论徽派朴学对现代文学批评的影响
|
摘要
徽派朴学是清代源于徽州而传播至全国的学术流派,以求"实"求"是"为治学方法,重《诗》《礼》,擅长考证与质疑。徽派朴学在代代相传的学者著作中得到继承和发展,对中国文学批评产生重大影响。现代文学发生后,徽派朴学作为一种学术方法或文学批评思想,在现代文学批评中似断实续地存在着。在新文学发生期,徽派朴学是先驱者的参照。新文学发生后,徽派朴学被一部分文学理论家扬弃地借鉴。现代文学批评发展中呈现的某些特征,在徽派朴学中能够找到理论依据。
Huizhou academics was originated from Huizhou during the Qing dynasty and then spread to the whole country. This school "sought for fact" and "sought for truth" in the research method, emphasizing poetics and rituals, and being good at textual research and questioning. Huizhou academics was inherited and developed in the works of scholars handed down from generation to generation, and exerted great influence on Chinese literary criticism. After the occurrence of Chinese modern literature, Huizhou academics still existed as an academic method or a literary critical thought in modern literary criticism. When the new literature occurred, Huizhou academics was a pioneer reference, and after the generation of the new literature, Huizhou academics was taken in by some literary theoreticians after discarding some respects, and the characteristics presented in the development of modern literature criticism could be referred to the academics of Huizhou as the theoretical basis.
Huizhou academics was originated from Huizhou during the Qing dynasty and then spread to the whole country. This school "sought for fact" and "sought for truth" in the research method, emphasizing poetics and rituals, and being good at textual research and questioning. Huizhou academics was inherited and developed in the works of scholars handed down from generation to generation, and exerted great influence on Chinese literary criticism. After the occurrence of Chinese modern literature, Huizhou academics still existed as an academic method or a literary critical thought in modern literary criticism. When the new literature occurred, Huizhou academics was a pioneer reference, and after the generation of the new literature, Huizhou academics was taken in by some literary theoreticians after discarding some respects, and the characteristics presented in the development of modern literature criticism could be referred to the academics of Huizhou as the theoretical basis.
引文
①[美]艾尔曼:《从理学到朴学》,赵刚译,江苏人民出版社,2012年,第2页。
②③戴震:《戴震文集》卷10,赵玉新点校,中华书局,1980年,第146—150、168页。
④⑤郭绍虞:《中国文学批评史》(下册),商务印书馆,2015年,第11—12、474页。
⑥⑦梁启超:《清代学术概论》,上海古籍出版社,2005年,第4页。
⑧梁启超:《饮冰室专集》之23,中华书局,1989年,第36—37页。
⑨梁启超:《中国近三百年学术史》,夏晓虹、陆胤校,商务印书馆,2010年,第30页。
⑩刘纳:《嬗变》,中国人民大学出版社,2010年,第1页。
(11)黄维樑:《中国诗学纵横论》,台北洪范书店,1982年,第27页。
(12)赵园:《艰难的选择》,上海文艺出版社,1986年,第117页。
(13)朱自清:《标准与尺度》,港青出版社,1978年,第8页。
(14)(15)(16)许道明:《中国现代文学批评史新编》,复旦大学出版社,2002年,第48、52、208页。
(17)王富仁:《中国现代文学批评略说》,《北京师范大学学报》(社科版)2011年第3期。
②③戴震:《戴震文集》卷10,赵玉新点校,中华书局,1980年,第146—150、168页。
④⑤郭绍虞:《中国文学批评史》(下册),商务印书馆,2015年,第11—12、474页。
⑥⑦梁启超:《清代学术概论》,上海古籍出版社,2005年,第4页。
⑧梁启超:《饮冰室专集》之23,中华书局,1989年,第36—37页。
⑨梁启超:《中国近三百年学术史》,夏晓虹、陆胤校,商务印书馆,2010年,第30页。
⑩刘纳:《嬗变》,中国人民大学出版社,2010年,第1页。
(11)黄维樑:《中国诗学纵横论》,台北洪范书店,1982年,第27页。
(12)赵园:《艰难的选择》,上海文艺出版社,1986年,第117页。
(13)朱自清:《标准与尺度》,港青出版社,1978年,第8页。
(14)(15)(16)许道明:《中国现代文学批评史新编》,复旦大学出版社,2002年,第48、52、208页。
(17)王富仁:《中国现代文学批评略说》,《北京师范大学学报》(社科版)2011年第3期。
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |