用户名: 密码: 验证码:
泰山四种苔草属植物的耐寒性研究
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
以白颖苔草、披针叶苔草、青绿苔草和低矮苔草等4种泰山野生苔草属植物为材料,通过自然降温条件下田间观察和测定人工低温胁迫下叶片的相对电导率,利用Logistic方程计算半致死温度(LT_(50)),结合低温下根系活力的大小,并在不同人工低温处理下测定叶片中丙二醛(MDA)、游离脯氨酸、可溶性蛋白含量和可溶性糖含量以及SOD活性,对几种苔草属植物的耐寒性及低温胁迫下的生理响应进行研究。结果表明,人工低温处理下,几种苔草的丙二醛、游离脯氨酸和可溶性蛋白含量整体呈先上升后下降的趋势,可溶性糖含量整体呈上升趋势,而SOD活性变化因苔草耐寒性不同而呈现差异;4种苔草的半致死温度LT_(50)范围为-11.74~-18.65℃,耐寒性强弱依次为:披针叶苔草>青绿苔草>低矮苔草>白颖苔草,这与田间自然低温下田间观察几种苔草属植物的耐寒性强弱相一致;根系活力下降幅度因苔草种类而异,与半致死温度大小排序有所不同,依次为披针叶苔草>白颖苔草>青绿苔草>低矮苔草。
In order to evaluate the cold tolerance of Carex rigescens,Carex lanceolata,Carex leucochlora and Carex humilis,4species of wild Carex from Mount tai,this experiment was conducted.On the basis of field observation,the relative electric conductivity(REC) and root vigor were determined in the leaves of Carex under the condition of artificial low temperature treatment.The logistic equation was constructed based on the relationship between REC and temperature,then the semi-lethal temperature was determined.Malondialdehyde(MDA) contents,free proline,soluble protein contents and SOD activity were analyzed.The results showed that:the leaf and root of Carex showed different tolerance to cold,which was no significant correlation between them.The contents of MDA,free proline and soluble protein increased firstly,then decreased.The activity of SOD enzyme showed differences due to various cultivars.The lethal temperature LT_(50) of four species of Carex was ranging from-11.74℃ to-18.65℃,the order of cold resistance from strong to weakness is:Carex lanceolate > Carex leucochlora > Carex humilis > Carex rigescens.According to the decline degree of root vigor,however,the order of cold resistance is:Carex lanceolata > Carex rigescens > Carex leucochlora > Carex humilis.
引文
1.高灿红,胡晋,郑昀晔,等.2006.玉米幼苗抗氧化酶活性、脯氨酸含量变化及与其耐寒性的关系[J].应用生态学报,17(6):1045-1050.
    2.高俊凤.2006.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
    3.龚明,刘良友.1988.稻苗低温下叶片、幼根的细胞学反应[J].上海农业学报,4(1):47-54.
    4.蒋明义,郭绍川,张学明.1997.氧化胁迫下稻苗体内积累的脯氨酸的抗氧化作用[J].植物生理学报,23(4):347-352.
    5.李法增.2004.山东植物精要[M].北京:科学出版社.
    6.李秋丽.2010.4个狗牙根品种(系)的耐寒性评价[D].武汉:华中农业大学.
    7.李秀玲,刘开强,杨志民,等.2012.干旱胁迫对4种观赏草枯叶率及生理指标的影响[J].草地学报,20(1):76-82.
    8.李远发,王凌晖,唐春红.2011.不同种源麻风树幼苗对低温胁迫的生理响应[J].西北林学院学报,26(5):35-40.
    9.刘伟,艾希珍,梁文娟,等.低温弱光下水杨酸对黄瓜幼苗光合作用及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(6):921-924.
    10.刘友良,朱根海,刘祖祺.1985.植物抗冻性测定技术的原理和比较[J].植物生理学通讯,1(40):40-43.
    11.马万里,韩烈保,罗菊春.2001.草坪植物的新资源——苔草属植物[J].草业科学,18(2):43-45+56.
    12.Marlena L,Pawel O.2011.Effect of mother plant age on germination and size of seeds and seedlings in the perennial sedge Carex secalina(Cyperaceae)[J].Flora,206(2):158-163.
    13.孟庆伟,高辉远.2011.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社.
    14.Ning Hua,Wang Wen-li,Zheng Cheng-shu,Li Zhao-hui,Zhu Cui-ying,Zhang Qing-liang.2014.Genetic diversity analysis of sedges(Carex spp.)in Shandong,China based on inter-simple sequence repeat[J].Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,56:158-164.
    15.齐曼,尤努斯,塔衣尔.2011.干旱胁迫下尖果沙枣幼苗的根系活力和光合特性[J].应用生态学报,22(7):1789-1795.
    16.Reznicek A A.1990.Evolution in sedges(Carex,Cyperaceae)[J].Can.J.Bot.,68(7):1409-1432.
    17.宋广树,孙蕾,杨春刚,等.2012.吉林省水稻幼苗期低温处理对根系活力的影响[J].中国农学通报,28(3):33-37.
    18.王冠群,李丹青,张佳平,等.2014.德国鸢尾6个品种的耐寒性比较[J].园艺学报,41(4):773-780.
    19.王俊强,吕会刚,方唯,等.2006.苔草属种质资源的研究与应用[J].北京园林,22(2):36-38.
    20.王玲,王春雷,马喜娟,等.2012.锦带花新品种抗寒性[J].东北林业大学学报,40(12):43-46.
    21.王瑞雪.2014.低温对卷荚相思无性系耐寒生理特征的影响及综合评价[D].福州:福建农林大学.
    22.相昆,张美勇,徐颖,等.2011.不同核桃品种耐寒特性综合评价[J].应用生态学报,22(9):2325-2330.
    23.萧运峰,孙发政,高洁.1995.野生草坪植物——青绿苔草的研究[J].四川草原,2:29-32.
    24.许瑛,陈发棣.2008.菊花8个品种的低温半致死温度及其抗寒适应性[J].园艺学报,35(4):559-564.
    25.薛红,沙伟,倪红伟.2005.苔草属植物研究概况[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报,21(4):81-86.
    26.杨静,王华田,宋承东.2007.持续低温胁迫对红叶石楠抗寒性生理生化特性的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,29(6):998-992.
    27.周艳虹,喻景权,钱琼秋,等.2003.低温弱光对黄瓜幼苗生长及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,14(6):921-924.
    28.朱云华,芦建国,徐友新.2007.南京地区冬绿地被植物耐寒性试验[J].中国园林,23(8):20-23.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700