东营凹陷中央隆起带平衡剖面分析及差异隆升过程研究
|
摘要
东营凹陷中央隆起带是胜利油田油气最富集的地区之一,前人对东营凹陷中央隆起带进行了诸多方面的研究,但对中央隆起带不同区域的差异隆升过程及构造形态缺少对比。该文通过平衡剖面的绘制,重塑了东营凹陷中央隆起带不同区域的差异构造形态及演化过程。结果表明,中央隆起带东段辛镇构造带断裂活动从沙三开始,沙二沉积期构造雏形基本显现;东营组沉积期构造格局基本定型;馆陶组沉积期断裂数量、构造幅度进一步增大;到明化镇组沉积期,构造形态发展为现今状态。中央隆起带西段梁家楼-现河断裂带自沙四沉积期开始发育,沙三末期构造雏形基本显现;沙二沉积阶段构造幅度加大,构造形态基本定型;东营组沉积阶段构造形态进一步扩大,到明化镇组沉积阶段,发展为如今构造形态。
The central uplift belt of Dongying depression is one of the most enrichment area of oil and gas in Shengli oilfield.Many researchers have been carried out in this area.But comparative study on uplift process and structural form in different regions is lack.Based on the drawing of balanced section,tectonic morphology and the differential tectonic evolution process of the central uplift belt of Dongying depression have been reconstructed.It is showed that Xinzhen tectonic fracture in east section start from the third section of Shahejie formation,and the embryonic form of the structure in the second section of Shahejie formation has basically appeared.Structural pattern has been formed basically in the sedimentary period of Dongying formation.The number of faults and the tectonic extent of Guantao formation has increased furtherly during the sedimentary period of Guantao formation,and present condition of structures has been formed in the sedimentary period of Minghuazhen formation.Liangjalou-Xianhe fault belt in the west section of the central uplift zone has been developed from the fourth section of sedimentary period of Shahejie formation,the embryonic form of the structure of the third section of Shahejie formation has appeared basically,structural form of the sedimentary period of second section of Shahejie formation has increased and the structural form is basically formed.Structures expand furtherly in Dongying formation and develop to present form in Minghuazhen formation.
The central uplift belt of Dongying depression is one of the most enrichment area of oil and gas in Shengli oilfield.Many researchers have been carried out in this area.But comparative study on uplift process and structural form in different regions is lack.Based on the drawing of balanced section,tectonic morphology and the differential tectonic evolution process of the central uplift belt of Dongying depression have been reconstructed.It is showed that Xinzhen tectonic fracture in east section start from the third section of Shahejie formation,and the embryonic form of the structure in the second section of Shahejie formation has basically appeared.Structural pattern has been formed basically in the sedimentary period of Dongying formation.The number of faults and the tectonic extent of Guantao formation has increased furtherly during the sedimentary period of Guantao formation,and present condition of structures has been formed in the sedimentary period of Minghuazhen formation.Liangjalou-Xianhe fault belt in the west section of the central uplift zone has been developed from the fourth section of sedimentary period of Shahejie formation,the embryonic form of the structure of the third section of Shahejie formation has appeared basically,structural form of the sedimentary period of second section of Shahejie formation has increased and the structural form is basically formed.Structures expand furtherly in Dongying formation and develop to present form in Minghuazhen formation.
引文
[1]万晓龙,邱楠生,李亮,等.东营凹陷古近系沙三段异常高压及成藏响应[J].天然气地球科学,2004(1):95-98.
[2]张升平,吕宝凤,夏斌,等.东营凹陷新生代构造转型及其控油意义[J].大地构造与成矿学,2007(3):281-287.
[3]姜福杰,姜振学,庞雄奇.东营凹陷油气成藏体系的划分及定量评价[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2008(5):651-660.
[4]冯有良,周海民,任建业,等.渤海湾盆地东部古近系层序地层及其对构造活动的响应[J].中国科学:地球科学,2010,40(10):1356-1376.
[5]王冰洁.东营凹陷超压特征及演化与油气驱动机制[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2012:18-24.
[6]张岚.东营凹陷古近系成岩层序与优质储层分布[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2005:6-19.
[7]曹美灵.东营-惠民凹陷断裂特征与油气成藏关系研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2007:6-37.
[8]唐其升.东营凹陷断裂系统与中央构造带形成机制[D].杭州:浙江大学,2008:18-74.
[9]于建国,李三忠,王金铎,等.东营凹陷盐底辟作用与中央隆起带断裂构造成因[J].地质科学,2005,41(1):55-68.
[10]任建业,张青林.东营凹陷中央背斜隆起带形成机制分析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2004,28(3):254-262.
[11]王增明.东营凹陷中央隆起带构造演化及成藏模式研究[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2005:27-56.
[12]Qi J,Yang Q.Cenozoic structural deformation and dynamic processes of the Bohai Bay basin province,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,27(4):757-771.
[13]高山,章军锋,许文良,等.拆沉作用与华北克拉通破坏[J].科学通报,2009,54(14):1962-1973.
[14]宗国洪,肖焕钦,李常宝,等.济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义[J].高校地质学报,1999,5(3):275-282.
[15]王秉海,钱凯.胜利油区地质研究与勘探实践[M].山东:石油大学出版社,1992:1-221.
[16]李三忠,索艳慧,戴黎明,等.渤海湾盆地形成与华北克拉通破坏[J].地学前缘,2010,17(4):64-89.
[17]Dahlstrom C D A.Balanced cross sections[J].Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences,1969,6(4):743-757.
[18]苏惠,曲丽萍,李桂霞,等.东濮凹陷平衡剖面与构造演化研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(4):469-478.
[19]张进铎.平衡剖面技术在国内外油气勘探中的最新应用[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(6):1856-1861.
[20]梁慧社,张建珍,夏义平.平衡剖面技术及其在油气勘探中的应用[M].北京:地震出版社,2002:1-114.
[21]Hossack J R.The use of balanced cross-sections in the calculation of orogenic contraction:A review[J].Journal of the Geological Society,1979,136(6):705-711.
[22]De Paor D G.Balanced section in thrust belts;Part 1,Construction[J].AAPG Bulletin,1988,72(1):73-90.
[23]Gibbs A D.Balanced cross-section construction from seismic sections in areas of extensional tectonics[J].Journal of Structural Geology,1983,5(2):153-160.
[24]Suppe J,Medwedeff D A.Geometry and kinematics of fault‐propagation folding[J].Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae,1990,83(3):409-454.
[25]Jabbour M,Dhont D,Hervou?t Y,et al.Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folds with variable interlimb angle[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2012,42(1):212-226.
[26]方石,孙求实,谢荣祥,等.平衡剖面技术原理及其研究进展[J].科技导报,2012,30(8):73-79.
[27]汤济广,梅廉夫,沈传波,等.平衡剖面技术在盆地构造分析中的应用进展及存在的问题[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(6):19-22.
[28]漆家福.渤海湾新生代盆地的两种构造系统及其成因解释[J].中国地质,2004,31(1):15-22.
[29]曾广策,王方正,郑和荣,等.东营凹陷新生代火山岩及其与盆地演化、油藏的关系[J].地球科学,1997(2):43-45.
[30]叶兴树,王伟锋,戴俊生,等.东营凹陷沙三-东营期断裂活动特征[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(4):7-11.
[31]陈伟,卢华复,施央申.平衡剖面计算机模拟及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1993:1-195.
[32]毛小平,吴冲龙,袁艳斌.地质构造的物理平衡剖面法[J].地球科学,1998,23(2):61-64.
[33]颜丹平,田崇鲁,孟令波,等.伸展构造盆地的平衡剖面及其构造意义---以松辽盆地南部为例[J].地球科学,2003,28(3):275-280.
[34]周建勋.同沉积挤压盆地构造演化恢复的平衡剖面方法及其应用[J].地球学报,2005,26(2):151-156.
[35]李翔.平衡剖面技术在洼陷构造分析中的应用-以临南洼陷古近系为例[J].山东国土资源,2010,26(12):1-5.
[36]韩清华,兖鹏,余朝华,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷辛东地区构造演化及油气成藏规律[J].地质力学学报,2008(4):362-373.
[37]盛文波,操应长,刘晖,等.东营凹陷古近纪控盆断层演化特征及盆地结构类型[J].石油与天然气地质,2008(3):290-296.
[2]张升平,吕宝凤,夏斌,等.东营凹陷新生代构造转型及其控油意义[J].大地构造与成矿学,2007(3):281-287.
[3]姜福杰,姜振学,庞雄奇.东营凹陷油气成藏体系的划分及定量评价[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2008(5):651-660.
[4]冯有良,周海民,任建业,等.渤海湾盆地东部古近系层序地层及其对构造活动的响应[J].中国科学:地球科学,2010,40(10):1356-1376.
[5]王冰洁.东营凹陷超压特征及演化与油气驱动机制[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2012:18-24.
[6]张岚.东营凹陷古近系成岩层序与优质储层分布[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2005:6-19.
[7]曹美灵.东营-惠民凹陷断裂特征与油气成藏关系研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2007:6-37.
[8]唐其升.东营凹陷断裂系统与中央构造带形成机制[D].杭州:浙江大学,2008:18-74.
[9]于建国,李三忠,王金铎,等.东营凹陷盐底辟作用与中央隆起带断裂构造成因[J].地质科学,2005,41(1):55-68.
[10]任建业,张青林.东营凹陷中央背斜隆起带形成机制分析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2004,28(3):254-262.
[11]王增明.东营凹陷中央隆起带构造演化及成藏模式研究[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2005:27-56.
[12]Qi J,Yang Q.Cenozoic structural deformation and dynamic processes of the Bohai Bay basin province,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,27(4):757-771.
[13]高山,章军锋,许文良,等.拆沉作用与华北克拉通破坏[J].科学通报,2009,54(14):1962-1973.
[14]宗国洪,肖焕钦,李常宝,等.济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义[J].高校地质学报,1999,5(3):275-282.
[15]王秉海,钱凯.胜利油区地质研究与勘探实践[M].山东:石油大学出版社,1992:1-221.
[16]李三忠,索艳慧,戴黎明,等.渤海湾盆地形成与华北克拉通破坏[J].地学前缘,2010,17(4):64-89.
[17]Dahlstrom C D A.Balanced cross sections[J].Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences,1969,6(4):743-757.
[18]苏惠,曲丽萍,李桂霞,等.东濮凹陷平衡剖面与构造演化研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(4):469-478.
[19]张进铎.平衡剖面技术在国内外油气勘探中的最新应用[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(6):1856-1861.
[20]梁慧社,张建珍,夏义平.平衡剖面技术及其在油气勘探中的应用[M].北京:地震出版社,2002:1-114.
[21]Hossack J R.The use of balanced cross-sections in the calculation of orogenic contraction:A review[J].Journal of the Geological Society,1979,136(6):705-711.
[22]De Paor D G.Balanced section in thrust belts;Part 1,Construction[J].AAPG Bulletin,1988,72(1):73-90.
[23]Gibbs A D.Balanced cross-section construction from seismic sections in areas of extensional tectonics[J].Journal of Structural Geology,1983,5(2):153-160.
[24]Suppe J,Medwedeff D A.Geometry and kinematics of fault‐propagation folding[J].Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae,1990,83(3):409-454.
[25]Jabbour M,Dhont D,Hervou?t Y,et al.Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folds with variable interlimb angle[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2012,42(1):212-226.
[26]方石,孙求实,谢荣祥,等.平衡剖面技术原理及其研究进展[J].科技导报,2012,30(8):73-79.
[27]汤济广,梅廉夫,沈传波,等.平衡剖面技术在盆地构造分析中的应用进展及存在的问题[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(6):19-22.
[28]漆家福.渤海湾新生代盆地的两种构造系统及其成因解释[J].中国地质,2004,31(1):15-22.
[29]曾广策,王方正,郑和荣,等.东营凹陷新生代火山岩及其与盆地演化、油藏的关系[J].地球科学,1997(2):43-45.
[30]叶兴树,王伟锋,戴俊生,等.东营凹陷沙三-东营期断裂活动特征[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(4):7-11.
[31]陈伟,卢华复,施央申.平衡剖面计算机模拟及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1993:1-195.
[32]毛小平,吴冲龙,袁艳斌.地质构造的物理平衡剖面法[J].地球科学,1998,23(2):61-64.
[33]颜丹平,田崇鲁,孟令波,等.伸展构造盆地的平衡剖面及其构造意义---以松辽盆地南部为例[J].地球科学,2003,28(3):275-280.
[34]周建勋.同沉积挤压盆地构造演化恢复的平衡剖面方法及其应用[J].地球学报,2005,26(2):151-156.
[35]李翔.平衡剖面技术在洼陷构造分析中的应用-以临南洼陷古近系为例[J].山东国土资源,2010,26(12):1-5.
[36]韩清华,兖鹏,余朝华,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷辛东地区构造演化及油气成藏规律[J].地质力学学报,2008(4):362-373.
[37]盛文波,操应长,刘晖,等.东营凹陷古近纪控盆断层演化特征及盆地结构类型[J].石油与天然气地质,2008(3):290-296.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |