用户名: 密码: 验证码:
绿色基础设施的洪水调节服务供需测度研究进展
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Measurements of the supply and demand for the flood regulation ecosystem services of green infrastructure: A review
  • 作者:颜文涛 ; 黄欣 ; 王云才
  • 英文作者:YAN Wentao;HUANG Xin;WANG Yuncai;College of Architecture and Planning,Tongji University;Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning,Chongqing university;
  • 关键词:绿色基础设施 ; 生态系统服务 ; 洪水调节 ; 供需测度 ; 服务流动
  • 英文关键词:green infrastructure;;ecosystem service;;flood regulation;;supply and demand measurements;;service flows
  • 中文刊名:STXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:同济大学建筑与城市规划学院;重庆大学建筑城规学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-23
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划课题(2017YFC0505705);; 国家自然科学基金面上项目(51278504);国家自然科学基金面上项目(51678087)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STXB201904005
  • 页数:13
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-2031/Q
  • 分类号:44-56
摘要
绿色基础设施(green infrastructure, GI)可提供高效且可获取的洪水调节服务,其供需测度是提升服务水平的基础与前提,可为城市土地利用与绿色基础设施规划提供决策依据。以GI洪水调节服务供需为研究对象,梳理GI洪水调节服务供需的概念内涵、主体构成和尺度关系。回顾了GI洪水调节服务供需测度方法,包括土地利用测度法、生态系统测度法和洪水调蓄模型法等供应水平测度方法,以及风险评估法、洪水淹没模型法和经济损失法等需求水平测度方法。基于生态系统服务的供需关系,构建了GI洪水调节服务供需分析框架,通过供需数量均衡和空间匹配将供需关系分为四种情景,对应服务动态平衡、调整服务供需水平和服务流动机制3种调控手段。从服务测度重点、动态变化分析、供需阈值效能、服务流动机制等四个方面提出了未来研究方向,以期对绿色基础设施规划研究和生态系统服务管理与决策研究有所启示。
        Green infrastructure can provide efficient and accessible flood regulation ecosystem services; the measurement of supply and demand is the basis and prerequisite for improving ecosystem services and can provide decision-making information for land use planning and green infrastructure planning. This paper elaborates on the flood regulation ecosystem services of green infrastructure, including the conceptual connotation, main body composition, and relationship for each scale of supply and demand. Various methods of measurement for flood regulation service supply and demand are reviewed; the methods for supply measurement include land use method, ecosystem methods, and the flood storage model, while the methods for demand include the risk assessment method, flood submerged model, and economic loss statistics. Based on the existing research on the supply and demand of ecosystem services, we envisage a supply and demand analysis framework for flood regulation services. Through quantity balance and space matching for supply and demand, the relationship of supply and demand is divided into four scenarios. For each scenario, there are three regulation strategies: regulation for supply and demand toward dynamic balance, adjustment of supply and demand for quantity match, and service flow mechanism for the spatial match. Finally, we summarize deficiencies in the current research and propose future research directions with the aim of enlightening research on green infrastructure planning and ecosystem service management and decision-making.
引文
[1] Andréassian V. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 291(1/2): 1-27.
    [2] Costanza R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(2): 350-352.
    [3] Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(3): 643-653.
    [4] Castro A J, Verburg P H, Martín-López B, Garcia-Llorente M, Cabello J, Vaughn C C, López E. Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: a landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 132: 102-110.
    [5] Geijzendorffer I R, Martín-López B, Roche P K. Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 52: 320-331.
    [6] 颜文涛, 黄欣, 邹锦. 融合生态系统服务的城乡土地利用规划: 概念框架与实施途径. 风景园林, 2017, (1): 45-51.
    [7] 傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.
    [8] Vallecillo S, Polce C, Barbosa A, Perpiňa Castillo C, Vandecasteele I, Rusch G M, Maes J. Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: an ecosystem service perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 174: 41-54.
    [9] de Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7(3): 260-272.
    [10] Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G, Vizcaino P, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E. Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57: 405-417.
    [11] Pártl A, Va, Lorencová E K. A spatial analysis of integrated risk: vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to different hazards in the Czech Republic. Natural Hazards, 2017, 89(3): 1185-1204.
    [12] Castro A J, Vaughn C C, Julian J P, García-Llorente M. Social demand for ecosystem services and implications for watershed management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2016, 52(1): 209-221.
    [13] L?htinen K, Guan Y C, Li N, Toppinen A. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in supply chain management in the global forest industry. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 21: 130-140.
    [14] Costanza R, D′Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O′Neill R V, Paruelo J. The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1): 3-15.
    [15] Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 17-29.
    [16] Ritzema H, Kirkpatrick H, Stibinger J, Heinhuis H, Belting H, Schrijver R, Diemont H. Water management supporting the delivery of ecosystem services for grassland, heath and moorland. Sustainability, 2016, 8(5): 440-440.
    [17] Benedict M A, McMahon E T. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Washington DC: Island Press, 2006.
    [18] 张炜, 杰克·艾亨, 刘晓明. 生态系统服务评估在美国城市绿色基础设施建设中的应用进展评述. 风景园林, 2017, (2): 101-108.
    [19] 邹锦, 颜文涛, 曹静娜, 叶林. 绿色基础设施实施的规划学途径——基于与传统规划技术体系融合的方法. 中国园林, 2014, 30(9): 92-95.
    [20] Crossman N D, Burkhard B, Nedkov S, Willemen L L J, Petz K, Palomo I, Drakou E G, Martín-López B, McPhearson T, Boyanova K, Alkemade R, Egoh B, Dunbar M B, Maes J. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 4-14.
    [21] Villamagna A M, Angermeier P L, Bennett E M. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecological Complexity, 2013, 15: 114-121.
    [22] Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408.
    [23] Tallis H, Polasky S. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2009, 1162(1): 265-283.
    [24] 吕一河, 胡健, 孙飞翔, 张立伟. 水源涵养与水文调节: 和而不同的陆地生态系统水文服务. 生态学报, 2015, 35(15): 5191-5196.
    [25] Nedkov S, Burkhard B. Flood regulating ecosystem services—Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 67-79.
    [26] Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Kienast F. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 39-53.
    [27] Wei H J, Fan W G, Wang X C, Lu N C, Dong X B, Zhao Y N, Ya X J, Zhao Y F. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: a review. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 15-27.
    [28] Martínez-Harms M J, Balvanera P. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 2012, 8(1/2): 17-25.
    [29] 严岩, 朱捷缘, 吴钢, 詹云军. 生态系统服务需求、供给和消费研究进展. 生态学报, 2017, 37(8): 2489-2496.
    [30] 马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 吴健生. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1277-1289.
    [31] Baró F, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E, Frantzeskaki N. Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: a quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 55: 146-158.
    [32] 白杨, 王敏, 李晖, 黄沈发, Alatalo J M. 生态系统服务供给与需求的理论与管理方法. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17): 5846-5852.
    [33] Serna-Chavez H M, Schulp C J E, van Bodegom P M, Bouten W, Verburg P H, Davidson M D. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 39: 24-33.
    [34] 罗静茹, 张德顺, 刘鸣, 哈拉尔德·策普. 城市生态系统服务的量化评估与制图——以德国盖尔森基辛市沙克尔协会地区为例. 风景园林, 2016, (5): 41-49.
    [35] Sohel M S I, Mukul S A, Burkhard B. Landscape′s capacities to supply ecosystem services in Bangladesh: a mapping assessment for Lawachara National Park. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 12: 128-135.
    [36] 吴炳方, 黄进良, 沈良标. 湿地的防洪功能分析评价——以东洞庭湖为例. 地理研究, 2000, 19(2): 189-193.
    [37] 饶恩明, 肖燚, 欧阳志云. 中国湖库洪水调蓄功能评价. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(8): 1356-1365.
    [38] 曹云, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 黄志刚, 邢芳芳. 森林生态系统的水文调节功能及生态学机制研究进展. 生态环境, 2006, 15(6): 1360-1365.
    [39] 唐尧, 祝炜平, 张慧, 宋瑜. InVEST 模型原理及其应用研究进展. 生态科学, 2015, 34(3): 204-208.
    [40] 黄从红, 杨军, 张文娟. 生态系统服务功能评估模型研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12): 3360-3367.
    [41] Stürck J, Poortinga A, Verburg P H. Mapping ecosystem services: the supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 38: 198-211.
    [42] Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, Windhorst W. Landscapes′ capacities to provide ecosystem services - a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 2009, 15(1): 1-22.
    [43] Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson D M, Le Maitre D C, van Jaarsveld A S. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2008, 127(1/2): 135-140.
    [44] 王尧, 徐佩, 傅斌, 王威, 王海雯. 森林生态系统水源涵养功能评估模型研究进展. 生态经济, 2018, 34(2): 158-164, 169-169.
    [45] 李佩武, 李贵才, 陈莉, 袁雪竹, 徐凤. 深圳市植被径流调节及其生态效益分析. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(7): 1223-1233.
    [46] Posthumus H, Rouquette J R, Morris J, Gowing D J G, Hess T M. A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(7): 1510-1523.
    [47] 林炳青, 陈莹, 陈兴伟. SWAT模型水文过程参数区域差异研究. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(11): 1988-1999.
    [48] 李恒鹏, 王旭强, 杨桂山, 金洋. 基于单元格网的STREAM分布式水文模型及其应用——以太湖上游西苕溪流域为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 715-715.
    [49] Goodrich D C, Guertin D P, Burns I S, Nearing M A, Stone J J, Wei H Y, Heilman P, Hernandez M, Spaeth K, Pierson F, Paige G B, Miller S N, Kepner W G, Ruyle G, McClaran M P, Weltz M, Leonard J. AGWA: the automated geospatial watershed assessment tool to inform rangeland management. Rangelands, 2011, 33(4): 41-47.
    [50] Kron W. Flood risk = hazard · values · vulnerability. Water International, 2005, 30(1): 58-68.
    [51] Patro S, Chatterjee C, Mohanty S, Singh R, Raghuwanshi N S. Flood inundation modeling using MIKE FLOOD and remote sensing data. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2009, 37(1): 107-118.
    [52] 方建, 李梦婕, 王静爱, 史培军. 全球暴雨洪水灾害风险评估与制图. 自然灾害学报, 2015, 24(1): 1-8.
    [53] 郭凤清, 屈寒飞, 曾辉, 丛沛桐, 耿欣. 基于MIKE21的潖江蓄滞洪区洪水危险性快速预测. 自然灾害学报, 2013, 22(3): 144-152.
    [54] 初祁, 彭定志, 徐宗学, 孟德娟, 甄婷婷, 姜其贵. 基于MIKE 11和MIKE 21的城市暴雨洪涝灾害风险分析. 北京师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 50(5): 446-451.
    [55] 麻蓉, 白涛, 黄强, 杨旺旺. MIKE 21模型及其在城市内涝模拟中的应用. 自然灾害学报, 2017, 26(4): 172-179.
    [56] 谢五三, 田红, 卢燕宇. 基于FloodArea模型的大通河流域暴雨洪涝灾害风险评估. 暴雨灾害, 2015, 34(4): 384-387.
    [57] 张明达, 李蒙, 戴丛蕊, 黄玮. 基于FloodArea模型的云南山洪淹没模拟研究. 灾害学, 2016, 31(1): 78-82.
    [58] Stürck J, Schulp C J E, Verburg P H. Spatio-temporal dynamics of regulating ecosystem services in Europe– The role of past and future land use change. Applied Geography, 2015, 63: 121-135.
    [59] Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 104-116.
    [60] Turner W R, Brandon K, Brooks T M, Gascon C, Gibbs H K, Lawrence K S, Mittermeier R A, Selig E R. Global biodiversity conservation and the alleviation of poverty. BioScience, 2012, 62(1): 85-92.
    [61] Nedkov S, Zhiyanski M, Dimitrov S, Borisova B, Popov A, Ihtimanski I, Yaneva R, Nikolov P, Bratanova-Doncheva S. Mapping and assessment of urban ecosystem condition and services using integrated index of spatial structure. On Ecosystem, 2017, 2: e14499.
    [62] Maass J M, Balvanera P, Castillo A, Daily G C, Mooney H A, Ehrlich P, Quesada M, Miranda A, Jaramillo V J, García-Oliva F, Martínez-Yrizar A, Cotler H, López-Blanco J, Pérez-Jiménez A, Búrquez A, Tinoco C, Ceballos G, Barraza L, Ayala R, Sarukhán J. Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: Insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society, 2005, 10(1): 17.
    [63] 肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 徐洁. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700