锻炼坚持认知决策模型的检验与拓展
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Testing and Development of Psychological Decision-making Model of Exercise Adherence
- 论文作者：吴洲阳 ; 毛志雄 ; 郭璐
- 英文论文作者：Wu zhouyang ; Mao zhixiong ; Guo lu ; Beijing Sport University Sport Psychology Section
- 年：2015
- 作者机构：北京体育大学运动人体科学学院;
- 论文关键词：锻炼坚持认知决策模型 ; 锻炼自我效能 ; 锻炼效果 ; 锻炼承诺 ; 锻炼坚持
- 英文论文关键词：Psychological Decision-making Model of Exercise Adherence ; Exercise Self-efficacy ; Exercise Effects ; Exercise Commitment ; Exercise Adherence
- 会议召开时间：2015-10-16
- 会议录名称：第十八届全国心理学学术会议摘要集——心理学与社会发展
- 英文会议录名称：Proceedings of the 18th National Academic Congress of Psychology
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：G804.8
- 学会代码：ZGXG
- 会议名称：第十八届全国心理学学术会议
- 会议地点：中国天津
- 主办单位：中国心理学会
- 学会名称：中国心理学会
- 页数：3
- 文件大小：866k
- 原文格式：D
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
目的:长期坚持有规律的锻炼才能产生并保持良好的、稳定的身心效益。因此,探究锻炼坚持的心理机制很有必要。本研究以锻炼坚持认知决策模型为出发点,研究一检验该模型对大学生锻炼坚持意向的预测作用,研究二进而将该模型由预测锻炼坚持意向拓展到预测锻炼坚持行为,以期更好地预测大学生的锻炼坚持。本研究中坚持规律性体育锻炼不小于3个月则为有锻炼坚持行为,否则为无锻炼坚持行为。方法:研究采用横断调查研究设计,采用锻炼动机量表(MPAM-R)简化版、体育锻炼效果自评量表(EEI)、锻炼自我效能简化量表、锻炼承诺量表、及Godin休闲运动问卷工具施测。回收大学生有效问卷216份,年龄为19.8±1.43岁。结果:研究一通过结构方程模型和探索性因素分析检验原锻炼坚持认知决策模型。结果显示:(1)原锻炼坚持认知决策模型的拟合优度可以接受,χ~2(145)=259.73,χ~2/df=1.79,p<.01;GFI=.887,AGFI=.852,RMSEA=.061;(2)锻炼动机、锻炼效果和锻炼自我效能对锻炼承诺的标准化路径系数分别为.03(p=.662)、.68(p<.01)、.17(p=.01);锻炼承诺对锻炼坚持意向的路径为.92(p<.01);(3)锻炼效果和锻炼自我效能经锻炼承诺中介后,可解释锻炼坚持意向84%的方差;(4)探索性因素分析显示锻炼承诺和锻炼坚持意向可提取一个公因子,提示锻炼承诺和锻炼坚持意向两个概念之间存在重合,因此在研究二的拓展后模型中,删除锻炼坚持意向,由锻炼承诺直接预测锻炼坚持行为。研究二通过逻辑斯蒂克回归和多元线性回归对拓展后的锻炼坚持认知决策模型进行中介效应检验。结果显示:(1)锻炼动机对锻炼坚持行为的预测不显著(OR=1.128,p=.647);(2)锻炼效果和锻炼自我效能经锻炼承诺(OR=3.252,p<.01)完全中介后正向预测锻炼坚持行为;(3)锻炼承诺每增加一个单位,锻炼坚持比率增加225%。结论:(1)拓展后的锻炼坚持认知决策模型能够较好预测锻炼坚持行为,即锻炼效果及锻炼自我效能以锻炼承诺为中介,正向预测锻炼坚持。(2)锻炼坚持动机对锻炼坚持行为的无直接及间接预测作用,这可能与样本代表性和量表选择有关,未来研究应增大样本或选择更合适的锻炼坚持动机量表进行检验。
Objective: To attain and maintain stable physical and psychological benefits, exercise must be conducted on a regular basis over a period of time. Therefore, it is essential to explore psychological mechanism in exercise adherence. In this research, Psychological Decision-making Model of Exercise Adherence was tested in predicting Exercise Adherence Intention of college students in study 1 and in study 2 this model was developed to predict Exercise Adherence which was defined as whether exercise was conducted on regular basis no less than three months. Methods: Cross-sectional design. Questionnaires were adopted including Motive for Physical Activities Measure-Revised,Exercise Effects Inventory, Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale, Exercise Commitment Scale, and Godin Leisure-Time Questionnaire. 216 college students(aged 19.8±1.43) participated in the survey. Results: In study 1, Psychological Decision-making Model of Exercise Adherence was examined with structural equation modeling and exploratory factor analysis which revealed that(1) the model was acceptable, χ~2(145) =259.73, χ~2/df=1.79, p <.01; GFI=.887, AGFI=.852, RMSEA=.061;(2) the paths of Exercise Motivation,Exercise Effects, and Exercise Self-efficacy to Exercise Commitment were.03(p=.662),.68(p<.01),.17(p=.01) respectively, while the direct path of Exercise Commitment to Exercise Adherence was.92(p <.01);(3) 84% Exercise Adherence Intention was explained by Exercise Effects and Exercise Self-efficacy via Exercise Commitment;(4) a common factor can be extracted from Exercise Commitment and Exercise Adherence Intention, showing an overlap between the two concepts. Therefore, Exercise Adherence Intention was deleted and Exercise Commitment predicted Exercise Adherence directly in study 2. In study 2, the developed model was examined with logistic regression and multiple linear regression which showed that(1) Exercise Adherence was not predicted by Exercise Motivation(OR=1.128, p=.647);(2) Exercise Adherence was positively predicted by Exercise Effects and Exercise Self-efficacy via Exercise Commitment(OR=3.252, p<.01)acted as mediator;(3) when every one unit increase in Exercise Commitment, 225% increase in the rate of Exercise Adherence. Conclusion:(1) Exercise adherence could be explained by the Developed Psychological Decision-making Model of Exercise Adherence; namely, the relation between Exercise Effects/Exercise Self-efficacy and Exercise Adherence was fully mediated by Exercise Commitment;(2) Exercise Motivation can't predict Exercise Adherence either directly or indirectly due to lack of a representative sample and a suitable measurement probably. Future research could examine the developed model with a more suitable exercise motivation scale in a larger sample.
Objective: To attain and maintain stable physical and psychological benefits, exercise must be conducted on a regular basis over a period of time. Therefore, it is essential to explore psychological mechanism in exercise adherence. In this research, Psychological Decision-making Model of Exercise Adherence was tested in predicting Exercise Adherence Intention of college students in study 1 and in study 2 this model was developed to predict Exercise Adherence which was defined as whether exercise was conducted on regular basis no less than three months. Methods: Cross-sectional design. Questionnaires were adopted including Motive for Physical Activities Measure-Revised,Exercise Effects Inventory, Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale, Exercise Commitment Scale, and Godin Leisure-Time Questionnaire. 216 college students(aged 19.8±1.43) participated in the survey. Results: In study 1, Psychological Decision-making Model of Exercise Adherence was examined with structural equation modeling and exploratory factor analysis which revealed that(1) the model was acceptable, χ~2(145) =259.73, χ~2/df=1.79, p <.01; GFI=.887, AGFI=.852, RMSEA=.061;(2) the paths of Exercise Motivation,Exercise Effects, and Exercise Self-efficacy to Exercise Commitment were.03(p=.662),.68(p<.01),.17(p=.01) respectively, while the direct path of Exercise Commitment to Exercise Adherence was.92(p <.01);(3) 84% Exercise Adherence Intention was explained by Exercise Effects and Exercise Self-efficacy via Exercise Commitment;(4) a common factor can be extracted from Exercise Commitment and Exercise Adherence Intention, showing an overlap between the two concepts. Therefore, Exercise Adherence Intention was deleted and Exercise Commitment predicted Exercise Adherence directly in study 2. In study 2, the developed model was examined with logistic regression and multiple linear regression which showed that(1) Exercise Adherence was not predicted by Exercise Motivation(OR=1.128, p=.647);(2) Exercise Adherence was positively predicted by Exercise Effects and Exercise Self-efficacy via Exercise Commitment(OR=3.252, p<.01)acted as mediator;(3) when every one unit increase in Exercise Commitment, 225% increase in the rate of Exercise Adherence. Conclusion:(1) Exercise adherence could be explained by the Developed Psychological Decision-making Model of Exercise Adherence; namely, the relation between Exercise Effects/Exercise Self-efficacy and Exercise Adherence was fully mediated by Exercise Commitment;(2) Exercise Motivation can't predict Exercise Adherence either directly or indirectly due to lack of a representative sample and a suitable measurement probably. Future research could examine the developed model with a more suitable exercise motivation scale in a larger sample.
引文