用户名: 密码: 验证码:
甘肃省枸杞炭疽病菌对4种甾醇脱甲基抑制剂的敏感性
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Sensitivity analysis of Colletotrichum spp. from wolfberry to four sterol demethylation inhibitors in Gansu Province
  • 作者:张海英 ; 刘永刚 ; 李建军 ; 张新瑞
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Haiying;LIU Yonggang;LI Jianjun;ZHANG Xinrui;Institute of Plant Protection,Gansu Academy of Agricultural Science;Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pests in Tianshui, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;
  • 关键词:枸杞炭疽病菌 ; 胶孢炭疽复合种 ; 尖孢炭疽复合种 ; 甾醇脱甲基抑制剂 ; 苯醚甲环唑 ; 戊唑醇 ; 丙环唑 ; 氟硅唑 ; 敏感性
  • 英文关键词:Colletotrichum spp.;;Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex;;Colletotrichum acutatum species complex;;sterol demethylation inhibitors(DMIs);;difenoconazole;;tebuconazole;;propiconazole;;flusilazole;;sensitivity
  • 中文刊名:NYXB
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science
  • 机构:甘肃省农业科学院植物保护研究所;农业农村部天水作物有害生物科学观测实验站;
  • 出版日期:2019-08-09
  • 出版单位:农药学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.21
  • 基金:甘肃省农业科学院科研条件建设及成果转化项目(2017GAAS24);甘肃省农业科学院农业科技创新专项(2017GAAS23);甘肃省农业科学院中青年基金项目(2015GAAS37)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:NYXB201904005
  • 页数:7
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-3995/S
  • 分类号:28-34
摘要
为明确甘肃省枸杞炭疽病菌对甾醇脱甲基抑制剂类药剂(DMIs)的敏感性,采用菌丝生长速率法测定了采自甘肃省靖远县3个地区及景泰县3个地区共102株枸杞炭疽病菌对苯醚甲环唑、戊唑醇、丙环唑及氟硅唑的敏感性,分别就不同年份、不同地区间胶孢炭疽复合种和尖孢炭疽复合种对4种DMIs杀菌剂的敏感性差异进行了分析。结果表明:供试46株枸杞胶孢炭疽复合种整体上对苯醚甲环唑、戊唑醇、丙环唑和氟硅唑仍表现为敏感,EC_(50)值分别在0.28~1.20、0.11~2.98、0.32~2.84和0.35~3.85μg/mL之间;而56株尖孢炭疽复合种对4种药剂的敏感性则出现了不同程度分化,部分菌株疑似已出现敏感性下降现象,其中,对苯醚甲环唑、戊唑醇、丙环唑和氟硅唑敏感性最低的菌株EC_(50)值分别为1.63、3.80、6.21和4.74μg/mL。不同年份间采集的枸杞胶孢炭疽复合种和尖孢炭疽复合种对4种杀菌剂的敏感性均存在显著差异,2017年采集的菌株敏感性相对更低,4种杀菌剂对胶孢炭疽复合种的平均EC_(50)值分别为(0.84±0.03)、(1.23±0.13)、(1.19±0.09)和(1.69±0.17)μg/mL,对尖孢炭疽复合种的平均EC_(50)值分别为(1.06±0.03)、(2.25±0.15)、(2.43±0.20)和(2.85±0.19)μg/mL。不同地区枸杞炭疽病菌对4种杀菌剂的敏感性表现不同,其中靖远县五合镇的胶孢炭疽复合种对4种杀菌剂敏感性最低,平均EC_(50)值分别为(0.79±0.12)、(1.28±0.87)、(1.39±1.05)和(1.74±1.04)μg/mL,景泰县草窝滩镇的胶孢炭疽复合种对苯醚甲环唑和丙环唑敏感性最高,平均EC_(50)值为(0.28±0.10)和(0.46±0.10)μg/mL,对戊唑醇和氟硅唑敏感性最高的胶孢炭疽复合种来自景泰县寺滩乡,平均EC_(50)值为(0.42±0.16)和(0.65±0.09)μg/mL;不同地区间采集的尖孢炭疽复合种对4种杀菌剂的敏感性则不存在显著差异。研究结果可为甘肃省枸杞炭疽病防治中杀菌剂的合理使用及延缓抗药性发展提供依据。
        The objective of this work is to evaluate the sensitivity of Colletotrichum spp. isolated from wolfberry in Gansu Province to sterol demethylation inhibitors(DMIs). The petri plate was adopted to test the sensitivities of 102 isolates of Colletotrichum spp. from wolfberry at three different regions in Jingyuan and three different regions in Jingtai in Gansu province to 4 DMIs fungicides including difenoconazole, tebuconazole, propiconazole and flusilazole. The sensitivity differentiation of C.gloeosporioides species complex and C. acutatum species complex collected indifferent years and from different regions to four fungicides was analyzed respectively. The results indicated that the overall sensitivities of 46 C. gloeosporioides species complex to difenoconazole, tebuconazole, propiconazole and flusilazole were high. EC_(50) value ranged from 0.28 to1.20 μg/mL, 0.11 to 2.98 μg/mL, 0.32 to2.84 μg/mL and 0.35 to 3.85 μg/mL, respectively. However, the sensitivities of 56 tested C. acutatum species complex isolates to four DMIs fungicides were different and some strains were suspected to have decreased sensitivity. The average EC_(50) values of the least sensitive strains to difenoconazole,tebuconazole, propiconazole and flusilazole are 1.63,3.8,6.21 and 4.74 μg/mL, respectively. The sensitivities of C. gloeosporioides species complex and C. acutatum species complex collected in different years to those 4 DMIs fungicides showed significant difference and the collected strains in2017 showed relatively lower sensitivities. The average EC_(50) values of C. gloeosporioides species complex to four DMIs fungicides respectively were(0.84 ± 0.03),(1.23 ± 0.13),(1.19 ± 0.09) and(1.69 ±0.17) μg/mL, respectively. The average EC_(50) values of C. acutatum species complex to four DMIs fungicides respectively were(1.06 ± 0.03),(2.25 ± 0.15),(2.43 ± 0.20) and(2.85 ± 0.19)μg/mL,respectively. The sensitivities of Colletotrichum spp. isolates collected from different areas to those 4 fungicides were different. The strains of C. gloeosporioides species complex collected from Wuhe Jingyuan county had the lowest sensitivity. The average EC_(50) values were(0.79 ± 0.12),(1.28 ± 0.87),(1.39 ± 1.05) and(1.74 ± 1.04) μg/mL, respectively. The strains with the highest sensitivity to difenoconazole and propiconazole were collected from Caowotan Jingtai county, and the average EC_(50) values were(0.28 ± 0.10) and(0.46 ± 0.10) μg/mL, respectively. The strains with the highest sensitivity to tebuconazole and flusilazole were collected from Sitan Jingtai county, and the average EC_(50) values were(0.42 ± 0.16) and(0.65 ± 0.09) μg/mL, respectively. There was no significant difference among the sensitivities of C. acutatum species complex from different areas to those 4 fungicides. The results provided the theoretical basis for the rational use of fungicides to control wolfberry anthracnose in Gansu Province and delaying resistance development.
引文
[1]张军文,刘国春.甘肃枸杞产业及其干燥设备应用的发展现状及思考[J].中国种业,2017(7):45-47.ZHANG J W,LIU G C.Development status and thinking of Gansu wolfberry industry and its drying equipment application[J].China Seed Ind,2017(7):45-47.
    [2]李向东,康天兰,刘学周,等.甘肃省枸杞产业现状及发展建议[J].甘肃农业科技,2017(1):65-69.LI X D,KANG T L,LIU X Z,et al.Development suggestions and status of wolfberry industry in Gansu Province[J].Gansu Agric SciTechnol,2017(1):65-69.
    [3]李海霞.枸杞炭疽病综合防治试验报告[J].农业科技与信息,2014,11(8):26-27.LI H X.Comprehensive control test report on anthracnose of wolfberry[J].Agric Sci-Technol Information,2014,11(8):26-27.
    [4]郝转.我国枸杞的栽培技术与病虫害防治技术[J].农技服务,2017,34(18):26-28.HAO Z.Cultivation technology and pest control technology of Chinese wolfberry[J].Agric Technol Service,2017,34(18):26-28.
    [5]曲玲,焦恩宁,张宗山.枸杞炭疽病研究进展[J].北方园艺2011(20):195-199.QU L,JIAO E N,ZHANG Z S.Research advances on anthracnose of wolfberry[J].Northern Horticulture,2011(20):195-199.
    [6]SUN G Y,CUI J Q,WANG S F,et al.First report of anthracnose of Lycium barb arum caused by Colletotrichuma cutatum in China[J].Plant Dis,2008,92(10):1471.
    [7]唐慧锋,赵世华,谢施讳,等.枸杞炭疽病发生规律试验观察初报[J].落叶果树,2003(5):55-57.TANG H F,ZHAO S H,XIE S W,et al.Preliminary observation on regularity?of?outbreak in anthracnose of wolfberry[J].Deciduous Fruits,2003(5):55-57.
    [8]邓维萍,杨敏,杜飞,等.葡萄胶孢炭疽菌对3种麦角甾醇脱甲基抑制剂类杀菌剂的敏感性[J].农药学学报,2011,13(3):245-252.DENG W P,YANG M,DU F,et al.Sensitivity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing grape anthracnose to three sterol demethylation inhibitor(DMI)fungicides[J].Chin J Pestic Sci,2011,13(3):245-252.
    [9]刘霞,杨克强,朱玉凤,等.8种杀菌剂对核桃炭疽病病原菌胶孢炭疽菌的室内毒力[J].农药学学报,2013,15(4):412-420.LIU X,YANG K Q,ZHU Y F,et al.Laboratory toxicity of eight fungicides against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing walnut anthracnose[J].Chin J Pestic Sci,2013,15(4):412-420.
    [10]宋丹丹,张伊莹,张琳婧,等.杨树炭疽病菌对多菌灵及3种DMIs杀菌剂的敏感性[J].农药学学报,2016,18(5):567-574.SONG D D,ZHANG Y Y,ZHANG L J,et al.Sensitivities of poplar anthracnose fungi isolates to carbendazim and three C-14ademethylation inhibitors[J].Chin J Pestic Sci,2016,18(5):567-574.
    [11]丁向阳,徐建强,邓全恩,等.柿炭疽病化学防治药剂的初步筛选[J].经济林研究,2015,33(4):148-151.DING X Y,XU J Q,DENG Q E,et al.Preliminary selection of fungicides to anthracnose pathogens in persimmon[J].Non-Wood For Res,2015,33(4):148-151.
    [12]张全,韩君,张小兵,等.9种杀菌剂对苹果炭疽病菌的毒力比较[J].山东农业科学,2012,44(1):91-93.ZHANG Q,HAN J,ZHANG X B,et al.Toxicity comparison of nine fungicides to Glomerella cingulata[J].Shandong Agric Sci,2012,44(1):91-93.
    [13]田春燕,徐军,董丰收,等.微生物降解三唑类杀菌剂研究进展[J].农药学学报,2016,18(2):141-150.TIAN C Y,XU J,DONG F S,et al.Research progress on microbial degradation of triazole fungicides[J].Chin J Pestic Sci,2016,18(2):141-150.
    [14]FUCHS A,DRANDAREVSKI C A.The likelihood of development of resistance to systemic fungicides which inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis[J].Neth J Plant Pathol,1976,82(2):85-87.
    [15]KOLLER W,SCHEINPFLUG H.Fungal resistance to sterol biosythesis inhibitors:a new challenge[J].Plant Dis,1987,71(12):1066-1074.
    [16]XU X F,LIN T,YUAN S K,et al.Characterization of baseline sensitivity and resistance risk of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides complex isolates from strawberry and grape to two demethylationinhibitor fungicides,prochloraz and tebuconazole[J].Australas Plant Pathol,2014,43(6):605-613.
    [17]陈聃,时浩杰,吴慧明,等.浙江省葡萄炭疽菌对甲基硫菌灵和戊唑醇的抗药性研究[J].果树学报,2013,30(4):665-668.CHEN D,SHI H J,WU H M,et al.Resistance of Colletotrichumgloeosporioides causing grape ripe rot to thiophanate-methyl and tebuconazole in Zhejiang[J].J Fruit Sci,2013,30(4):665-668.
    [18]韩永超,向发云,曾祥国,等.湖北省草莓炭疽病菌对苯醚甲环唑的敏感性测定[J].植物保护学报,2016,43(3):525-526.HAN Y C,XIANG F Y,ZENG X G,et al.Sensitivity of Colletotrichum spp.from strawberry to difenoconazole in Hubei Province[J].J Plant Prot,2016,43(3):525-526.
    [19]杨石有,周慧珍,张贺,等.116株芒果炭疽病菌对咪鲜胺的敏感性测定[J].植物保护,2015,41(3):201-204.YANG S Y,ZHOU H Z,ZHANG H,et al.Susceptibility of mango anthracnose pathogen to prochloraz[J].Plant Prot,2015,41(3):201-204.
    [20]蒲金基,张贺,杨石有,等.芒果炭疽病菌对丙环唑的敏感性基线及抗药性评价[J].中国果树,2014(6):24-27.PU J J,ZHANG H,YANG S Y,et al.Sensitive baseline and resistance detection of mango anthracnose pathogen to propiconazole[J].China Fruits,2014(6):24-27.
    [21]中华人民共和国农业农村部.农药室内生物测定试验准则杀菌剂第2部分:抑制病原真菌菌丝生长试验平皿法:NY/T1156.2—2006[S].2006.Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's of Republic of China.Pesticide guidelines for laboratory bioactivity tests part:petri plate test for determing fungicide inhibition of mycelial growth:NY/T 1156.2—2006[S].2006.
    [22]詹家绥,吴娥娇,刘西莉,等.植物病原真菌对几类重要单位点杀菌剂的抗药性分子机制[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(17):3392-3404.ZHAN J S,WU E J,LIU X L,et al.Molecular basis of resistance of phytopathogenic fungi to several site-specific fungicides[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2014,47(17):3392-3404.
    [23]齐永志,张小风,赵卫松,等.梨黑星病菌对氟硅唑的敏感性及与不同杀菌剂之间的交互抗性[J].农药学学报,2012,14(2):165-169.QI Y Z,ZHANG X F,ZHAO W S,et al.Sensitivity of venturia nashicola to flusilazole and cross-resistance against diverse fungicides[J].Chin J Pestic Sci,2012,14(2):165-169.
    [24]徐建强,刁兴旺,李恒,等.中国河南省小麦纹枯病菌对苯醚甲环唑及戊唑醇的敏感性[J].农药学学报,2016,18(5):582-588.XU J Q,DIAO X W,LI H,et al.Sensitivity to difenoconazole and tebuconazole of Rhizoctonia cerealis in Henan Province in China[J].Chin J Pestic Sci,2016,18(5):582-588.
    [25]蓝国兵,于琳,何自福,等.2009-2014年间广东省菜心炭疽病菌对咪鲜胺的敏感性[J].农药学学报,2018,20(2):249-253.LAN G B,YU L,HE Z F,et al.Sensitivity of Colletotrichum higginsianum isolated from Brassica parachinensis to prochloraz in Guangdong Province from 2009 to 20 14[J].Chin J Pestic Sci,201 8,20(2):249-253.
    [26]徐建强,夏彦飞,黄宇龙,等.河南省小麦纹枯病病原菌鉴定及其对三唑酮的敏感性[J].植物保护学报,2018,45(3):423-431.XU J Q,XIA Y F,HUANG Y L,et al.Etiology identification and sensitivity of the pathogen of wheat sharp eyespot to triadimefon in Henan Province[J].J Plant Prot,2018,45(3):423-431.
    [27]王得瑾,赵精珍,赵文渊,等.甘肃靖远2017年度气候影响评价[J].安徽农学通报,2018,24(13):128-130.WANG D J,ZHAO J Z,ZHAO W Y,et al.Climate impact assessment of Jingyuan county Gansu Province in 201 7[J].Anhui Agric Sci Bull,2018,24(13):128-130.
    [28]叶滔,马志强,毕秋艳,等.植物病原真菌对甾醇生物合成抑制剂类(SBIs)杀菌剂的抗药性研究进展[J].农药学学报,2012,14(1):1-16.YE T,MA Z Q,BI Q Y,et al.Research advances on the resistance of plant pathogenic fungi to SBIs fungicides[J].Chin J Pestic Sci,2012,14(1):1-16.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700