莫言小说《蛙》的文学伦理学解读
|
摘要
莫言小说《蛙》围绕"计划生育"这一事件展开,通过人物叙述者"我"讲述了姑姑的生活故事以及与该事件密切相关的农村生活百态,成功再现了中国20世纪50年代以来的伦理景象。沿着"计划生育"这一主线,从文学伦理学批评角度来分析并解构小说《蛙》中的伦理环境、伦理选择、伦理身份以及伦理意识等四个重要的伦理结,以期揭示生活的真相、洞悉莫言作品《蛙》的内在伦理本质。
Mo Yan's Frog revolves around the event of "family planning". Through the narrator "I",the novel tells the story of my aunt's life and the countryside life related to the event. It successfully reproduces the ethical picture of China from the 1950s. Based on the major thread of "family planning" in Frog,analysis and deconstruction of four important ethical elements are realized from the perspective of ethical literary criticism so as to reveal the truth of life and get an insight into the inner ethical essence of the novel. These four important ethical elements include ethical environment,ethical choice,ethical identity and ethical consciousness.
Mo Yan's Frog revolves around the event of "family planning". Through the narrator "I",the novel tells the story of my aunt's life and the countryside life related to the event. It successfully reproduces the ethical picture of China from the 1950s. Based on the major thread of "family planning" in Frog,analysis and deconstruction of four important ethical elements are realized from the perspective of ethical literary criticism so as to reveal the truth of life and get an insight into the inner ethical essence of the novel. These four important ethical elements include ethical environment,ethical choice,ethical identity and ethical consciousness.
引文
[1]聂珍钊.文学伦理学批评:基本理论与术语[J].外国文学研究,2010(1):14.
[2]王源.莫言矛盾文学奖获奖作品《蛙》研讨会综述[J].东岳论丛,2011(11):189.
[3]聂珍钊.文学伦理学批评与道德批评[J].外国文学研究,2006(2):16.
[4]莫言.蛙[M].北京:作家出版社,2012.
[5]宁明.生命伦理与社会伦理的角力——《蛙》中的伦理困境与救赎[J].山东社会科学,2015(8):107.
[6]王庆节.作为示范伦理的儒家伦理[J].学术月刊,2006(9):48.
[7]王亚平.面向世界的敞开与自我救赎之路——解读莫言长篇小说《蛙》[J].中国文学研究,2014(3):99.
[8]盖光.女性母性人性——莫言长篇小说《蛙》中“姑姑”的性属隐喻[J].湖南大学学报:社会科学版,2013,27(3):85.
[9]尚必武.成长的不能承受之轻:麦克尤恩《水泥花园》的伦理意识与伦理选择[J].外语教学,2014(4):72.
[10]聂珍钊.文学伦理学批评:伦理选择与斯芬克斯因子[J].外国文学研究,2011(6):5.
[11]蒋栋元.为了忘却的记忆——《第十九个妻子》的创伤叙事研究[J].当代外国文学,2016(2):35.
[12]李若平.谁的创伤在说话——《塔楼》的创伤叙事分析[J].中北大学学报:社会科学版,2016,32(6):91.
[2]王源.莫言矛盾文学奖获奖作品《蛙》研讨会综述[J].东岳论丛,2011(11):189.
[3]聂珍钊.文学伦理学批评与道德批评[J].外国文学研究,2006(2):16.
[4]莫言.蛙[M].北京:作家出版社,2012.
[5]宁明.生命伦理与社会伦理的角力——《蛙》中的伦理困境与救赎[J].山东社会科学,2015(8):107.
[6]王庆节.作为示范伦理的儒家伦理[J].学术月刊,2006(9):48.
[7]王亚平.面向世界的敞开与自我救赎之路——解读莫言长篇小说《蛙》[J].中国文学研究,2014(3):99.
[8]盖光.女性母性人性——莫言长篇小说《蛙》中“姑姑”的性属隐喻[J].湖南大学学报:社会科学版,2013,27(3):85.
[9]尚必武.成长的不能承受之轻:麦克尤恩《水泥花园》的伦理意识与伦理选择[J].外语教学,2014(4):72.
[10]聂珍钊.文学伦理学批评:伦理选择与斯芬克斯因子[J].外国文学研究,2011(6):5.
[11]蒋栋元.为了忘却的记忆——《第十九个妻子》的创伤叙事研究[J].当代外国文学,2016(2):35.
[12]李若平.谁的创伤在说话——《塔楼》的创伤叙事分析[J].中北大学学报:社会科学版,2016,32(6):91.