基于因子及聚类分析的25个茶树品种光合性能评价
|
摘要
【目的】对25个茶树品种春、夏、秋季的光合性能进行评价。【方法】采用Li-6400光合系统测定不同茶树春、夏、秋季新梢叶片的光合参数并予以统计分析。【结果】因子分析提取的2个因子可以概括81.16%的光合参数信息,因子1主要受净光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)、胞间CO2浓度(Ci)及羧化率(CE)的影响,因子2主要受水分利用率(WUE)和蒸腾速率(Tr)的影响;春季,铁观音、菊花春的光合因子综合得分较高;夏季,浙农113和中茶302得分较高;秋季,浙农113和巴渝特早得分较高。系统聚类将所有材料分为2类,其中大部分茶树夏季的叶片为一类,具有较高的Pn和WUE;春、秋季的所有茶树叶片及黔湄502等6个茶树品种的夏季叶片为一类,具有较高的Pn、Gs、Ci和Tr,但WUE较低。【结论】制定栽培管理措施时应因时因品种制宜。
[Purpose]Photosynthetic performance of 25 tea cultivars in different seasons would be evaluated.[Method]Photosynthetic parameters of different tea cultivars at spring, summer and autumn were measured by an intelligent portable photosynthesis system(Li-6400 X), and the data would be analyzed.[Result]The first two factors accounted for 81.16% of the total variation. Factor 1 was mainly affected by the levels of net photosynthetic rate(Pn), stomatal conductance(Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) and carboxylation efficiency(CE), factor 2 was mainly affected by the levels of water use efficiency(WUE) and transpiration rate(Tr). Tieguanyin and Juhuachun had the higher factor score in spring, Zhenong 113 and Zhongcha 302 had the higher factor score in summer, in addition, Zhenong 113 and Bayu Tezao had the higher factor score in autumn. All the cultivars were classified into 2 types, tea leaves of most of the cultivars in summer were A type, which showed the better Pn and WUE levels, and the leaves of all the tea cultivars in spring and autumn and the leaves of Qianmei 502, Nanjiang Daye, Wuniuzao, Meizan, Mengshan 11 and Chuanmu 217 in summer were the B type, which shows the better Pn, Gs, Ci and Tr levels, but the lower WUE level.[Conclusion]The cultivation management measures of tea plant should be formulated according the cultivars and season.
[Purpose]Photosynthetic performance of 25 tea cultivars in different seasons would be evaluated.[Method]Photosynthetic parameters of different tea cultivars at spring, summer and autumn were measured by an intelligent portable photosynthesis system(Li-6400 X), and the data would be analyzed.[Result]The first two factors accounted for 81.16% of the total variation. Factor 1 was mainly affected by the levels of net photosynthetic rate(Pn), stomatal conductance(Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) and carboxylation efficiency(CE), factor 2 was mainly affected by the levels of water use efficiency(WUE) and transpiration rate(Tr). Tieguanyin and Juhuachun had the higher factor score in spring, Zhenong 113 and Zhongcha 302 had the higher factor score in summer, in addition, Zhenong 113 and Bayu Tezao had the higher factor score in autumn. All the cultivars were classified into 2 types, tea leaves of most of the cultivars in summer were A type, which showed the better Pn and WUE levels, and the leaves of all the tea cultivars in spring and autumn and the leaves of Qianmei 502, Nanjiang Daye, Wuniuzao, Meizan, Mengshan 11 and Chuanmu 217 in summer were the B type, which shows the better Pn, Gs, Ci and Tr levels, but the lower WUE level.[Conclusion]The cultivation management measures of tea plant should be formulated according the cultivars and season.
引文
[1]刘周莉,赵明珠,秦娇娇,等.三种木质藤本植物光合特性比较研究[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(6):952.DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.06.007.
[2]MCDOWELL S C.Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus(Rosaceae)[J].American Journal of Botany,2002,89(9):1431.DOI:10.3732/ajb.89.9.1431.
[3]梁文斌,刘卫东,聂东伶,等.短梗大参的光合特性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(2):6.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.02.002.
[4]ISEBRANDS J C,CEULEMANS R,WIARD B.Genetic variation in photosynthetic traits among Populous clones in relation to yield[J].Plant Physiology Biochemistry,1988,26(4):427.
[5]胡加新,李蕊萍,朱雯,等.高州油茶光合生理特性[J].华南农业大学学报,2015,36(5):111.DOI:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2015.05.019.
[6]MOHOTTI A J,LAWLOR D W.Diurnal variation of photosynthesis and photoinhibition in tea:effects of irradiance and nitrogen supply during growth in the field[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2002,53(367):313.DOI:10.1093/jexbot/53.367.313.
[7]刘建福,钟书淳,黄安民,等.武夷岩茶光合特性及品质成分比较[J].热带作物学报,2014,35(6):1148.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2014.06.018.
[8]CHEN X H,ZHUANG C G,HE Y F,et al.Photosynthesis,yield,and chemical composition of Tieguanyin tea plants(Camellia sinensis(L.)O.Kuntze)in response to irrigation treatments[J].Agricultural Water Management,2010,97:419.DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.10.015.
[9]JOSHI S C,PALNI L M S.Clonal variation in temperature response of photosynthesis in tea[J].Plant Science,1998,137:225.DOI:10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00015-6.
[10]钟秋生,林郑和,陈常颂,等.不同浓度氟对茶树幼苗光合作用的影响[J].福建农业学报,2014,29(3):233.DOI:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.03.007.
[11]郭春芳,孙云,张木清.土壤水分胁迫对茶树光合作用光响应特性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(6):1413.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1011.2008.01413.
[12]林金科.水分胁迫对茶树光合作用的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,1998,27(4):40.DOI:10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).1998.04.009.
[13]林郑和,钟秋生,陈常颂,等.缺氮条件下不同品种茶树叶片光合特性的变化[J].茶叶科学,2013,33(6):5.DOI:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2013.06.009.
[14]韩楠,唐茜,赖云松,等.四川引进的茶树特色品种黄金芽、金光、郁金稥的光合特性[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(4):1600.DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.8cjas.2015.04.036.
[15]韩楠.四川引进的茶树特色品种黄金芽、金光、郁金稥的光合特性[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2015.
[16]郭春芳,孙云,陈常颂,等.茶树品种光合与水分利用特性比较及聚类分析[J].作物学报,2008,34(10):1797.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01797.
[17]柯世省,金则新,李钧敏.浙江天台山茶树光合日变化及光响应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2002,8(2):159.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1006-687X.2002.02.009.
[18]林金科.田间茶+树净光合速率及其生态生理因子的日变化[J].福建农业大学学报,1999,28(3):294.DOI:10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).1999.03.008.
[19]李庚飞.不同郁闭度对茶树净光合速率及茶园生态因子的影响[J].福建林业科技,2013,40(3):50.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2013.03.11.
[20]刘志龙,方建民,虞木奎,等.三种林-茶复合林分中环境因子和茶的光合特征参数的日变化规律[J].植物资源与环境学报,2009,18(2):62.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2009.02.011.
[21]肖正东,程鹏,马永春,等.不同种植模式下茶树光合特性、茶芽性状及茶叶化学成分的比较[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(2):15.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.02.003.
[22]王婉,沈汉,舒骏,等.林茶复合条件下茶树光合特性与荧光参数的研究[J].湖南农业科学,2013(5):101.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2013.05.030.
[23]肖润林,王久荣,单武雄,等.不同遮阴水平对茶树光合环境及茶叶品质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(6):6.
[24]丁红艳,陈建,张敏.基于因子分析和聚类分析的新疆各地区经济发展水平综合评价[J].数字的实践与认识,2016,46(4):36.
[25]刘昌明,王会肖.土壤-作物-大气界面水分过程与节水调控[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
[26]邹琦.作物抗旱生理生态研究[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,1994.
[27]费颖新.间作树木对茶园生态环境及茶叶品质影响的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2004.
[28]唐茜,叶善蓉,单虹丽,等.引进茶树品种光合特性的比较研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2006,24(3):303.DOI:10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2006.03.014.
[2]MCDOWELL S C.Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus(Rosaceae)[J].American Journal of Botany,2002,89(9):1431.DOI:10.3732/ajb.89.9.1431.
[3]梁文斌,刘卫东,聂东伶,等.短梗大参的光合特性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(2):6.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.02.002.
[4]ISEBRANDS J C,CEULEMANS R,WIARD B.Genetic variation in photosynthetic traits among Populous clones in relation to yield[J].Plant Physiology Biochemistry,1988,26(4):427.
[5]胡加新,李蕊萍,朱雯,等.高州油茶光合生理特性[J].华南农业大学学报,2015,36(5):111.DOI:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2015.05.019.
[6]MOHOTTI A J,LAWLOR D W.Diurnal variation of photosynthesis and photoinhibition in tea:effects of irradiance and nitrogen supply during growth in the field[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2002,53(367):313.DOI:10.1093/jexbot/53.367.313.
[7]刘建福,钟书淳,黄安民,等.武夷岩茶光合特性及品质成分比较[J].热带作物学报,2014,35(6):1148.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2014.06.018.
[8]CHEN X H,ZHUANG C G,HE Y F,et al.Photosynthesis,yield,and chemical composition of Tieguanyin tea plants(Camellia sinensis(L.)O.Kuntze)in response to irrigation treatments[J].Agricultural Water Management,2010,97:419.DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.10.015.
[9]JOSHI S C,PALNI L M S.Clonal variation in temperature response of photosynthesis in tea[J].Plant Science,1998,137:225.DOI:10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00015-6.
[10]钟秋生,林郑和,陈常颂,等.不同浓度氟对茶树幼苗光合作用的影响[J].福建农业学报,2014,29(3):233.DOI:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.03.007.
[11]郭春芳,孙云,张木清.土壤水分胁迫对茶树光合作用光响应特性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(6):1413.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1011.2008.01413.
[12]林金科.水分胁迫对茶树光合作用的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,1998,27(4):40.DOI:10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).1998.04.009.
[13]林郑和,钟秋生,陈常颂,等.缺氮条件下不同品种茶树叶片光合特性的变化[J].茶叶科学,2013,33(6):5.DOI:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2013.06.009.
[14]韩楠,唐茜,赖云松,等.四川引进的茶树特色品种黄金芽、金光、郁金稥的光合特性[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(4):1600.DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.8cjas.2015.04.036.
[15]韩楠.四川引进的茶树特色品种黄金芽、金光、郁金稥的光合特性[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2015.
[16]郭春芳,孙云,陈常颂,等.茶树品种光合与水分利用特性比较及聚类分析[J].作物学报,2008,34(10):1797.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01797.
[17]柯世省,金则新,李钧敏.浙江天台山茶树光合日变化及光响应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2002,8(2):159.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1006-687X.2002.02.009.
[18]林金科.田间茶+树净光合速率及其生态生理因子的日变化[J].福建农业大学学报,1999,28(3):294.DOI:10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).1999.03.008.
[19]李庚飞.不同郁闭度对茶树净光合速率及茶园生态因子的影响[J].福建林业科技,2013,40(3):50.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2013.03.11.
[20]刘志龙,方建民,虞木奎,等.三种林-茶复合林分中环境因子和茶的光合特征参数的日变化规律[J].植物资源与环境学报,2009,18(2):62.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2009.02.011.
[21]肖正东,程鹏,马永春,等.不同种植模式下茶树光合特性、茶芽性状及茶叶化学成分的比较[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(2):15.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.02.003.
[22]王婉,沈汉,舒骏,等.林茶复合条件下茶树光合特性与荧光参数的研究[J].湖南农业科学,2013(5):101.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2013.05.030.
[23]肖润林,王久荣,单武雄,等.不同遮阴水平对茶树光合环境及茶叶品质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(6):6.
[24]丁红艳,陈建,张敏.基于因子分析和聚类分析的新疆各地区经济发展水平综合评价[J].数字的实践与认识,2016,46(4):36.
[25]刘昌明,王会肖.土壤-作物-大气界面水分过程与节水调控[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
[26]邹琦.作物抗旱生理生态研究[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,1994.
[27]费颖新.间作树木对茶园生态环境及茶叶品质影响的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2004.
[28]唐茜,叶善蓉,单虹丽,等.引进茶树品种光合特性的比较研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2006,24(3):303.DOI:10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2006.03.014.