校园足球改革中政策工具的地域差异性研究
|
摘要
采用内容分析法、专家访谈法和数理统计法,以我国23个省市自治区在2015—2017年颁布的校园足球改革政策样本为研究对象,探析七大地理区域在校园足球改革中政策工具的运用上是否存在差异性,并对其存在的共性问题提出相关建议。研究表明:1)从供给型政策工具看,七大地域在其运用上具有一致性,而在具体工具类别的运用上七大地域内部存在些许差异性; 2)从环境型政策工具看,七大地域在环境型政策工具的具体工具类别的运用上存在差异性,但各地域在其高频工具和低频工具使用上呈现出一致性; 3)从需求型政策工具看,各地域在其运用上存在明显差异性,且在具体工具的缺失上也有较大差异性,仅有个别省市自治区在具体工具的缺失上存在一致性;4)从政策工具上看,七大地理区域在政策工具的使用上具有一致性,具体是环境型政策工具运用频率大于供给型政策工具大于需求型政策工具。
By using the methods of content analysis,expert interviewand mathematical statistics,and taking the sample of campus football reform policy issued by 23 provinces,municipalities and autonomous regions of China from 2015 to 2017 as the research object,this paper analyzes whether there are differences in the use of policy tools in campus football reform in the seven geographical regions,and puts forward the related suggestions to the common problems. The study shows that: 1) from the perspective of supply-oriented policy tools,the seven regions have consistency in their application,while there are some differences within the seven regions in the use of specific tool categories; 2) from the perspective of environmental policy tools,there are differences in the use of specific tools for environmental policy tools in the seven regions.However,the use of high-frequency and low-frequency tools in different regions is consistent; 3) from the perspective of demand-oriented policy tools,there are obvious differences in the use of these tools in different regions,and there are also great differences in the absence of specific tools. Only some provinces,municipalities and autonomous regions have consistency in the lack of specific tools; 4) from the perspective of policy tools,the seven geographical regions have consistency in the use of policy tools. Specifically,environmental policy tools are used more frequently than supply-based policy tools than demand-based policy tools.
By using the methods of content analysis,expert interviewand mathematical statistics,and taking the sample of campus football reform policy issued by 23 provinces,municipalities and autonomous regions of China from 2015 to 2017 as the research object,this paper analyzes whether there are differences in the use of policy tools in campus football reform in the seven geographical regions,and puts forward the related suggestions to the common problems. The study shows that: 1) from the perspective of supply-oriented policy tools,the seven regions have consistency in their application,while there are some differences within the seven regions in the use of specific tool categories; 2) from the perspective of environmental policy tools,there are differences in the use of specific tools for environmental policy tools in the seven regions.However,the use of high-frequency and low-frequency tools in different regions is consistent; 3) from the perspective of demand-oriented policy tools,there are obvious differences in the use of these tools in different regions,and there are also great differences in the absence of specific tools. Only some provinces,municipalities and autonomous regions have consistency in the lack of specific tools; 4) from the perspective of policy tools,the seven geographical regions have consistency in the use of policy tools. Specifically,environmental policy tools are used more frequently than supply-based policy tools than demand-based policy tools.
引文
[1]顾建光.公共政策工具研究的意义、基础与层面[J].公共管理学报,2006(4):58-61.
[2]李纪霞,董众鸣,徐仰才,等.我国青少年校园足球活动管理体制创新研究[J].山东体育学院学报,2012,28(3):99-104.
[3]毛振明,刘天彪,臧留红.论“新校园足球”的顶层设计[J].武汉体育学院学报,2015,49(3):58-62.
[4]贺新奇,刘玉东.我国“校园足球”若干问题再探讨[J].北京体育大学学报,2013,36(11):108-113.
[5]邱林,戴福祥,张廷安.我国校园足球发展中政府职能定位研究[J].武汉体育学院学报,2016,50(6):95-100.
[6]姜南.我国校园足球政策执行的制约因素与路径选择——基于史密斯政策执行过程模型的视角[J].中国体育科技,2017,53(1):3-8,26.
[7]孟青,刘鎏,王永顺.福建省校园足球公共政策执行绩效评价指标[J].体育科学研究,2017,21(4):12-22.
[8]徐德全.关于校园足球绩效评价的思考[J].牡丹江师范学院学报(自然科学版),2013(1):44-45.
[9]时维金,万宇,沈建华,等.基于政策工具视角下的中国足球改革发展总体方案[J].武汉体育学院学报,2016(2):83-89.
[10]龚波,陶然成,董众鸣.当前我国校园足球若干重大问题探讨[J].上海体育学院学报,2017,41(1):61-67.
[11]郑志强,郑娟.中国校园足球政策工具分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2016,50(4):5-11.
[12] Berelson B. Content analysis in communication research[M]. New York,NY,US:Free Press,1952.
[13]邹菲.内容分析法的理论与实践研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2004.
[14] Anne Schneider,Helen Tngram. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools[J]. The Journal of Political,1990,52(2):510-529.
[15]迈克尔·豪利特,M·拉米什.公共政策研究——政策循环与政策子系统[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店出版社,2006.
[16]Roy Rothwell,Walter Zegveld. Industrial innovation and public policy:preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s[M]. London:Greenwood Press(West sport,Conn.),1980.
[17]李林,王向东,于文谦,等.政策工具视角下中国冰雪产业政策文本特征分析[J].吉林体育学院学报,2018,34(4):57-63.
[18]曲洁.义务教育改革与发展的政策工具研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2013.
[19] Roy Rothwell,Walter Zegveld. Reindustrialization and technology[M]. Toronto:Logman Group Limited,1985.
[20]Schneider A,Ingram H. Social construction of target populations-implications for politics and policy[J]. American Political Science Review,1993,87(2):334-347.
[21]李纪霞.全国青少年校园足球活动发展战略研究[D].上海:上海体育学院,2012.
[22]金亚虹.生物反馈对动态平衡技能学习的影响[C]//第十一届全国运动心理学学术会议摘要集(会后版).中国体育科学学会运动心理学分会、中国心理学会体育运动心理专业委员会:中国体育科学学会运动心理学分会,2018:1.
[23]董山山.儿童身体动态平衡能力评价指标的创建[C]//2018年中国生理学会运动生理学专业委员会会议暨“科技创新与运动生理学”学术研讨会论文集.中国生理学会运动生理学专业委员会、北京体育大学:北京体育大学运动生理教研室,2018:1.
[2]李纪霞,董众鸣,徐仰才,等.我国青少年校园足球活动管理体制创新研究[J].山东体育学院学报,2012,28(3):99-104.
[3]毛振明,刘天彪,臧留红.论“新校园足球”的顶层设计[J].武汉体育学院学报,2015,49(3):58-62.
[4]贺新奇,刘玉东.我国“校园足球”若干问题再探讨[J].北京体育大学学报,2013,36(11):108-113.
[5]邱林,戴福祥,张廷安.我国校园足球发展中政府职能定位研究[J].武汉体育学院学报,2016,50(6):95-100.
[6]姜南.我国校园足球政策执行的制约因素与路径选择——基于史密斯政策执行过程模型的视角[J].中国体育科技,2017,53(1):3-8,26.
[7]孟青,刘鎏,王永顺.福建省校园足球公共政策执行绩效评价指标[J].体育科学研究,2017,21(4):12-22.
[8]徐德全.关于校园足球绩效评价的思考[J].牡丹江师范学院学报(自然科学版),2013(1):44-45.
[9]时维金,万宇,沈建华,等.基于政策工具视角下的中国足球改革发展总体方案[J].武汉体育学院学报,2016(2):83-89.
[10]龚波,陶然成,董众鸣.当前我国校园足球若干重大问题探讨[J].上海体育学院学报,2017,41(1):61-67.
[11]郑志强,郑娟.中国校园足球政策工具分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2016,50(4):5-11.
[12] Berelson B. Content analysis in communication research[M]. New York,NY,US:Free Press,1952.
[13]邹菲.内容分析法的理论与实践研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2004.
[14] Anne Schneider,Helen Tngram. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools[J]. The Journal of Political,1990,52(2):510-529.
[15]迈克尔·豪利特,M·拉米什.公共政策研究——政策循环与政策子系统[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店出版社,2006.
[16]Roy Rothwell,Walter Zegveld. Industrial innovation and public policy:preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s[M]. London:Greenwood Press(West sport,Conn.),1980.
[17]李林,王向东,于文谦,等.政策工具视角下中国冰雪产业政策文本特征分析[J].吉林体育学院学报,2018,34(4):57-63.
[18]曲洁.义务教育改革与发展的政策工具研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2013.
[19] Roy Rothwell,Walter Zegveld. Reindustrialization and technology[M]. Toronto:Logman Group Limited,1985.
[20]Schneider A,Ingram H. Social construction of target populations-implications for politics and policy[J]. American Political Science Review,1993,87(2):334-347.
[21]李纪霞.全国青少年校园足球活动发展战略研究[D].上海:上海体育学院,2012.
[22]金亚虹.生物反馈对动态平衡技能学习的影响[C]//第十一届全国运动心理学学术会议摘要集(会后版).中国体育科学学会运动心理学分会、中国心理学会体育运动心理专业委员会:中国体育科学学会运动心理学分会,2018:1.
[23]董山山.儿童身体动态平衡能力评价指标的创建[C]//2018年中国生理学会运动生理学专业委员会会议暨“科技创新与运动生理学”学术研讨会论文集.中国生理学会运动生理学专业委员会、北京体育大学:北京体育大学运动生理教研室,2018:1.