国际合作下的ESI高被引论文产出及其影响力研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]探索国际合作下世界主要国家/地区高被引论文的产出情况及影响力水平。[方法/过程]以2008-2018年ESI中22个学科领域186 474篇高被引论文为基础研究数据,以高被引论文总数排名前10的国家/地区为主要研究对象,对样本国家/地区高水平、高影响力的科技文献产出、产出影响力及合作情况进行分析,重点分析我国进入ESI学科所属高被引文献的国际合作情况及影响力特征。[结果/结论]国际合作对不同国家/地区的科研产出影响不同;国际合作强度与成果产出影响力不存在显著的正相关关系;国际合作对我国大部分学科领域的高被引论文均有积极的正面影响,但部分学科领域国际合作高被引论文的总体影响力却低于我国自主研发高被引论文。
[Purpose/Significance]To explore the output and impact of highly cited papers in major countries/territories of the world with international collaboration.[Method/Process]Based on 186474 highly cited papers of 22 scientific fields in 2008-2018 which obtained from the Essential Science Indicators(ESI),we took top 10 countries/territories with the highest number of highly cited papers as the main research samples.Then we analyzed the output and impact of highly cited papers by taking collaboration and non-collaboration into consideration.Besides,this paper focused on the analysis of the international collaboration output and impact of China's highly cited papers.[Results/Conclusions]International collaboration had different effects on research output in different countries/territories;There was no significant positive correlation between the intensity of international collaboration and the impact of papers;In China,International collaboration made positive contributions to highly cited papers in most scientific fields,but in some fields,the overall citation impact of internationally collaboration highly cited papers was lower than non-international collaboration highly cited papers.
[Purpose/Significance]To explore the output and impact of highly cited papers in major countries/territories of the world with international collaboration.[Method/Process]Based on 186474 highly cited papers of 22 scientific fields in 2008-2018 which obtained from the Essential Science Indicators(ESI),we took top 10 countries/territories with the highest number of highly cited papers as the main research samples.Then we analyzed the output and impact of highly cited papers by taking collaboration and non-collaboration into consideration.Besides,this paper focused on the analysis of the international collaboration output and impact of China's highly cited papers.[Results/Conclusions]International collaboration had different effects on research output in different countries/territories;There was no significant positive correlation between the intensity of international collaboration and the impact of papers;In China,International collaboration made positive contributions to highly cited papers in most scientific fields,but in some fields,the overall citation impact of internationally collaboration highly cited papers was lower than non-international collaboration highly cited papers.
引文
[1]倪萍,安新颖.国际合著模式与论文被引相关性研究[J].医学信息学杂志,2015,36(9):60-64.
[2]黄日茜,李振兴,张婧婧.德国国际科技合作机制研究及启示[J].中国科学基金,2016,(3):262-268.
[3]魏芹,邹立尧.国家自然科学基金委员会与俄罗斯基础研究基金会(NSFC-RFBR)2003-2012年国际合作交流项目情况分析[J].中国科学基金,2014,(2):134-140.
[4]Beaver D B D,Rosen R.Studies in Scientific Collaboration[J].Scientometrics,1979,1(2):133-149.
[5]金炬,武夷山,梁战平.国际科技合作文献计量学研究综述——《科学计量学》(Scientometrics)期刊相关论文综述[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(3):63-67.
[6]Bordons M,Gómez I,Fernández M T,et al.Local,Domestic and International Scientific Collaboration in Biomedical Research[J].Scientometrics,1996,37(2):279-295.
[7]Cho C C,Hu M W,Liu M C.Improvements in Productivity Based on Co-authorship:A Case Study of Published Articles in China[J].Scientometrics,2010,85(2):463-470.
[8]Hayati Z,Didegah F.International Scientific Collaboration Among Iranian Researchers During 1998-2007[J].Library Hi Tech,2010,28(3):433-446.
[9]Gl?nzel W,Schubert A.Double Effort=Double Impact?A Critical View at International Co-authorship in Chemistry[J].Scientometrics,2001,50(2):199-214.
[10]叶伟萍,梁文艳,胡咏梅.C9大学离世界一流大学有多远——分学科的国际合作比较[J].教育研究,2017,(3):53-66.
[11]Gl?nzel W.National Characteristics in International Scientific Co-authorship Relations[J].Scientometrics,2001,51(1):69-115.
[12]Leimu R,Koricheva J.Does Scientific Collaboration Increase the Impact of Ecological Articles?[J].Bioscience,2005,55(5):438-443.
[13]王文平,刘云,何颖,等.国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究——基于文献计量学分析的视角[J].科研管理,2015,36(3):127-137.
[14]霍艳蓉.基本科学指数(Essential Science Indicators)数据库[J].图书情报工作,2003,(1):56-59.
[15]刘月雷,聂峰英.基于ESI数据库的地球科学领域文献计量分析研究[J].现代情报,2015,35(6):81-85.
[16]邱均平,赵蓉英,马瑞敏,等.世界一流大学及学科竞争力评价的意义、理念与实践[J].科技进步与对策,2006,24(3):23-26.
[17]陈仕吉,史丽文,左文革.基于ESI的学术影响力指标测度方法与实证[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(2):97-102.
[18]Chuang K Y,Wang M H,Ho Y S.High-impact Papers Presented in the Subject Category of Water Resources in the Essential Science Indicators Database of the Institute for Scientific Information[J].Scientometrics,2011,87(3):551-562.
[19]Fu H Z,Chuang K Y,Wang M H,et al.Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators[J].Scientometrics,2011,88(3):841-862.
[20]岳晓旭,袁军鹏,黄萃,等.基于ESI学科分类的中国科研国际合作主导地位变迁分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(4):3-17.
[21]苏林伟,田盛慧,赵星.国家/地区高被引论文的科学基金资助研究[J].中国科学基金,2015,(5):371-377.
[2]黄日茜,李振兴,张婧婧.德国国际科技合作机制研究及启示[J].中国科学基金,2016,(3):262-268.
[3]魏芹,邹立尧.国家自然科学基金委员会与俄罗斯基础研究基金会(NSFC-RFBR)2003-2012年国际合作交流项目情况分析[J].中国科学基金,2014,(2):134-140.
[4]Beaver D B D,Rosen R.Studies in Scientific Collaboration[J].Scientometrics,1979,1(2):133-149.
[5]金炬,武夷山,梁战平.国际科技合作文献计量学研究综述——《科学计量学》(Scientometrics)期刊相关论文综述[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(3):63-67.
[6]Bordons M,Gómez I,Fernández M T,et al.Local,Domestic and International Scientific Collaboration in Biomedical Research[J].Scientometrics,1996,37(2):279-295.
[7]Cho C C,Hu M W,Liu M C.Improvements in Productivity Based on Co-authorship:A Case Study of Published Articles in China[J].Scientometrics,2010,85(2):463-470.
[8]Hayati Z,Didegah F.International Scientific Collaboration Among Iranian Researchers During 1998-2007[J].Library Hi Tech,2010,28(3):433-446.
[9]Gl?nzel W,Schubert A.Double Effort=Double Impact?A Critical View at International Co-authorship in Chemistry[J].Scientometrics,2001,50(2):199-214.
[10]叶伟萍,梁文艳,胡咏梅.C9大学离世界一流大学有多远——分学科的国际合作比较[J].教育研究,2017,(3):53-66.
[11]Gl?nzel W.National Characteristics in International Scientific Co-authorship Relations[J].Scientometrics,2001,51(1):69-115.
[12]Leimu R,Koricheva J.Does Scientific Collaboration Increase the Impact of Ecological Articles?[J].Bioscience,2005,55(5):438-443.
[13]王文平,刘云,何颖,等.国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究——基于文献计量学分析的视角[J].科研管理,2015,36(3):127-137.
[14]霍艳蓉.基本科学指数(Essential Science Indicators)数据库[J].图书情报工作,2003,(1):56-59.
[15]刘月雷,聂峰英.基于ESI数据库的地球科学领域文献计量分析研究[J].现代情报,2015,35(6):81-85.
[16]邱均平,赵蓉英,马瑞敏,等.世界一流大学及学科竞争力评价的意义、理念与实践[J].科技进步与对策,2006,24(3):23-26.
[17]陈仕吉,史丽文,左文革.基于ESI的学术影响力指标测度方法与实证[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(2):97-102.
[18]Chuang K Y,Wang M H,Ho Y S.High-impact Papers Presented in the Subject Category of Water Resources in the Essential Science Indicators Database of the Institute for Scientific Information[J].Scientometrics,2011,87(3):551-562.
[19]Fu H Z,Chuang K Y,Wang M H,et al.Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators[J].Scientometrics,2011,88(3):841-862.
[20]岳晓旭,袁军鹏,黄萃,等.基于ESI学科分类的中国科研国际合作主导地位变迁分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(4):3-17.
[21]苏林伟,田盛慧,赵星.国家/地区高被引论文的科学基金资助研究[J].中国科学基金,2015,(5):371-377.