论我国解雇保护制度的完善
|
摘要
解雇保护制度直接影响着用工安全性和灵活性,关乎着社会经济的发展。与发达国家相比,我国在劳动者过错行为原因的解雇、劳动者本身原因的解雇以及经济性裁员中均存在着对劳动者倾斜保护过度的问题,进而造成新形式的不公平。为了增强我国经济在国际上的竞争力,有必要完善解雇保护制度,提高我国企业的用工灵活性,具体措施应为:适当降低劳动者过错行为原因和劳动者本身原因的解雇保护力度、放宽对经济性裁员中优先留用人员的限制、创设解雇保护豁免制度。
Dismissal protection system directly affects the safety and flexibility of employment, and is related to the development of social economy. Compared with developed countries, there are some problems of overprotection of workers in the aspect of dismissal due to worker's faulty behavior, their own reasons and the economic dismissal, which in turn leads to new forms of unfairness in China. In order to enhance the competitiveness of China's economy in the international arena, it is necessary to improve the dismissal protection system and improve the flexibility of employment of Chinese enterprises.The specific measures should be taken, which include appropriately reducing the protection of dismissal due to worker's faulty behavior and their own reasons, and relaxing the priority of retaining employee in economic dismissal and establishing immunity system of the dismissal protection.
Dismissal protection system directly affects the safety and flexibility of employment, and is related to the development of social economy. Compared with developed countries, there are some problems of overprotection of workers in the aspect of dismissal due to worker's faulty behavior, their own reasons and the economic dismissal, which in turn leads to new forms of unfairness in China. In order to enhance the competitiveness of China's economy in the international arena, it is necessary to improve the dismissal protection system and improve the flexibility of employment of Chinese enterprises.The specific measures should be taken, which include appropriately reducing the protection of dismissal due to worker's faulty behavior and their own reasons, and relaxing the priority of retaining employee in economic dismissal and establishing immunity system of the dismissal protection.
引文
[1]楼继伟:现行劳动合同法不适合灵活用工.[EB/OL].(2016-03-08)[2018-11-18]. https://new.qq.com/cmsn/20160308/20160308007221.
[2]董保华.《劳动合同法》的十大失衡问题[J].探索与争鸣,2016(4):10-17.
[3]杨浩楠.完善我国解雇保护法律制度的思路与对策[J].法学,2016(3):67-70.
[4]刘贯学.新中国劳动保障史话(1949-2003)[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社.2004.
[5]沃尔夫冈·多伊普勒.德国劳动法[M].王倩,译.上海:上海人民出版社.2016.
[6]郑爱青.法国劳动合同法概要[M].北京:光明日报出版社.2010.
[7]黄卉.德国劳动法中的解雇保护制度[J].中外法学,2007(1):106-109.
[8]Jesse Elvin. Damages for non-economic harm in unfair dismissal cases[J]. Cambridge Law Journal,2004,63(2):303-306.
[9]凯瑟琳·巴纳德.欧盟劳动法[M].付欣,译.北京:中国法制出版社.2005.
[10]谢德成.海峡两岸经济性裁员制度之比较[J].海峡法学,2010(4):13-17.
[11]闫海,魏萍.中国与欧盟经济性裁员立法的比较及借鉴[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2010,9(11):31-33.
[12]李哲.公司高级管理人员雇员地位问题之探讨[J].兰州学刊,2007(12):79-80.
[2]董保华.《劳动合同法》的十大失衡问题[J].探索与争鸣,2016(4):10-17.
[3]杨浩楠.完善我国解雇保护法律制度的思路与对策[J].法学,2016(3):67-70.
[4]刘贯学.新中国劳动保障史话(1949-2003)[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社.2004.
[5]沃尔夫冈·多伊普勒.德国劳动法[M].王倩,译.上海:上海人民出版社.2016.
[6]郑爱青.法国劳动合同法概要[M].北京:光明日报出版社.2010.
[7]黄卉.德国劳动法中的解雇保护制度[J].中外法学,2007(1):106-109.
[8]Jesse Elvin. Damages for non-economic harm in unfair dismissal cases[J]. Cambridge Law Journal,2004,63(2):303-306.
[9]凯瑟琳·巴纳德.欧盟劳动法[M].付欣,译.北京:中国法制出版社.2005.
[10]谢德成.海峡两岸经济性裁员制度之比较[J].海峡法学,2010(4):13-17.
[11]闫海,魏萍.中国与欧盟经济性裁员立法的比较及借鉴[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2010,9(11):31-33.
[12]李哲.公司高级管理人员雇员地位问题之探讨[J].兰州学刊,2007(12):79-80.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |