超浅埋隧道下穿高速公路典型施工方法比选研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Comparative study on typical construction methods of super-shallow buried tunnel under expressway 作者：赵俊澄 ; 陈文龙 ; 任益 英文作者：Zhao Juncheng;Chen Wenlong;Ren Yi; 关键词：超浅埋隧道 ; 铁路隧道 ; 施工方法 ; 变形控制 ; 数值模拟 英文关键词：super-shallow-buried tunnel;;railway tunnel;;construction methods;;deformation control;;numerical modeling 中文刊名：XDGD 英文刊名：Modern Urban Transit 机构：兰州交通大学; 出版日期：2019-02-20 出版单位：现代城市轨道交通 年：2019 基金：国家自然科学基金(11662007);; 甘肃省建设科技攻关项目(JK2018-33) 语种：中文; 页：XDGD201902008 页数：6 CN：02 ISSN：11-5183/U 分类号：39-44

摘要

超浅埋隧道在下穿高速公路施工时,会使路基产生不均匀沉降,所以选择合适的施工方法对工程质量至关重要。为了评估不同施工方法对下穿超浅埋隧道变形特性的控制影响,特以3种典型的隧道施工方法(台阶法、CD法、双侧壁导坑法)为例,对路基沉降、拱顶沉降、水平收敛进行数值模拟,对比有无交通荷载情况下的变形规律。结果表明:在采用上述隧道施工方法的情况下,隧道下穿高速公路施工会对路基造成"U"形的沉降破坏面;以台阶法路基沉降值为基础,CD法沉降量减少19.7%,双侧壁导坑法沉降量减少38.2%;3种方法在施加交通荷载作用后,拱顶沉降分别增加了7.8mm、7.7mm、4.9mm,水平位移分别为32.5mm、29.3mm和26.2mm。总之,双侧壁导坑法在水平收敛变形的控制方面更适合浅埋下穿隧道施工。
        When super-shallow-buried tunnel is constructed under the expressway, it causes differential settlement of subgrades. Therefore, a correct choice of construction method is very important to the quality of the engineering works. In order to evaluate the influence of different construction methods on the deformation characteristics of super-shallow-buried tunnel under the expressway, 3 typical tunnel construction methods are used: bench cut method, CD method and double side heading method, and its numerical modeling is carried out. The pattern of deformation is analyzed by comparing with and without traffi c loads. The results show: in the case of the above-mentioned tunnel construction method, the underpass expressway construction causes "U" shaped settlement and surface failure to the subgrade. Based on the settlement value of bench-cut subgrade, the settlement reduction by CD method accounts for 19.7%, and the double side heading method accounted for 38.2%. The settlement increased by 7.8mm, 7.7mm and 4.9mm respectively after the 3 methods used under traffic load. Horizontal convergence is 32.5 mm, 29.3mm and 26.2mm respectively. In general, the method of double-sidedheading method is more suitable for the control of horizontal convergence deformation in shallow-buried tunnel.

引文

[1]赵立财.浅埋大跨径软土地层公路隧道下穿既有铁路车站路基施工技术[J].现代隧道技术,2014,51(6):160-166.
    [2]龚彦峰,唐曌,李强,等.高速铁路隧道超浅埋下穿高速公路设计研究[J].铁道标准设计,2016(2):119-124.
    [3]梁建波.盾构下穿地铁隧道施工中对既有隧道沉降影响的分析[D].广东广州:广州大学,2016.
    [4]张耀军.零间距下穿既有在建隧道施工技术研究[J].铁道建筑技术,2017(3):88-92.
    [5]韩高升,李梅,王秀英.预切槽法在浅埋暗挖下穿公路段隧道中的设计[J].铁道工程学报,2017,34(4):58-64.
    [6]晋学辉.浅埋铁路隧道下穿高速公路技术分析[J].公路交通技术,2018,34(4):89-94.
    [7]单超.大跨度公路隧道下穿既有城际铁路隧道施工力学行为研究[J].中外公路,2017,37(2):200-205.
    [8]杨成永,马文辉,彭华.地铁双线盾构近距下穿盾构隧道施工沉降控制[J].铁道工程学报,2018,35(7):91-98.
    [9]武斌.沪昆客专下穿村庄及河流段浅埋隧道机械开挖施工技术[J].铁道建筑技术,2017(7):97-100.
    [10]谢龙.浅析超浅埋隧道下穿国道进洞施工难点及施工技术[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版),2017,13(5):11-13.