学术迹在期刊评价中的应用及影响因素研究
|
摘要
文章以SSCI收录信息科学与图书馆学期刊为例,采集期刊三年时间段(2015—2017)相关数据,测算期刊的学术迹,以发文量和学术迹构建图情领域期刊学术迹二维评价区间图;以此为样本分析三大类指标(期刊评价指标、其他学术指标、期刊特征指标)的18个二级指标数据,系统比较学术迹与影响因素的相关性与独立性。结果表明,学术迹与影响因子、特征因子、即年指标、h指数均具有高度相关性;但与期刊自引率、开放获取不具有相关性(P>0.05);不同分区、学科归属、收录情况、出版周期在学术迹上存在显著差异,跨学科、多收录体系期刊学术迹表现更佳。
Based on the journals of information science & library subject embodied by SSCI, this paper collects relevant data of three-year period(2015-2017) to calculate and construct a two-dimensional evaluation map of the journals' academic trace; taking this journals as a sample, 3 primary indicators and 18 secondary indicators were used to systematically compare the correlation and independence between academic trace and influencing factors. The study found thatacademic trace is highly correlated with IF、Eigenfactor、Immediacy Index and H-index; but no relations with self-citedrate and OA(P>0.05); there are significant differences in academic trace among different divisions、subject attribution、index system and publishing cycles, the Interdisciplinary and multi-collection system journals have better performance.
Based on the journals of information science & library subject embodied by SSCI, this paper collects relevant data of three-year period(2015-2017) to calculate and construct a two-dimensional evaluation map of the journals' academic trace; taking this journals as a sample, 3 primary indicators and 18 secondary indicators were used to systematically compare the correlation and independence between academic trace and influencing factors. The study found thatacademic trace is highly correlated with IF、Eigenfactor、Immediacy Index and H-index; but no relations with self-citedrate and OA(P>0.05); there are significant differences in academic trace among different divisions、subject attribution、index system and publishing cycles, the Interdisciplinary and multi-collection system journals have better performance.
引文
[1]Bornmann L,Daniel H D.The state of h index research:Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance[J].Embo Reports,2009,10(1):2-6.
[2]Bornmann L.Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance:some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff(2010)paper[J].Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(3):441-443.
[3]Alberts B.Impact factor distortions[J].Science,2013,340(6134):787.
[4]Garfield E.The impact factor[J].Current Contents,1994,25(20):3-7.
[5]Hirsch J E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
[6]Aguillo I F,Ortega J L,Fernández M.Webometric Ranking of world universities:introduction,methodology,and future developments[J].Higher Education in Europe,2008,33(2-3):233-244.
[7]Erdt M,Nagarajan A,Sin S C J,et al.Altmetrics:an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(2):1117-1166.
[8]叶鹰.国际学术评价指标研究现状及发展综述[J].情报学报,2014,33(2):215-224.
[9]陈慧琪.Altmertrics视角下期刊影响力二维评价方法研究--以国际图书情报学期刊为例[J].情报探索,2018,1(1):42-48.
[10]蒋勇青,齐萍.学术期刊影响力评价方法研究[J].中国软科学,2017(3):178-185.
[11]俞立平,武夷山.学术期刊客观赋权评价新方法--指标难度赋权法[J].数据分析与知识发现,2011,27(4):64-70.
[12]俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.基于极值法的学术期刊组合评价研究[J].图书与情报,2009(4):22-27.
[13]俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.基于结果一致度的学术期刊组合评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(1):59-64.
[14]Ye F Y,Leydesdorff L.The“academic trace”of the performance matrix:a mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator(I3)[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(4):742-750.
[15]Fred Y Y.The h-Core and h-Tail Distribution with Dynamic Metrics[M]//Scientific Metrics:Towards Analytical and Quantitative Sciences.Springer,Singapore,2017:215-231.
[16]薛霏,叶鹰.大学的学术矩阵和学术迹探讨[J].大学图书馆学报,2014,32(1):25-29.
[17]唐继瑞,叶鹰.单篇论著学术迹与影响矩比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(2):4-16.
[18]孙竹梅,华薇娜.学科发展的学术迹和学术矩阵探析[J].图书馆论坛,2016(1):36-41.
[19]苏云梅,武建光.学术团体间学术迹的比较研究[J].情报杂志,2015(12):44-47.
[20]宋玲玲.学术迹及学术矩阵测度评价探析--以航空、航天领域期刊为例[J].现代情报,2017,37(10):137-143.
[21]Huang M H,Chen D Z,Shen D,et al.Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fields[J].Scientometrics,2015,104(1):61-86.
[22]唐璞妮,徐苑琳.基于作者贡献权重的学术迹在学者学术影响力评价中的应用[J].情报资料工作,2018,39(2):19-23.
[23]陈小清,刘丽,邢美园.单篇论著影响力评价指标比较分析--学术迹与Altmetrics评分、F1000评分、Comment的比较[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(3):114-118.
[24]Garfield E.Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J].Science,1972,178(4060):471-479.
[25]Leydesdorff L.How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(7):1327-1336.
[26]Bollen J,Van de Sompel H,Hagberg A,et al.A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures[J].Plo S One,2009,4(6):e6022.
[27]张和平,陈齐海.基于PLSR的学术期刊影响力影响因素研究[J].情报科学,2018,V36(2):53-57.
[28]万莉.学术期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(12):1160-1165.
[29]黄贺方,孙建军,李江.期刊影响力评价指标之间的相关性研究[J].情报科学,2011(9):1322-1326.
[30]熊泽泉,段宇锋.论文早期下载量可否预测后期被引量?--以图书情报领域期刊为例[J].图书情报知识,2018(4):32-42.
[31]薛霏,鲁特·莱兹多夫,叶鹰.学术评价的多变量指标探讨[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(4):63-73.
[32]Swan A.The open access citation advantage:studies and results to date[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,2010,112(FO2S06):195-225.
[2]Bornmann L.Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance:some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff(2010)paper[J].Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(3):441-443.
[3]Alberts B.Impact factor distortions[J].Science,2013,340(6134):787.
[4]Garfield E.The impact factor[J].Current Contents,1994,25(20):3-7.
[5]Hirsch J E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
[6]Aguillo I F,Ortega J L,Fernández M.Webometric Ranking of world universities:introduction,methodology,and future developments[J].Higher Education in Europe,2008,33(2-3):233-244.
[7]Erdt M,Nagarajan A,Sin S C J,et al.Altmetrics:an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(2):1117-1166.
[8]叶鹰.国际学术评价指标研究现状及发展综述[J].情报学报,2014,33(2):215-224.
[9]陈慧琪.Altmertrics视角下期刊影响力二维评价方法研究--以国际图书情报学期刊为例[J].情报探索,2018,1(1):42-48.
[10]蒋勇青,齐萍.学术期刊影响力评价方法研究[J].中国软科学,2017(3):178-185.
[11]俞立平,武夷山.学术期刊客观赋权评价新方法--指标难度赋权法[J].数据分析与知识发现,2011,27(4):64-70.
[12]俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.基于极值法的学术期刊组合评价研究[J].图书与情报,2009(4):22-27.
[13]俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.基于结果一致度的学术期刊组合评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(1):59-64.
[14]Ye F Y,Leydesdorff L.The“academic trace”of the performance matrix:a mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator(I3)[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(4):742-750.
[15]Fred Y Y.The h-Core and h-Tail Distribution with Dynamic Metrics[M]//Scientific Metrics:Towards Analytical and Quantitative Sciences.Springer,Singapore,2017:215-231.
[16]薛霏,叶鹰.大学的学术矩阵和学术迹探讨[J].大学图书馆学报,2014,32(1):25-29.
[17]唐继瑞,叶鹰.单篇论著学术迹与影响矩比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(2):4-16.
[18]孙竹梅,华薇娜.学科发展的学术迹和学术矩阵探析[J].图书馆论坛,2016(1):36-41.
[19]苏云梅,武建光.学术团体间学术迹的比较研究[J].情报杂志,2015(12):44-47.
[20]宋玲玲.学术迹及学术矩阵测度评价探析--以航空、航天领域期刊为例[J].现代情报,2017,37(10):137-143.
[21]Huang M H,Chen D Z,Shen D,et al.Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fields[J].Scientometrics,2015,104(1):61-86.
[22]唐璞妮,徐苑琳.基于作者贡献权重的学术迹在学者学术影响力评价中的应用[J].情报资料工作,2018,39(2):19-23.
[23]陈小清,刘丽,邢美园.单篇论著影响力评价指标比较分析--学术迹与Altmetrics评分、F1000评分、Comment的比较[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(3):114-118.
[24]Garfield E.Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J].Science,1972,178(4060):471-479.
[25]Leydesdorff L.How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(7):1327-1336.
[26]Bollen J,Van de Sompel H,Hagberg A,et al.A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures[J].Plo S One,2009,4(6):e6022.
[27]张和平,陈齐海.基于PLSR的学术期刊影响力影响因素研究[J].情报科学,2018,V36(2):53-57.
[28]万莉.学术期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(12):1160-1165.
[29]黄贺方,孙建军,李江.期刊影响力评价指标之间的相关性研究[J].情报科学,2011(9):1322-1326.
[30]熊泽泉,段宇锋.论文早期下载量可否预测后期被引量?--以图书情报领域期刊为例[J].图书情报知识,2018(4):32-42.
[31]薛霏,鲁特·莱兹多夫,叶鹰.学术评价的多变量指标探讨[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(4):63-73.
[32]Swan A.The open access citation advantage:studies and results to date[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,2010,112(FO2S06):195-225.