基于组合赋权和VIKOR的学术期刊综合评价研究
|
摘要
针对传统学术期刊综合评价中指标权重大多为单一赋权且评价信息难以集结的问题,提出一种新的基于组合赋权和VIKOR的学术期刊综合评价模型.首先,分别利用DEMATEL方法和熵权法确定指标的主观权重和客观权重;然后,利用乘法归一化方法计算指标的组合权重;最后,基于VIKOR方法计算各方案的利益比率值并排序.以教育类期刊为研究对象,结果表明,模型不仅能够充分考虑学术期刊指标间的相互影响关系和指标提供的信息量,还可以有效避免个别较差指标的消极影响被其他指标中和,为学术期刊评价问题提供了一种新思路.
Aimming at the problem that most of the method of the index weight are single and the aggregation of evaluation information is difficult in traditional comprehensive evaluation of academic journal, this paper proposes a new comprehensive evaluation model of academic journal based on combined weight and VIKOR. Firstly, the DEMATEL method and the entropy method are used to determine the subjective weight and objective weight. Then,the multiplicative normalization method is introduced to compute the combined weight.Finally, the VIKOR method is used to compute the interest rate value and the rank of the solution. By taking some educational journals as the research object, the empirical results show that this model gives a new idea as it not only can consider the mutual influence relationships among indexes and the amount of evaluation information, but also can avoid the bad effect of some indexes being balanced by other indexes.
Aimming at the problem that most of the method of the index weight are single and the aggregation of evaluation information is difficult in traditional comprehensive evaluation of academic journal, this paper proposes a new comprehensive evaluation model of academic journal based on combined weight and VIKOR. Firstly, the DEMATEL method and the entropy method are used to determine the subjective weight and objective weight. Then,the multiplicative normalization method is introduced to compute the combined weight.Finally, the VIKOR method is used to compute the interest rate value and the rank of the solution. By taking some educational journals as the research object, the empirical results show that this model gives a new idea as it not only can consider the mutual influence relationships among indexes and the amount of evaluation information, but also can avoid the bad effect of some indexes being balanced by other indexes.
引文
[1]俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.TOPSIS在期刊评价中的应用及在高次幂下的推广[J].统计研究,2012, 29(12):96-101.
[2] Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060):471-479.
[3] Bergstrom C T, West J D, Wiseman M A. The Eigenfactor Metrics[J]. The Journal of Neuroscience,2008, 28(45):11433-11434.
[4] Yue W, Wilson C S. Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology:a structural equation modeling analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 60(3):317-332.
[5]王伟明.基于社会网络分析和密度算子的学术期刊综合评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018, 29(04):393-399.
[6]张发明,王伟明.基于DEMATEL和Choquet积分的学术期刊综合评价研究[J].情报科学,2018,36(05):71-75.
[7]张发明,王伟明.基于因子分析和诱导密度算子的学术期刊组合评价[J].情报杂志,2018, 37(03):165-170.
[8] Markpin T, Boonradsamee B, Ruksinsut K, et al. Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2):251-261.
[9] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
[10] Moed H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2010, 4(3):265-277.
[11]辛督强.基于主成分分析的13种力学类中文期刊综合评价[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012, 23(2):224-227.
[12]辛督强,韩国秀.因子分析法在科技期刊综合评价中的应用[J].数理统计与管理,2014, 33(1):116-121.
[13]姚红.基于灰色关联分析法的期刊综合评价[J].情报科学,2003, 21(7):730-734.
[14]苏成,潘云涛,袁军鹏,等.基于优化PageRank、HITS和SALSA算法的期刊评价研究[J].编辑学报,2015, 27(4):330-333.
[15]李琳,黄海军,汪寿阳.基于DEA/AR博弈交叉效率方法的学术期刊评价研究[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(4):118-126.
[16]熊国经,熊玲玲,陈小山.基于PLS结构方程模塑进行学术期刊评价的实证研究[J].情报理论与实践,2017, 40(8):117-121.
[17]陈国福,王亮,熊国经,等.基于主成分和集对分析法的期刊评价方法研究[J].情报杂志,2017, 36(3):196-201.
[18]邱均平,李爱群,周明华,等.中国学术期刊评价的特色、做法与结果分析[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2008, 14(4):64-69.
[19]李凯扬,贾玉萍.基于AHP的期刊全文数据库的模糊综合评价[J].情报科学,2005, 23(11):1688-1691.
[20]程慧平.基于主成分分析与熵权TOPSIS方法的期刊学术影响力研究[J].情报科学,2015, 33(12):77-82.
[21] Gabus A, Fontela E. World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL[R]. Switzerland Geneva Battelle Geneva Research Centre, 1972.
[22]孙永河,韩玮,段万春.复杂系统DEMATEL算法研究进展评述[J].控制与决策,2017, 32(3):385-392.
[23]弓晓敏,耿秀丽,孙绍荣.基于二元语义DEMATEL和DEA的多属性群决策方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2016, 22(8):1992-2000.
[24]杨扬,杨尚鹏,章牧,等.基于DEMATEL法的旅行预订类App评价指标体系[J].旅游学刊,2016,43(2):64-74.
[25]熊国经,熊玲玲,陈小山.基于熵值法修正PLS权重的学术期刊综合评价[J].情报杂志,2017, 36(6):192-196.
[26] Opricovic S, Tzeng G H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods:A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2):445-455.
[27]中国社会科学文献计量评价研究中心,清华大学图书馆.《中国学术期刊影响因子年报(人文社会科学)》[J/CD].北京:中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社,2015.
[28]丁筠.学术期刊影响力指数(CI)预测模型的构建[J].情报科学,2017(2):27-32.
[29]罗式胜.期刊引用半衰期的概念一一种与期刊被引半衰期对应的指标[J].图书与情报,1995(2):20-21.
[2] Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060):471-479.
[3] Bergstrom C T, West J D, Wiseman M A. The Eigenfactor Metrics[J]. The Journal of Neuroscience,2008, 28(45):11433-11434.
[4] Yue W, Wilson C S. Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology:a structural equation modeling analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 60(3):317-332.
[5]王伟明.基于社会网络分析和密度算子的学术期刊综合评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018, 29(04):393-399.
[6]张发明,王伟明.基于DEMATEL和Choquet积分的学术期刊综合评价研究[J].情报科学,2018,36(05):71-75.
[7]张发明,王伟明.基于因子分析和诱导密度算子的学术期刊组合评价[J].情报杂志,2018, 37(03):165-170.
[8] Markpin T, Boonradsamee B, Ruksinsut K, et al. Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2):251-261.
[9] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
[10] Moed H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2010, 4(3):265-277.
[11]辛督强.基于主成分分析的13种力学类中文期刊综合评价[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012, 23(2):224-227.
[12]辛督强,韩国秀.因子分析法在科技期刊综合评价中的应用[J].数理统计与管理,2014, 33(1):116-121.
[13]姚红.基于灰色关联分析法的期刊综合评价[J].情报科学,2003, 21(7):730-734.
[14]苏成,潘云涛,袁军鹏,等.基于优化PageRank、HITS和SALSA算法的期刊评价研究[J].编辑学报,2015, 27(4):330-333.
[15]李琳,黄海军,汪寿阳.基于DEA/AR博弈交叉效率方法的学术期刊评价研究[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(4):118-126.
[16]熊国经,熊玲玲,陈小山.基于PLS结构方程模塑进行学术期刊评价的实证研究[J].情报理论与实践,2017, 40(8):117-121.
[17]陈国福,王亮,熊国经,等.基于主成分和集对分析法的期刊评价方法研究[J].情报杂志,2017, 36(3):196-201.
[18]邱均平,李爱群,周明华,等.中国学术期刊评价的特色、做法与结果分析[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2008, 14(4):64-69.
[19]李凯扬,贾玉萍.基于AHP的期刊全文数据库的模糊综合评价[J].情报科学,2005, 23(11):1688-1691.
[20]程慧平.基于主成分分析与熵权TOPSIS方法的期刊学术影响力研究[J].情报科学,2015, 33(12):77-82.
[21] Gabus A, Fontela E. World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL[R]. Switzerland Geneva Battelle Geneva Research Centre, 1972.
[22]孙永河,韩玮,段万春.复杂系统DEMATEL算法研究进展评述[J].控制与决策,2017, 32(3):385-392.
[23]弓晓敏,耿秀丽,孙绍荣.基于二元语义DEMATEL和DEA的多属性群决策方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2016, 22(8):1992-2000.
[24]杨扬,杨尚鹏,章牧,等.基于DEMATEL法的旅行预订类App评价指标体系[J].旅游学刊,2016,43(2):64-74.
[25]熊国经,熊玲玲,陈小山.基于熵值法修正PLS权重的学术期刊综合评价[J].情报杂志,2017, 36(6):192-196.
[26] Opricovic S, Tzeng G H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods:A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2):445-455.
[27]中国社会科学文献计量评价研究中心,清华大学图书馆.《中国学术期刊影响因子年报(人文社会科学)》[J/CD].北京:中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社,2015.
[28]丁筠.学术期刊影响力指数(CI)预测模型的构建[J].情报科学,2017(2):27-32.
[29]罗式胜.期刊引用半衰期的概念一一种与期刊被引半衰期对应的指标[J].图书与情报,1995(2):20-21.