土地利用多功能性评价及空间差异研究
|
摘要
采用熵权TOPSIS和聚类分析对江苏省土地利用多功能性评价及空间差异研究可以对改善江苏省13市土地利用环境,提高土地利用效率提供有效对策,为促进区域土地利用的可持续发展提供依据。研究结果表明:苏州和无锡土地利用多功能性综合水平处于良好阶段,两个城市的土地利用多功能性具有较强的相似性;徐州、宿迁、淮安、盐城、南通、泰州、扬州、南京、常州和镇江的土地利用多功能性综合水平处于一般阶段,而连云港土地利用多功能性综合水平还处于较差阶段,其中南京、常州、镇江、南通和扬州土地利用多功能性相似性较高,徐州、宿迁、淮安、盐城、连云港和泰州土地利用多功能性具有较高相似性。通过江苏省土地利用多功能性分析,苏南地区苏州和无锡土地利用综合功能发挥较好,苏南其他地区和苏中地区土地利用社会功能和生态功能水平还需进一步提高,苏北地区土地利用的经济功能、社会功能和生态功能普遍较弱,还有很大提升空间。江苏省13市土地利用多功能性的发展水平在苏南、苏中和苏北各有不同,需要根据各地的具体土地利用情况制定具体措施提升土地利用率。
The land use multifunctionality and spatial differences were evaluated by using the methods of entropy TOPSIS and cluster analysis in 13 cities of Jiangsu Province, which would provide effective countermeasures for improving the land use environment and land use efficiency, and provide a basis for promoting the sustainable development of regional land use. The land use function evaluation was generally good and was strongly similar in Suzhou with Wuxi. The multifunctional comprehensive land use was at a general level in Xuzhou, Suqian, Huaian,Yancheng, Nantong, Taizhou, Yangzhou, Nanjing, Changzhou and Zhenjiang, while it was still at a relatively poor level in Lianyungang. The versatility of land use was highly similar among Nanjing, Changzhou, Zhenjiang, Nantong and Yangzhou and among Xuzhou, Suqian, Huaian, Yancheng, Lianyungang and Taizhou. Comprehensive function of land use in Suzhou and Wuxi in southern Jiangsu Province was better. The social function and ecological function of land use in other areas of southern and central Jiangsu Province needed to be further improved. The economic function,social function and ecological function of land use in northern Jiangsu Province were generally weak, and there was still much room for its improvement. The development levels of land use function evaluation in 13 cities of Jiangsu Province were different among the southern, central and northern Jiangsu Province. Specific measures need to be taken to improve land utilization efficiency according to the specific land use in each area.
The land use multifunctionality and spatial differences were evaluated by using the methods of entropy TOPSIS and cluster analysis in 13 cities of Jiangsu Province, which would provide effective countermeasures for improving the land use environment and land use efficiency, and provide a basis for promoting the sustainable development of regional land use. The land use function evaluation was generally good and was strongly similar in Suzhou with Wuxi. The multifunctional comprehensive land use was at a general level in Xuzhou, Suqian, Huaian,Yancheng, Nantong, Taizhou, Yangzhou, Nanjing, Changzhou and Zhenjiang, while it was still at a relatively poor level in Lianyungang. The versatility of land use was highly similar among Nanjing, Changzhou, Zhenjiang, Nantong and Yangzhou and among Xuzhou, Suqian, Huaian, Yancheng, Lianyungang and Taizhou. Comprehensive function of land use in Suzhou and Wuxi in southern Jiangsu Province was better. The social function and ecological function of land use in other areas of southern and central Jiangsu Province needed to be further improved. The economic function,social function and ecological function of land use in northern Jiangsu Province were generally weak, and there was still much room for its improvement. The development levels of land use function evaluation in 13 cities of Jiangsu Province were different among the southern, central and northern Jiangsu Province. Specific measures need to be taken to improve land utilization efficiency according to the specific land use in each area.
引文
[1]OECD.Multifunctionality:towards an Analytical Framework[M].Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,2001.
[2]BARBIE E B,KOCH E W,SILLIMAN B R,et al.Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values[J].Science,2008,319:321-323.
[3]VERBURG P H,MERTZ O,ERB K H,et al.Land system change and food security:Towards multi-scale land system solutions[J].Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2013(5):494-502.
[4]SCH??ER B,HELMING K,WIGGERING H.Assessing land use change impacts:A comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks[J].Journal of Land Use Science,2010(2):159-178.
[5]AUBRY C,RAMAMONJISOA J,DABAT M H,et al.Urban agriculture and land use in cities:An approach with the multifunctionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo(Madagascar)[J].Land Use Policy,2012(2):429-439.
[6]HELMING K,PéREZ SOBA M.Landscape scenarios an d multifunctionality:Making land use impact assessment operational[J].Ecology and Society,2011(1):50.
[7]PARACCHINI M L,PACINI C,JONES M L M,et al.An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options[J].Ecological Indicators,2011(1):71-80.
[8]CALLO-CONCHA D,DENICH M.A participatory framework to assess multifunctional land-use systems with multicriteria and multivariate analyses:A case study on agrobiodiver sity of agroforestry systems in ToméA?ú,Brazil[J].Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems,2014(1):40-50.
[9]KATES R W,CLARK W C,CORELL R,et al.Sustainability science[J].Science,2001(292):641-642.
[10]党丽娟,徐勇,高雅.土地利用功能分类及空间结构评价方法:以燕沟流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2014(5):193-197.
[11]刘沛,段建南,王伟,等.土地利用系统功能分类与评价体系研究[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2010(1):113-118.
[12]王枫,董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断:以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2015b(10):1698-1713.
[13]甄霖,魏云洁,谢高地,等.中国土地利用多功能性动态的区域分析[J].生态学报,2010(24):6749-6761.
[14]杜国明,孙晓兵,王介勇.东北地区土地利用多功能性演化的时空格局[J].地理科学进展,2016(2):232-244.
[15]王枫,董玉祥.广州市土地利用多功能的空间差异及影响因素分析[J].资源科学,2015a(11):2179-2192.
[16]梁小英,顾铮鸣,雷敏,等.土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究:以陕西省蓝田县为例[J].自然资源学报,2014(7):1127-1135.
[17]彭建,吕慧玲,刘焱序,等.国内外多功能景观研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2015(4):465-476.
[18]唐弢,朱坦,徐鹤,等.基于生态系统服务功能价值评估的土地利用总体规划环境影响评价研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007(3):45-49.
[19]黄安,许月卿,郝晋珉,等.土地利用多功能性评价研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(04):88-97.
[20]张路路,郑新奇,原智远,等.基于全排列多边形综合图示法的唐山市土地利用多功能性评价[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(06):23-32.
[21]雷勋平,Robin Qiu,刘勇.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].农业工程学报,2016(13):243-253.
[22]朱士鹏,徐兵,毛蒋兴.城市生态系统健康极其障碍度评价:以南宁市为例[J].安徽大学学报:自然科学版,2015(3):96-102.
[23]高惠璇.应用多元统计分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社出版,2005.
[24]王波,吴子玉.基于范数灰关联度确定权重的江苏省文化产业竞争力综合评价研究[J].江苏社会科学,2016(3):244-251.
[2]BARBIE E B,KOCH E W,SILLIMAN B R,et al.Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values[J].Science,2008,319:321-323.
[3]VERBURG P H,MERTZ O,ERB K H,et al.Land system change and food security:Towards multi-scale land system solutions[J].Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2013(5):494-502.
[4]SCH??ER B,HELMING K,WIGGERING H.Assessing land use change impacts:A comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks[J].Journal of Land Use Science,2010(2):159-178.
[5]AUBRY C,RAMAMONJISOA J,DABAT M H,et al.Urban agriculture and land use in cities:An approach with the multifunctionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo(Madagascar)[J].Land Use Policy,2012(2):429-439.
[6]HELMING K,PéREZ SOBA M.Landscape scenarios an d multifunctionality:Making land use impact assessment operational[J].Ecology and Society,2011(1):50.
[7]PARACCHINI M L,PACINI C,JONES M L M,et al.An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options[J].Ecological Indicators,2011(1):71-80.
[8]CALLO-CONCHA D,DENICH M.A participatory framework to assess multifunctional land-use systems with multicriteria and multivariate analyses:A case study on agrobiodiver sity of agroforestry systems in ToméA?ú,Brazil[J].Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems,2014(1):40-50.
[9]KATES R W,CLARK W C,CORELL R,et al.Sustainability science[J].Science,2001(292):641-642.
[10]党丽娟,徐勇,高雅.土地利用功能分类及空间结构评价方法:以燕沟流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2014(5):193-197.
[11]刘沛,段建南,王伟,等.土地利用系统功能分类与评价体系研究[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2010(1):113-118.
[12]王枫,董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断:以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2015b(10):1698-1713.
[13]甄霖,魏云洁,谢高地,等.中国土地利用多功能性动态的区域分析[J].生态学报,2010(24):6749-6761.
[14]杜国明,孙晓兵,王介勇.东北地区土地利用多功能性演化的时空格局[J].地理科学进展,2016(2):232-244.
[15]王枫,董玉祥.广州市土地利用多功能的空间差异及影响因素分析[J].资源科学,2015a(11):2179-2192.
[16]梁小英,顾铮鸣,雷敏,等.土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究:以陕西省蓝田县为例[J].自然资源学报,2014(7):1127-1135.
[17]彭建,吕慧玲,刘焱序,等.国内外多功能景观研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2015(4):465-476.
[18]唐弢,朱坦,徐鹤,等.基于生态系统服务功能价值评估的土地利用总体规划环境影响评价研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007(3):45-49.
[19]黄安,许月卿,郝晋珉,等.土地利用多功能性评价研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(04):88-97.
[20]张路路,郑新奇,原智远,等.基于全排列多边形综合图示法的唐山市土地利用多功能性评价[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(06):23-32.
[21]雷勋平,Robin Qiu,刘勇.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].农业工程学报,2016(13):243-253.
[22]朱士鹏,徐兵,毛蒋兴.城市生态系统健康极其障碍度评价:以南宁市为例[J].安徽大学学报:自然科学版,2015(3):96-102.
[23]高惠璇.应用多元统计分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社出版,2005.
[24]王波,吴子玉.基于范数灰关联度确定权重的江苏省文化产业竞争力综合评价研究[J].江苏社会科学,2016(3):244-251.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |