三权分置下农户耕地质量保护支付意愿研究
|
摘要
基于新疆农户调查数据,研究农户耕地质量保护的支付意愿和支付方式偏好,比较耕地流转农户与非流转农户支付意愿和支付方式偏好的差异,并采用Probit模型分析农户耕地质量保护支付意愿的影响因素。研究表明:88. 87%的农户愿意为保护耕地质量支付劳动或资金,农户资金支付意愿水平为89. 82元/亩,劳动支付意愿水平为6. 94天/亩,综合支付意愿水平为294. 56元/亩。非流转农户偏好于劳动支付方式,流转农户偏好于资本支付方式,流转农户耕地质量保护综合支付意愿水平显著低于非流转农户。影响农户耕地质量保护支付意愿的因素主要是耕地特征和政策因素,以及农产品质量安全法规熟悉程度、参与订单农业生产、农户身体健康程度等因素。新疆耕地地力保护补贴政策应该提高补贴标准,采用资金补贴、物化补贴、技术补贴等多种方式进行。
Based on the survey data of farmers in Xinjiang,the CVM method was used to study the farmer's willingness to pay and payment method preferences for the farmland quality protection; the differences in willingness to pay and preference for payment methods between circulating farmers and non-circulating farmers were compared,and Probit model was used to analyze the factors that affected the willingness to pay of farmers.The research showed that 88.87% of the farmers were willing to pay labor or funds for the farmland quality protection.The farmers' willingness to pay for funds was 89.82 yuan/mu,the willingness to pay for labor was 6.94 days/mu,and the comprehensive willingness to pay was 294.56 yuan/mu.The non-circulating farmers preferred labor input,and the land-transferred farmers preferred capital investment,and farmers' willingness to pay for farmland quality protection was significantly lower than non-circulation farmers.The main factors were the arable land factors and policy factors,as well as the familiarity of agricultural product quality and safety regulations,the participation of agricultural production orders and the degree of physical health of farmers.The subsidy policy for the protection of farmland fertility in Xinjiang should raise the subsidy standard,and adopt various methods such as capital subsidies,materialization subsidies,and technical subsidies.
Based on the survey data of farmers in Xinjiang,the CVM method was used to study the farmer's willingness to pay and payment method preferences for the farmland quality protection; the differences in willingness to pay and preference for payment methods between circulating farmers and non-circulating farmers were compared,and Probit model was used to analyze the factors that affected the willingness to pay of farmers.The research showed that 88.87% of the farmers were willing to pay labor or funds for the farmland quality protection.The farmers' willingness to pay for funds was 89.82 yuan/mu,the willingness to pay for labor was 6.94 days/mu,and the comprehensive willingness to pay was 294.56 yuan/mu.The non-circulating farmers preferred labor input,and the land-transferred farmers preferred capital investment,and farmers' willingness to pay for farmland quality protection was significantly lower than non-circulation farmers.The main factors were the arable land factors and policy factors,as well as the familiarity of agricultural product quality and safety regulations,the participation of agricultural production orders and the degree of physical health of farmers.The subsidy policy for the protection of farmland fertility in Xinjiang should raise the subsidy standard,and adopt various methods such as capital subsidies,materialization subsidies,and technical subsidies.
引文
[1]李明秋,李滢,牛海鹏,等.基于农户决策行为的耕地质量保护机制探析[J].农业经济,2014(10):84-86.
[2]唐秀美,陈百明,刘玉,等.耕地生态价值评估研究进展分析[J].农业机械学报,2016(9):256-265.
[3]任朝霞,陆玉麒.条件价值法在西安市耕地资源非市场价值评估的应用[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(3):28-32.
[4]田志会,刘瑞涵.京郊农田生态系统非使用价值的估算[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(6):27-31.
[5]宋敏.基于CVM与AHP方法的耕地资源外部效益研究-以武汉市洪山区为例[J].农业经济问题,2012(4):62-70.
[6]孙海兵.农户对耕地外部效益支付意愿的实证分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2010(4):7-11.
[7]高汉琦,牛海鹏,方国友,等.基于CVM多情景下的耕地生态效益农户支付/受偿意愿分析-以河南省焦作市为例[J].资源科学,2011,33(11):2116-2123.
[8]牛海鹏,王坤鹏.基于单边界二分式CVM的不同样本方案下耕地保护外部性测度与分析-以河南省焦作市为例[J].资源科学,2017,39(7):1227-1237.
[9]李广东,邱道持,王平.三峡生态脆弱区耕地非市场价值评估[J].地理学报,2011,66(4):562-575.
[10]杨欣,Michael Burton,张安录.基于潜在分类模型的农田生态补偿标准测算-一个离散选择实验模型的实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):27-36.
[11]蔡银莺,张安录.北江汉平原农地保护的外部效益研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(1):98-104.
[12]庄皓雯,赵凯,胡娟.粮食主产区耕地保护利益补偿标准的测算-基于山东省328份城乡居民支付意愿问卷[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(12):13-17.
[13]施园园,赵华甫,郧文聚,等.基于选择试验法的北京市城乡居民耕地保护支付意愿研究[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):178-184.
[14]陈美球,王光远.农民对耕地非生产性功能的认识及其量化实证研究-基于1065份问卷调查[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(3):10-16.
[15]望晓东,魏玲.耕地生态价值支付意愿的影响因素实证研究-基于武汉市的实地调查[J].生态经济,2015,31(8):121-124.
[2]唐秀美,陈百明,刘玉,等.耕地生态价值评估研究进展分析[J].农业机械学报,2016(9):256-265.
[3]任朝霞,陆玉麒.条件价值法在西安市耕地资源非市场价值评估的应用[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(3):28-32.
[4]田志会,刘瑞涵.京郊农田生态系统非使用价值的估算[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(6):27-31.
[5]宋敏.基于CVM与AHP方法的耕地资源外部效益研究-以武汉市洪山区为例[J].农业经济问题,2012(4):62-70.
[6]孙海兵.农户对耕地外部效益支付意愿的实证分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2010(4):7-11.
[7]高汉琦,牛海鹏,方国友,等.基于CVM多情景下的耕地生态效益农户支付/受偿意愿分析-以河南省焦作市为例[J].资源科学,2011,33(11):2116-2123.
[8]牛海鹏,王坤鹏.基于单边界二分式CVM的不同样本方案下耕地保护外部性测度与分析-以河南省焦作市为例[J].资源科学,2017,39(7):1227-1237.
[9]李广东,邱道持,王平.三峡生态脆弱区耕地非市场价值评估[J].地理学报,2011,66(4):562-575.
[10]杨欣,Michael Burton,张安录.基于潜在分类模型的农田生态补偿标准测算-一个离散选择实验模型的实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):27-36.
[11]蔡银莺,张安录.北江汉平原农地保护的外部效益研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(1):98-104.
[12]庄皓雯,赵凯,胡娟.粮食主产区耕地保护利益补偿标准的测算-基于山东省328份城乡居民支付意愿问卷[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(12):13-17.
[13]施园园,赵华甫,郧文聚,等.基于选择试验法的北京市城乡居民耕地保护支付意愿研究[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):178-184.
[14]陈美球,王光远.农民对耕地非生产性功能的认识及其量化实证研究-基于1065份问卷调查[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(3):10-16.
[15]望晓东,魏玲.耕地生态价值支付意愿的影响因素实证研究-基于武汉市的实地调查[J].生态经济,2015,31(8):121-124.