摘要
目的:观察应用微创技术拔除下颌死髓第一磨牙的临床效果。方法:收集需要拔除的下颌死髓第一磨牙380例,随机采用微创技术或锤挺法进行拔除,对手术时间及术中、术后并发症进行对比观察和统计分析。结果:与锤挺法相比,微创技术拔除下颌死髓第一磨牙的手术时间缩短(P<0.05),术中及术后并发症的发生率降低(P<0.05)。结论:微创技术的应用,使下颌死髓第一磨牙的拔除更加容易
Objective To observe the clinical effect of extracting non-vital lower first molar with minimally invasive technique. Methods 380 non-vital lower first molars were extracted.190 teeth were extracted with minimally invasive technique while others with conventional way.The operation time, intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results Compared with the conventional way, extracting non-vital lower molar with minimally invasive technique cost less time and has lower intra-operative and postoperative complication incidence rate(P<0.05). Conclusion It is easier to extract non-vital lower first molars with the minimally invasive technique.
引文
[1]秦瑞峰,胡开进.微创拔牙技术的应用[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2010,3(10):592-596.
[2]Babbush CA.A new atraumatic system for tooth removal and immediate implant restoration[J].Implant Dent,2007,16:139-145.
[3]Donlon WC,Truta MP.Minimally invasive third molar surgery[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(2):359.
[4]邱蔚六,张震康.口腔颌面外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:59.
[5]胡开进,杨擎天.微创拔牙理念及技术操作[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2011,38(3):249-252,264.
[6]霍丽,徐扬.高速涡轮钻拔除下颌阻生牙的临床应用[J].中国美容医学,2011,20(10):1622-1622.
[7]Baqain ZH,Karaky AA,Sawair F,et al.Frequency estimate and risk factors for postoperative morbidity after third molar removal:A prospective cohort study[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2008,6(11):2276-2283.
[8]Jones S.Atraumatic extractions with Luxator Periotome[J].Dental Tribune Daily U.S.,2012,4(6):7-8.
[9]张雪洋,胡飞,朱安棣,等.Luxator微创拔牙刀的临床研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(2):20-22.
[10]胡开进.微创拔牙技术[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2010,24(4):241-243.