拉林铁路崩滑地质灾害危险性评价
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Risk Assessment of Falling and Landslide Geological Disasters along Lalin Railway
- 论文作者：巨能攀 ; 赵建军
- 英文论文作者：Ju Nengpan ; Zhao Jianjun ; State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Chengdu University of Technology
- 年：2016
- 作者机构：成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室;
- 论文关键词：地质灾害 ; 发育特征 ; 分布规律 ; 定性分析
- 英文论文关键词：geological disasters ; development characteristics ; distribution regularities ; qualitative analysis
- 会议召开时间：2016-10-14
- 会议录名称：“川藏铁路建设的挑战与对策”2016学术交流会论文集
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：U212.22
- 学会代码：ZGTD
- 会议名称：“川藏铁路建设的挑战与对策”2016学术交流会
- 会议地点：中国四川成都
- 主办单位：中国铁道学会、中国铁道学会工程分会、中国中铁股份有限公司、中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司
- 学会名称：中国铁道学会
- 页数：9
- 文件大小：2185k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
拉林铁路处于软岩极为发育、海拔最高、构造活动最为强烈的地区,发育大量的地质灾害,严重威胁铁路的选线与施工。本文在收集相关资料和大量野外调查的基础上,分析影响因素,总结研究区内地质灾害发育特征与分布规律,建立相应的评价体系,运用定性与定量结合的评价方法进行地质灾害危险性评价与分区。研究结果表明:运用定性与定量相结合的分析方法,综合考虑研究区地质灾害发育特征、灾害分布规律、工程活动等因素进行地质灾害危险性评价,将整个区域分为3个区,其中轻度危险区占研究区45.3%,中度危险区占33.5%,重度危险区占21.2%。本文完整地论述了拉林铁路沿线崩滑地质灾害性评价的技术路线,划分出沿线不同区域的危险性,对于保证拉林铁路工程建设的顺利进行具有重要意义。
Lalin railway located in the area where soft rock extremely developed,altitude is highest,and structural movement most intense.In which area,developed a large number of geological disasters that seriously threat the line selection and construction of the railway.Therefore,this paper based on the relevant data collection and field investigation,analyzed the influence factors,summarized the development characteristics and distribution regularities of geological disasters in the study area,established a relevant evaluation system,utilized qualitative evaluation methods to assess and regionalize the risk of geological disasters.The results show that:utilizing the qualitative analysis methods,comprehensive considerate the development characteristics and distribution regularities of geological disasters,engineering activities and other factors to assess the risk of geological disasters,divided the study area into three districts,in which,light danger district accounted for 45.3%of study area,moderate danger district accounted for 33.5%,catastrophic danger district accounted for 21.2%.This paper completely discussed the technic technical route of falling and landslide geological disasters assessment along the Lalin railway,categorized the risk of different area along the railway,it has an important significance to guarantee the smooth progress of Lalin railway construction.
Lalin railway located in the area where soft rock extremely developed,altitude is highest,and structural movement most intense.In which area,developed a large number of geological disasters that seriously threat the line selection and construction of the railway.Therefore,this paper based on the relevant data collection and field investigation,analyzed the influence factors,summarized the development characteristics and distribution regularities of geological disasters in the study area,established a relevant evaluation system,utilized qualitative evaluation methods to assess and regionalize the risk of geological disasters.The results show that:utilizing the qualitative analysis methods,comprehensive considerate the development characteristics and distribution regularities of geological disasters,engineering activities and other factors to assess the risk of geological disasters,divided the study area into three districts,in which,light danger district accounted for 45.3%of study area,moderate danger district accounted for 33.5%,catastrophic danger district accounted for 21.2%.This paper completely discussed the technic technical route of falling and landslide geological disasters assessment along the Lalin railway,categorized the risk of different area along the railway,it has an important significance to guarantee the smooth progress of Lalin railway construction.
引文
[1]丁继新,周圣华,等.川藏公路然乌—东久段地质灾害定量评价[J].自然灾害学报,2005,14(4):79-84.Ding Jixin,Zhou Shenghua.Quantitative assessment of geological hazards in segment between Ranwu and Dongjiu in Sichuan[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2005,14(4):79-84.
[2]袁素凤.模糊综合评价高速公路建设工程地质灾害危险性[J].灾害学,2009,24(2):57-60.Yuan Sufang.Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of geologic hazard of express way construction engineering[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2009,24(2):57-60.
[3]Van Dijke J J,Van Westen C J.Rockfall hazard:a geomorphological application of neighbourhood analysis with ILWIS[J].ITC Journal,1990,(1):40-44.
[4]Zhang Hongren.Geological hazard control in China[J].Natiral Disaster Reduction in China,1994,1(l):40-42.
[5]黄润秋,李日国.三峡工程水库岸坡稳定性预测的逻辑信息模型[J].水文地质工程地质,1992,1:76-80.Huang Runqiu,Li Riguo.Logical message model of stability predication to bank slopes in three gorges[J].Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology,1992,1:76-80.
[6]柴贺军,黄润秋,刘汉超.滑坡堵江危险度的分析与评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1997,8(4):1-8.Chai Hejun,Huang Runqiu,Liu Hanchao.Analysis and evaluation on landslide for its risk ddegree of damming a river[J].The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,1997,8(4):1-8.
[7]Michael-leiba M.Landslides in research,theory and practice,Thomas Telford,London[J].Quantitative Landslides Risk Assessment of Cairns,Australia,2000:1059-1064.
[8]陈永波.滑坡危险度区划研究——以三峡开县库区为例[D].成都:西南交通大学,2002.
[9]殷坤龙,张桂荣,地质灾害风险区划与综合防治对策[J].安全与环境工程,2003,10(1):32-35.Yin Kunlong,Zhang Guirong.Risk zonation of geohazards and its comprehensive control[J].Safety and Enviromental Engineering,2003,10(1):32-35.
[10]薛强,延安宝塔区地质灾害危险性评价研究[D].西安:西安科技大学,2002.
[11]张春山,韩金良,孙炜锋,等.陕西陇县地质灾害危险性分区评价[J].地质通报,2008,27(1 1):1795-1801.Zhang Chunshan,Han Jinliang,Sun Weifeng,et al.Assessment of geohazard danger zoning in Longxian Country,Shanxi,China[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2008,27(11):1795-1801.
[12]桂蕾,殷坤龙,等.基于聚类分析的滑坡灾害危险性区划研究[J].水文地质与工程地质学报,2013,40(1):100-105.Gui Lei,Kun Yinlong,et al.Landslide hazard zonation based on cluster analysis[J].Hydrogeology&Engineering Geology,2013,40(1):100-105.
[13]范强,巨能攀,等.证据权法在区域滑坡危险性评价中的应用——以贵州省为例[J].工程地质学报,2014,22(3):474-481.Fan Qiang,JuNengpan,et al.Landslides hazards assessment with weights of evidence-a case study in Guizhou,China[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2014,22(3):474-481.
[14]许冲,戴福初,姚鑫,等.GIS支持下基于层次分析法的汶川地震区滑坡易发性评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(2):3978-3985.Xu Chong,Dai Fuchu,Yao Xin,et al.GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment using analytical hierarchy process(AHP)for May 12,2008 Wenchuan earthquake region[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2009,28(2):3978-3985.
[15]王佳佳,殷坤龙,等.基于GIS和信息量的滑坡灾害易发性评价——以三峡库区万州区为例[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,(4):797-808.WangJiajia,YinKunlong,et al.Landslides susceptibility assessment based on GIS and weighted information value:a case study of Wanzhoudistict,three gorges reservoir[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,(4):797-808.
[16]柳源.中国地质灾害(以崩、滑、流为主)危险性分析与区划[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(1):95-99.Liu Yuan.Risk analysis and zoning of geological hazards(chiefly landslide,rock fall and debris flow)in China[J].The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2003,14(1):95-99.
[17]高彩云,崔希民.基于多因素加权灰靶决策模型的滑坡灾害危险性评价[J].中南大学学报,2016,47(2):524-530.Gao Caiyun,Cui Ximin.Landslide risk assessment based on multi-index weighted grey target decision model[J].Journal of Central South University,2016,47(2):524-530.
[2]袁素凤.模糊综合评价高速公路建设工程地质灾害危险性[J].灾害学,2009,24(2):57-60.Yuan Sufang.Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of geologic hazard of express way construction engineering[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2009,24(2):57-60.
[3]Van Dijke J J,Van Westen C J.Rockfall hazard:a geomorphological application of neighbourhood analysis with ILWIS[J].ITC Journal,1990,(1):40-44.
[4]Zhang Hongren.Geological hazard control in China[J].Natiral Disaster Reduction in China,1994,1(l):40-42.
[5]黄润秋,李日国.三峡工程水库岸坡稳定性预测的逻辑信息模型[J].水文地质工程地质,1992,1:76-80.Huang Runqiu,Li Riguo.Logical message model of stability predication to bank slopes in three gorges[J].Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology,1992,1:76-80.
[6]柴贺军,黄润秋,刘汉超.滑坡堵江危险度的分析与评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1997,8(4):1-8.Chai Hejun,Huang Runqiu,Liu Hanchao.Analysis and evaluation on landslide for its risk ddegree of damming a river[J].The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,1997,8(4):1-8.
[7]Michael-leiba M.Landslides in research,theory and practice,Thomas Telford,London[J].Quantitative Landslides Risk Assessment of Cairns,Australia,2000:1059-1064.
[8]陈永波.滑坡危险度区划研究——以三峡开县库区为例[D].成都:西南交通大学,2002.
[9]殷坤龙,张桂荣,地质灾害风险区划与综合防治对策[J].安全与环境工程,2003,10(1):32-35.Yin Kunlong,Zhang Guirong.Risk zonation of geohazards and its comprehensive control[J].Safety and Enviromental Engineering,2003,10(1):32-35.
[10]薛强,延安宝塔区地质灾害危险性评价研究[D].西安:西安科技大学,2002.
[11]张春山,韩金良,孙炜锋,等.陕西陇县地质灾害危险性分区评价[J].地质通报,2008,27(1 1):1795-1801.Zhang Chunshan,Han Jinliang,Sun Weifeng,et al.Assessment of geohazard danger zoning in Longxian Country,Shanxi,China[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2008,27(11):1795-1801.
[12]桂蕾,殷坤龙,等.基于聚类分析的滑坡灾害危险性区划研究[J].水文地质与工程地质学报,2013,40(1):100-105.Gui Lei,Kun Yinlong,et al.Landslide hazard zonation based on cluster analysis[J].Hydrogeology&Engineering Geology,2013,40(1):100-105.
[13]范强,巨能攀,等.证据权法在区域滑坡危险性评价中的应用——以贵州省为例[J].工程地质学报,2014,22(3):474-481.Fan Qiang,JuNengpan,et al.Landslides hazards assessment with weights of evidence-a case study in Guizhou,China[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2014,22(3):474-481.
[14]许冲,戴福初,姚鑫,等.GIS支持下基于层次分析法的汶川地震区滑坡易发性评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(2):3978-3985.Xu Chong,Dai Fuchu,Yao Xin,et al.GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment using analytical hierarchy process(AHP)for May 12,2008 Wenchuan earthquake region[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2009,28(2):3978-3985.
[15]王佳佳,殷坤龙,等.基于GIS和信息量的滑坡灾害易发性评价——以三峡库区万州区为例[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,(4):797-808.WangJiajia,YinKunlong,et al.Landslides susceptibility assessment based on GIS and weighted information value:a case study of Wanzhoudistict,three gorges reservoir[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,(4):797-808.
[16]柳源.中国地质灾害(以崩、滑、流为主)危险性分析与区划[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(1):95-99.Liu Yuan.Risk analysis and zoning of geological hazards(chiefly landslide,rock fall and debris flow)in China[J].The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2003,14(1):95-99.
[17]高彩云,崔希民.基于多因素加权灰靶决策模型的滑坡灾害危险性评价[J].中南大学学报,2016,47(2):524-530.Gao Caiyun,Cui Ximin.Landslide risk assessment based on multi-index weighted grey target decision model[J].Journal of Central South University,2016,47(2):524-530.