城市地价与土地集约利用协调性分析——以河北省为例
|
摘要
以河北省148个县(市、区)商服、住宅和工业地价与土地集约利用数据为基础,分析城市地价与土地集约利用空间分布特征,并采用协调模型分析二者的空间协调关系。结果表明:1)城市地价空间分布差异较大,其中商服和住宅地价较高、空间波动较大,工业地价较低、空间变化平缓,呈现出"各市辖区中心带动,周边县逐步发展"的特征;2)土地集约利用整体水平偏低,差异较大,中心带动作用较强,在地域条件的影响下,集约度水平由西北向东南逐步提高;3)不同类型地价与土地集约利用之间的协调关系比较稳定,呈现优质和良好协调类型集中分布、失调类型离散分布且均以协调类型为主的分布特征。探析城市地价与土地集约利用的空间分布关系,可为有效调控土地要素价格、调节土地供需和促进城市土地资源朝集约化、可持续化方向发展提供科学依据。
It was significant to study the coordination between urban land price and land intensive use,and it can promote the healthy development of urban land market and the efficient utilization of urban land use.Based on GIS and the coordination model,this paper analyzed the spatial distribution characteristics and coordination relationship of commercial,residential and industrial land price and land intensive use in 148 counties(cities or districts) of Hebei Province in 2014.The results showed that:first,the spatial distribution of urban land prices was quite different,with higher commercial and residential land prices fluctuated widely,lower industrial land prices changed gentle,and all types of land prices showed the characteristics of "the center of each district is the driver,and the surrounding counties develop gradually";second,the overall level of land intensive use was low,with strong central driving effect,and the level of intensiveness gradually increased from northwest to southeast under the influence of regional conditions;third,the coordination between land price of different types and land intensive use was relatively stable,showing the distribution characteristics of centralized distribution of high-quality and good coordination types and discrete distribution of disordered types,and the distribution characteristics were mainly in coordination types.Exploring the relationship between urban land price and land intensive use can provide a scientific basis for effectively regulating the elements of land price and land supply-demand,and for promoting intensive and sustainable using of urban land resources.
It was significant to study the coordination between urban land price and land intensive use,and it can promote the healthy development of urban land market and the efficient utilization of urban land use.Based on GIS and the coordination model,this paper analyzed the spatial distribution characteristics and coordination relationship of commercial,residential and industrial land price and land intensive use in 148 counties(cities or districts) of Hebei Province in 2014.The results showed that:first,the spatial distribution of urban land prices was quite different,with higher commercial and residential land prices fluctuated widely,lower industrial land prices changed gentle,and all types of land prices showed the characteristics of "the center of each district is the driver,and the surrounding counties develop gradually";second,the overall level of land intensive use was low,with strong central driving effect,and the level of intensiveness gradually increased from northwest to southeast under the influence of regional conditions;third,the coordination between land price of different types and land intensive use was relatively stable,showing the distribution characteristics of centralized distribution of high-quality and good coordination types and discrete distribution of disordered types,and the distribution characteristics were mainly in coordination types.Exploring the relationship between urban land price and land intensive use can provide a scientific basis for effectively regulating the elements of land price and land supply-demand,and for promoting intensive and sustainable using of urban land resources.
引文
[1] 邓娅杰.小城镇地价与土地集约利用关系研究[D].成都:四川师范大学,2015.
[2] 苏斌.GIS支持下的城市地价空间分布与土地集约利用研究[D].郑州:解放军信息工程大学,2010.
[3] 李萍.长沙市主城区城市土地集约利用与地价的空间关联研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2011.
[4] 吴金华,尹剑,梁晶晶.铜川开发区地价与土地集约利用的相互关系研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(8):4796-4798.
[5] 孙宇杰,陈志刚.江苏省城市土地集约利用与城市化水平协调发展研究[J].资源科学,2012,34(5):889-895.
[6] 杨会霞,葛京凤.不同集约梯度下地价与城市土地集约利用关系研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(8):33-38.
[7] 齐梅.城市土地集约利用与地价的空间关联研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2009.
[8] 党青,周介铭,何伟,等.住宅用地价格与土地集约利用度相关性研究——以四川省成都市为例[J].四川师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,37(6):917-922.
[9] 陈俊宇.基于数字地价模型的成都市地价时空分异规律研究[D].成都:四川师范大学,2014.
[10] 徐心茹,金晓斌,张志宏,等.基于县域尺度的中国住宅用地市场健康度研究[J].地理研究,2017,36(1):85-96.
[11] 李洁茹,张军海,李仁杰,等.数字地价模型的石家庄城区地价空间分布规律探讨[J].测绘科学,2017,42(8):60-68.
[12] 梁彦庆,王松涛,黄志英,等.我国城市地价分形特征及区域对比[J].地理与地理信息科学,2015,31(6):72-76.
[13] 闫丽英,韩会然,陈婉婧,等.北京市住宿业空间分布格局及影响因素研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(1):94-101.
[14] 范辉,刘卫东,吴泽斌.城市土地集约利用内部协调性的时空演变——以武汉市中心城区为例[J].地理科学,2014,34(6):696-704.
[15] 田时中,马东水,方眉玉.基于熵值法的安徽省城镇化质量测度及比较研究[J].沈阳大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(4):417-421.
[16] 卓秀伟,汤小华,李明辉.基于改进熵值法和空间自相关的城市土地集约利用评价——以江西省为例[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015(3):88-97.
[17] 王秀,姚玲玲,李阳,等.新型城镇化与土地集约利用耦合协调性及其时空分异——以黑龙江省12个地级市为例[J].经济地理,2017,37(5):173-180.
[18] 赵丹丹,胡业翠.土地集约利用与城市化相互作用的定量研究——以中国三大城市群为例[J].地理研究,2016,35(11):2105-2115.
[19] 张志,龚健,王利华.城市土地集约利用与社会经济时空耦合协调发展评价——以湖北省12个地级市为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):296-303.
[20] ALTUZARRA A,ESTEBAN M.Land prices and housing prices:The case of Spain[J].Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,2011,26(4):397.
[21] SIRMANS C F,SLADE B A.National transaction-based land price indices[J].The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,2012,45(4):829-845.
[22] NANDA A,YEH J H.Spatio-temporal diffusion of residential land prices across Taipei regions[J].Springer Plus,2014,3(1):505.
[23] 李江苏,王晓蕊,苗长虹,等.城镇化水平与城镇化质量协调度分析——以河南省为例[J].经济地理,2014,34(10):70-77.
[24] 聂艳,于婧,胡静,等.基于系统协调度的武汉城市土地集约利用评价[J].资源科学,2009,31(11):1934-1939.
[25] 张祚,周敏,金贵,等.湖北“两圈两带”格局下的新型城镇化与土地集约利用协调度分析[J].世界地理研究,2018,27(2):65-75.
[26] 李晓庆,姜博,初楠臣.城市群土地集约利用与新型城镇化耦合协调分析——以我国三大城市群为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(7):983-991.
[2] 苏斌.GIS支持下的城市地价空间分布与土地集约利用研究[D].郑州:解放军信息工程大学,2010.
[3] 李萍.长沙市主城区城市土地集约利用与地价的空间关联研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2011.
[4] 吴金华,尹剑,梁晶晶.铜川开发区地价与土地集约利用的相互关系研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(8):4796-4798.
[5] 孙宇杰,陈志刚.江苏省城市土地集约利用与城市化水平协调发展研究[J].资源科学,2012,34(5):889-895.
[6] 杨会霞,葛京凤.不同集约梯度下地价与城市土地集约利用关系研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(8):33-38.
[7] 齐梅.城市土地集约利用与地价的空间关联研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2009.
[8] 党青,周介铭,何伟,等.住宅用地价格与土地集约利用度相关性研究——以四川省成都市为例[J].四川师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,37(6):917-922.
[9] 陈俊宇.基于数字地价模型的成都市地价时空分异规律研究[D].成都:四川师范大学,2014.
[10] 徐心茹,金晓斌,张志宏,等.基于县域尺度的中国住宅用地市场健康度研究[J].地理研究,2017,36(1):85-96.
[11] 李洁茹,张军海,李仁杰,等.数字地价模型的石家庄城区地价空间分布规律探讨[J].测绘科学,2017,42(8):60-68.
[12] 梁彦庆,王松涛,黄志英,等.我国城市地价分形特征及区域对比[J].地理与地理信息科学,2015,31(6):72-76.
[13] 闫丽英,韩会然,陈婉婧,等.北京市住宿业空间分布格局及影响因素研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(1):94-101.
[14] 范辉,刘卫东,吴泽斌.城市土地集约利用内部协调性的时空演变——以武汉市中心城区为例[J].地理科学,2014,34(6):696-704.
[15] 田时中,马东水,方眉玉.基于熵值法的安徽省城镇化质量测度及比较研究[J].沈阳大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(4):417-421.
[16] 卓秀伟,汤小华,李明辉.基于改进熵值法和空间自相关的城市土地集约利用评价——以江西省为例[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015(3):88-97.
[17] 王秀,姚玲玲,李阳,等.新型城镇化与土地集约利用耦合协调性及其时空分异——以黑龙江省12个地级市为例[J].经济地理,2017,37(5):173-180.
[18] 赵丹丹,胡业翠.土地集约利用与城市化相互作用的定量研究——以中国三大城市群为例[J].地理研究,2016,35(11):2105-2115.
[19] 张志,龚健,王利华.城市土地集约利用与社会经济时空耦合协调发展评价——以湖北省12个地级市为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):296-303.
[20] ALTUZARRA A,ESTEBAN M.Land prices and housing prices:The case of Spain[J].Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,2011,26(4):397.
[21] SIRMANS C F,SLADE B A.National transaction-based land price indices[J].The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,2012,45(4):829-845.
[22] NANDA A,YEH J H.Spatio-temporal diffusion of residential land prices across Taipei regions[J].Springer Plus,2014,3(1):505.
[23] 李江苏,王晓蕊,苗长虹,等.城镇化水平与城镇化质量协调度分析——以河南省为例[J].经济地理,2014,34(10):70-77.
[24] 聂艳,于婧,胡静,等.基于系统协调度的武汉城市土地集约利用评价[J].资源科学,2009,31(11):1934-1939.
[25] 张祚,周敏,金贵,等.湖北“两圈两带”格局下的新型城镇化与土地集约利用协调度分析[J].世界地理研究,2018,27(2):65-75.
[26] 李晓庆,姜博,初楠臣.城市群土地集约利用与新型城镇化耦合协调分析——以我国三大城市群为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(7):983-991.