中国省际新型城镇化发展测度

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Measurement of Inter-provincial New Urbanization Development in China 作者：李政通 ; 姚成胜 ; 邹圆 ; 龚圆 英文作者：Li Zhengtong;Yao Chengsheng;Zou Yuan;Gong Yuan;Center of Central China Economic and social Development Research,Nanchang University;School of Economics and Management,Nanchang University;Econometric Research Institution,Nanchang University; 关键词：新型城镇化 ; 政策体现式综合评价法 ; 序关系分析法 ; 熵值法 英文关键词：new urbanization;;PECEM;;rank correlation analysis;;entropy method 中文刊名：TJJC 英文刊名：Statistics & Decision 机构：南昌大学中国中部经济社会发展研究中心;南昌大学经济管理学院;南昌大学计量经济研究会; 出版日期：2019-01-30 15:35 出版单位：统计与决策 年：2019 期：v.35;No.518 基金：国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(2015AZD070);; 第57批中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2015M571984);; 南昌大学研究生创新资助项目(CX2015081) 语种：中文; 页：TJJC201902023 页数：6 CN：02 ISSN：42-1009/C 分类号：97-102

摘要

文章首先对序关系分析法进行改进,运用融合熵值法构建一种政策体现式的综合评价法,并将其运用于我国31省(市、区)2010—2014年新型城镇化发展水平变化的综合评价当中。研究认为:相对于熵值法而言,政策体现式综合评价法不仅能够体现评价对象的政策导向变化,而且显著提高了综合评价的全面性、可靠性、系统性和适用性;总体上看,我国新型城镇化的整体发展水平不高,2010—2014年整体以每年0.021个单位的速度增长。由于传统熵值法突出了城镇经济发展以及城镇人口和土地扩张,但弱化了城镇生活和城镇生态建设的内容,因而西北和西南等地区新型城镇化的发展速度被明显低估,而广大东部沿海则被明显高估。
        This paper firstly improves the rank correlation analysis method,and then uses entropy fusion method to construct a policy-embodied comprehensive evaluation method(PECEM),which is applied to the comprehensive evaluation of the changes in the development level of new-type urbanization in 31 provinces(cities and districts) from 2010 to 2014.The study results show that compared with the entropy method,the PECEM can not only reflect the change of policy orientation of the evaluated object,but also significantly improve the comprehensiveness,reliability,systematicness and applicability of evaluation.From a general view,the overall development level of new-type urbanization in China is not high,with the overall annual growth rate of 0.021 units from 2010 to 2014.The traditional entropy value method highlights urban economic development,urban population and land expansion,and weakens the content of urban life and urban ecological construction.Consequently,the development speed of new-type urbanization in northwest and southwest China is obviously underestimated,while the vast east coast is obviously overestimated.

引文

[1]Zhang X,Wu Y,Shen L.An Evaluation Framework for the Sustainability of Urban Land Use:A Study of Capital Cities and Municipalities in China[J].Habitat International,2011,35(1).
    [2]Ouyang T,Fu S,Zhu Z,et al.A New Assessment Method for Urbanization Environmental Impact:Urban Environment Entropy Model and its Application[J].Environmental Monitoring&Assessment,2008,(146).
    [3]陈忠暖,高权,王帅.中国省际城镇化综合水平及其空间分异[J].经济地理,2014,34(6).
    [4]杨艳琳,翟超颖.中国城镇化质量与就业质量的度量及其相关性分析[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(1).
    [5]张发明,郭亚军,易平涛.序关系分析下的多阶段交互式群体评价方法[J].系统工程学报,2011,26(5).
    [6]张发明.区间标度群组序关系评价法及其运用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(3).
    [7]郭显光.改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践, 1998, 18(12).