用户名: 密码: 验证码:
心房颤动患者使用新型口服抗凝药有效性和安全性的网状Meta分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Network Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
  • 作者:霍礼超 ; 李梦丽 ; 宋明惠 ; 张彦霞 ; 薛鹏龙 ; 乔成栋
  • 英文作者:HUO Lichao;LI Mengli;SONG Minghui;ZHANG Yanxia;XUE Penglong;QIAO Chengdong;Department of Geriatrics,the First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University;Department of Oncology,the First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University;
  • 关键词:心房颤动 ; Meta分析 ; 抗凝药 ; 随机对照试验 ; 华法林 ; 阿哌沙班
  • 英文关键词:Atrial fibrillation;;Meta-analysis;;Anticoagulants;;Randomized controlled trial;;Warfarin;;Apixaban
  • 中文刊名:QKYX
  • 英文刊名:Chinese General Practice
  • 机构:兰州大学第一临床医学院老年病科;兰州大学第一临床医学院肿瘤科;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15 15:47
  • 出版单位:中国全科医学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.22;No.611
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:QKYX201920016
  • 页数:10
  • CN:20
  • ISSN:13-1222/R
  • 分类号:70-79
摘要
背景心房颤动是临床上最常见的心律失常之一,血栓形成是心房颤动的常见并发症。长期以来华法林作为心房颤动患者抗凝的首选药物,其不良反应一直困扰着临床医生和患者。目前随着新型口服抗凝药的问世,这一难题得到了解决,相关的大型临床试验也验证了其疗效,但是仍然缺乏新型口服抗凝药之间直接的比较。目的采用网状Meta分析方法评价心房颤动患者使用新型口服抗凝药的治疗效果。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMBase、the Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据知识服务平台、中国知网(CNKI)等数据库,搜集关于新型口服抗凝药治疗心房颤动患者的随机对照试验(RCTs),检索截止时间为2018年7月。对纳入文献进行质量评价及数据提取,采用R 3.4.3和Stata 14软件对栓塞发生率、颅内出血发生率、缺血性脑卒中发生率、全因死亡率、心肌梗死发生率、胃肠道出血发生率等进行分析;采用曲线下面积(SUCAR)计算对干预措施进行排序。结果共纳入28篇RCTs,227 919例患者。网状Meta分析结果显示,使用华法林栓塞发生率高于达比加群150 mg、利伐沙班20 mg、阿哌沙班10 mg和依度沙班60 mg(P<0.05);使用华法林颅内出血发生率高于达比加群110 mg、达比加群150 mg、利伐沙班20 mg、阿哌沙班10 mg、依度沙班30 mg、依度沙班60 mg(P<0.05);使用华法林缺血性脑卒中发生率高于达比加群150 mg(P<0.05);除西美加群36 mg、利伐沙班15 mg外,使用华法林全因死亡率高于其他新型口服抗凝药(P<0.05);使用华法林心肌梗死发生率高于西美加群36 mg(P<0.05);使用华法林胃肠道出血发生率低于利伐沙班20 mg(P<0.05)。SUCAR对干预措施的排序结果显示,在降低栓塞发生率、全因死亡率方面,达比加群150 mg效果最好;在降低颅内出血、胃肠道出血发生率方面,依度沙班30 mg效果最好;在降低缺血性脑卒中、心肌梗死发生率方面,西美加群36 mg效果最好。结论现有的证据表明阿哌沙班10 mg可能是应用前景较好的药物。本研究纳入文献的总体质量较高,结果有一定的指导意义,但是纳入的国内文献质量不高,仍需要在国内开展更多高质量的临床试验对本研究的结果给予验证。
        Background Atrial fibrillation(AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias encountered clinically.Thrombosis is a common complication of AF.For a long time,warfarin was a first choice for anticoagulation in patients with AF.But adverse reactions of warfarin have been troubled clinicians and patients.At present,with the new anticoagulants generated,and their efficacies have been verified by large-scale clinical trials,this problem has been solved.But there is still lack of direct comparative studies of such anticoagulants.Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with AF by network meta-analysis.Methods Databases of PubMed,EMBase,the Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CBM,Wanfang Data,CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trials(RCTs) concerning novel oral anticoagulants in patients with AF from inception to July,2018.Quality assessment and data extraction from the included RCTs were performed.Statistical analyses of the incidence of embolization,intracranial hemorrhage,ischemic stroke,myocardial infarction,and gastrointestinal bleeding,and all-cause mortality were conducted with R 3.4.3 and Stata 14 software.Surface under the cumulative ranking(SUCAR) was used to rank the value of the treatments.Results A total of 28 RCTs were included,involving 261 272 patients.The results of network meta-analysis showed that the incidence of embolic events associated with warfarin was higher than that caused by dabigatran(150 mg),rivaroxaban(20 mg),apixaban(10 mg),and edoxaban(60 mg)(P<0.05).The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage related with warfarin was higher than that caused by dabigatran(110 mg),dabigatran(150 mg),rivaroxaban(20 mg),apixaban(10 mg),edoxaban(30 mg)and edoxaban(60 mg)(P<0.05).Warfarin was associated with a higher incidence of ischemic stroke compared with dabigatran(150 mg)(P<0.05).Other treatments,except for ximelagatran(36 mg) and rivaroxaban(15 mg),were associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with warfarin(P<0.05).Warfarin was associated with a higher incidence of myocardial infarction compared with ximelagatran(36 mg)(P<0.05).But it was associated with a lower incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding compared with rivaroxaban(20 mg)(P<0.05).SUCAR values of all the interventions demonstrated that,dabigatran(150 mg) was associated with lower incidence of embolization and all-cause mortality;edoxaban(30 mg) was related to lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding;ximelagatran(36 mg) was associated with lower incidence of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction.Conclusion Available evidence shows that apixaban(10 mg) may be a promising treatment.The overall quality of the included studies is high,and the analysis results have certain guiding significance.However,considering the unsatisfied quality of the included domestic studies,our results need to be verified by more high-quality domestic studies.
引文
[1]LE HEUZEY J Y.Epidemiology,etiology and mechanism of atrial fibrillation[J].Bull Acad Natl Med,2011,195(4/5):953-960.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62229-5.
    [2]GO A S,HYLEK E M,PHILLIPS K A,et al.Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults:national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention:the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation(ATRIA)study[J].JAMA,2001,285(18):2370-2375.DOI:10.1001/jama.285.18.2370.
    [3]陈伟伟,高润霖,刘力生,等.中国心血管病报告2013概要[J].中国循环杂志,2014,29(7):487-491.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2014.07.003.CHEN W W,GAO R L,LIU L S,et al.China cardiovascular disease report 2013 summary[J].Chinese Circulation Journal,2014,29(7):487-491.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2014.07.003.
    [4]EXTRAMIANA F,MAISON-BLANCHE P.Stroke and atrial fibrillation:where to go from here?[J].Stroke,2015,46(3):605-607.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007809.
    [5]周自强,胡大一,陈捷,等.中国心房颤动现状的流行病学研究[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(7):491-494.DOI:10.3760/j.issn:0578-1426.2004.07.005.ZHOU Z Q,HU D Y,CHEN J,et al.An epidemiological survey of atrial fibrillation in China[J].Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine,2004,43(7):491-494.DOI:10.3760/j.issn:0578-1426.2004.07.005.
    [6]PETERSEN P,BOYSEN G,GODTFREDSEN J,et al.Placebocontrolled,randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation.The Copenhagen AFASAK study[J].Lancet,1989,1(8631):175-179.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91200-2.
    [7]MANT J,HOBBS F D,FLETCHER K,et al.Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation(the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study,BAFTA):a randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2007,370(9586):493-503.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61233-1.
    [8]LUIK A,RADZEWITZ A,KIESER M,et al.Cryoballoon versus open irrigated radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation:the prospective,randomized,controlled,noninferiority FreezeAF study[J].Circulation,2015,132(14):1311-1319.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016871.
    [9]HIGGINS J P,GREEN S.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0[EB/OL].(2011-03)[2018-07-05].http://www.handbook.cochrane.org/.
    [10]张超,鄢金柱,孙凤,等.网状Meta分析一致性的鉴别与处理方法[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(7):884-888.DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.20140146.ZHANG C,YAN J Z,SUN F,et al.Differentiation and handling of homogeneity in network meta-analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine,2014,14(7):884-888.DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.20140146.
    [11]DIAS S,WELTON N J,CALDWELL D M,et al.Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis[J].Stat Med,2010,29(7/8):932-944.DOI:10.1002/sim.3767.
    [12]SALANTI G,ADES A E,IOANNIDIS J P.Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis:an overview and tutorial[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2011,64(2):163-171.DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016.
    [13]ALBERS G W,DIENER H C,FRISON L,et al.Ximelagatran vs warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation:a randomized trial[J].JAMA,2005,293(6):690-698.DOI:10.1001/jama.293.6.690.
    [14]CONNOLLY S J,EZEKOWITZ M D,YUSUF S,et al.Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation[J].N Engl J Med,2009,361(12):1139-1151.DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0905561.
    [15]CONNOLLY S J,WALLENTIN L,EZEKOWITZ M D,et al.The long-term multicenter observational study of dabigatran treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation(RELY-ABLE)study[J].Circulation,2013,128(3):237-243.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001139.
    [16]DOUKETIS J D,ARNEKLEV K,GOLDHABER S Z,et al.Comparison of bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with ximelagatran or warfarin:assessment of incidence,case-fatality rate,time course and sites of bleeding,and risk factors for bleeding[J].Arch Intern Med,2006,166(8):853-859.DOI:10.1001/archinte.166.8.853.
    [17]EIKELBOOM J W,WALLENTIN L,CONNOLLY S J,et al.Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation:an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy(RE-LY)trial[J].Circulation,2011,123(21):2363-2372.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004747.
    [18]EZEKOWITZ M D,EIKELBOOM J,OLDGREN J,et al.Longterm evaluation of dabigatran 150 vs.110 mg twice a day in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation[J].Europace,2016,18(7):973-978.DOI:10.1093/europace/euv312.
    [19]FLAKER G,LOPES R D,AL-KHATIB S M,et al.Efficacy and safety of apixaban in patients after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation:insights from the ARISTOTLE trial(apixaban for reduction in stroke and other thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation)[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2014,63(11):1082-1087.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.062.
    [20]FLAKER G C,GRUBER M,CONNOLLY S J,et al.Risks and benefits of combining aspirin with anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation:an exploratory analysis of stroke prevention using an oral thrombin inhibitor in atrial fibrillation(SPORTIF)trials[J].Am Heart J,2006,152(5):967-973.DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.024.
    [21]GARCIA D A,WALLENTIN L,LOPES R D,et al.Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation according to prior warfarin use:results from the apixaban for reduction in stroke and other thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation trial[J].Am Heart J,2013,166(3):549-558.DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2013.05.016.
    [22]GOODMAN S G,WOJDYLA D M,PICCINI J P,et al.Factors associated with major bleeding events:insights from the ROCKETAF trial(rivaroxaban once-daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation)[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2014,63(9):891-900.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.013.
    [23]GRANGER C B,ALEXANDER J H,MCMURRAY J J,et al.Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation[J].N Engl J Med,2011,365(11):981-992.DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1107039.
    [24]HANKEY G J,PATEL M R,STEVENS S R,et al.Rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack:a subgroup analysis of ROCKET AF[J].Lancet Neurol,2012,11(4):315-322.DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70042-X.
    [25]HYLEK E M,HELD C,ALEXANDER J H,et al.Major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban or warfarin:the ARISTOTLE trial(apixaban for reduction in stroke and other thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation):predictors,characteristics,and clinical outcomes[EB/OL].(2014-05-27)[2018-07-21].http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/o/cochrane/clcentral/articles/626/CN-01117626/frame.html.
    [26]LEE K H,PARK H W,LEE N,et al.Optimal dose of dabigatran for the prevention of thromboembolism with minimal bleeding risk in Korean patients with atrial fibrillation[J].Europace,2017,19(suppl_4):iv1-9.DOI:10.1093/europace/eux247.
    [27]OLSSON S B.Stroke prevention with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation(SPORTIF III):randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2003,362(9397):1691-1698.DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14841-6.
    [28]PICCINI J P,HELLKAMP A S,LOKHNYGINA Y,et al.Relationship between time in therapeutic range and comparative treatment effect of rivaroxaban and warfarin:results from the ROCKET AF trial[J].J Am Heart Assoc,2014,3(2):e000521.DOI:10.1161/JAHA.113.000521.
    [29]SHERWOOD M W,NESSEL C C,HELLKAMP A S,et al.Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin:ROCKET AF trial[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2015,66(21):2271-2281.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.024.
    [30]SHIMADA Y J,YAMASHITA T,KORETSUNE Y,et al.Effects of regional differences in Asia on efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin-insights from the engage AF-TIMI 48trial[J].Circ J,2015,79(12):2560-2567.DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0574.
    [31]SHOSHA R I,IBRAHIM O M,SETIHA M E,et al.The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation[J].IJPSRR,2017,43(2):38-48.
    [32]STEFFEL J,GIUGLIANO R P,BRAUNWALD E,et al.Edoxaban vs.warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation on amiodarone:a subgroup analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48trial[EB/OL].(2015-05-13)[2018-08-11].http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/o/cochrane/clcentral/articles/248/CN-01258248/frame.html.
    [33]STEINBERG B A,HELLKAMP A S,LOKHNYGINA Y,et al.Higher risk of death and stroke in patients with persistent vs.paroxysmal atrial fibrillation:results from the ROCKET-AFtrial[J].Eur Heart J,2015,36(5):288-296.DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu359.
    [34]TANAHASHI N,HORI M,MATSUMOTO M,et al.Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation for the secondary prevention of stroke:a subgroup analysis of J-ROCKET AF[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2013,22(8):1317-1325.DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasd is.2012.12.010.
    [35]WALLENTIN L,YUSUF S,EZEKOWITZ M D,et al.Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation:an analysis of the RE-LY trial[J].Lancet,2010,376(9745):975-983.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61194-4.
    [36]YAMASHITA T,KORETSUNE Y,YANG Y,et al.Edoxaban vs.warfarin in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation-an ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 subanalysis[J].Circ J,2016,80(4):860-869.DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1082.
    [37]高鑫,杨艳敏,朱俊,等.达比加群与华法林在中国非瓣膜病心房颤动患者卒中预防中的对照研究:RE-LY研究中国亚组分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2016,44(11):929-934.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.11.006.GAO X,YANG Y M,ZHU J,et al.Dabigatran versus warfarin for the prevention of stroke in Chinese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation:Chinese subpopulation analysis of RE-LY[J].Chinese Journal of Cardiology,2016,44(11):929-934.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.11.006.
    [38]简立国,丁同斌,刘士超.达比加群酯预防心房颤动患者发生脑梗死的临床疗效及安全性分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(18):123-124.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5110.2016.18.082.JIAN L G,DING T B,LIU S C.Clinical efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate in preventing cerebral infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation[J].Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases,2016,19(18):123-124.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5110.2016.18.082.
    [39]李迪.达比加群对老年非瓣膜性房颤患者凝血功能的影响[J].山东医药,2015,55(44):65-67.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2015.44.025.LI D.Effect of dabigatran on coagulation function in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation[J].Shandong Medical Journal,2015,55(44):65-67.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2015.44.025.
    [40]卢奕,温连安,李东,等.非瓣膜性房颤达比加群酯抗凝治疗的疗效及安全性评价[J].中国药业,2017,26(6):49-51.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2017.06.015.LU Y,WEN L A,LI D,et al.Clinical observation of dabigatran and warfarin in treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation[J].China Pharmaceuticals,2017,26(6):49-51.DOI:10.3969/j issn.1006-4931.2017.06.015.
    [41]RUFF C T,GIUGLIANO R P,BRAUNWALD E,et al.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation:a meta-analysis of randomised trials[J].Lancet,2014,383(9921):955-962.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0.
    [42]ERIKSSON B I,QUINLAN D J,WEITZ J I.Comparative pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral direct thrombin and factor xa inhibitors in development[J].Clin Pharmacokinet,2009,48(1):1-22.DOI:10.2165/0003088-200948010-00001.
    [43]SONG F,ALTMAN D G,GLENNY A M,et al.Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions:empirical evidence from published metaanalyses[J].BMJ,2003,326(7387):472.DOI:10.1136/bmj.326.7387.472.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700