区域协调发展战略下的行政边界研究框架
|
摘要
边界作为一种自然和体制作用下形成的综合性空间地理要素,如同一堵"看不见的墙"阻碍了跨行政区域的物质交换和能量传递,影响了区域可持续发展,加强行政边界研究具有较强的时代性和迫切性。系统梳理国内外相关研究,发现已有研究存在以下缺憾:重视实证研究,忽视边界作为空间地理要素的理论研究;注重空间尺度,缺乏行政边界尺度转换的探讨;依赖单一方法,欠缺多学科研究方法的交叉与融合。因此,为解决行政边界壁垒面临的现实困境和服务于新时代国家重大战略的新需求,应该重视行政边界领域的理论研究,系统阐释边界作为空间地理要素的本质内涵,重点开展边界区域协调发展的"过程—格局—机制"、不同尺度空间边界区域的政策体系、不同尺度空间行政边界的尺度转换、行政区经济向经济区经济转变的路径等领域研究,加强综合性与系统分析方法、区域性与区域分析方法等运用,建立一套较为完整的、系统的研究方法体系,引领人民生活走向更美好更公平的新时代。
Border as a comprehensive spatial geographic element is formed by natural and institutional functions, hinders the material exchange and energy transfer between administrative regions, and affects regional sustainable development.it has strong temporal spirit and urgency to strengthen the research of administrative border. Systematically sorting out the relevant literatures at home and abroad, it has been found that the existing studies have the following drawbacks:emphasizing on the empirical research, ignoring the theoretical study on the border as a spatial geographic element;focusing on the spatial scale, lacking the discussion of the scale conversion of administrative border; relying on a single method, lacking the crossover and integration of multidisciplinary research methods. Therefore, in order to solve the practical difficulties of administrative border barriers and the new requirement for the major strategies of the new era, we should pay attention to theoretical research in the field of administrative border, and systematically explain the essential connotation of border as a spatial geographic element. We should focus on the study of the"process-pattern-mechanism"of coordinated development of border region, the policy system of border region at different scales space, the scale conversion of administrative border at different scales space, and the path of economy transformation from the administrative area to the economic zone and other fields. In order to lead the people's life toward a new and better era,we should strengthen the application of comprehensive and systematic analysis methods, regional and region analysis methods, and establish a relatively complete and systematic research method system.
Border as a comprehensive spatial geographic element is formed by natural and institutional functions, hinders the material exchange and energy transfer between administrative regions, and affects regional sustainable development.it has strong temporal spirit and urgency to strengthen the research of administrative border. Systematically sorting out the relevant literatures at home and abroad, it has been found that the existing studies have the following drawbacks:emphasizing on the empirical research, ignoring the theoretical study on the border as a spatial geographic element;focusing on the spatial scale, lacking the discussion of the scale conversion of administrative border; relying on a single method, lacking the crossover and integration of multidisciplinary research methods. Therefore, in order to solve the practical difficulties of administrative border barriers and the new requirement for the major strategies of the new era, we should pay attention to theoretical research in the field of administrative border, and systematically explain the essential connotation of border as a spatial geographic element. We should focus on the study of the"process-pattern-mechanism"of coordinated development of border region, the policy system of border region at different scales space, the scale conversion of administrative border at different scales space, and the path of economy transformation from the administrative area to the economic zone and other fields. In order to lead the people's life toward a new and better era,we should strengthen the application of comprehensive and systematic analysis methods, regional and region analysis methods, and establish a relatively complete and systematic research method system.
引文
[1]陈钊.行政边界区域刍论[J].人文地理,1996,11(4):45-48.
[2]王成龙,刘慧,张梦天.边界效应研究进展及展望[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(9):1 109-1 118.
[3]王成龙,刘慧,张梦天.行政边界对城市群城市用地空间扩张的影响——基于京津冀城市群的实证研究[J].地理研究,2016,35(1):173-183.
[4]王振波,朱传耿,徐建刚.省际边界区域边界效应的测定——以淮海经济区为例[J].经济地理,2008,28(5):765-770.
[5]朱传耿,王振波,孟召宜.我国省际边界区域的研究进展及展望[J].经济地理,2007,27(2):302-305.
[6]曹小曙,徐建斌.中国省际边界区县域经济格局及影响因素的空间异质性[J].地理学报,2018,73(6):1 065-1 075.
[7] Landry A. Borders and Big Macs[J]. Economics Letters,2013,120(2):318-322.
[8] Xing W,Li S. Home bias,border effect and internal market integration in China:Evidence from inter-provincial value-added tax statistics[J]. Review of Development Economics,2011,15(3):491-503.
[9]行伟波,李善同.本地偏好、边界效应与市场一体化——基于中国地区间增值税流动数据的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),2009,8(4):1 455-1 474.
[10]李天籽.中国沿边的跨境经济合作的边界效应[J].经济地理,2015,35(10):5-12.
[11] Gorodnichenko Y,Tesar L L. Border effect or country effect?Seattle may not be so far from Vancouver after all[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,2009,1(1):219-241.
[12]李铁立,姜怀宇.边境区位、边境区经济合作的理论与实践——以辽宁省—朝鲜边境地区经济合作为例[J].人文地理,2004,19(6):1-5.
[13]何雄浪,张泽义.边界效应、国内市场一体化与区域壁垒[J].工业技术经济,2014(10):58-67.
[14] Gao X,Long C X. Cultural border,administrative border,and regional economic development:Evidence from Chinese cities[J]. China Economic Review,2014(31):247-264.
[15]王亮,刘卫东.西方经济地理学对国家边界及其效应的研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(5):601-608.
[16]唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.流动性视角下边界的空间实践及其意义——以云南省河口县中越边境地区X村为例[J].地理研究,2016,35(8):1 535-1 546.
[17] Baumann H. Enclaves,borders,and everyday movements:Palestinian marginal mobility in East Jerusalem[J]. Cities,2016,59:173-182.
[18] Zimmerbauer K,Suutari T,Saartenoja A. Resistance to the deinstitutionalization of a region:Borders,identity and activism in a municipality merger[J]. Geoforum,2012,43(6):1 065-1 075.
[19]唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.社会建构主义视角下的边界——研究综述与启示[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(7):969-978.
[20]李郇,徐现祥.中国撤县(市)设区对城市经济增长的影响分析[J].地理学报,2015,70(8):1 202-1 214.
[21]王成龙,刘慧,张梦天.基于结构方程模型的京津冀城市用地行政边界效应分析[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(7):1 127-1 137.
[22]余斌,刘明华,朱丽霞,等.城市群的边界效应与边界地区发展[J].地理科学,2012,32(6):666-672.
[23]程金龙.中原经济区省际边界区域经济格局时空演化[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):30-36.
[24]陈永林,谢炳庚,杨贤房,等.多引力作用下的省际边界县域经济空间格局及发展思路——以赣粤闽客家聚居区为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(1):46-51.
[25] Karaman O,Islam T. On the dual nature of intra-urban borders:The case of a Romani neighborhood in Istanbul[J]. Cities,2012,29(4):234-243.
[26]朱翔,徐美.湖南省省际边界中心城市的选择与培育[J].经济地理,2011,31(11):1 761-1 767.
[27] Park J Y,Kwon C,Son M. Economic implications of the Canada-U. S. border bridges:Applying a binational local economic model for international freight movements[J]. Research in Transportation Business&Management,2014,11(8):123-133.
[28]赵永亮.市场获得,边界效应与经济集聚——基于“中心—外围”城市经济活动的考察[J].中国工业经济,2012(3):69-81.
[29]牛欣,陈向东.城市创新跨边界合作与辐射距离探析——基于城市间合作申请专利数据的研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(6):659-667.
[30]晁恒,马学广,李贵才.尺度重构视角下国家战略区域的空间生产策略——基于国家级新区的探讨[J].经济地理,2015,35(5):1-8.
[31] Nicholls W J. Producing-resisting national borders in the United States,France and the Netherlands[J]. Political Geography,2016(51):43-52.
[32]丁四保.从区域规划看中国的区域制度[J].地理科学,2013,33(2):129-134.
[33] Rui A C,Vulevic A,Fernández J C,et al. Accessibility and connectivity-Movement between cities,as a critical factor to achieve success on cross-border cooperation(CBC)projects. A European analysis[J]. Sustainable Cities&Society,2017(32):181-190.
[34] Raposo M L,Ferreira J J M,Fernandes C I. Local and crossborder SME cooperation:Effects on innovation and performance[J]. Revista Europea De Dirección Y Economía De La Empresa,2014,23(4):157-165.
[35]韩玉刚,焦华富,郇恒飞.省际边缘区传统制造业集聚过程及动因分析——以安徽省宁国市耐磨铸件产业为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(7):1 128-1 133.
[36]韩玉刚,焦华富,李俊峰.中国省际边缘区产业集群的网络特征和形成机理——以安徽省宁国市耐磨铸件产业集群为例[J].地理研究,2011,30(5):814-826.
[37] Mccallum J. National borders matter:Canada-U. S. regional trade patterns[J]. American Economic Review,1995,85(3):615-623.
[38]李郇,徐现祥.边界效应的测定方法及其在长江三角洲的应用[J].地理研究,2006,25(5):792-802.
[39]贺灿飞,任永欢,李蕴雄.产品结构演化的跨界效应研究——基于中国地级市出口产品的实证分析[J].地理科学,2016,36(11):1 605-1 613.
[40]黄新飞,陈珊珊,李腾.价格差异、市场分割与边界效应——基于长三角15个城市的实证研究[J].经济研究,2014(12):18-32.
[41] Xu X,Voon J P. Regional integration in China:a statistical model[J]. Economics Letters,2003,79(1):35-42.
[42]杨效忠,张捷,叶舒娟.基于社会网络的跨界旅游区边界效应测度及转化[J].地理科学,2010,17(6):826-832.
[43]杨效忠,冯立新,张凯.交通方式对跨界旅游区景区可达性影响及边界效应测度——以大别山为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(6):693-702.
[44]傅伯杰.地理学综合研究的途径与方法:格局与过程耦合[J].地理学报,2014,69(8):1 052-1 059.
[45]汪德根.高铁网络化时代旅游地理学研究新命题审视[J].地理研究,2016,35(3):403-418.
[46]汪德根,陈田,陆林,等.区域旅游流空间结构的高铁效应及机理——以中国京沪高铁为例[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):214-233.
[47]王丰龙,张传勇.行政区划调整对大城市房价的影响研究[J].地理研究,2017,36(5):913-925.
[48]王开泳,陈田.行政区划研究的地理学支撑与展望[J].地理学报,2018,73(4):688-700.
[49]曾冰,张朝,龚征旗,等.从行政区和经济区关系演化探析我国省际交界地区发展[J].经济地理,2016,36(1):27-32.
[2]王成龙,刘慧,张梦天.边界效应研究进展及展望[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(9):1 109-1 118.
[3]王成龙,刘慧,张梦天.行政边界对城市群城市用地空间扩张的影响——基于京津冀城市群的实证研究[J].地理研究,2016,35(1):173-183.
[4]王振波,朱传耿,徐建刚.省际边界区域边界效应的测定——以淮海经济区为例[J].经济地理,2008,28(5):765-770.
[5]朱传耿,王振波,孟召宜.我国省际边界区域的研究进展及展望[J].经济地理,2007,27(2):302-305.
[6]曹小曙,徐建斌.中国省际边界区县域经济格局及影响因素的空间异质性[J].地理学报,2018,73(6):1 065-1 075.
[7] Landry A. Borders and Big Macs[J]. Economics Letters,2013,120(2):318-322.
[8] Xing W,Li S. Home bias,border effect and internal market integration in China:Evidence from inter-provincial value-added tax statistics[J]. Review of Development Economics,2011,15(3):491-503.
[9]行伟波,李善同.本地偏好、边界效应与市场一体化——基于中国地区间增值税流动数据的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),2009,8(4):1 455-1 474.
[10]李天籽.中国沿边的跨境经济合作的边界效应[J].经济地理,2015,35(10):5-12.
[11] Gorodnichenko Y,Tesar L L. Border effect or country effect?Seattle may not be so far from Vancouver after all[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,2009,1(1):219-241.
[12]李铁立,姜怀宇.边境区位、边境区经济合作的理论与实践——以辽宁省—朝鲜边境地区经济合作为例[J].人文地理,2004,19(6):1-5.
[13]何雄浪,张泽义.边界效应、国内市场一体化与区域壁垒[J].工业技术经济,2014(10):58-67.
[14] Gao X,Long C X. Cultural border,administrative border,and regional economic development:Evidence from Chinese cities[J]. China Economic Review,2014(31):247-264.
[15]王亮,刘卫东.西方经济地理学对国家边界及其效应的研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(5):601-608.
[16]唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.流动性视角下边界的空间实践及其意义——以云南省河口县中越边境地区X村为例[J].地理研究,2016,35(8):1 535-1 546.
[17] Baumann H. Enclaves,borders,and everyday movements:Palestinian marginal mobility in East Jerusalem[J]. Cities,2016,59:173-182.
[18] Zimmerbauer K,Suutari T,Saartenoja A. Resistance to the deinstitutionalization of a region:Borders,identity and activism in a municipality merger[J]. Geoforum,2012,43(6):1 065-1 075.
[19]唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.社会建构主义视角下的边界——研究综述与启示[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(7):969-978.
[20]李郇,徐现祥.中国撤县(市)设区对城市经济增长的影响分析[J].地理学报,2015,70(8):1 202-1 214.
[21]王成龙,刘慧,张梦天.基于结构方程模型的京津冀城市用地行政边界效应分析[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(7):1 127-1 137.
[22]余斌,刘明华,朱丽霞,等.城市群的边界效应与边界地区发展[J].地理科学,2012,32(6):666-672.
[23]程金龙.中原经济区省际边界区域经济格局时空演化[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):30-36.
[24]陈永林,谢炳庚,杨贤房,等.多引力作用下的省际边界县域经济空间格局及发展思路——以赣粤闽客家聚居区为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(1):46-51.
[25] Karaman O,Islam T. On the dual nature of intra-urban borders:The case of a Romani neighborhood in Istanbul[J]. Cities,2012,29(4):234-243.
[26]朱翔,徐美.湖南省省际边界中心城市的选择与培育[J].经济地理,2011,31(11):1 761-1 767.
[27] Park J Y,Kwon C,Son M. Economic implications of the Canada-U. S. border bridges:Applying a binational local economic model for international freight movements[J]. Research in Transportation Business&Management,2014,11(8):123-133.
[28]赵永亮.市场获得,边界效应与经济集聚——基于“中心—外围”城市经济活动的考察[J].中国工业经济,2012(3):69-81.
[29]牛欣,陈向东.城市创新跨边界合作与辐射距离探析——基于城市间合作申请专利数据的研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(6):659-667.
[30]晁恒,马学广,李贵才.尺度重构视角下国家战略区域的空间生产策略——基于国家级新区的探讨[J].经济地理,2015,35(5):1-8.
[31] Nicholls W J. Producing-resisting national borders in the United States,France and the Netherlands[J]. Political Geography,2016(51):43-52.
[32]丁四保.从区域规划看中国的区域制度[J].地理科学,2013,33(2):129-134.
[33] Rui A C,Vulevic A,Fernández J C,et al. Accessibility and connectivity-Movement between cities,as a critical factor to achieve success on cross-border cooperation(CBC)projects. A European analysis[J]. Sustainable Cities&Society,2017(32):181-190.
[34] Raposo M L,Ferreira J J M,Fernandes C I. Local and crossborder SME cooperation:Effects on innovation and performance[J]. Revista Europea De Dirección Y Economía De La Empresa,2014,23(4):157-165.
[35]韩玉刚,焦华富,郇恒飞.省际边缘区传统制造业集聚过程及动因分析——以安徽省宁国市耐磨铸件产业为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(7):1 128-1 133.
[36]韩玉刚,焦华富,李俊峰.中国省际边缘区产业集群的网络特征和形成机理——以安徽省宁国市耐磨铸件产业集群为例[J].地理研究,2011,30(5):814-826.
[37] Mccallum J. National borders matter:Canada-U. S. regional trade patterns[J]. American Economic Review,1995,85(3):615-623.
[38]李郇,徐现祥.边界效应的测定方法及其在长江三角洲的应用[J].地理研究,2006,25(5):792-802.
[39]贺灿飞,任永欢,李蕴雄.产品结构演化的跨界效应研究——基于中国地级市出口产品的实证分析[J].地理科学,2016,36(11):1 605-1 613.
[40]黄新飞,陈珊珊,李腾.价格差异、市场分割与边界效应——基于长三角15个城市的实证研究[J].经济研究,2014(12):18-32.
[41] Xu X,Voon J P. Regional integration in China:a statistical model[J]. Economics Letters,2003,79(1):35-42.
[42]杨效忠,张捷,叶舒娟.基于社会网络的跨界旅游区边界效应测度及转化[J].地理科学,2010,17(6):826-832.
[43]杨效忠,冯立新,张凯.交通方式对跨界旅游区景区可达性影响及边界效应测度——以大别山为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(6):693-702.
[44]傅伯杰.地理学综合研究的途径与方法:格局与过程耦合[J].地理学报,2014,69(8):1 052-1 059.
[45]汪德根.高铁网络化时代旅游地理学研究新命题审视[J].地理研究,2016,35(3):403-418.
[46]汪德根,陈田,陆林,等.区域旅游流空间结构的高铁效应及机理——以中国京沪高铁为例[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):214-233.
[47]王丰龙,张传勇.行政区划调整对大城市房价的影响研究[J].地理研究,2017,36(5):913-925.
[48]王开泳,陈田.行政区划研究的地理学支撑与展望[J].地理学报,2018,73(4):688-700.
[49]曾冰,张朝,龚征旗,等.从行政区和经济区关系演化探析我国省际交界地区发展[J].经济地理,2016,36(1):27-32.