摘要
目的:核算分析2016年我国慢性病非传染性疾病(以下简称慢性病)可避免住院费用规模及结构,为提高我国医疗卫生资源利用效率提供政策依据。方法:以卫生费用核算为基础按照可避免住院疾病范围,核算分析我国慢性病可避免住院费用总量和构成。结果:2016年我国慢性病可避免住院费用总量为1 492.63亿元,占到总住院费用的10.45%。从机构分布看,65%的慢性病可避免住院费用主要发生在区县级医院;从疾病分布看,73%的可避免住院费用发生在慢性阻塞性肺病、糖尿病、高血压;从人群分布看,50岁及以上人群是可避免费用的消费主体。结论:我国可避免住院费用规模较大,反映出我国可避免住院问题比较严重,应加大对重点疾病、重点人群干预作用;探索建立我国可避免住院监测指标体系,为构建以医疗价值和健康为中心的医疗卫生服务体系提供信息支持。
Objective: To account and analyze potentially preventable hospitalization(PPH) for non-communicable diseases(NCDs)so as to provide policy basis for improving the utilization efficiency of medical resources in China. Methods: Based on the System of Health Account 2011 and the determined scope of diseases, it accounted and analyzed the scale and structure of PPH for NCDs in China. Results: In 2016, the total expenditures of PPHs for NCDs were 149.26 billion yuan, accounted for 10.45% of total inpatient expenditures. In terms of its structure, 65% of preventable inpatient expenditures for NCDs occurred in hospitals at district and county level; 73% of preventable inpatient expenditures for NCDs were caused by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and hypertension; and people aged over 50 consumed the major of preventable inpatient expenditure. Conclusion: The incidence rate of PPHs for NCDs consumed a large scale of expenditures in China, which reflected that PPHs was serious; interventions should be made to target major diseases and population; it should explore the establishment of PPHs to inform the construction of value-centered and health-oriented health systems in China.
引文
[1]BILLINGS J,ZEITEL K,LUKOMNIK J,et al.Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City[J]Health aff(Millwood),1993,12(1):162-173.
[2]STAMP K M,DUCKETT S J,FISHER D A,et al.Hospital use for potentially preventable conditions in aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and other Australian populations[J].Aust n z j public health,1998,22(6):673-678.
[3]JACKSON G,TOBIAS M.Potentially avoidable hospitalisations in New Zealand,1989-98[J].Aust n z j public health2001,25(3):212-221.
[4]NITI M,NG T P.Avoidable hospitalisation rates in Singapore,1991-1998:assessing trends and inequities of quality in primary care[J].J epidemiol community health,2003,57(1):17-22
[5]ROOS L L,WALLD R,UHANOVA J,et al.Physician visits,hospitalizations,and socioeconomic status:ambulatory care sensitive conditions in a Canadian aetting[J].Health aervices research,2005,40(4):1167-1185.
[6]SHEERIN I,ALLEN G,HENARE M,et al.Avoidable hospitalisations:potential for primary and public health initiatives in Canterbury,New Zealand[J].N z med j2006,119(1236):U2029.
[7]PURDY S,GRIFFIN T,SALISBURY C,et al.Ambulatory care sensitive conditions:terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians[J].Public health,2009,123(2):169-173.
[8]翟铁民,张毓辉,万泉,柴培培,魏强,王从从,郭锋,赵郁馨.卫生费用核算新体系:SHA2011介绍[J].中国卫生经济,2013,32(1):13-15.
[9]张毓辉,万泉,柴培培,郭锋,翟铁民,王从从,王秀峰基于“卫生费用核算体系2011”的中国经常性卫生费用核算结果[J].中国卫生经济,2015,34(3):12-16.