科技评估DIIS方法
|
摘要
科技评估在科技管理中发挥着重要的作用,从智库角度而言,其不仅是智库研究的重要任务,而且是智库研究质量的重要保障。然而,现有科技评估方法通常作用于评估问题的局部,缺少从辩证法及系统论角度对科技评估全过程方法体系的思考与认知。为此,文章将潘教峰提出的解决智库研究一般问题的DIIS理论方法运用于科技评估,据此提出科技评估DIIS方法,进而从DIIS视角出发将科技评估在科技决策咨询中的作用界定为六大功能:证据形成功能、衡量比较功能、诊断分析功能、前瞻预测功能、价值导向与判断功能和质量控制功能。最后以机构评估、项目评估、政策评估和研究质量评估为例,分析科技评估DIIS方法的实践应用,以期为我国科技评估实践提供一种方法指引与支撑。
Science and technology assessment plays a prominent role in the science and technology management. It is not only the important task of think tank research but also the significant guarantee of think tank research quality. Nevertheless, the existing science and technology assessment methods are generally applied in the part of the issue, which lack the thinking and cognition of the whole process methodology of science and technology management from dialectics and systems theory, which is a common problem in the think tank research. Therefore, based on Data-Information-Intelligence-Solution(DIIS) theory and methodology, this paper systematically analyzes the general laws followed by think tanks, and consequently proposes a DIIS method of science and technology assessment. Furthermore, under the perspective of DIIS, six functions of science and technology assessment in the science and technology decision-making process are developed. Finally, in order to provide a guideline for the science and technology management and decision-making in our country, four examples are provided to illustrate the applications of science and technology DIIS method, such as institutional assessment, project assessment, policy assessment, and talent assessment.
Science and technology assessment plays a prominent role in the science and technology management. It is not only the important task of think tank research but also the significant guarantee of think tank research quality. Nevertheless, the existing science and technology assessment methods are generally applied in the part of the issue, which lack the thinking and cognition of the whole process methodology of science and technology management from dialectics and systems theory, which is a common problem in the think tank research. Therefore, based on Data-Information-Intelligence-Solution(DIIS) theory and methodology, this paper systematically analyzes the general laws followed by think tanks, and consequently proposes a DIIS method of science and technology assessment. Furthermore, under the perspective of DIIS, six functions of science and technology assessment in the science and technology decision-making process are developed. Finally, in order to provide a guideline for the science and technology management and decision-making in our country, four examples are provided to illustrate the applications of science and technology DIIS method, such as institutional assessment, project assessment, policy assessment, and talent assessment.
引文
[1]潘教峰.科技智库研究的DIIS理论方法.中国科学报,2017-01-09(7).
2 潘教峰,杨国梁,刘慧晖.智库DIIS理论方法.中国管理科学,2017,25(Special Issue):1-14.
3 潘教峰.加强智库建设推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化——潘教峰研究员访谈.中国科学院院刊,2017,32(3):297-302.
4 中国科学院科技评价研究组.关于我院科技评价工作的若干思考.中国科学院院刊,2007,22(2):104-114.
5 郑永和,刘云,何鸣鸿.科学基金绩效评估方案设计中的若干问题研究.中国基础科学,2008,(2):41-44.
6 刘莉.英国大学科研评价改革:从RAE到REF.科学学与科学技术管理.2014,35(2):39-45.
(1)参见:http://www.ref.ac.uk/
2 潘教峰,杨国梁,刘慧晖.智库DIIS理论方法.中国管理科学,2017,25(Special Issue):1-14.
3 潘教峰.加强智库建设推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化——潘教峰研究员访谈.中国科学院院刊,2017,32(3):297-302.
4 中国科学院科技评价研究组.关于我院科技评价工作的若干思考.中国科学院院刊,2007,22(2):104-114.
5 郑永和,刘云,何鸣鸿.科学基金绩效评估方案设计中的若干问题研究.中国基础科学,2008,(2):41-44.
6 刘莉.英国大学科研评价改革:从RAE到REF.科学学与科学技术管理.2014,35(2):39-45.
(1)参见:http://www.ref.ac.uk/