空间距离对聋生抵御威胁信息的影响研究
|
摘要
为探究空间距离对聋生抵御威胁信息的影响,以74名聋人大学生为研究对象,采用了空间距离(分散秧田式、紧密秧田式)和威胁材料(教育类、医疗类)的2×2两因素混合实验设计,通过威胁性信息态度量表测量聋生抵御威胁性信息的程度。研究发现,空间距离显著影响聋生抵御威胁信息的效果,空间距离越小,越能有效抵御威胁信息。因此,空间距离也可作为一种有效的威胁抵御资源。
In order to explore the influence of spatial distance on deaf students resisting threatening information. taking the 74 deaf students as the object,this research adopts a 2 × 2 two-factor mixed experiment design with spatial distance( loosened seeding type,tight seeding type) and threat materials( education and medical treatment),and uses the threatening information attitude scale to measure the degree of deaf students' resistance to threatening information. It is found that the spatial distance can significantly affect the resistance to threatening information of deaf students. The smaller the spatial distance,the more effectively they can resist the threatening information. Deaf students are concerned about the both issues: education and medical treatment.In this regard,on the basis that intimate relationship is an effective threat resistance resource,it is suggested that spatial distance may also be an effective threat resistance resource.
In order to explore the influence of spatial distance on deaf students resisting threatening information. taking the 74 deaf students as the object,this research adopts a 2 × 2 two-factor mixed experiment design with spatial distance( loosened seeding type,tight seeding type) and threat materials( education and medical treatment),and uses the threatening information attitude scale to measure the degree of deaf students' resistance to threatening information. It is found that the spatial distance can significantly affect the resistance to threatening information of deaf students. The smaller the spatial distance,the more effectively they can resist the threatening information. Deaf students are concerned about the both issues: education and medical treatment.In this regard,on the basis that intimate relationship is an effective threat resistance resource,it is suggested that spatial distance may also be an effective threat resistance resource.
引文
[1]Baumeister R F, Smart L, Boden J M. Relation ofThreatened Egotism to Violence and Aggression:The DarkSide of High Self-Esteem.[J]. Psychological Review,1996(1):5-33.
[2]Cohen G L. Accepting Threatening Information:Self-Affirmation and the Reduction of Defensive Biases[J].Current Directions in Psychological Science,2002(4):119-123.
[3]Mikulincer M,Florian V,Hirschberger G. The ExistentialFunction of Close Relationships:Introducing Death Into theScience of Love[J]. Personality and Social PsychologyReview,2003(1):20.
[4]顾凡.人际空间距离的实验研究[J].心理科学,1993(5):56—58.
[5]钟毅平,张志.时空距离、特征类型对态度的影响[J].心理学探新,2011(3):230—233.
[6]冯东.学生座位结构的价值取向与理性反思[J].中国教育学刊,2016(4):42—45.
[7]Cohen G L,Aronson J,Steele C M. When Beliefs Yield toEvidence:Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming theSelf. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000(9):1151-1164.
[8]Sherman D K,Cohen G L. The Psychology of Self-Defense:Self-Affirmation Theory[M.]//Zanna P.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego,CA US:Elsevier Academic Press,2006:183-242.
[9]Boroditsky L. Metaphoric Structuring:Understanding TimeThrough Spatial Metaphors[J]. Cognition,2000(1):1-28.
[2]Cohen G L. Accepting Threatening Information:Self-Affirmation and the Reduction of Defensive Biases[J].Current Directions in Psychological Science,2002(4):119-123.
[3]Mikulincer M,Florian V,Hirschberger G. The ExistentialFunction of Close Relationships:Introducing Death Into theScience of Love[J]. Personality and Social PsychologyReview,2003(1):20.
[4]顾凡.人际空间距离的实验研究[J].心理科学,1993(5):56—58.
[5]钟毅平,张志.时空距离、特征类型对态度的影响[J].心理学探新,2011(3):230—233.
[6]冯东.学生座位结构的价值取向与理性反思[J].中国教育学刊,2016(4):42—45.
[7]Cohen G L,Aronson J,Steele C M. When Beliefs Yield toEvidence:Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming theSelf. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000(9):1151-1164.
[8]Sherman D K,Cohen G L. The Psychology of Self-Defense:Self-Affirmation Theory[M.]//Zanna P.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego,CA US:Elsevier Academic Press,2006:183-242.
[9]Boroditsky L. Metaphoric Structuring:Understanding TimeThrough Spatial Metaphors[J]. Cognition,2000(1):1-28.