资产证券化风险管控——基于次贷危机案例研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on Asset Securitization Risk Management——Based on the Case Study of Subprime Mortgage Crisis 作者：李雅丽 英文作者：Li Yali; 关键词：资产证券化 ; 次贷危机 ; 风险管控 ; 监管套利 ; 流动性风险 ; 系统性风险 ; 信息不对称 ; 信息披露 ; 信用评级 ; 宏观审慎监管 ; 微观审慎监管 ; 货币政策 英文关键词：Asset Backed Securitization;;Subprime Mortgage Crisis;;Risk Management and Control;;Regulatory Arbitrage;;Liquidity Risk;;Systemic Risk;;Information Asymmetry;;Information Disclosure;;Credit Rating;;Macroprudential Regulation;;Micro-prudential Regulation;;Monetary Policy 中文刊名：SCJR 英文刊名：Southwest Finance 机构：郑州航空工业管理学院; 出版日期：2019-05-14 14:16 出版单位：西南金融 年：2019 期：No.454 基金：河南省社科规划项目(2018BJJ054);; 河南省教育厅人文社会项目(2019-ZZJH-073) 语种：中文; 页：SCJR201905002 页数：9 CN：05 ISSN：51-1587/F 分类号：13-21

摘要

本文以2007年前美国次级抵押贷款证券化业务为研究对象,以风险因素——风险事件——损失为主要内容进行研究,认为资产证券化的最大风险因素在于信息不透明,这不仅缘起于该业务本身的复杂性,也在于评级机构未曾提供更多的正确信息;同时证券化各环节激励机制的缺失以及监管套利机会的存在,加大了信息不透明造成的逆向选择和道德风险。在信息高度不透明的环境下,与证券化业务相关的金融市场信心非常脆弱,任何风吹草动都有可能造成市场恐慌,进而出现交易流动性枯竭和融资流动性枯竭,这分别是金融危机前雷曼兄弟和北岩银行遭遇到的风险事件,这些事件最终导致了全球金融市场的巨大损失。本文还对我国当前证券化市场存在的风险因素进行了分析,最后就如何管控我国资产证券化业务风险给出了相应的政策建议。
        This paper takes the US subprime mortgage securitization business before 2007 as the research object, and main contents studied in this paper include the risk factor--risk event--loss. It is believed that the biggest risk factor of asset securitization is information opacity, which is not only due to the complexity of the business itself,but also because the rating agencies have not provided more correct information; at the same time, the lack of incentives system in various aspects of securitization and the existence of regulatory arbitrage opportunities have increased the adverse selection and moral hazard caused by information opacity. In an environment where information is highly opaque, the financial market confidence associated with the securitization business is very fragile, and any turmoil may cause market panic, which in turn leads to depletion of trading liquidity and depletion of financing liquidity. These were the risk events encountered by Lehman Brothers and Northern Rock Bank before the financial crisis that eventually led to huge losses in the global financial market. This paper also analyzes the risk factors existing in China's current securitization market, and finally gives corresponding policy recommendations on how to control the risk of China's asset securitization business.

引文

[1]方明.次贷危机之谜:预料之中的美元政策副产品[R].中银国际,2008.
    [2]巴曙松,孟之静,孙兴亮.金融危机后资产证券化的新特征及监管新动态[J].经济纵横,2010(8).
    [3]次贷风波研究课题组.次贷风波启示录[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2008.
    [4]李雅丽.美国投资银行FICC业务:发展历程、策略及启示[J].南方金融,2016(9).
    [5]李溦,黄小军,赵艳洁,李勇.别了,雷曼兄弟[M].北京:中信出版社,2009.
    [6]吴进,杨珺皓.信贷资产证券化的评级分析[J].中国金融,2014(10).
    [7]郭杰群.资产证券化需走出“小农经济”[J].中国金融,2017(11).
    [8]贺锐骁.我国企业资产证券化信息披露制度建设的现状及完善建议[J].金融法苑,2017(2).
    [9]冯诗婷.资产证券化信用评级制度与系统性风险分析[J].财经理论与实践,2017,38(2).
    [10]李波.2018年资产证券化发展报告[J].债券,2019(1).
    [11]徐阳.信贷资产证券化信用评级方法的改进与应用[J].债券,2018(2).
    [12]薛小飞.中国资产证券化信用评级研究[J].清华金融评论,2017(2).
    [13]章彰.资产证券化:风险管理的视角与逻辑(下)[J].银行家,2019(1).
    [14]Hyun Song Shin. Reflections on northern rock:The bank run that heralded the global financial crisis[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,2009,23(1).
    (1)在回购交易中,资金借入方需要以国库券、高等级的债券作为抵押品,其中证券化产品的AAA等级也是一种颇受欢迎的抵押物。资金融出方通过扣减一部分抵押物的市场价值而降低自身面临的风险,通常对抵押品的扣减比例(haircut)会随着抵押品价值的涨跌而发生变化。
    (2)本段有关雷曼兄弟相关数据均来自李溦等《别了,雷曼兄弟》(2009年版)