及物性系统下虎鲸身份建构的生态话语分析
|
摘要
基于系统功能语法及物性理论,借助语料库工具对虎鲸生态评估报告中的语言特征以及虎鲸的身份建构路径进行了研究,旨在揭示生态评估报告中的生态取向。研究表明,涉及虎鲸的参与者角色大都由物种集体名词以及商业化、公式化、科学研究性名词实现,将虎鲸建构为为人类服务的意义表征和工具性身份特征;三大及物性过程多使用被动结构将虎鲸识解为"被动接受者""无主动行为者"和"无意识者"的身份。生态报告中建构虎鲸身份使用的语言资源不符合深层生态思想。
The paper studies linguistic characteristics of ecological assessment reports and the path of identity construction of killer whale from the perspective of transitivity system in virtue of corpus tools so as to reveal the ecological orientation of ecological assessment reports. It demonstrates that roles of killer whale are mostly represented by collective nouns of species and commercialized,formulaic as well as scientific research nouns which turn killer whale into semantic representation and instrumental identities for human purposes. Killer whale is often interpreted as " passive recipient", " unconscious and inactive actor" and " server" by the three processes realized by passive structures. Language resources used as identity construction of killer whale in the text do not conform to the deep ecological thought.
The paper studies linguistic characteristics of ecological assessment reports and the path of identity construction of killer whale from the perspective of transitivity system in virtue of corpus tools so as to reveal the ecological orientation of ecological assessment reports. It demonstrates that roles of killer whale are mostly represented by collective nouns of species and commercialized,formulaic as well as scientific research nouns which turn killer whale into semantic representation and instrumental identities for human purposes. Killer whale is often interpreted as " passive recipient", " unconscious and inactive actor" and " server" by the three processes realized by passive structures. Language resources used as identity construction of killer whale in the text do not conform to the deep ecological thought.
引文
[1]刘继宗,袁闯.论当代科学的生态学化[J].学术月刊,1988,20(4):45-51.
[2]何伟,魏榕,ARRAN S.生态语言学的超学科发展:阿伦·斯提布教授访谈录[J].外语研究,2018,35(2):22-26.
[3]黄国文.从系统功能语言学到生态语言学[J].外语教学,2017,38(5):1-6.
[4]ALEXANDER R,STIBBE A. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse[J]. Language Science,2014,41(41):104-110.
[5]GOATLY A. Humans,animals and metaphors[J]. Society and Animal,2006,14(1):15-37.
[6]ALEXANDER R J. Framing Discourse on the Environment:A Critical Discourse Approach[M]. New York and London:Routledge,2009:26-45.
[7]范俊军.生态语言学研究述评[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(2):110-115.
[8]黄国文.生态语言学的兴起与发展[J].中国外语,2016,13(1):9-12.
[9]周文娟.中国语境下生态语言学研究的理念与实践:黄国文生态语言学研究述评[J].西安外国语大学学报,2017,25(3):24-28.
[10]黄国文,赵蕊华.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法[J].现代外语,2017,40(5):585-596.
[11]戴桂玉,仇娟.语言、环境、社会:生态酒店英文简介之生态批评性话语分析[J].外语与外语教学,2012,33(1):48-52.
[12]赵蕊华.系统功能视角下生态话语分析的多层面模式:以生态报告中银无须鳕身份建构为例[J].中国外语,2016,13(5):84-91.
[13]黄国文,陈旸.自然诗歌的生态话语分析:以狄金森的《一只小鸟沿小径走来》为例[J].外国语文,2017,33(2):61-66.
[14]余娟,王瑛.自然生态记录片中的参与者角色配置与生态意识的建构[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(4):17-26.
[15]何伟,张瑞杰.生态话语分析模式构建[J].中国外语2017,14(5):56-64.
[16]刘润清.西方语言学流派[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2013:334.
[17]辛志英,黄国文.系统功能语言学与生态话语分析[J].外语教学,2013,34(3):7-10.
[18]HALLIDAY M A K,MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M]. London:Arnold,2004.
[19]STIBBE A. Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M]. London:Routledge,2015.
[20]卫乃兴.词语学要义[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2012:3.
[21]何伟,魏榕.生态语言学:发展历程与学科属性[J].国外社会科学,2018,40(4):113-123.
[22]何伟,魏榕.话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J].当代修辞学,2018,36(5):63-73.
[23]DEVALL B,SESSIONS G. Deep Ecology:Living as if Nature Mattered[M]. Salt Lake City:Peregrine Smith Books,1985.
[24]雷毅.奈斯与深层生态学[J].自然辩证法通讯,2003,34(3):82-87.
(1)本文对“killer whale(s)”相关分类参考了赵蕊华(2016)的分类类型。
(2)图中的类别名词频数是词形还原后的结果。
(3)Erasure指的是语篇中重要信息被忽视、压制、背景化、边缘化等。
[2]何伟,魏榕,ARRAN S.生态语言学的超学科发展:阿伦·斯提布教授访谈录[J].外语研究,2018,35(2):22-26.
[3]黄国文.从系统功能语言学到生态语言学[J].外语教学,2017,38(5):1-6.
[4]ALEXANDER R,STIBBE A. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse[J]. Language Science,2014,41(41):104-110.
[5]GOATLY A. Humans,animals and metaphors[J]. Society and Animal,2006,14(1):15-37.
[6]ALEXANDER R J. Framing Discourse on the Environment:A Critical Discourse Approach[M]. New York and London:Routledge,2009:26-45.
[7]范俊军.生态语言学研究述评[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(2):110-115.
[8]黄国文.生态语言学的兴起与发展[J].中国外语,2016,13(1):9-12.
[9]周文娟.中国语境下生态语言学研究的理念与实践:黄国文生态语言学研究述评[J].西安外国语大学学报,2017,25(3):24-28.
[10]黄国文,赵蕊华.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法[J].现代外语,2017,40(5):585-596.
[11]戴桂玉,仇娟.语言、环境、社会:生态酒店英文简介之生态批评性话语分析[J].外语与外语教学,2012,33(1):48-52.
[12]赵蕊华.系统功能视角下生态话语分析的多层面模式:以生态报告中银无须鳕身份建构为例[J].中国外语,2016,13(5):84-91.
[13]黄国文,陈旸.自然诗歌的生态话语分析:以狄金森的《一只小鸟沿小径走来》为例[J].外国语文,2017,33(2):61-66.
[14]余娟,王瑛.自然生态记录片中的参与者角色配置与生态意识的建构[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(4):17-26.
[15]何伟,张瑞杰.生态话语分析模式构建[J].中国外语2017,14(5):56-64.
[16]刘润清.西方语言学流派[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2013:334.
[17]辛志英,黄国文.系统功能语言学与生态话语分析[J].外语教学,2013,34(3):7-10.
[18]HALLIDAY M A K,MATTHIESSEN C M I M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M]. London:Arnold,2004.
[19]STIBBE A. Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M]. London:Routledge,2015.
[20]卫乃兴.词语学要义[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2012:3.
[21]何伟,魏榕.生态语言学:发展历程与学科属性[J].国外社会科学,2018,40(4):113-123.
[22]何伟,魏榕.话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J].当代修辞学,2018,36(5):63-73.
[23]DEVALL B,SESSIONS G. Deep Ecology:Living as if Nature Mattered[M]. Salt Lake City:Peregrine Smith Books,1985.
[24]雷毅.奈斯与深层生态学[J].自然辩证法通讯,2003,34(3):82-87.
(1)本文对“killer whale(s)”相关分类参考了赵蕊华(2016)的分类类型。
(2)图中的类别名词频数是词形还原后的结果。
(3)Erasure指的是语篇中重要信息被忽视、压制、背景化、边缘化等。
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |