基于加权灰色关联度的C2C平台商品信息可信度评估方法研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：A Study of C2C Platform Product Information Credibility Based on the Grey Relation Grade 作者：郭顺利 ; 张向先 ; 李中梅 英文作者：GUO Shun-li;ZHANG Xiang-xian;LI Zhong-mei;School of Management , Jilin University; 关键词：C2C平台 ; 信息可信度 ; 评价方法 ; 层次分析法 ; 加权灰色关联度 英文关键词：C2C platform;;information credibility;;evaluation method;;AHP;;weighted grey relational grade 中文刊名：QBKX 英文刊名：Information Science 机构：吉林大学管理学院; 出版日期：2017-07-04 15:49 出版单位：情报科学 年：2017 期：v.35;No.311 语种：中文; 页：QBKX201707025 页数：7 CN：07 ISSN：22-1264/G2 分类号：144-150

摘要

【目的/意义】寻找有效的C2C平台信息可信度计算方法,识别平台虚假信息和冗余信息,为C2C平台用户选择和购买商品提供依据和参考。【方法/过程】首先运用文献综述和层次分析法,根据信息传播理论与C2C平台的特点构建C2C平台信息可信度评价指标体系;其次提出基于加权灰色关联度的信息可信度计算方法;最后采集58同城二手手机数据验证提出方法的有效性和合理性。【结果/结论】构建了C2C平台信息可信度评价指标体系,提出了一种基于加权灰色关联度的C2C平台信息可信度计算方法,验证了方法的可操作性和实际应用价值。
        【Purpose/significance】This paper aims at looking for effective C2C platform information credibility calculation method, identifying false information and redundant information platform so as to provide the basis and reference for users in C2C platform to choose and buy goods.【Method/process】This paper first constructs the information credibility evaluation index system of C2C platform according to the information dissemination theory and the characteristics of C2C platform by using literature review and analytic hierarchy process;secondly, the information credibility calculation is put forward based on weighted gray relational degree Method; thirdly,collect the second-hand mobile phone data from 58 cities to verify the validity and rationality of the method presented in the study.【Result/conclusion】The paper constructs the evaluation index system of C2C platform information credibility, puts forward a method of C2C platform information credibility based on weighted grey incidence degree, verifies the method has certain operational and practical value.

引文

1国家信息中心.中国分享经济发展报告2016[EB/OL].http://www.sic.gov.cn/News/86/6011.htm,2016-05-31.
    2 Ma T J,Atkin D.User generated content and credibility evaluation of online health information:A meta analytic study[J].Telematics and Informatics,2016,34(5):472-486.
    3 Liu Q,Wu S,Yu F,et al.ICE:Information Credibility Evaluation on Social Media via Representation Learning[J].ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:1609.09226,2016.
    4 钟诚,赵志峰,姚高峰.语义环境中信息可信度计算方法研究[J].情报理论与实践,2012,(1):103-105,128.
    5 屈文建,谢冬.网络学术论坛信息可信度的灰度分析[J].图书情报知识,2013,(2):112-118.
    6 李璐旸,李渝勤,刘挺,秦兵,王轩.面向网络文本的信息可信度评估方法研究[J].智能计算机与应用,2013,(5):31-34,38.
    7 孟美任,丁晟春.在线中文商品评论可信度研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2013,(9):60-66.
    8 Gooseeker集搜客[EB/OL].http://www.gooseeker.com/pro/product.html,2016-06-09.
    9 站长之家.站长工具[EB/OL].http://seo.chinaz.com/?m=&host=58.com,2016-06-12.
    10 360信用平台.58同城[EB/OL].http://xinyong.360.cn/detail/bj.58.com,2016-06-16.
    11 郭顺利,张向先,李中梅.面向用户信息需求的移动O2O在线评论有用性排序模型研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,12(23):85-93.