摘要
基于概念史的研究视角,通过梳理"体育人口"概念内涵在中外不同历史背景下的转变,指出其背后所蕴含的体育思想变化与拓展。以此为枢纽,阐释从20世纪60年代以来日本、苏联以及欧美和我国体育思想演进,为当今体育研究中的"体育人口"概念发展谱系的梳理提供借鉴。研究体育人口的概念,需要从体育出发,适当地涉及竞技体育与学校体育,更需要从群众体育角度出发全面看问题,分清矛盾的主要方面和次要方面。随着对体育人口研究的不断深入,与之相关的研究热点越来越多。群众体育、竞技体育、学校体育等研究点也在此时期不断被充实,相互之间形成了一个多维的研究领域,跨学科定义也成为定义体育人口概念的主要方式。为了建立健全体育人口概念体系,从多维度、多视角出发解读新时期发展下的体育人口主题很有必要。研究认为,"体育人口"概念差异和人们对"体育"或者"身体活动"的认识密切相关。
Based on the research perspective of concept history,this paper points out the change and expansion of sports thoughts behind the concept of "sports population"by sorting out the changes of its connotation in different historical backgrounds at home and abroad.Taking this as a pivot,this paper explains the evolution of sports thoughts in Japan,the Soviet Union, Europe, America and China since the 1960 s,and provides a reference for sorting out the development pedigree of the concept of "sports population"in current sports research. To study the concept of sports population,it is necessary to start from sports and appropriately involve competitive sports and school sports.It is also necessary to comprehensively look at the problems from the perspective of mass sports and distinguish the main aspects and secondary aspects of contradictions.With the deepening of the research on sports population,there are more and more research hotspots related to it.Research sites such as mass sports,competitive sports,and school sports have also been enriched during this period,forming a multi-dimensional research field.Interdisciplinary definition has also become the main way to define the concept of sports population.In order to establish a sound sports population conceptual system,it is necessary to interpret the theme of sports population under the new era from a multi-dimensional and multi-perspective field of vision.The study considers that the concept of "ports population"is closely related to people's understanding of "sports"or "physical activity".
引文
[1] 孙江.概念、概念史与中国语境[J].史学月刊,2012(09):5-11.
[2] 孙江.切入民国史的两个视角:概念史与社会史[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学版),2013,50(1):105-107.
[3] 马克思.马克思·恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1958:102.
[4] 菅原礼.体育人口的构造[M].东京:大修馆书店:1965:17.
[5] 台湾大辞典编订委员会.台湾体育大辞典[M].台北:台湾商务书馆,1985:153.
[6] 陈华.体育人文社会学的发展趋势[J].体育科学研究,2005(1):16-19.
[7] 仇军,田思庆.欧美体育社会学研究图景[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2017:39-40.
[8] 石龙,王桂荣.西方体育人文价值的演变[J].中国体育科技,2008(5):20-30.
[9] 张万和,胡红.对体育人口问题的初步探讨[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),1986(3):106-111.
[10] 徐隆瑞.体育人口浅论[J].华南师范大学学报,1991(1):101-113.
[11] 黄俊伟.关于我国体育人口的质及传统影响因素的讨论[J].武汉体育学院学报,1993(3):20-22.
[12] 梁红梅,李金龙,李梦桐.体育概念的重新界定[J].北京体育大学学报,2014(1):100-103.
[13] 卢元镇.中国体育社会学[M].北京:北京体育大学出版社,1996:75-77.
[14] 仇军,高峰.体育人口概念研究[J].体育科学,1999(2):11-14.
[15] 肖焕禹,方立.体育人口的概念、分类及其统计标准[J].体育科研,2005,26(1).
[16] 彭大松,许玮.体育人口研究:近三十年研究回顾及相关问题探讨[J].天津体育学院学报,2009,24(4):348-352.
[17] 黄俊伟.关于我国体育人口的质及传统影响因素的讨论[J].武汉体育学院学报,1993(3):20-22.
[18] 张洪潭.体育人口新论[J].体育与科学,1999(4):1-5.
[19] 张磊,夏成前.体育现代化指标体系中“体育人口”指标合理性论证[J].体育与科学,2014(4):74-79.