasks in multiple mobile manipulation systems. In Proceedings of International Symposium of Robotics Research, 1995, pp. 333–342.
    [78]A. Chella, R. Sorbello et al. A new hybrid multi-agent architecture for the coordination of a robots colony activities. In Proceedings of the 15th Eureopean Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI'2002, Lyon, France, July 2002, pp. 713-717.
    [79]R. Arkin. Cooperation without communication: Multi-agent schema-based robot navigation. Journal of Robotic Systems, 1992, 9(3), pp.351-364.
    [80]L. Parker. ALLIANCE: an architecture for fault tolerant multi-robot cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1998,14(2), pp.220-240.
    [81]B. P. Gerkey, M. J. Mataric. Sold! : market methods for multi-robot control. In IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2002, 18(5), pp. 758-768.
    [82]R. Zlot, A. Stentz et al. Multi-robot exploration controlled by a market economy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002.
    [83]K.D. Martin, A blackboard system for automatic transcription of simple polyphonic music. MIT Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report, 1996, No. 385.
    [84]N. Carver, and V. Lesser, The evolution of blackboard control architectures. expert systems applications, Special Issue on the Blackboard Paradigm and its Applications ,1992,7(1), pp. 1-30.
    [85]T. Arai, J. Ota, Motion planning of multiple mobile robots, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robots and Systems, 1992, pp. 1761-1768.
    [86]M. Sharir, Algorithmic motion planning in robotics, Computer, 1989, 22, pp.9-20.
    [87]S. Thierry, L. Stephane, L. Jean-Paul, Path coordination for multiple mobile robots: a resolution-complete algorithm, IEEE Transactions on robotics and automation, 2002,18(1), pp. 42-49.
    [88]J. E. Hopcroft, J. T. Schwartz, M. Sharir, On the complexity of motion planning for multiple independent objects: PSPACE-hardness of the Warehouseman’s Problem”, Robot Research, 1984, 3(4), pp. 76-88.
    [89]L. Carrioli, Unsupervised path-planning of many asynchronously self-moving vehicles, In Proceedings of the IROS, 1991, pp. 555-559.
    [90]O. Khatib. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots, Robotics Research, 1991, 5(1), pp. 90-98.
    [91]蒋新松,机器人学导论。辽宁科学技术出版社,1994
    [92]C. Niederberger, D.Radovic, M.Gross. Generic path planning for real-time Applications. Computer Graphics International (CGI'04), Greece, 2004, pp. 299-306.
    [93]C. O’Dunlaing and C.Yap. “A retraction method for planning the motion of a disk.”, Algorithms, 1985, pp. 187-192.
    [94]B. L. Brumitt, A. Stentz, Dynamic mission planning for multiple mobile robots. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996, pp. 2396-1401.
    [95]J.H. Holland, Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 1975.
    [96]梁吉业,遗传算法应用中的一些共性问题研究,计算机应用研究,1999, (7), pp. 20-21.
    [97]D.E.Goldberg, Computer-aided gas pipeline operation using genetic algorithm and rule learning. Doctoral dissertation, No.8402282, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, 1983.
    [98]李敏强,寇纪淞,林丹,李书全,遗传算法的基本理论与应用,科学出版社,2003.
    [99]D.E.Goldberg, Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989.
    [100]Z.Michalewiz, Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs, 3rd edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
    [101]J.J.Grefenstette, R.Gopal et al, Genetic algorithms for the traveling salesman problem. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA 1), Grefenstette, J.J. (ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985, pp.160~168.
    [102]De Jong, K.A. An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems (PHD Dissertation). University of Michigan, No. 76~9381,1975.
    [103]M. Srinivas and L.M.Patnaik, Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1994,24(4), pp.656~667
    [104]J.J.Grefenstette, Optimization of control parameters for genetic algorithms. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1986,16(1), pp.122~128.
    [105]J.D.Schatter, A study of control parameters affecting on-line performance of genetic algorithms for function optimization. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA 3), Schaffer, J.D. (ed.), San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1989, pp. 51~60.
    [106]Shuhua Liu, Yantao Tian, Jinfang Liu, Multi Mobile Robot Path Planning Based on Genetic Algorithm,the 5th World Congress On Intelligent Control and Automation, Hangzhou China. 2004. pp. 4706-4709.
    [107]S. Kato, J. Takeno. Fundamental Studies on the Application of Traffic Rules to the Locomotive Robot World, -study 1 -Robot's Collision Avoidance Problem, Dead Problem, and Path Planning of Multi robot System Including Obstacle Avoidance. In Proceedings of the 7th lecture meeting of Robotics Society of Japan, 1989, pp.9-12.
    [108]O.Brock, O. Khatib, Real-time obstacle avoidance and motion coordination, In Proceedings of the 1999 International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning. July 1999, pp. 274-279.
    [109]K.Kant and S. W. Zucker. Towards efficient trajectory planning: Path-velocity decomposition. Int. J. of Robotics Research, 1986, 5(3), pp. 72-89.
    [110]S. Akella, S. hutchinson, Coordinating the motions of multiple robots with specified trajectories, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002, vol. 1, pp. 624 –631.
    [111]K. M. Krishna, H. Hexmoor, Reactive collision avoidance of multiple moving agents by cooperation and conflict propagation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2141-2147.
    [112]O. Brock, O. Khatib, Real-time obstacle avoidance and motion coordination in a multi-robot workcell. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning. July 1999, pp. 274-279
    [113]M. Saito, T. Tsumura, Collision free motion control of multiple mobile robots on path network, In Proceedings of the IROS’91, 1991, pp. 1068-1073.
    [114]T. Fraichard, Dynamic trajectory planning with dynamic constrains: a state-time space approach. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 1993, pp. 1393-1400.
    [115]M. Erdmann and T. Lozano-Perez, On multiple moving objects, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, 1986, pp. 1419-1424.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700