正当防卫制度的适用现状与制度完善

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：The Application and Improvement of the Justifiable Defense System 作者：孙凤荣 英文作者：SUN Feng-rong;Law School, Nankai University; 关键词：正当防卫 ; 人权保障 ; 立法规范性 ; 界定标准 英文关键词：justifiable defense;;human rights protection;;normative nature of legislation;;defining criteria 中文刊名：TZFG 英文刊名：Tianjin Legal Science 机构：南开大学法学院; 出版日期：2019-06-15 出版单位：天津法学 年：2019 期：v.35;No.138 语种：中文; 页：TZFG201902014 页数：5 CN：02 ISSN：12-1416/D 分类号：89-93

摘要

正当防卫制度旨在保障公民依法行使防卫权,作为刑事违法阻却事由,理当对人权保障产生重要作用,然而,无论是1979年《刑法》还是1997年《刑法》实施期间,正当防卫制度的适用率一直很低,近些年的表现是,涉及正当防卫的案件,认定并免除刑罚处罚的寥寥无几。刑法条文有关正当防卫制度的认定标准模糊,导致这一制度的适用欠缺确定性和规范性,在司法程序中,认定的现实压力和部分司法传统增加了正当防卫制度的适用难度,正当防卫制度在刑法体系中地位不断下降,经常被讥讽为"僵尸条款",这违背正当防卫制度的立法初衷。基于此,要从稳定人们的规范性期待和完善司法适用两方面进行全面的反思,实现正当防卫制度对于人权保障的应有之意。
        Justifiable defense aims to protect citizens from exercising their right to defense. As elimination of crime, it is reasonable to play an important role in the protection of human rights. However, the application rate of justifiable defense has been very low during both the implementation of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China in 1979 and in1997. In recent years, the number of cases involving justifiable defense which are exempted from criminal punishment is rare. The provisions of the criminal law regarding the identification of the legitimate defense are vague, resulting in the lack of certainty and standardization of the application of this system. In the judicial process, the identified realistic pressures and some judicial traditions increase the difficulty of applying justifiable defense. Justifiable defense has been declining in the criminal law system and is often ridiculed as"zombie provisions", which violates the original intention of the justifiable defense. Based on this, it is necessary to improve normative expectations and judicial application, and only in this way can justifiable defense play its role in safeguarding human rights.

引文

[1]李毅.从案例再议正当防卫制度[D].西南政法大学,2009.
    [2]徐璐璐.刑事违法性与防卫行为之违法性判断[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2015,(01):91-95.
    [3]彭卫东.正当防卫论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2001.
    [4]刘宪权.中国刑法理论前沿问题研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2005.
    [5]姜敏.正当防卫制度中的“城堡法”:渊源、发展与启示[J].法学评论,2018,(05):47-60.
    [6]劳东燕.正当防卫的异化与刑法系统的功能[J].法学家,2018,(05):76-92.
    [7]刘项南.适度扩大正当防卫正当化根据[N].检察日报,2018-02-11(003).
    [8]史雯.期待可能性在正当防卫中的适用问题——基于昆山砍人案、于欢案等案件的分析与反思[J].三明学院学报,2018,(05):46-51.
    [9]劳东燕.正当防卫的异化与刑法系统的功能[J].法学家,2018,(05):76-92.
    [10]邓多文.论刑法的合理性解释[D].西南政法大学,2010.
    [11]张峰.正当防卫的司法实践判断[J].中国检察官,2018,(01):66-71.
    [12]崔志鑫.论正当防卫的防卫限度[D].西南政法大学,2008.
    [13]张明楷.刑法学2006年版[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
    [14]赵秉志,刘志伟.正当防卫理论若干争议问题研究[J].法律科学,2001,(02):66-79.
    [15]陈兴良.正当防卫如何才能避免沦为僵尸条款——以于欢故意伤害案一审判决为例的刑法教义学分析[J].法学家,2017,(05):89-104.