摘要
依据受压圆筒爆破实验得到的数据,对极限载荷法、应力分类法的结果进行了分析,并对两种方法的相对安全性进行了比较。同时,对于应力分类法中的一次局部薄膜应力以及薄膜应力加弯曲应力的强度条件进行了讨论。
Based on the data from explosion experiment of pressure cylinder, the results from limit load analysis and stress categorization method were analyzed in this paper. Also, these two analysis methods were compared in the aspect of relative safety. At the same times, the limits for primary local membrane stress and membrane plus bending stress in stress categorization method were discussed.
引文
[1]秦叔经,压力容器分析设计方法的安全性和经济性讨论[J].化工设备与管道,2006(6):1-6.
[2]GB 150—89,钢制压力容器编制说明[S].
[3]薛明德,黄克智,李世玉,等.GB 15—2011中圆筒开孔补强设计的分析法[J].化工设备与管道,2012,49(3):1-11.
[4]EN 13445,Unfired Pressure Vessels[S].2009.
[5]ASME,Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code[S].Sec.VIII-2,2010.
[6]W.J.Cottam,S.S.Gill,Experimental Investigation of the Behavior Beyond the Elastic Limit of Flush Nozzles in Cylindrical Pressure Vessel[J].Journal Mechanical Engineering Science,1996,3(8).
[7]GB 150—2011,压力容器[S].2011.
[8]JB 4732—95,钢制压力容器-分析设计标准(2005确认版)[S].2005.
[9]秦叔经.应力分类方法的几点讨论[J].化工设备与管道,2013,50(4):1-9.
[10]Rodabaugh,E.C.,A Review of Area Replacement Rules for Pipe Connections in Pressure Vessels and Piping[J].WRC Bulletin 335,1988.