中国“十二五”期间环境规制效率时空差异与驱动机制研究
|
摘要
运用超效率数据包络分析法(SE-DEA)模型和固定效应回归模型探究中国"十二五"期间环境规制效率的时空差异和驱动机制。结果表明:(1)"十二五"时期,中国的环境规制综合效率平均值在0.86～1.16范围内波动,产生波动的原因主要是投入的环境保护资源被利用的程度不同。(2)"十二五"时期,中国环境规制综合效率、纯技术效率和规模效率均呈现东部地区>西部地区>中部地区的空间差异,东部地区综合效率主要受规模效率的影响,中部地区综合效率主要受纯技术效率的影响,西部地区没有明显的规律性。(3)"十二五"时期,在环境规制综合效率层面,政府干预程度是调节中国环境外部性的正向驱动机制,环境治理投资程度和开放程度则为负向驱动机制。
Using the super-efficient data envelopment analysis(SE-DEA)model and the fixed-effect regression model,this paper explored the temporal-spatial difference of environmental regulation efficiency in China and driving forces during the 12th Five-Year-Plan period.Results showed that:(1)During the 12th Five-Year-Plan period,the mean environmental regulation comprehensive efficiency ranged from 0.86 to 1.16.The reason for the fluctuation was mainly due to the different utilization levels of the input environmental resources.(2)Environmental regulation comprehensive efficiency,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency all showed the similarly spatial difference during the 12th Five-Year-Plan period(eastern region>western region>central region).The eastern region's comprehensive efficiency mainly affected by scale efficiency,while the central region's mainly affected by pure technical efficiency,but the western region did not show obvious characteristics.(3)During the 12th Five-Year-Plan period,with regard to the comprehensive efficiency,government intervention had a positive effect on regulating the externalities of environment,and environmental governance investment and openness had negative effect.
Using the super-efficient data envelopment analysis(SE-DEA)model and the fixed-effect regression model,this paper explored the temporal-spatial difference of environmental regulation efficiency in China and driving forces during the 12th Five-Year-Plan period.Results showed that:(1)During the 12th Five-Year-Plan period,the mean environmental regulation comprehensive efficiency ranged from 0.86 to 1.16.The reason for the fluctuation was mainly due to the different utilization levels of the input environmental resources.(2)Environmental regulation comprehensive efficiency,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency all showed the similarly spatial difference during the 12th Five-Year-Plan period(eastern region>western region>central region).The eastern region's comprehensive efficiency mainly affected by scale efficiency,while the central region's mainly affected by pure technical efficiency,but the western region did not show obvious characteristics.(3)During the 12th Five-Year-Plan period,with regard to the comprehensive efficiency,government intervention had a positive effect on regulating the externalities of environment,and environmental governance investment and openness had negative effect.
引文
[1]吴舜泽,陈斌,逯元堂,等.中国环境保护投资失真问题分析与建议[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(3):112-117.
[2]董文福,傅德黔,努丽亚.我国环境污染治理投资的发展及存在问题[J].中国环境监测,2008,24(4):87-89.
[3]陈鹏,逯元堂,吴舜泽,等.中国与欧盟环保投资及支出比较分析[J].生态经济,2016,32(11):190-192.
[4]马中.环境与资源经济学概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.
[5]高培勇.公共经济学[M].2版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[6]林成.从市场失灵到政府失灵:外部性理论及其政策的演进[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2007.
[7]张琳.环境污染问题的经济学分析---基于市场失灵与政府失灵的考察[J].山东财政学院学报,2008(5):24-27.
[8]王浩.我国城市工业污染中的市场失灵和政府失灵探析[J].四川理工学院学报(社会科学版),2010,25(5):88-91.
[9]宋晨.政府在环境外部性问题上的角色转变[J].中国管理信息化,2010,13(4):74-76.
[10]徐惠明.外商直接投资对昆山环境溢出效应研究[D].上海:同济大学,2006.
[11]夏友富.外商投资中国污染密集产业现状、后果及其对策研究[J].管理世界,1999(3):109-123.
[12]李子豪,刘辉煌.FDI对环境的影响存在门槛效应吗---基于中国220个城市的检验[J].财贸经济,2012(9):101-108.
[13]曾慧.外商直接投资环境效应及区域差异研究---基于面板模型的实证分析[J].国际商务研究,2016,37(2):87-96.
[14]傅京燕,李丽莎.FDI、环境规制与污染避难所效应---基于中国省级数据的经验分析[J].公共管理学报,2010,7(3):65-74.
[15]TONE K.A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130(3):498-509.
[16]FUKUYAMA H,WEBER W L.A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency[J].Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,2009,43(4):274-287.
[17]叶祥松,彭良燕.我国环境规制的规制效率研究---基于1999-2008年我国省际面板数据[J].经济学家,2011(6):81-86.
[18]郭国峰,郑召锋.基于DEA模型的环境治理效率评价---以河南为例[J].经济问题,2009(1):48-51.
[19]王奇,李明全.基于DEA方法的我国大气污染治理效率评价[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(5):942-946.
[20]王莉莉.利用外资对于中国环境污染的影响研究[D].南京:东南大学,2016.
[21]程钰,任建兰,陈延斌,等.中国环境规制效率空间格局动态演变及其驱动机制[J].地理研究,2016,35(1):123-136.
[22]徐成龙,任建兰,程钰.山东省环境规制效率时空格局演变及影响因素[J].经济地理,2014,34(12):35-40.
[23]王俊能,许振成,胡习邦,等.基于DEA理论的中国区域环境效率分析[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(4):565-570.
[24]姜林.中国环境规制效率评价研究[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2011.
[25]刘静.我国环境规制效率测评研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2010.
[2]董文福,傅德黔,努丽亚.我国环境污染治理投资的发展及存在问题[J].中国环境监测,2008,24(4):87-89.
[3]陈鹏,逯元堂,吴舜泽,等.中国与欧盟环保投资及支出比较分析[J].生态经济,2016,32(11):190-192.
[4]马中.环境与资源经济学概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.
[5]高培勇.公共经济学[M].2版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[6]林成.从市场失灵到政府失灵:外部性理论及其政策的演进[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2007.
[7]张琳.环境污染问题的经济学分析---基于市场失灵与政府失灵的考察[J].山东财政学院学报,2008(5):24-27.
[8]王浩.我国城市工业污染中的市场失灵和政府失灵探析[J].四川理工学院学报(社会科学版),2010,25(5):88-91.
[9]宋晨.政府在环境外部性问题上的角色转变[J].中国管理信息化,2010,13(4):74-76.
[10]徐惠明.外商直接投资对昆山环境溢出效应研究[D].上海:同济大学,2006.
[11]夏友富.外商投资中国污染密集产业现状、后果及其对策研究[J].管理世界,1999(3):109-123.
[12]李子豪,刘辉煌.FDI对环境的影响存在门槛效应吗---基于中国220个城市的检验[J].财贸经济,2012(9):101-108.
[13]曾慧.外商直接投资环境效应及区域差异研究---基于面板模型的实证分析[J].国际商务研究,2016,37(2):87-96.
[14]傅京燕,李丽莎.FDI、环境规制与污染避难所效应---基于中国省级数据的经验分析[J].公共管理学报,2010,7(3):65-74.
[15]TONE K.A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130(3):498-509.
[16]FUKUYAMA H,WEBER W L.A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency[J].Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,2009,43(4):274-287.
[17]叶祥松,彭良燕.我国环境规制的规制效率研究---基于1999-2008年我国省际面板数据[J].经济学家,2011(6):81-86.
[18]郭国峰,郑召锋.基于DEA模型的环境治理效率评价---以河南为例[J].经济问题,2009(1):48-51.
[19]王奇,李明全.基于DEA方法的我国大气污染治理效率评价[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(5):942-946.
[20]王莉莉.利用外资对于中国环境污染的影响研究[D].南京:东南大学,2016.
[21]程钰,任建兰,陈延斌,等.中国环境规制效率空间格局动态演变及其驱动机制[J].地理研究,2016,35(1):123-136.
[22]徐成龙,任建兰,程钰.山东省环境规制效率时空格局演变及影响因素[J].经济地理,2014,34(12):35-40.
[23]王俊能,许振成,胡习邦,等.基于DEA理论的中国区域环境效率分析[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(4):565-570.
[24]姜林.中国环境规制效率评价研究[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2011.
[25]刘静.我国环境规制效率测评研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2010.