战略联盟知识异质性对焦点企业突破性创新的影响研究
|
摘要
基于网络理论与知识基础观理论,通过采集产业技术创新联盟内的234份联盟成员的调查问卷,探讨了战略联盟知识异质性对焦点企业突破性创新的影响,并考察了知识搜索强度与网络惯例在其中的作用机制。研究表明:战略联盟知识异质性与焦点企业突破性创新之间呈倒U型关系;知识搜索强度正向调节战略联盟知识异质性与焦点企业突破性创新之间的关系;网络惯例正向调节战略联盟知识异质性与焦点企业突破性创新之间的关系。
Based on network theory and knowledge-based view theory, this study discusses the impact of strategic alliance knowledge heterogeneity on breakthrough innovation of core enterprise and studies the mechanism of knowledge search intensity and network routines through collecting 234 questionnaires of the alliance enterprises in industrial technology innovation alliance. The results show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between strategic alliance knowledge heterogeneity and breakthrough innovations in core enterprises. Moreover, knowledge search intensity has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between strategic alliance knowledge heterogeneity and breakthrough innovation, and network routines have a positive moderating effect on the relationship between strategic alliance knowledge heterogeneity and breakthrough innovation.
Based on network theory and knowledge-based view theory, this study discusses the impact of strategic alliance knowledge heterogeneity on breakthrough innovation of core enterprise and studies the mechanism of knowledge search intensity and network routines through collecting 234 questionnaires of the alliance enterprises in industrial technology innovation alliance. The results show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between strategic alliance knowledge heterogeneity and breakthrough innovations in core enterprises. Moreover, knowledge search intensity has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between strategic alliance knowledge heterogeneity and breakthrough innovation, and network routines have a positive moderating effect on the relationship between strategic alliance knowledge heterogeneity and breakthrough innovation.
引文
[1] 邵云飞, 詹坤, 吴言波. 突破性创新: 理论综述与研究展望[J]. 技术经济, 2017, 36(4): 30-37.
[2] SCHMICKL C, KIESER A. How Much Do Specialists Have to Learn from Each Other when They Jointly Develop Radical Product Innovations?[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(3): 473-491.
[3] SRIVASTAVA M K, GNYAWALI D R. When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(4): 797-810.
[4] COBENA M, GALLEGO A, CASANUEVA C. Heterogeneity, Diversity and Complementarity in Alliance Portfolios[J]. European Management Journal, 2017, 35(4): 464-476.
[5] LEE D, KIRKPATRICK H K, MADHAVAN R. Diversity in Alliance Portfolios and Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(5): 1 472-1 497.
[6] LEEUW T D, LOKSHIN B, DUYSTERS G. Returns to Alliance Portfolio Diversity: The Relative Effects of Partner Diversity on Firm’s Innovative Performance and Productivity[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(9): 1 839-1 849.
[7] 孙永磊, 党兴华, 宋晶. 基于网络惯例的双元能力对合作创新绩效的影响[J]. 管理科学,2014,27(2):38-47.
[8] 殷俊杰, 邵云飞. 创新搜索和惯例的调节作用下联盟组合伙伴多样性对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(4): 545-553.
[9] 陈祖胜, 任浩, 林明. 知识互补性对研发网络内异位势企业间联盟的影响——基于知识基础结构的调节效应[J]. 预测, 2015, 34(2): 28-33.
[10] BAUER M, LEKER J. Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Process Innovation in the Chemical Industry[J]. R&D Management, 2013, 43(3): 196-212.
[11] PARKHE A. Interfirm Diversity, Organizational Learning, and Longevity in Global Strategic Alliances[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1991, 22(4): 579-601.
[12] 戴勇, 胡明溥. 产学研伙伴异质性对知识共享的影响及机制研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(6): 66-79.
[13] GARCIA R, CALANTONE R. A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2002,19(2):110-132.
[14] ALEXANDER L, VAN K D. Teams in Pursuit of Radical Innovation: A Goal Orientation Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2014, 39(4): 423-438.
[15] DAS T K, TENG B S. A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(1): 31-61.
[16] YAO Z, YANG Z, FISHER G J, et al. Knowledge Complementarity, Knowledge Absorption Effectiveness, and New Product Performance: The Exploration of International Joint Ventures in China[J]. International Business Review,2013,22(1):216-227.
[17] MUTHUSAMY S K, WHITE M A. Learning and Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances: A Social Exchange View[J]. Organization Studies, 2005, 26(3): 415-441.
[18] 岳鹄, 朱怀念, 张光宇, 等. 网络关系、合作伙伴差异性对开放式创新绩效的交互影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(7): 1 018-1 024.
[19] PARK S H, ZHOU D. Firm Heterogeneity and Competitive Dynamics in Alliance Formation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(3): 531-554.
[20] VERONA G. A Resource-Based View of Product Development[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(1): 132-142.
[21] ROTHWELL R, FREEMAN C, HORLSEY A, et al. SAPPHO Updated-Project SAPPHO Phase II[J]. Research Policy, 1974, 3(3): 258-291.
[22] 符峰华, 蒙生儒, 刘刚. 高新技术企业社会联系与创新绩效关系的实证研究——基于资源拼凑和创新搜索强度的中介调节效应[J]. 预测, 2018, 37(4): 17-23.
[23] 宋晶, 孙永磊, 陈劲. 基于调节定向的网络惯例对合作创新绩效的作用研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(2): 127-135.
[24] ZOLLO M, REUER J J, SINGH H. Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances[J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(6): 701-713.
[25] 陈学光, 徐金发. 网络组织及其惯例的形成——基于演化论的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006,25(4): 52-58.
[26] ZHOU K Z, LI C B. How Knowledge Affects Radical Innovation: Knowledge Base, Market Knowledge Acquisition, and Internal Knowledge Sharing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(9): 1 090-1 102.
[27] FANG E. The Effect of Strategic Alliance Knowledge Complementarity on New Product Innovativeness in China[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(1): 158-172.
[28] FARCH J L, HACKETT R D, LIANG J. Individual-Level Cultural Values as Moderators of Perceived Organizational Support-Employee Outcome Relationships in China: Comparing the Effects of Power Distance and Traditionality[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(3): 715-729.
[2] SCHMICKL C, KIESER A. How Much Do Specialists Have to Learn from Each Other when They Jointly Develop Radical Product Innovations?[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(3): 473-491.
[3] SRIVASTAVA M K, GNYAWALI D R. When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(4): 797-810.
[4] COBENA M, GALLEGO A, CASANUEVA C. Heterogeneity, Diversity and Complementarity in Alliance Portfolios[J]. European Management Journal, 2017, 35(4): 464-476.
[5] LEE D, KIRKPATRICK H K, MADHAVAN R. Diversity in Alliance Portfolios and Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(5): 1 472-1 497.
[6] LEEUW T D, LOKSHIN B, DUYSTERS G. Returns to Alliance Portfolio Diversity: The Relative Effects of Partner Diversity on Firm’s Innovative Performance and Productivity[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(9): 1 839-1 849.
[7] 孙永磊, 党兴华, 宋晶. 基于网络惯例的双元能力对合作创新绩效的影响[J]. 管理科学,2014,27(2):38-47.
[8] 殷俊杰, 邵云飞. 创新搜索和惯例的调节作用下联盟组合伙伴多样性对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(4): 545-553.
[9] 陈祖胜, 任浩, 林明. 知识互补性对研发网络内异位势企业间联盟的影响——基于知识基础结构的调节效应[J]. 预测, 2015, 34(2): 28-33.
[10] BAUER M, LEKER J. Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Process Innovation in the Chemical Industry[J]. R&D Management, 2013, 43(3): 196-212.
[11] PARKHE A. Interfirm Diversity, Organizational Learning, and Longevity in Global Strategic Alliances[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1991, 22(4): 579-601.
[12] 戴勇, 胡明溥. 产学研伙伴异质性对知识共享的影响及机制研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(6): 66-79.
[13] GARCIA R, CALANTONE R. A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2002,19(2):110-132.
[14] ALEXANDER L, VAN K D. Teams in Pursuit of Radical Innovation: A Goal Orientation Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2014, 39(4): 423-438.
[15] DAS T K, TENG B S. A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(1): 31-61.
[16] YAO Z, YANG Z, FISHER G J, et al. Knowledge Complementarity, Knowledge Absorption Effectiveness, and New Product Performance: The Exploration of International Joint Ventures in China[J]. International Business Review,2013,22(1):216-227.
[17] MUTHUSAMY S K, WHITE M A. Learning and Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances: A Social Exchange View[J]. Organization Studies, 2005, 26(3): 415-441.
[18] 岳鹄, 朱怀念, 张光宇, 等. 网络关系、合作伙伴差异性对开放式创新绩效的交互影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(7): 1 018-1 024.
[19] PARK S H, ZHOU D. Firm Heterogeneity and Competitive Dynamics in Alliance Formation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(3): 531-554.
[20] VERONA G. A Resource-Based View of Product Development[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(1): 132-142.
[21] ROTHWELL R, FREEMAN C, HORLSEY A, et al. SAPPHO Updated-Project SAPPHO Phase II[J]. Research Policy, 1974, 3(3): 258-291.
[22] 符峰华, 蒙生儒, 刘刚. 高新技术企业社会联系与创新绩效关系的实证研究——基于资源拼凑和创新搜索强度的中介调节效应[J]. 预测, 2018, 37(4): 17-23.
[23] 宋晶, 孙永磊, 陈劲. 基于调节定向的网络惯例对合作创新绩效的作用研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(2): 127-135.
[24] ZOLLO M, REUER J J, SINGH H. Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances[J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(6): 701-713.
[25] 陈学光, 徐金发. 网络组织及其惯例的形成——基于演化论的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006,25(4): 52-58.
[26] ZHOU K Z, LI C B. How Knowledge Affects Radical Innovation: Knowledge Base, Market Knowledge Acquisition, and Internal Knowledge Sharing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(9): 1 090-1 102.
[27] FANG E. The Effect of Strategic Alliance Knowledge Complementarity on New Product Innovativeness in China[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(1): 158-172.
[28] FARCH J L, HACKETT R D, LIANG J. Individual-Level Cultural Values as Moderators of Perceived Organizational Support-Employee Outcome Relationships in China: Comparing the Effects of Power Distance and Traditionality[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(3): 715-729.