基于CiteSpace的国内外城市生态修复研究进展以及对西北地区的启示
|
摘要
为综合比较国内外生态修复领域的研究现状与热点演进,采用文献计量的方法。通过对1992—2017年CNKI数据库1 356篇、WOS核心合集957篇生态修复主题文献进行分类统计,从刊文量、篇均被引数、共现关键词、主要期刊和主要研究机构等方面进行了对比分析。结果表明如下。1)国内外生态修复研究发展态势良好。工业发达国家走在前列,中国东部和中部地区紧跟其后,西部地区关注力度不够。2)国内外生态修复研究的热点演进不同。国际主要关注河流修复与实践、城市界面与水生生物区系、采煤塌陷区和风险评估、生态系统服务和淡水大型无脊椎动物、湿地缓解和限制因素分析。国内主要集中在河流修复、海绵城市和生物多样性保护等方面。3)国外生态修复研究的合作强度、持续性、系统性和学科交叉性明显高于国内。未来中国,尤其是西北地区的生态修复研究应在政策支持、生态修复技术、多尺度耦合和跨部门合作等方面进行加强。
The bibliometric method was used to comprehensively compare the research statuses and research focuses in the field of ecological restoration at home and abroad. 1,356 articles and 957 articles on ecological restoration published from 1992 to 2017 were collected from the CNKI database and the WOS core collection, respectively. These articles were compared from perspectives such as the publication number, citation number per article, co-keywords, major journals, and major research institutions etc. As indicated by the results, 1) There is a good development trend for domestic and foreign researches on ecological restoration. Developed industrialized countries are leading the way, followed by eastern and central regions of China, and the western regions of China are making slow progresses. 2) Researches on ecological restoration at home and abroad focus on different topics. Foreign researches mainly concentrate on river restoration and practice, urban interface and aquatic biota, coal mining subsidence areas and risk assessment, ecosystem services and large freshwater invertebrates, wetland mitigation and limiting factors. Domestic researches primarily focus on river restoration, sponge city and biodiversity conservation. 3) The collaboration strength, persistence, systematicness and interdisciplinary nature of foreign researches on ecological restoration are obviously superior to those of domestic researches. In the future, researches on ecological restoration in China, especially in the northwestern regions, should be strengthened in terms of policy support, ecological restoration technologies, multiscale coupling, cross-sector cooperation etc.
The bibliometric method was used to comprehensively compare the research statuses and research focuses in the field of ecological restoration at home and abroad. 1,356 articles and 957 articles on ecological restoration published from 1992 to 2017 were collected from the CNKI database and the WOS core collection, respectively. These articles were compared from perspectives such as the publication number, citation number per article, co-keywords, major journals, and major research institutions etc. As indicated by the results, 1) There is a good development trend for domestic and foreign researches on ecological restoration. Developed industrialized countries are leading the way, followed by eastern and central regions of China, and the western regions of China are making slow progresses. 2) Researches on ecological restoration at home and abroad focus on different topics. Foreign researches mainly concentrate on river restoration and practice, urban interface and aquatic biota, coal mining subsidence areas and risk assessment, ecosystem services and large freshwater invertebrates, wetland mitigation and limiting factors. Domestic researches primarily focus on river restoration, sponge city and biodiversity conservation. 3) The collaboration strength, persistence, systematicness and interdisciplinary nature of foreign researches on ecological restoration are obviously superior to those of domestic researches. In the future, researches on ecological restoration in China, especially in the northwestern regions, should be strengthened in terms of policy support, ecological restoration technologies, multiscale coupling, cross-sector cooperation etc.
引文
[1]Li J,Dong S C,Li Z H,et al.A bibliometric analysis of chinese ecological and environmental research on urbanization[J].Journal of Resources and Ecology,2014,5(3):211-221.
[2]沈清基.“城市双修”中的生态修复[J].环境经济,2017(15):12-14.
[3]曹永强,郭明,刘思然,等.基于文献计量分析的生态修复现状研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(8):2442-2450.
[4]荣先林.生态修复技术在现代园林中应用:以杭州经济技术开发区为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2010.
[5]Burton C M,Burton P J,Hebda R,et al.Determining the optimal sowing density for mixture of native plants used to revegetate degraded ecosystems[J].Restoration Ecology,2006,14(3):379-390.
[6]Palmer M A,Bernhardt E S,Allan J D,et al.Standards for ecological successful restoration[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,42(2):208-217.
[7]于贵瑞,谢高地,王秋凤,等.西部地区植被恢复重建中几个问题的思考[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2):216-220.
[8]毛德华,夏军,黄友波.西北地区生态修复的若干基本问题探讨[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(1):15-18.
[9]魏巍,冯晶.城市生态修复国际经验和启示[J].城市发展研究,2017,24(5):13-19.
[10]关军洪,郝培尧,董丽,等.矿山废弃地生态修复研究进展[J].生态科学,2017,36(2):193-200.
[11]郑晓笛.近年来风景园林行业中的棕地再生:热潮、误区与展望[J].中国园林,2017,33(5):10-14.
[12]乔秀娟,段渊古.城市生活垃圾填埋场景观重建措施探究:以西安江村沟垃圾填埋场景观重建为例[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(3):293-296.
[13]丰瞻,许文年,李少丽,等.基于恢复生态学理论的裸露山体生态修复模式研究[J].中国水土保持,2008(4):23-36.
[14]Buchanan B P,Walter M T,Nagle G N,et al.Monitoring and assessment of a river restoration project in central New York[J].River Research and Applications,2012,28(2):216-233.
[15]熊明彪.污染土壤生态修复研究综述[J].中国水土保持,2009(6):41-42.
[16]Chen C M.Cite Space II:Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J].Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(3):359-377.
[17]陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等.Cite Space知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253.
[18]吴晓秋,吕娜.基于关键词共现频率的热点分析方法研究[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(8):115-119.
[19]张新平,张芳芳,王得祥.基于文献计量的国内外生态智慧研究比较分析[J].中国城市林业,2017,15(5):6-11.
[20]董洁,张新平.基于文献计量视角的国内外高职人才培养研究进展对比分析[J].职业技术教育,2017,38(21):48-56.
[21]张新平,张芳芳,王得祥.国内外土地利用研究动态文献计量与可视化分析[J].世界农业,2017(8):40-48.
[22]陈春娣,贾振毅,吴胜军,等.基于文献计量法的中国景观连接度应用研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3243-3255.
[23]刘晖,吴小辉,李仓拴.生境营造的实验性研究(二):场地生境类型划分与分区[J].中国园林,2017,33(7):46-53.
[24]颜文涛,王云才,象伟宁.城市雨洪管理实践需要生态实践智慧的引导[J].生态学报,2016,36(16):4926-4928.
[25]刘晖,王晶懋,吴小辉.生境营造的实验性研究[J].中国园林,2017,33(3):19-23.
[26]张新平.景观用途棕地的识别评估及修复技术研究进展[J].陕西职业技术学院学报,2016,11(4):45-48.
[27]Xiang W N.Pasteur's quadrant:an appealing ecophronetic alternative to the prevalent Bohr's quadrant in ecosystem services research[J].Landscape Ecology,2017,32(12):2241-2247.
[28]Xiang W N.Doing real and permanent good in landscape and urban planning:Ecological wisdom for urban sustainability[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2014,121(S1):65-69.
[2]沈清基.“城市双修”中的生态修复[J].环境经济,2017(15):12-14.
[3]曹永强,郭明,刘思然,等.基于文献计量分析的生态修复现状研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(8):2442-2450.
[4]荣先林.生态修复技术在现代园林中应用:以杭州经济技术开发区为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2010.
[5]Burton C M,Burton P J,Hebda R,et al.Determining the optimal sowing density for mixture of native plants used to revegetate degraded ecosystems[J].Restoration Ecology,2006,14(3):379-390.
[6]Palmer M A,Bernhardt E S,Allan J D,et al.Standards for ecological successful restoration[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,42(2):208-217.
[7]于贵瑞,谢高地,王秋凤,等.西部地区植被恢复重建中几个问题的思考[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2):216-220.
[8]毛德华,夏军,黄友波.西北地区生态修复的若干基本问题探讨[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(1):15-18.
[9]魏巍,冯晶.城市生态修复国际经验和启示[J].城市发展研究,2017,24(5):13-19.
[10]关军洪,郝培尧,董丽,等.矿山废弃地生态修复研究进展[J].生态科学,2017,36(2):193-200.
[11]郑晓笛.近年来风景园林行业中的棕地再生:热潮、误区与展望[J].中国园林,2017,33(5):10-14.
[12]乔秀娟,段渊古.城市生活垃圾填埋场景观重建措施探究:以西安江村沟垃圾填埋场景观重建为例[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(3):293-296.
[13]丰瞻,许文年,李少丽,等.基于恢复生态学理论的裸露山体生态修复模式研究[J].中国水土保持,2008(4):23-36.
[14]Buchanan B P,Walter M T,Nagle G N,et al.Monitoring and assessment of a river restoration project in central New York[J].River Research and Applications,2012,28(2):216-233.
[15]熊明彪.污染土壤生态修复研究综述[J].中国水土保持,2009(6):41-42.
[16]Chen C M.Cite Space II:Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J].Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(3):359-377.
[17]陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等.Cite Space知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253.
[18]吴晓秋,吕娜.基于关键词共现频率的热点分析方法研究[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(8):115-119.
[19]张新平,张芳芳,王得祥.基于文献计量的国内外生态智慧研究比较分析[J].中国城市林业,2017,15(5):6-11.
[20]董洁,张新平.基于文献计量视角的国内外高职人才培养研究进展对比分析[J].职业技术教育,2017,38(21):48-56.
[21]张新平,张芳芳,王得祥.国内外土地利用研究动态文献计量与可视化分析[J].世界农业,2017(8):40-48.
[22]陈春娣,贾振毅,吴胜军,等.基于文献计量法的中国景观连接度应用研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3243-3255.
[23]刘晖,吴小辉,李仓拴.生境营造的实验性研究(二):场地生境类型划分与分区[J].中国园林,2017,33(7):46-53.
[24]颜文涛,王云才,象伟宁.城市雨洪管理实践需要生态实践智慧的引导[J].生态学报,2016,36(16):4926-4928.
[25]刘晖,王晶懋,吴小辉.生境营造的实验性研究[J].中国园林,2017,33(3):19-23.
[26]张新平.景观用途棕地的识别评估及修复技术研究进展[J].陕西职业技术学院学报,2016,11(4):45-48.
[27]Xiang W N.Pasteur's quadrant:an appealing ecophronetic alternative to the prevalent Bohr's quadrant in ecosystem services research[J].Landscape Ecology,2017,32(12):2241-2247.
[28]Xiang W N.Doing real and permanent good in landscape and urban planning:Ecological wisdom for urban sustainability[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2014,121(S1):65-69.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |