宋代科举取士的阶层分析——基于布迪厄的资本理论视角

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Social Stratification of Imperial Examination in the Song Dynasty:An Analysis from the Perspective of Bourdieu's Capital Theory 作者：潘玲霞 ; 彭虹斌 英文作者：PAN Ling-xia;PENG Hong-bin;School of Public Administration,South China Normal University; 关键词：宋代科举 ; 资本理论 ; 上升流动 ; 阶层差距 英文关键词：imperial examination in the Song Dynasty;;the capital theory;;upward mobility;;stratum gap 中文刊名：JMDX 英文刊名：Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition) 机构：华南师范大学公共管理学院; 出版日期：2018-09-28 出版单位：集美大学学报(教育科学版) 年：2018 期：v.19;No.83 基金：教育部人文社科2014年规划基金项目“儒家文化背景下学校教育领导美德范畴与制度规约”的阶段性成果(14YJA880055) 语种：中文; 页：JMDX201805010 页数：5 CN：05 ISSN：35-1238/U 分类号：51-55

摘要

科举制度作为中国古代社会的官员选拔制度,肇基于隋而废于清末,历时一千三百多年。其中,宋代是科举制度趋于完备的时期,先后实行了锁院、别头试、誊录与封弥等详密的科考管理制度,为应举士人提供较为公平的考试氛围。此外,宋代科举取士的人数之多也是前所未有的,这些都极大地刺激了寒素士子的读书欲望。然而,徇私舞弊、宗室应举及恩荫补官等又在一定程度上阻塞着寒素士子的上升流动之路。因此,笔者拟以法国社会学家布迪厄的资本理论为视角,从经济资本、文化资本及社会资本三个方面对宋代不同阶层的学子所拥有的教育资源进行分析,以审视宋代科举考试的公平性。
        As an official selection system in the ancient China,imperial examination system started at the Sui Dynasty and ended in the late Qing Dynasty,lasting for more than 1,300 years. The Song Dynasty was the period when the imperial examination system tended to be complete,and some management systems of the imperial examination were successively implemented,such as locking the court system,avoidance system,transcripts system and seal system,which provided a fair examination atmosphere for the candidates. In addition,the number of candidates admitted in the Song Dynasty was also unprecedented,which greatly stimulated the impoverished candidates to study. However,irregularities for favoritism,imperial clan system and Yin Bu official system to a certain extent blocked the way to upward mobility for the impoverished candidates. Therefore,this paper tries to choose the capital theory of the French sociologist Bourdieu as the perspective to analyze the educational resources owned by candidates from different classes in the Song Dynasty through the economic capital,cultural capital and social capital,in order to examine the fairness of the imperial examination in the Song Dynasty.

引文

[1]张希清.论宋代科举取士之多与冗官问题[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1987(5):105-123.
    [2]祖慧,杨竹旺.《宋代登科总录》与宋代状元研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017,47(1):35-41.
    [3]布迪厄.文化资本与社会炼金术[M].包亚明,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:89.
    [4]张希清.中国科举制度通史(宋代卷)[M].上海人民出版社,2015:205; 579.
    [5]徐积.节孝集:卷三十上赵殿院书[M].台北:商务印书馆,2008:945.
    [6]布尔迪厄.艺术的法则:文学场的生成和结构[M].刘晖,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2001:309.
    [7]李焘.续资治通鉴长编:卷一八六嘉祐二年[M].北京:中华书局,2004:4495.
    [8]欧阳修.欧阳修全集:卷一百一十一条约举人怀挟文字札子[M].北京:中华书局,2001:1677.
    [9]王之望.汉滨集:卷八论监类省试朝札[M].台北:商务印书馆,2008:760.
    [10]徐松.宋会要辑稿·选举:五之三一贡举杂录[M].北京:中华书局,1957.
    [11]布迪厄.文化资本与社会炼金术[M].包亚明,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
    [12]王铚.默记(卷下)[M].北京:中华书局,1981:39.
    [13]脱脱.宋史:卷四百五[M].北京:中华书局,1977:12242.
    [14]王象之.舆地纪胜:卷一四五简州·人物[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:545.
    [15]邹重华,粟品孝.宋代四川家族与学术论集[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2005:325.
    [16]王禹偁.小畜集:卷十寄题义门胡氏华林书院[M].台北:商务印书馆,2008:92.
    [17]王善军.宋代世家大族的藏书及其对成员的教育[C].中国古代社会与思想文化研究论集,2004:17.
    [18]李心传.建炎以来朝野杂记·乙集:卷十四嘉定四选总数[M].北京:中华书局,2000:1221.