用户名: 密码: 验证码:
黄土丘陵区撂荒恢复过程中植物群落组成与土壤养分及酶活性变化的关系
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Relationship Between the Vegetation Community and Soil Nutrient and Enzyme Activity During the Restoration of Abandoned Land in the Loess Hilly Region
  • 作者:乔文静 ; 戴银月 ; 张伟 ; 付淑月 ; 杨改河 ; 韩新辉 ; 陈正兴 ; 高德新 ; 冯永忠
  • 英文作者:QIAO Wen-jing;DAI Yin-yue;ZHANG Wei;FU Shu-yue;YANG Gai-he;HAN Xin-hui;CHEN Zheng-xing;GAO De-xin;FENG Yong-zhong;College of Agronomy,Northwest A&F University;Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Circular Agriculture;
  • 关键词:黄土丘陵区 ; 撂荒地 ; 植物群落 ; 化学计量 ; 酶活性
  • 英文关键词:Loess Hilly Region;;abandoned land;;vegetation community;;stoichiometry;;enzyme activity
  • 中文刊名:HJKZ
  • 英文刊名:Environmental Science
  • 机构:西北农林科技大学农学院;陕西省循环农业工程技术研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2018-06-21 15:33
  • 出版单位:环境科学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0504601);; 国家自然科学基金项目(41571501)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HJKZ201812048
  • 页数:12
  • CN:12
  • ISSN:11-1895/X
  • 分类号:401-412
摘要
为揭示黄土丘陵区植被恢复过程中土壤性质变化趋势,以黄土丘陵区10~45a的撂荒地为研究对象,分析撂荒后植被恢复过程中植物群落演变规律、土壤养分含量、4种酶活性变化及其相关关系.结果表明,随着撂荒年限的增加,恢复过程中主要群落的演变为猪毛蒿(Artemisia scoparia)→达乌里胡枝子(Lespedeza dahurica)+铁杆蒿(Artemisia sacrorum)→茭蒿(Artemisia giraldii)+铁杆蒿→白羊草(Bothriochloa flaccidum)+茭蒿,群落多样性指数整体表现为先增后减的趋势,菊科(Compositae)、禾本科(Poaceae)及豆科(Leguminosae)这3科占比从66. 67%降至50%,后上升到75%.土壤有机碳(SOC),全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)、速效氮(AN)、速效磷(AP)与碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)、脲酶(UE)与蔗糖酶(SC)这4种酶活性呈增加趋势,但增加程度不同,化学计量比总体呈波动上升趋势.菊科、禾本科与豆科相比总科数、总属数、总种数及植物多样性,对养分和酶活性有更显著的影响,贡献率分别为72. 8%、69. 1%、66. 0%,且三大科对土壤酶的影响大于土壤养分,其中禾本科与豆科对养分及酶活性表现为正影响,而菊科表现为负影响.撂荒恢复过程中草地群落优势科占比的升高显著影响土壤酶的升高,并导致土壤养分变化.
        The trends of and relationships among the plant community,soil nutrients,and four soil enzymes were investigated after being abandoned for 10,15,20,30,and 45 years to reveal the soil properties during the restoration in the Loess Hilly Region. The results indicate the following ranking of dominant plant community species: Artemisia scoparia→ Lespedeza dahurica + Artemisia sacrorum→ Artemisia giraldii + irons Artemisia annua→ Bothriochloa flaccidum + Artemisia selengensis. The ranking reflects an increase along the chronosequence of abandoned land. Moreover,the ratio of the total species of Compositae, Poaceae, and Leguminosae decreases from 66. 67% to 50% and then increases up to 75%. The SOC,TN,TP,AN,AP,and four enzyme activity types(ALP,CAT,UE,and SC) increase but respond differently to restoration,while the stoichiometric ratio fluctuates. In contrast to the number of plant families,genus,species,and plant diversity,Compositae,Poaceae,and Leguminosae have major effects on the soil nutrient and enzyme activity,which explains the total variation of 72. 8%,69. 1%,and 66. 0%,respectively. The effects of these three families on the soil enzymes are greater than that on soil nutrients. Poaceae and Leguminosae have a positive effect on the nutrient and enzyme activity,while the family Compositae has a negative effect. Overall,the changes of dominant species of grassland communities during restoration significantly affect the soil enzyme and thereby are responsible for the soil nutrient dynamics.
引文
[1] Sun W Y,Song X Y,Mu X M,et al. Spatiotemporal vegetation cover variations associated with climate change and ecological restoration in the Loess Plateau[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2015,209-210:87-99.
    [2] Bai J J,Di L P,Bai J T. NDVI and regional climate variation since the implementation of revegetation program in northern Shaanxi Province,China[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing,2014,7(11):4581-4588.
    [3]崔晓临,雷刚,王涛,等.退耕还林还草工程实施对洛河流域土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(5):68-73.Cui X L,Lei G,Wang T,et al. Impacts of grain for green project on soil erosion in Luohe River Basin of northern Shaanxi Province,China[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(5):68-73.
    [4]张晓霞,杨宗儒,查同刚,等.晋西黄土区退耕还林22年后林地土壤物理性质的变化[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):416-424.Zhang X X,Yang Z R,Zha T G,et al. Changes in the physical properties of soil in forestlands after 22 years under the influence of the Conversion of Cropland into Farmland Project in Loess region,western Shanxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(2):416-424.
    [5]邓景成,高鹏,穆兴民,等.黄土高原退耕还林工程对生态环境的影响及对策建议[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(5):63-68.Deng J C,Gao P,Mu X M,et al. Impacts and advice of the grain for green project to ecological environment on the Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(5):63-68.
    [6]雒明伟,毛亮,李倩倩,等.青藏高原筑路取土迹地恢复植物群落与土壤的碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(23):7832-7841.Luo M W,Mao L,Li Q Q,et al. C,N,and P stoichiometry of plant and soil in the restorable plant communities distributed on the Land Used for Qinghai-Tibet Highway Construction in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(23):7832-7841.
    [7] Korb J E,Johnson N C,Covington W W. Slash pile burning effects on soil biotic and chemical properties and plant establishment:recommendations for amelioration[J]. Restoration Ecology,2004,12(1):52-62.
    [8]刘洋,曾全超,安韶山,等.黄土丘陵区草本植物叶片与枯落物生态化学计量学特征[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(6):1793-1800.Liu Y,Zeng Q C,An S S,et al. Ecological stoichiometry of leaf and litter of herbaceous plants in loess hilly and gully regions,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2017,28(6):1793-1800.
    [9]李鑫,曾全超,安韶山,等.黄土高原纸坊沟流域不同植物叶片及枯落物的生态化学计量学特征研究[J].环境科学,2015,36(3):1084-1091.Li X,Zeng Q C, An S S, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics in leaf and litter under different vegetation types of Zhifanggou Watershed on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Environmental Science,2015,36(3):1084-1091.
    [10] Horodecki P,Jagodziński A M. Tree species effects on litter decomposition in pure stands on afforested post-mining sites[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2017,406:1-11.
    [11]赵勇,吴明作,樊巍,等.太行山针、阔叶森林凋落物分解及养分归还比较[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(9):1616-1624.Zhao Y,Wu M Z,Fan W,et al. Comparison of nutrient return and litter decomposition between coniferous and broad-leaved forests in Hilly Region of Taihang Mountains[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2009,24(9):1616-1624.
    [12]曾昭霞,刘孝利,王克林,等.桂西北喀斯特区原生林与次生林凋落物及养分归还特征比较[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(1):146-151.Zeng Z X,Liu X L,Wang K L,et al. Comparison of litterfall and nutrients return properties of primary and secon-dary forest ecosystems,the karst region of Northwest Guangxi[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2010,19(1):146-151.
    [13] Ren C J,Chen J,Deng J,et al. Response of microbial diversity to C:N:P stoichiometry in fine root and microbial biomass following afforestation[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2017,53(4):457-468.
    [14]何兵,李睿玉,张红,等. 5种外来菊科植物对根际土壤微生物群落和酶活性的影响[J].安全与环境学报,2013,13(3):176-180.He B,Li R Y,Zhang H,et al. Effects of five alien Compositae plants on the growth of the microbial community of the rhizosphere and the soil's enzyme activity[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2013,13(3):176-180.
    [15] An S S,Cheng Y,Huang Y M,et al. Effects of revegetation on soil microbial biomass,enzyme activities,and nutrient cycling on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Restoration Ecology,2013,21(5):600-607.
    [16] Perkins L B,Nowak R S. Native and non-native grasses generate common types of plant-soil feedbacks by altering soil nutrients and microbial communities[J]. Oikos,2013,122(2):199-208.
    [17]薛超玉,焦峰,张海东,等.黄土丘陵区弃耕地恢复过程中土壤与植物恢复特征[J].草业科学,2016,33(3):368-376.Xue C Y,Jiao F,Zhang H D,et al. The characteristics of plant species and soil quality in the restoration process of the Loess Hilly Region[J]. Pratacultural Science,2016,33(3):368-376.
    [18]刘海威,张少康,焦峰.黄土丘陵区不同退耕年限草地群落特征及其土壤水分养分效应[J].草业学报,2016,25(10):31-39.Liu H W,Zhang S K,Jiao F. Relationships between community characteristics and soil nutrients and moisture in abandoned hill country grassland[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(10):31-39.
    [19]杨丽霞,陈少锋,安娟娟,等.陕北黄土丘陵区不同植被类型群落多样性与土壤有机质、全氮关系研究[J].草地学报,2014,22(2):291-298.Yang L X,Chen S F,An J J,et al. Relationships among community diversity and soil organic matter,total nitrogen under different vegetation types in the Gully Region of Loess Region[J]. Acta Agrectir Sinica,2014,22(2):291-298.
    [20] Zhang C,Liu G B,Xue S,et al. Soil bacterial community dynamics reflect changes in plant community and soil properties during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2016,97:40-49.
    [21]杜峰,徐学选,张兴昌,等.陕北黄土丘陵区撂荒群落排序及演替[J].生态学报,2008,28(11):5418-5427.Du F,Xu X X,Zhang X C,et al. The ordination of abandoned old-field communities and secondary succession rate,successional divergence or convergence in the Loess Hilly Region of northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2008,28(11):5418-5427.
    [22]张海东,汝海丽,焦峰,等.黄土丘陵区退耕时间序列梯度上草本植被群落与土壤C、N、P、K化学计量学特征[J].环境科学,2016,37(3):1128-1138.Zhang H D,Ru H L,Jiao F,et al. C,N,P,K stoichiometric characteristic of leaves,root and soil in different abandoned years in Loess Plateau[J]. Environmental Science,2016,37(3):1128-1138.
    [23]秦伟,朱清科,张宇清,等.陕北黄土区生态修复过程中植物群落物种多样性变化[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(2):403-409.Qin W, Zhu Q K, Zhang Y Q, et al. Dynamics of plant community species diversity in the process of ecological rehabilitation in North Shaanxi Loess Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2009,20(2):403-409.
    [24]张学礼,胡振琪,初士立.土壤含水量测定方法研究进展[J].土壤通报,2005,36(1):118-123.Zhang X L,Hu Z Q,Chu S L. Methods for measuring soil water content:a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2005,36(1):118-123.
    [25]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].(第三版).北京:中国农业出版社,2000. 25-78.
    [26]张超,刘国彬,薛萐,等.黄土丘陵区不同林龄人工刺槐林土壤酶演变特征[J].林业科学,2010,46(12):23-29.Zhang C,Liu G B,Xue S,et al. Evolution of soil enzyme activities of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation at different ages in Loess Hilly Region[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2010,46(12):23-29.
    [27] Ren C J,Kang D,Wu J P,et al. Temporal variation in soil enzyme activities after afforestation in the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Geoderma,2016,282:103-111.
    [28]马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(上)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(3):162-168.
    [29]马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):231-239.
    [30]林勇,艾训儒,姚兰,等.木林子自然保护区不同群落类型主要优势种群的生态位研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(2):223-234.Lin Y,Ai X R,Yao L,et al. Niches of main dominant species of different community types in Mulinzi Nature Reserve[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2017,32(2):223-234.
    [31]郝文芳,杜峰,陈小燕,等.黄土丘陵区天然群落的植物组成、植物多样性及其与环境因子的关系[J].草地学报,2012,20(4):609-615.Hao W F,Du F,Chen X Y,et al. Composition and diversity analysis of natural-community plants in the Loess Hilly Region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica,2012,20(4):609-615.
    [32]张超,董淑琦,刘国彬,等.黄土丘陵区植被演替中不同草本植物间的化感效应[J].草地学报,2012,20(5):848-854.Zhang C,Dong S Q,Liu G B,et al. Allelopathic effect of different herbaceous plants during vegetation succession in the Hilly-Gully Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica,2012,20(5):848-854.
    [33]张仁懿,徐当会,陈凌云,等.基于N:P化学计量特征的高寒草甸植物养分状况研究[J].环境科学,2014,35(3):1131-1137.Zhang R Y,Xu D H,Chen L Y,et al. Plant N status in the alpine grassland of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau:base on the N:P stoichiometry[J]. Environmental Science,2014,35(3):1131-1137.
    [34] Van Ruijven J,Berendse F. Positive effects of plant species diversity on productivity in the absence of legumes[J]. Ecology Letters,2003,6(3):170-175.
    [35]王冬,杨政,郝红敏,等.黄土区退耕草地凋落物—土壤界面水分过程特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):80-84.Wang D,Yang Z,Hao H M,et al. Hydrological processes of litter-soil interfacial systems in restoration grasslands of the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(1):80-84.
    [36]苏日古嘎,张玉霞,朱爱民.干旱胁迫对3种野生豆科牧草生长发育和抗旱生理机制的影响[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2017,32(5):424-428,441.Suriguga,Zhang Y X,Zhu A M. Effects of drought stress on growth development and physiological mechanisms of drought resistance of 3 wild Leguminous forages[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities(Natural Sciences),2017,32(5):424-428,441.
    [37]李磊,贾志清,朱雅娟,等.我国干旱区植物抗旱机理研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(5):1053-1059.Li L,Jia Z Q,Zhu Y J,et al. Research advances on drought resistance mechanism of plant species in arid area of China[J].Journal of Desert Research,2010,30(5):1053-1059.
    [38]周凯,郭维明,徐迎春.菊科植物化感作用研究进展[J].生态学报,2004,24(8):1776-1784.Zhou K, Guo W M, Xu Y C. Advances of research on allelopathic potential in compositae[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(8):1776-1784.
    [39]郭曼,郑粉莉,和文祥,等.黄土丘陵区不同退耕年限植被多样性变化及其与土壤养分和酶活性的关系[J].土壤学报,2010,47(5):979-986.Guo M,Zheng F L,He W X,et al. Variation of vegetation diversity and its relationship with soil nutrient and enzyme activity in lands of different abandoned years in the loess hilly-gully region[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2010,47(5):979-986.
    [40]崔宁洁,张丹桔,刘洋,等.不同林龄马尾松人工林林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(10):2610-2617.Cui N J,Zhang D J,Liu Y,et al. Plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties under different aged Pinus massoniana plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2014,33(10):2610-2617.
    [41]刘旻霞.亚高寒草甸不同坡向植物光合生理和叶片形态差异[J].生态学报,2017,37(24):8526-8536.Liu M X. Studies on physiological and leaf morphological traits for photosynthesis on different slopes in a subalpine meadow[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(24):8526-8536.
    [42] Zhong Y Q W,Yan W M,Wang R W,et al. Differential responses of litter decomposition to nutrient addition and soil water availability with long-term vegetation recovery[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2017,53(8):939-949.
    [43]宋彦涛,周道玮,李强,等.松嫩草地80种草本植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(3):222-230.Song Y T,Zhou D W,Li Q,et al. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in 80 herbaceous plant species of Songnen grassland in Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2012,36(3):222-230.
    [44]杨珏,阮晓红.土壤磷素循环及其对土壤磷流失的影响[J].土壤与环境,2001,10(3):256-258.Yang Y,Ruan X H. Soil circulation of phosphosrus and its effects on the soil loss of phosphorus[J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences,2001,10(3):256-258.
    [45] Fan H B,Wu J P,Liu W F,et al. Linkages of plant and soil C:N:P stoichiometry and their relationships to forest growth in subtropical plantations[J]. Plant and Soil,2015,392(1-2):127-138.
    [46] Zhang W,Qiao W J,Gao D X,et al. Relationship between soil nutrient properties and biological activities along a restoration chronosequence of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation forests in the Ziwuling Mountains,China[J]. CATENA,2018,161:85-95.
    [47]刘善江,夏雪,陈桂梅,等.土壤酶的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(21):1-7.Liu S J,Xia X,Chen G M,et al. Study progress on functions and affecting factors of soil enzymes[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2011,27(21):1-7.
    [48]刘洋,黄懿梅,曾全超.黄土高原不同植被类型下土壤细菌群落特征研究[J].环境科学,2016,37(10):3931-3938.Liu Y,Huang Y M,Zeng Q C. Soil bacterial communities under different vegetation types in the Loess Plateau[J]. Environmental Science,2016,37(10):3931-3938.
    [49]李君剑,刘峰,周小梅.矿区植被恢复方式对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].环境科学,2015,36(5):1836-1841.Li J J,Liu F,Zhou X M. Effects of different reclaimed scenarios on soil microbe and enzyme activities in mining areas[J].Environmental Science,2015,36(5):1836-1841.
    [50] Ren C J,Chen J,Lu X J,et al. Responses of soil total microbial biomass and community compositions to rainfall reductions[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2018,116:4-10.
    [51]张笑培,杨改河,任广鑫,等.黄土高原南部植被恢复对土壤理化性状与土壤酶活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(6):64-68.Zhang X P,Yang G H,Ren G X,et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil physical-chemical properties and activities of soil enzyme in the gully region of the Loess Plateau[J].Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2010,28(6):64-68.
    [52] Siebenks A,Roscher C. Functional composition rather than species richness determines root characteristics of experimental grasslands grown at different light and nutrient availability[J].Plant and Soil,2016,404(1-2):399-412.
    [53] Hu G Z,Liu H Y,Yin Y,et al. The role of legumes in plant community succession of degraded grasslands in northern China[J]. Land Degradation&Development,2016,27(2):366-372.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700