数字版权技术措施规避行为的刑法评价
|
摘要
规避技术措施行为可以分为直接规避行为和间接规避行为。我国《著作权法》未加以区分地将规避技术措施行为全部规定为侵权行为,但并不意味着刑法上应当全部入罪化。现阶段直接规避行为缺乏刑事制裁必要性,但间接规避行为应单独认定为犯罪。规避技术措施行为的后续行为触犯刑法的,应以侵犯著作权罪论处。为实现法益的契合,应当增设新的罪名规制间接规避行为,同时应当将"以营利为目的"作为主观要件,实现犯罪圈的限缩。
The behavior of avoiding technical measures can be divided into direct evasion and indirect evasion. The copyright law of our country does not distinguish the act of circumvention of technical measures as tort without distinction,but it means that all the criminal law should be incriminating. At this stage,the indirect evasion should be identified as a crime alone,but the necessity of the direct evasion of the act is lack of criminal sanctions. The following acts of circumvention of technological measures behavior violated the criminal law,should be punished for the crime of copyright infringement. In order to achieve the coincidence of legal interests,new accusation should be added to regulate indirect evasion. Meanwhile,the subjective element of "profit as the purpose"should be used to achieve the narrowing of the crime circle.
The behavior of avoiding technical measures can be divided into direct evasion and indirect evasion. The copyright law of our country does not distinguish the act of circumvention of technical measures as tort without distinction,but it means that all the criminal law should be incriminating. At this stage,the indirect evasion should be identified as a crime alone,but the necessity of the direct evasion of the act is lack of criminal sanctions. The following acts of circumvention of technological measures behavior violated the criminal law,should be punished for the crime of copyright infringement. In order to achieve the coincidence of legal interests,new accusation should be added to regulate indirect evasion. Meanwhile,the subjective element of "profit as the purpose"should be used to achieve the narrowing of the crime circle.
引文
[1]刘颖.版权法上技术措施的范围[J].法学评论,2017(3):96-106.
[2]赵加兵.论规避技术保护措施的刑法规制[J].湖北警官学院学报,2016(1):98-101.
[3]王迁.论禁止规避技术措施的范围[J].法学家,2016(6):133-145.
[4]班克庆,李晓明.版权技术措施保护模式的刑法取向[J].广西社会科学,2011(12):82-85.
[5]覃斌武.评美国版权法技术措施规则的司法分歧[J].知识产权,2016(11):98-104.
[6]孟磊,单芳.规避版权技术措施行为的刑法规制[J].科技与出版,2016(3):70-73.
[7]董慧娟.对技术措施直接规避行为构成独立的版权侵权的质疑[J].知识产权,2015(5):14-20.
[8]王迁:论禁止规避技术措施的范围[J].法学家,2016(6):133-145.
[9]杨彩霞.规避著作权技术措施行为刑法规制的比较与思考[J].政治与法律,2012(12):52-61.
[10]杨彩霞.网络环境下著作权刑法保护的合理性之质疑与反思[J].政治与法律,2013(11):54-64.
[11]李永升,袁汉兴.网络云端服务提供者侵犯著作权罪的刑法应对[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2017(2):65-71.
[12]陈忠林,陈可倩.关于知识产权刑法保护的几个问题[J].中国刑事法杂志,2007(3):14-18.
(1)具体法律信息详见澳大利亚联邦政府网站Federal Register of Legislation. https://www. legislation. gov. au/Details/C2004B00540/
(2)具体法律信息详见欧盟法律网http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexU riS erv/LexU riS erv. do? uri=CELEX:32001L0029:EN:HTML
[2]赵加兵.论规避技术保护措施的刑法规制[J].湖北警官学院学报,2016(1):98-101.
[3]王迁.论禁止规避技术措施的范围[J].法学家,2016(6):133-145.
[4]班克庆,李晓明.版权技术措施保护模式的刑法取向[J].广西社会科学,2011(12):82-85.
[5]覃斌武.评美国版权法技术措施规则的司法分歧[J].知识产权,2016(11):98-104.
[6]孟磊,单芳.规避版权技术措施行为的刑法规制[J].科技与出版,2016(3):70-73.
[7]董慧娟.对技术措施直接规避行为构成独立的版权侵权的质疑[J].知识产权,2015(5):14-20.
[8]王迁:论禁止规避技术措施的范围[J].法学家,2016(6):133-145.
[9]杨彩霞.规避著作权技术措施行为刑法规制的比较与思考[J].政治与法律,2012(12):52-61.
[10]杨彩霞.网络环境下著作权刑法保护的合理性之质疑与反思[J].政治与法律,2013(11):54-64.
[11]李永升,袁汉兴.网络云端服务提供者侵犯著作权罪的刑法应对[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2017(2):65-71.
[12]陈忠林,陈可倩.关于知识产权刑法保护的几个问题[J].中国刑事法杂志,2007(3):14-18.
(1)具体法律信息详见澳大利亚联邦政府网站Federal Register of Legislation. https://www. legislation. gov. au/Details/C2004B00540/
(2)具体法律信息详见欧盟法律网http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexU riS erv/LexU riS erv. do? uri=CELEX:32001L0029:EN:HTML