基于扎根理论的高校图书馆员职业认知研究
|
摘要
试图通过定性研究发现高校图书馆员对其职业的认知以及影响因素,以此作为改善满意度和提升图书馆员自我水平的前提和基础。以深度访谈和扎根理论作为资料获取和归纳观点的方法开展研究。深度访谈用以获得图书馆员日常工作经历和感受以及对图书馆工作的真实评价与看法,在此基础上采用扎根理论作为理论归纳和总结的方法,实现从基本经验到理论构建。高校图书馆员的职业认知分为内部和外部两个因素,内部因素包括个人认知、专业素养和职业技能,外部因素包括社会环境、工作任务、行业关怀、学术研究以及制度政策。内部因素和外部因素之间相互作用,共同对高校图书馆员的职业认知产生影响。
This paper attempts to find out the recognition and influencing factors of college librarians through a qualitative research, which is regarded as a prerequisite and basis to improve users' satisfaction and librarians' level. We will launch an investigation by using in-depth interviews and grounded theory as the methods for collecting data and making a summary. Thereinto, in-depth interviews are used to obtain librarians' daily work experiences and feelings, while the real evaluations and opinions of the library work can also be gained as well. Apart from these, the grounded theory as a method of theory inducing and summarizing has been adopted, which can facilitate theoretical explanations acquisition from the empirical data. Librarians' professional cognition mainly includes two parts, internal and external factors.Specifically speaking, the internal factors include personal cognitive identity, professionalism and vocational skills; while the external factors cover social environment, work tasks, industry concerns, academic researches and policy system. The interaction between internal and external factors also have an impact on the professional cognition of university librarians.
This paper attempts to find out the recognition and influencing factors of college librarians through a qualitative research, which is regarded as a prerequisite and basis to improve users' satisfaction and librarians' level. We will launch an investigation by using in-depth interviews and grounded theory as the methods for collecting data and making a summary. Thereinto, in-depth interviews are used to obtain librarians' daily work experiences and feelings, while the real evaluations and opinions of the library work can also be gained as well. Apart from these, the grounded theory as a method of theory inducing and summarizing has been adopted, which can facilitate theoretical explanations acquisition from the empirical data. Librarians' professional cognition mainly includes two parts, internal and external factors.Specifically speaking, the internal factors include personal cognitive identity, professionalism and vocational skills; while the external factors cover social environment, work tasks, industry concerns, academic researches and policy system. The interaction between internal and external factors also have an impact on the professional cognition of university librarians.
引文
[1]阮冈纳赞.图书馆学五定律[M].夏云,杨起全,王先林,等译.北京:书目文献出版社,1988:308.
[2]陈传夫,王云娣,盛钊,等.图书馆员去职业化问题、原因及对策研究[J].中国图书馆学报.2011,37(01):4-18
[3]李文文,陈雅.我国图书馆员“去职业化”问题探析[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(3):134-137.
[4]索站超.职业化:我国图书馆员未来发展的路径选择[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(01):83-86.
[5]闫小芬.基于职业化视角的学科馆员职业专业性、公共性调查分析[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(17):76-83.
[6]李超,徐建华,霍丽敏,等.当代图书馆员“快乐指数”调查主报告[J].图书情报工作,2007(6):6-11.
[7]俞碧飏,徐建华.群体比较视角下图书馆员内隐刻板印象实验研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(5):52-67.
[8]徐建华,付娇.图书馆员的职业生涯开发与管理[J].中国图书馆学报,2003(1):18-21.
[9]王凤娥.高校图书馆员职业倦怠与干预模式分析[J].大学图书馆学报,2008(4):89-93.
[10]肖希明,吴钢,刘畅,等.图书馆学专业教育与图书馆员职业竞争力:来自图书馆馆长的调查与分析[J].图书情报知识,2008(1):11-16.
[11]肖希明,宋琳琳,水亮,等.图书馆学专业教育与图书馆员职业竞争力:来自图书馆员的调查与分析[J].图书情报知识,2008(1):17-21.
[12]鄂丽君,王启云.高校图书馆专业馆员职业能力认识与需求调查研究[J].图书与情报,2016(5):97-104.
[13]陶倩,刘泳洁.美国专业图书馆员职业能力标准的内容分析[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(24):20-25.
[14]王姗姗.高校图书馆员工招聘偏好分析:基于扎根理论的一个探究性研究[J].上海高校图书情报工作研究,2016,26(3):55-58,25.
[15]Glaser B G,Strauss A L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory:Strategies for Qualitative Research[M].New Jersey:Transaction Publisher,2009:45.
[16]孙晓娥.扎根理论在深度访谈研究中的实例探析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2011,31(6):87-92.
[17]柯平,张文亮,李西宁,唐承秀.基于扎根理论的馆员对公共图书馆组织文化感知研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(3):37-49.
[18]王平,茹嘉祎.国内未成年人图书馆服务满意度影响因素:基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(19):41-46.
[19]刘建花,杨蕙馨.消费者响应企业社会责任的内在机理与干预路径:基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2013,33(4):12-20.
[2]陈传夫,王云娣,盛钊,等.图书馆员去职业化问题、原因及对策研究[J].中国图书馆学报.2011,37(01):4-18
[3]李文文,陈雅.我国图书馆员“去职业化”问题探析[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(3):134-137.
[4]索站超.职业化:我国图书馆员未来发展的路径选择[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(01):83-86.
[5]闫小芬.基于职业化视角的学科馆员职业专业性、公共性调查分析[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(17):76-83.
[6]李超,徐建华,霍丽敏,等.当代图书馆员“快乐指数”调查主报告[J].图书情报工作,2007(6):6-11.
[7]俞碧飏,徐建华.群体比较视角下图书馆员内隐刻板印象实验研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(5):52-67.
[8]徐建华,付娇.图书馆员的职业生涯开发与管理[J].中国图书馆学报,2003(1):18-21.
[9]王凤娥.高校图书馆员职业倦怠与干预模式分析[J].大学图书馆学报,2008(4):89-93.
[10]肖希明,吴钢,刘畅,等.图书馆学专业教育与图书馆员职业竞争力:来自图书馆馆长的调查与分析[J].图书情报知识,2008(1):11-16.
[11]肖希明,宋琳琳,水亮,等.图书馆学专业教育与图书馆员职业竞争力:来自图书馆员的调查与分析[J].图书情报知识,2008(1):17-21.
[12]鄂丽君,王启云.高校图书馆专业馆员职业能力认识与需求调查研究[J].图书与情报,2016(5):97-104.
[13]陶倩,刘泳洁.美国专业图书馆员职业能力标准的内容分析[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(24):20-25.
[14]王姗姗.高校图书馆员工招聘偏好分析:基于扎根理论的一个探究性研究[J].上海高校图书情报工作研究,2016,26(3):55-58,25.
[15]Glaser B G,Strauss A L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory:Strategies for Qualitative Research[M].New Jersey:Transaction Publisher,2009:45.
[16]孙晓娥.扎根理论在深度访谈研究中的实例探析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2011,31(6):87-92.
[17]柯平,张文亮,李西宁,唐承秀.基于扎根理论的馆员对公共图书馆组织文化感知研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(3):37-49.
[18]王平,茹嘉祎.国内未成年人图书馆服务满意度影响因素:基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(19):41-46.
[19]刘建花,杨蕙馨.消费者响应企业社会责任的内在机理与干预路径:基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2013,33(4):12-20.