家庭护理干预对提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴心力衰竭患者生活质量的价值研究
|
摘要
目的探讨慢阻肺伴心力衰竭患者采用家庭护理干预后,对其生活质量的影响。方法取60例我院在2014年12月～2017年12月收治的慢阻肺伴心力衰竭患者展开研究,以随机数字表法分为对照组、实验组,每组均30例。对照组用常规护理,以常规护理为基础,实验组用家庭护理干预,分析干预效果。结果生活质量评分对比显示实验组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);肺功能与对照组比较,实验组较优(P <0.05);不良事件发生率与对照组比较,实验组较低(P <0.05)。结论给予慢阻肺伴心力衰竭患者家庭护理干预,对提高患者生活质量具有积极作用,值得推广。
Objective To study the effect of family nursing intervention on improving quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure. Methods 60 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure who were admitted and treated in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2017 were selected and studied.According to the random number table,they were divided into the control group and the experimental group,with 30 cases in each group.The control group was given routine nursing while the experimental groupwas givenfamily nursing intervention on basis of routine nursing.The intervention effects were analyzed. Results The comparison of quality of life scores showed that the experimental group was higher than the control group(P< 0.05).Compared with the control group,the lung function was better in the experimental group(P < 0.05).The incidence of adverse events was lower in the experimental group than in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion Family nursing intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failurehas a positive effect on improving the quality of life of patients and it is worth promoting.
Objective To study the effect of family nursing intervention on improving quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure. Methods 60 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure who were admitted and treated in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2017 were selected and studied.According to the random number table,they were divided into the control group and the experimental group,with 30 cases in each group.The control group was given routine nursing while the experimental groupwas givenfamily nursing intervention on basis of routine nursing.The intervention effects were analyzed. Results The comparison of quality of life scores showed that the experimental group was higher than the control group(P< 0.05).Compared with the control group,the lung function was better in the experimental group(P < 0.05).The incidence of adverse events was lower in the experimental group than in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion Family nursing intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failurehas a positive effect on improving the quality of life of patients and it is worth promoting.
引文
[1]赵秋燕.浅析延续性护理干预对慢阻肺患者肺功能及生活质量的影响[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(11):157-158.
[2]王玫,赵晓梅,贺蓉,等.家庭延续护理在提高老年慢阻肺患者的肺功能和生活质量中的应用研究[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2018,2(9):111.
[3]苟元芬,王晓彬,彭红,等.延续护理干预对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响研究[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018,3(22):19-20.
[4]刘晶.慢阻肺合并慢性呼吸衰竭患者应用家庭无创通气的护理干预效果探讨[J].当代医学,2018,24(3):150-151.
[5]宋建梅,陈娜,乔珠,等.家庭护理干预对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响[J].心理医生,2017,23(21):253-254.
[6]郑秀琼,陈映琳,蔡博,等.延续性护理对慢阻肺患者戒烟情况及肺功能的影响[J].现代医院,2017,17(7):1073-1075.
[7]陈瑞君.延续性护理干预对慢阻肺患者肺功能及生活质量的影响[J].中国当代医药,2016,23(13):177-179.
[8]李梦竹.慢阻肺患者实施护理干预对生活质量的干预价值探析[J].心理医生,2016,22(20):189,190.
[9]Ghosh A,Mccarthy S,Halcomb E.Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice:a qualitative study[J].Bmc Family Practice,2016,17(1):1-7.
[10]宋建梅,陈娜,乔珠,等.家庭护理干预对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响[J].心理医生,2017,23(21):253-254.
[11]范立华.护理干预对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响研究[J].中医临床研究,2016,8(10):133.
[12]刘宁.出院后延伸护理干预对改善慢阻肺疾病患者生活质量的影响[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(17):4076-4077.
[13]雷芳.慢性心力衰竭合并慢阻肺患者治疗前后CRP,CK-MB和cTnT的动态变化[J].保健医学研究与实践,2015,12(6):40-42.
[14]李伟超,钟婉茜.强化护理干预在慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并Ⅱ型呼衰无创机械通气中的应用效果分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(4):538-540.
[15]吴挺实,陈钰,梁勇.个体化健康教育模式对改善稳定期慢阻肺患者行为和生活质量的作用[J].中外健康教育,2017,33(9):855-858.
[2]王玫,赵晓梅,贺蓉,等.家庭延续护理在提高老年慢阻肺患者的肺功能和生活质量中的应用研究[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2018,2(9):111.
[3]苟元芬,王晓彬,彭红,等.延续护理干预对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响研究[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018,3(22):19-20.
[4]刘晶.慢阻肺合并慢性呼吸衰竭患者应用家庭无创通气的护理干预效果探讨[J].当代医学,2018,24(3):150-151.
[5]宋建梅,陈娜,乔珠,等.家庭护理干预对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响[J].心理医生,2017,23(21):253-254.
[6]郑秀琼,陈映琳,蔡博,等.延续性护理对慢阻肺患者戒烟情况及肺功能的影响[J].现代医院,2017,17(7):1073-1075.
[7]陈瑞君.延续性护理干预对慢阻肺患者肺功能及生活质量的影响[J].中国当代医药,2016,23(13):177-179.
[8]李梦竹.慢阻肺患者实施护理干预对生活质量的干预价值探析[J].心理医生,2016,22(20):189,190.
[9]Ghosh A,Mccarthy S,Halcomb E.Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice:a qualitative study[J].Bmc Family Practice,2016,17(1):1-7.
[10]宋建梅,陈娜,乔珠,等.家庭护理干预对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响[J].心理医生,2017,23(21):253-254.
[11]范立华.护理干预对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响研究[J].中医临床研究,2016,8(10):133.
[12]刘宁.出院后延伸护理干预对改善慢阻肺疾病患者生活质量的影响[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(17):4076-4077.
[13]雷芳.慢性心力衰竭合并慢阻肺患者治疗前后CRP,CK-MB和cTnT的动态变化[J].保健医学研究与实践,2015,12(6):40-42.
[14]李伟超,钟婉茜.强化护理干预在慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并Ⅱ型呼衰无创机械通气中的应用效果分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(4):538-540.
[15]吴挺实,陈钰,梁勇.个体化健康教育模式对改善稳定期慢阻肺患者行为和生活质量的作用[J].中外健康教育,2017,33(9):855-858.