政府补贴对探索型、应用型创新企业影响研究
|
摘要
政府补贴驱动企业创新发展已在世界各国得到普遍认可,然而对探索型创新与应用型创新谁更有效争论不断。文章通过探讨政府补贴对探索型创新与应用型创新影响,验证创新治理能力对政府补贴与企业绩效具有调节作用,基于深圳181家企业问卷调查数据,采用结构方程模式进行分析,实证结果显示探索型创新比应用型创新更需要政府补贴,而应用型创新要比探索型创新对企业绩效的作用更大;创新治理能力对探索型与创新型创新都具有正向调节作用,且企业创新治理能力越强越容易获得政府补贴,进而影响企业绩效。
The government subsidies have been widely accepted in different countries globally to drive the innovative development of enterprise,but the question,"is government suhsidy more effective for explorive-innovation enterprises or applied-innovation enterprises",has always been the focus of debates.The influences of government subsidies are explored on explorative innovation and applied innovation in the research,and the moderating effect of innovation-governance ability on government subsidy and enterprise performance has been verified.Based on the questionnaire data of 181 enterprises in Shenzhen,the structural equation model is used to analyze in the paper.According to the empirical results,the government subsidies are more needed in explorative innovation than applied innovation,while applied innovation is more effective in enterprise performance than explorative innovation.Innovation-governance capacity has a positive regulatory function on both explorative innovation and applied innovation,and the stronger the innovation-governance ability of enterprises,the easier it will be to get government subsidies,thereby affecting enterprises performance.
The government subsidies have been widely accepted in different countries globally to drive the innovative development of enterprise,but the question,"is government suhsidy more effective for explorive-innovation enterprises or applied-innovation enterprises",has always been the focus of debates.The influences of government subsidies are explored on explorative innovation and applied innovation in the research,and the moderating effect of innovation-governance ability on government subsidy and enterprise performance has been verified.Based on the questionnaire data of 181 enterprises in Shenzhen,the structural equation model is used to analyze in the paper.According to the empirical results,the government subsidies are more needed in explorative innovation than applied innovation,while applied innovation is more effective in enterprise performance than explorative innovation.Innovation-governance capacity has a positive regulatory function on both explorative innovation and applied innovation,and the stronger the innovation-governance ability of enterprises,the easier it will be to get government subsidies,thereby affecting enterprises performance.
引文
[1]Christcnscn,J.F.profilcs for technologial innovation[J].Rescarch Policy,1995,24(1):727-745.
[2]Drucker,P. Innovation and cntreprcncurship[M].New York:Harper and Row,1985.
[3]Janscn,J.J.P.,Tempclaar,M.P.,van den Bosch,F.A.J.,and Volberda,H.W.Structural Differentiation and Ambidexttcrity:The Mcdiating Rolc of Integration Mcchanisms[J].Organization Scicnee,2009,20(4):797-811.
[4]Eurostat.Rcscarch and Development Expcnditurc,by Sectors of Performance.(http)://cpp.curostat.cc.curopa.cu),2009.
[5]Czarnitzki,D.,Hottenrott,H.,Thorwarth,S.Industrial rcscarch vcrsus devclopmcnt investment:the implications of financial constraints[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics.2010,35(3):1-24.
[6]Aschoff,B.The Effect of Subsidics on R&D Investrment and Success.Do Subsidy History and Sizc Mattter?.[J].ZEW-Ccntrc for Europcan Economic Research Discurssion,2009.09-032.
[7]Zhu.P.,XU.W&Lundin.M.2016.The impact of government's fundings and tax inccntivcs on industrial R&D invcstments-Empirical cvidenccs from industrial scctors in Shanghai[J].China Economic Review,2006,17(1):51-69.
[8]陆国庆、王舟、张春宇.中国战略性新兴产业政府创新补贴的绩效研究[J].经济研究,2014,7:44-55.
[9]杨洋,魏江,罗来军.谁在利用政府补贴进行创新?——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J].管理世界,2015,(01):75-86+98+188.
[10]Gorg,H.,&Strobl,E.The Effect of R&D Subsidices on Private R&D[J].Economica,2007,294(74):215-234.
[11]Wu.Y.The Effccts of State R&D Tax Crcdits in Stimulating Privatc R&D Expcnditurc:A Cross—State Empirical Analysis[J].Journal of Policy Analysis&Management,2005,24(4):785-802.
[12]Liang,X.,Lu,X.and Wang,L.Outward Inter nationalization of Privatc Enterpriscs in China:The Effect of Competitive Advantages and Disadvantages Comparcd to Homc Markcet Rivals[J].Journal of World Business,2012,47:134-144.
[13]李剑力.探索性创新、开发性创新及其平衡研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2009,(3):23-29.
[14]张建宇,蔡双立.探索性创新与开发性创新的协调路径及其对绩效的影响[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(05):64-70+168.
[15]March,J.G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[16]Romijn,H,Albaladcjo,M.Determinants of innuovation capability in small clcctronics and softwarc Firms in Southcrn England[J].Research Policy,2002,31:1053-1067.
[17]Caloghirou,Y,Kastclli,I,Tsakanika,A.Internal capabilitics and cxternal knowlcdgc sourccs:complements or substitutcs for innovative performancc?[J].Tcchnovation,2004,24:29-39.
[18]Block,F.Kcller M R.Where do Innovations come From? Trans formations in the U.S.National Innovation Systcm,1970-2006[J].The Information Tcchnology&Innovation Foundation,2008.7(9):1-22.
[19]Bccker,B.Public R&D policies and private R&D invcstment:A survey of the empirical cvidcncc[M].Journal of Economic Survcy,in press,2015.
[20]Garcia-Qucvcdo,J.Do public subsidies complemcnt complement busincss R&D? A meta-analysis of the cceonometric cvidcncc[J].Kyklos,2004,57(1):87-102.
[21]He Z L.Wong P K.Exploration vs.cexploitation:An cmpirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J].Organization Scicnce,2004,15(4):481-494.
[22]Hitt,M.A.,Ircland,R.D..Lcc,H.Technological Learning,Knowlcdge Management,Firm Growth and Performance:An Introduction Essay[J].Journal of Enginecring and Technology Managcmcnt,2000,17(4):231-246.
[23]Yam,R C.,Lo W,Tang,E.P,Lau,A K.Analysis of Sourccs of Innovation,Tcchnological Innovation Capabilitics,and Performance:An Empirical Study of Hong Kong Manufacturing Industrics[J].Rcscarch Policy,2011,40:391-402.
[24]OECD.The OECD Innovation Strategy:Getting a Hcad Start on Tomorrow[M].DECD,Paris,2010.
[25]Foray,D.Charactcrizing the Knowlcdgc Basc:Available and Missing Indicators.In:Knowlcdgc Management in the Learning Society[M].OECD,2000.
[26]Camisón,C,and A.Villar-Lópcz.Organizational innovation as an cnabler of technological innovation capabilitics and Firm Performancc[J].Journal of Business Research,2014,67(1):2891-2902.
[27]Damanpour,F.An Integration of Resecarch Findings of Effects of Firm Sizc and Market Competition on Product and Proccss Innovations[J].British Journal of Managcment,2010,21(4),996-1010.
[28]Guan,J.,Ma N.Innovative capability and Export Performance of Chinese Firms[J].Tcchnovation,2003,23(l):737-747.
[29]张杰,陈志远,杨连星,新夫.中国创新补贴政策的绩效评估:理论与证据[J].经济研究,2015,(10):4-17+33.
[30]Marino M,Lhuillcry,S,Parrotta,P.&Sala,D.Additionality on Crowding-out? An Overall Evaluation ofPublic R&D Subsidy on Private R&D Expenditure[J].Rcscarch Policy,2016,45(9):1715-1730.
[31]Gupta A K,Smith,K G,Shallcy,C E.The Intcrplay Bctween Exploration and Exploitation[J].Acadcmy of Managcement Journal,2006,49(4):693-706.
[32]黄世政.技术创新能力对组织创新与企业绩效的中介效果——以珠三角制造业为例[J].技术经济与管理研究,2017(04):43-47.
[33]Farjoun M.Beyond Dualism:Stability and Change as a Duality[J].Academy of Management Review,2010,35(2):202-225.
[2]Drucker,P. Innovation and cntreprcncurship[M].New York:Harper and Row,1985.
[3]Janscn,J.J.P.,Tempclaar,M.P.,van den Bosch,F.A.J.,and Volberda,H.W.Structural Differentiation and Ambidexttcrity:The Mcdiating Rolc of Integration Mcchanisms[J].Organization Scicnee,2009,20(4):797-811.
[4]Eurostat.Rcscarch and Development Expcnditurc,by Sectors of Performance.(http)://cpp.curostat.cc.curopa.cu),2009.
[5]Czarnitzki,D.,Hottenrott,H.,Thorwarth,S.Industrial rcscarch vcrsus devclopmcnt investment:the implications of financial constraints[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics.2010,35(3):1-24.
[6]Aschoff,B.The Effect of Subsidics on R&D Investrment and Success.Do Subsidy History and Sizc Mattter?.[J].ZEW-Ccntrc for Europcan Economic Research Discurssion,2009.09-032.
[7]Zhu.P.,XU.W&Lundin.M.2016.The impact of government's fundings and tax inccntivcs on industrial R&D invcstments-Empirical cvidenccs from industrial scctors in Shanghai[J].China Economic Review,2006,17(1):51-69.
[8]陆国庆、王舟、张春宇.中国战略性新兴产业政府创新补贴的绩效研究[J].经济研究,2014,7:44-55.
[9]杨洋,魏江,罗来军.谁在利用政府补贴进行创新?——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J].管理世界,2015,(01):75-86+98+188.
[10]Gorg,H.,&Strobl,E.The Effect of R&D Subsidices on Private R&D[J].Economica,2007,294(74):215-234.
[11]Wu.Y.The Effccts of State R&D Tax Crcdits in Stimulating Privatc R&D Expcnditurc:A Cross—State Empirical Analysis[J].Journal of Policy Analysis&Management,2005,24(4):785-802.
[12]Liang,X.,Lu,X.and Wang,L.Outward Inter nationalization of Privatc Enterpriscs in China:The Effect of Competitive Advantages and Disadvantages Comparcd to Homc Markcet Rivals[J].Journal of World Business,2012,47:134-144.
[13]李剑力.探索性创新、开发性创新及其平衡研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2009,(3):23-29.
[14]张建宇,蔡双立.探索性创新与开发性创新的协调路径及其对绩效的影响[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(05):64-70+168.
[15]March,J.G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[16]Romijn,H,Albaladcjo,M.Determinants of innuovation capability in small clcctronics and softwarc Firms in Southcrn England[J].Research Policy,2002,31:1053-1067.
[17]Caloghirou,Y,Kastclli,I,Tsakanika,A.Internal capabilitics and cxternal knowlcdgc sourccs:complements or substitutcs for innovative performancc?[J].Tcchnovation,2004,24:29-39.
[18]Block,F.Kcller M R.Where do Innovations come From? Trans formations in the U.S.National Innovation Systcm,1970-2006[J].The Information Tcchnology&Innovation Foundation,2008.7(9):1-22.
[19]Bccker,B.Public R&D policies and private R&D invcstment:A survey of the empirical cvidcncc[M].Journal of Economic Survcy,in press,2015.
[20]Garcia-Qucvcdo,J.Do public subsidies complemcnt complement busincss R&D? A meta-analysis of the cceonometric cvidcncc[J].Kyklos,2004,57(1):87-102.
[21]He Z L.Wong P K.Exploration vs.cexploitation:An cmpirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J].Organization Scicnce,2004,15(4):481-494.
[22]Hitt,M.A.,Ircland,R.D..Lcc,H.Technological Learning,Knowlcdge Management,Firm Growth and Performance:An Introduction Essay[J].Journal of Enginecring and Technology Managcmcnt,2000,17(4):231-246.
[23]Yam,R C.,Lo W,Tang,E.P,Lau,A K.Analysis of Sourccs of Innovation,Tcchnological Innovation Capabilitics,and Performance:An Empirical Study of Hong Kong Manufacturing Industrics[J].Rcscarch Policy,2011,40:391-402.
[24]OECD.The OECD Innovation Strategy:Getting a Hcad Start on Tomorrow[M].DECD,Paris,2010.
[25]Foray,D.Charactcrizing the Knowlcdgc Basc:Available and Missing Indicators.In:Knowlcdgc Management in the Learning Society[M].OECD,2000.
[26]Camisón,C,and A.Villar-Lópcz.Organizational innovation as an cnabler of technological innovation capabilitics and Firm Performancc[J].Journal of Business Research,2014,67(1):2891-2902.
[27]Damanpour,F.An Integration of Resecarch Findings of Effects of Firm Sizc and Market Competition on Product and Proccss Innovations[J].British Journal of Managcment,2010,21(4),996-1010.
[28]Guan,J.,Ma N.Innovative capability and Export Performance of Chinese Firms[J].Tcchnovation,2003,23(l):737-747.
[29]张杰,陈志远,杨连星,新夫.中国创新补贴政策的绩效评估:理论与证据[J].经济研究,2015,(10):4-17+33.
[30]Marino M,Lhuillcry,S,Parrotta,P.&Sala,D.Additionality on Crowding-out? An Overall Evaluation ofPublic R&D Subsidy on Private R&D Expenditure[J].Rcscarch Policy,2016,45(9):1715-1730.
[31]Gupta A K,Smith,K G,Shallcy,C E.The Intcrplay Bctween Exploration and Exploitation[J].Acadcmy of Managcement Journal,2006,49(4):693-706.
[32]黄世政.技术创新能力对组织创新与企业绩效的中介效果——以珠三角制造业为例[J].技术经济与管理研究,2017(04):43-47.
[33]Farjoun M.Beyond Dualism:Stability and Change as a Duality[J].Academy of Management Review,2010,35(2):202-225.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |