用户名: 密码: 验证码:
信任之下,其效何如——来自Meta分析的证据
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:How Does Trust Affect Performance? Evidence from a Meta-analytic Review of Literature
  • 作者:苏涛 ; 陈春花 ; 崔小雨 ; 陈鸿志
  • 英文作者:Su Tao;Chen Chunhua;Cui Xiaoyu;Chen Hongzhi;School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology;Business School, National University of Singapore;School of National Development, Peking University;Krannert School of Management, Purdue University;
  • 关键词:信任 ; 绩效 ; Meta分析 ; 调节效应
  • 英文关键词:Trust;;Performance;;Meta-analysis;;Identity;;Moderator Analysis
  • 中文刊名:LKGP
  • 英文刊名:Nankai Business Review
  • 机构:华南理工大学工商管理学院;新加坡国立大学商学院;北京大学国家发展研究院;美国普渡大学Krannert管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2017-08-08
  • 出版单位:南开管理评论
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.20;No.115
  • 基金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(11YJA630004);; 中央高校基金科研业务费项目(X2gs D2117810)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:LKGP201704017
  • 页数:14
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:12-1288/F
  • 分类号:181-194
摘要
通过对包含586个效应值、110576个独立样本、总样本量达126819个的238个独立实证研究的梳理以及Met a分析,本研究回答了"信任之下,其效何如"、"在不同层次,信任与绩效的关系是否存在同一性"、"垂直距离对信任与绩效的关系有何影响"这三个在以往研究中并未得到解答的重要问题,并获得了阶段性定论:信任能显著地促进绩效。在组织内,信任对团队绩效的促进作用尤为突出,而在组织间,信任对组织绩效同样有较强的促进作用;二者关系存在同一性,即在个体、团队和组织不同层次,信任对关系类、创新类、任务类绩效的促进作用均依次变弱;信任双方的垂直距离越小,信任对绩效促进作用越强;此外,出版属性、测量工具以及同源偏差程度均能显著调节信任与绩效之间的关系,地区文化基本能调节,这四个变量的调节方向在不同层次高度一致。而且,测量工具的测量维度越多,信度越高,使用越广泛,信任与绩效之间的相关性越强。鉴于任务类结果变量在现阶段的管理实践中仍占据主导地位,而信任对管理者重点关切的任务类绩效的促进作用并不是非常有效,信任在管理实践中的效用因而需要引起警惕。
        In recent years, the lack of trust is becoming an outstanding problem of organizations with the implementation of management innovation and organizational change. Trust catches our attention because it has an important impact on work performance and behavior outcomes. Therefore, it is quite urgent to identify the relationship between organizational trust and performance in management practice. At the same time, with more and more researches focused on the relationship between trust and performance of different levels and types, making a periodic conclusion also becomes possible in management academic research. The previous meta researches either are lack of timeliness or pay much attention to trust and performance of specific level or type. This article aims to capture the rule between trust and performance at different levels by conducting a meta-analysis review consisting of 238 independent empirical studies, 586 effect sizes, 110576 independent samples and a total sum sample size of 126819. It may answer the following three unanswered important questions in previous articles including how does trust affect performance, whether the effects of trust on performance at different levels are the same and how does vertical distance affect the relationship between trust and performance. We can make a periodic conclusion that trust can significantly promote performance. Specifically, trust not only has stronger positive correlation with team performance than individual and organizational one inside organizations but also promotes organizational performance strongly outside organizations. Identity exits in the effects of trust on performance at different levels. Trust has stronger positive correlation with performance of contextual type than performance of innovative type than performance of task type at different levels. Promotion effect of trust on performance strengthens when the vertical distance between trustors and trustees turns smaller. In addition, publication status, measurement tool and common method variance can significantly moderate the relationship between trust and performance. However, regional culture can only basically moderate the relationship between trust and performance. Moderating direction of the above variables is highly consistent. Furthermore, the more dimensions, higher reliability and wider use of measurement tools, the stronger the correlation. Attention should be paid to the effectiveness of using trust in management practice at this stage, as outcome variables of task type still dominates the management practice but trust is unable to most effectively promote performance of task type, which is mainly focused on by managers.
引文
[1]Kramer,R.M..Trust and Distrust in Organizations:Emerging Perspectives,Enduring Questions.Annual Review of Psychology,1999,50(1):569-598.
    [2]Dirks,K.T.,Ferrin,D.L..Trust in Leadership:Meta-analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice.Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87(4):611-628.
    [3]Podsakoff,P.M.,Mackenzie,S.B.,Moorman,R.H.,Fetters,R..Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers`Trust in Leader,Satisfaction,and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors.The Leadership Quarterly,1990,1(2):107-142.
    [4]Li,A.N.,Tan,H.H..What Happens When You Trust Your Supervisor?Mediators of Individual Performance in Trust Relationships.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2013,34(3):407-425.
    [5]Gulati,R.,Nickerson,J.A..Interorganizational Trust,Governance Choice,and Exchange Performance.Organization Science,2008,19(5):688-708.
    [6]Alfes,K.,Shantz,A.,Truss,C..The Link between Perceived HRM Practices,Performance and Well-being:The Moderating Effect of Trust in the Employer.Human Resource Management Journal,2012,22(4):409-427.
    [7]Peters,L.,Karren,R.J..An Examination of the Roles of Trust and Functional Diversity on Virtual Team Performance Ratings.Group&Organization Management,2009,22(3):1-26.
    [8]Atuahene-Gima,K.,Li,H..When Does Trust Matter?Antecedents and Contingent Effects of Supervisee Trust on Performance in Selling New Products in China and the United States.Journal of Marketing,2002,66(3):61-81.
    [9]Colquitt,J.A.,Scott,B.A.,Le Pine,J.A..Trust,Trustworthiness,and Trust Propensity:A Meta-analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships with Risk Taking and Job Performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92(4):909-917.
    [10]De Jong,B.A.,Dirks,K.T.,Gillespie,N..Trust and Team Performance:A Meta-analysis of Main Effects,Moderators,and Covariates.Journal of Applied Psychology,2016,101(8):1134-1150.
    [11]Glass,G.V..Primary,Secondary,and Meta-analysis of Research.Educational Researcher,1976,5(10):3-8.
    [12]Coleman,J.S..A Vision for Sociology.Society,1994,32(1):29-34.
    [13]Rousseau,D.M.,Sitkin,S.B.,Burt,R.S.,Camerer,C..Not So Different after All:A Cross-discipline View of Trust.Academy of Management Review,1998,23(3):393-404.
    [14]郑伯壎.企业组织中上下属的信任关系.社会学研究,1999,14(2):22-37.
    [15]Costigan,R.D.,Iiter,S.S.,Berman,J.J..A Multi-dimensional Study of Trust in Organizations.Journal of Managerial Issues,1998,10(3):303-317.
    [16]Davis,J.H.,Schoorman,F.D.,Mayer,R.C.,Hwee,H.T..The Trusted General Manager and Business Unit Performance:Empirical Evidence of A Competitive Advantage.Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(5):563-576.
    [17]Tiwana,A..Do Bridging Ties Complement Strong Ties?An Empirical Examination of Alliance Ambidexterity.Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(3):251-272.
    [18]刘智强,葛靓,王凤娟.组织任期与员工创新:基于地位属性和文化差异的元分析.南开管理评论,2015,18(6):4-15.
    [19]Konovsky,M.A.,Pugh,S.D..Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange.Academy of Management Journal,1994,37(3):656-669.
    [20]Blau,P.M..Exchange and Power in Social Life.Transaction Publishers,1994.
    [21]Naquin,C.E.,Paulson,G.D..Online Bargaining and Interpersonal Trust.Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88(1):113-120.
    [22]Robson,M.J.,Katsikeas,C.S.,Bello,D.C..Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International Strategic Alliances:The Role of Organizational Complexity.Organization Science,2008,19(4):647-665.
    [23]Bromiley,P.,Cummings,L.L..Transactions Costs in Organizations with Trust.Research on Negotiation in Organizations,1995,5(2):219-250.
    [24]Dirks,K.T..Trust in Leadership and Team Performance:Evidence from NCAA Basketball.Journal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(6):1004-1012.
    [25]Porter,T.W.,Lilly,B.S..The Effects of Conflict,Trust,and Task Commitment on Project Team Performance.International Journal of Conflict Management,1996,7(4):361-376.
    [26]李宁,严进.组织信任氛围对任务绩效的作用途径.心理学报,2007,39(6):1111-1121.
    [27]Casimir,G.,Waldman,D.A.,Bartram,T.,Yang,S..Trust and the Relationship between Leadership and Follower Performance:Opening the Black Box in Australia and China.Journal of Leadership&Organizational Studies,2006,12(3):68-84.
    [28]白云涛,王亚刚,席酉民.多层级领导对员工信任,工作绩效及创新行为的影响模式研究.管理工程学报,2008,22(3):24-29.
    [29]Wang,H.,Law,K.S.,Hackett,R.D.,Wang,D.,Chen,Z.X..Leader-Member Exchange as a Mediator of the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Followers`Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior.Academy of Management Journal,2005,48(3):420-432.
    [30]Mccauley,D.P.,Kuhnert,K.W..A Theoretical Review and Empirical Investigation of Employee Trust in Management.Public Administration Quarterly,1992,16(2):265-284.
    [31]Whitener,E.M..The Impact of Human Resource Activities on Employee Trust.Human Resource Management Review,1997,7(4):389-404.
    [32]Jones,A.P.,James,L.R.,Bruni,J.R..Perceived Leadership Behavior and Employee Confidence in the Leader as Moderated by Job Involvement.Journal of Applied Psychology,1975,60(1):146-149.
    [33]韦慧民,龙立荣.主管认知信任和情感信任对员工行为及绩效的影响.心理学报,2009,41(1):86-94.
    [34]Braun,S.,Peus,C.,Weisweiler,S.,Frey,D..Transformational Leadership,Job Satisfaction,and Team Performance:A Multilevel Mediation Model of Trust.The Leadership Quarterly,2013,24(1):270-283.
    [35]De Jong,B.A.,Elfring,T..How Does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Teams?The Mediating Role of Reflexivity,Monitoring,and Effort.Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(3):535-549.
    [36]Byrne,J.,Keskin,H.,Lynn,G.S.,Imamoglu,S.Z..Knowledge Networks in New Product Development Projects:A Transactive Memory Perspective.Information&Management,2005,42(8):1105-1120.
    [37]Carter,M.Z.,Mossholder,K.W..Are We on the Same Page?The Performance Effects of Congruence between Supervisor and Group Trust.Journal of Applied Psychology,2015,100(5):1349-1363.
    [38]Barczak,G.,Lassk,F.,Mulki,J..Antecedents of Team Creativity:An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence,Team Trust and Collaborative Culture.Creativity and Innovation Management,2010,19(4):332-345.
    [39]Dayan,M.,Di Benedetto,C.A..The Impact of Structural and Contextual Factors on Trust Formation in Product Development Teams.Industrial Marketing Management,2010,39(4):691-703.
    [40]Alge,B.J.,Wiethoff,C.,Klein,H.J..When Does the Medium Matter?Knowledge-building Experiences and Opportunities in Decision-making Teams.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2003,91(1):26-37.
    [41]Simmons,B.L.,Gooty,J.,Nelson,D.L.,Little,L.M..Secure Attachment:Implications for Hope,Trust,Burnout,and Performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2009,30(2):233-247.
    [42]Zaheer,A.,Mcevily,B.,Perrone,V..Does Trust Matter?Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance.Organization Science,1998,9(2):141-159.
    [43]Chua,R.Y.J.,Ingram,P.,Morris,M.W..From the Head and the Heart:Locating Cognition and Affect-based Trust in Managers`Professional Networks.Academy of Management Journal,2008,51(3):436-452.
    [44]Morgan,R.M.,Hunt,S.D..The Commitment-trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.The Journal of Marketing,1994,58(3):20-38.
    [45]Dacin,M.T.,Oliver,C.,Roy,J.P..The Legitimacy of Strategic Alliances:An Institutional Perspective.Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(2):169-187.
    [46]张旭梅,陈伟.供应链企业间信任、关系承诺与合作绩效——基于知识交易视角的实证研究.科学学研究,2011,29(12):1865-1874.
    [47]叶飞,徐学军.供应链伙伴关系间信任与关系承诺对信息共享与运营绩效的影响.系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(8):36-49.
    [48]Lado,A.A.,Dant,R.R.,Tekleab,A.G..Trust-Opportunism Paradox,Relationalism,and Performance in Interfirm Relationships:Evidence from the Retail Industry.Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(4):401-423.
    [49]Wang,G.,Oh,I.S.,Courtright,S.H.,Colbert,A..Transformational Leadership and Performance across Criteria and Levels:A Meta-analytic Review of 25 Years of Research.Group&Organization Management,2011,36(2):223-270.
    [50]Chen,C.C.,Chen,X.,Meindl,J.R..How Can Cooperation Be Fostered?The Cultural Effects of Individualism-Collectivism.Academy of Management Review,1998,23(2):285-304.
    [51]Hofstede,G.,Hofstede,G.J.,Minkov,M..Cultures and Organizations:Software of the Mind.New York:Mcgraw-Hill,1991:121-127.
    [52]Rosenthal,R..The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results.Psychological Bulletin,1979,86(3):638-641.
    [53]Lipsey,M.W.,Wilson,D.B..Practical Meta-analysis.Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,2001:86-95.
    [54]张徽燕,李端凤,姚秦.中国情境下高绩效工作系统与企业绩效关系的元分析.南开管理评论,2012,15(3):139-149.
    [55]Hedges,L.V.,Olkin,I..Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis.Orlando:Academic Press,2014:53-55.
    [56]Schmidt,F.L.,Hunter,J.E..Methods of Meta-analysis:Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings(2nd Ed.).Thousand Oaks,CA:SAGE,2015:54-58.
    [57]Rothstein,H.R.,Sutton,A.J.,Borenstein,M..Publication Bias in Meta-analysis:Prevention,Assessment and Adjustments.Chichester:John Wiley&Sons,2006:203-208.
    [58]Murray,J.,Farrington,D.P.,Sekol,I..Children`s Antisocial Behavior,Mental Health,Drug Use,and Educational Performance after Parental Incarceration:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,2012,138(2):175-210.
    [59]Pindyck,R.S.,Rubinfeld,D.L..Microeconomics(8th Ed.).Boston:Person,2013:121-135.
    [60]Borman,W.C.,Motowidlo,S.M..Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance.Personnel Selection in Organizations,1993,32(4):71-98.
    [61]陈春花,苏涛,王杏珊.中国情境下变革型领导与绩效关系的Meta分析.管理学报,2016,13(8):1174-1183.
    [62]Podsakoff,P.M.,Mac Kenzie,S.B.,Lee,J.Y.,Podsakoff,N.P..Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research:A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88(5):879-903.
    [63]Sepp?nen,R.,Blomqvist,K.,Sundqvist,S..Measuring Inter-organizational Trust—A Critical Review of the Empirical Research in 1990-2003.Industrial Marketing Management,2007,36(2):249-265.
    [64]Gundlach,G.T.,Cannon,J.P..“Trust But Verify”?The Performance Implications of Verification Strategies in Trusting Relationships.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2010,38(4):399-417.
    (1)r指皮尔森相关系数,k则是指r的个数,下同。
    (2)科学研究的目的在于发现规律。规律是指自然界、社会诸现象之间必然、本质、稳定、普遍和反复出现的关系。本研究检验信任与绩效关系在不同层面是否存在同一性的目的就在于发现二者关系的规律。
    (3)指员工个体绩效,下同。
    (4)若一个研究采用某量表的后续版本,或对该量表进行了修订,只要量表结构一致,仍将其视为使用了该量表。本研究只报告那些研究数量达到Meta分析要求(≥3)的测量方式。限于篇幅,未完全列示量表文献,留存备索。
    (5)Porter等[25]在1996年最先做了信任与绩效的实证研究,之后该领域研究逐渐增多。
    (6)篇幅所限,29个期刊不逐一列出,留存备索。
    (7)238个研究中,有3个研究报告的效应值统计项是回归系数β和t值,因为它们均服从t分布,因而可以通过计算获得自由度df,并且通过公式r=√t2/(t+df)和se=β/t计算获得r和标准误se;有2个报告r和标准差sd,使用公式se=sd√/n可以算出se。
    (8)篇幅所限,这234篇文献的目录并未全部列出,留存备索。
    (9)表1、2、3中,N为独立样本量;Fail-safe N为失安全系数;Q指检验异质性程度的统计量;df(Q)是自由度;I2是说明效应值的真实差异构成了观察变异的比例;τ2是说明比例的研究间变异可用于权重计算的比例;Z为双尾检验的统计值;R、F分别指随机、固定效应模型;*为p≤0.05,下同。
    (10)ri、rit、ric、rii、ril、rid、rih、rico、ricg、ria、rt、rtt、rti、rtn、rtd;ro;rrc、rri和rrf分别指组织内信任与个体绩效(个体任务、关系、创新绩效),组织内对领导(直接、高层领导)、对同事的信任与个体绩效,组织内认知、情感信任与个体绩效的相关系数,组织内信任与团队绩效(团队任务、创新、新产品开发、决策绩效)的相关系数,组织内信任与组织绩效的相关系数,组织间信任与组织绩效(组织合作、创新、财务绩效)的相关系数。
    (11)|r|≥0.40,变量之间为强相关关系;|r|≤0.25,变量之间为弱相关关系;0.25≤|r|≤0.40,变量之间为中等强度相关关系.
    (12)rie、riw、rip、riu、rimc、riro、ripo、rima、rirt、riny、riot、rih、ril,rte、rtw、rtp、rtu、rtmc、rtja、rtma、rtsi、rtck、rtka、rtot、rth、rtl、roe、row、rop、rou、romc、roma、root、roh、rol、rre、rrw、rrp、rru、rrza、rrdo、rrku、rrco、rrmc、rrot、rrh、rrl分别指在地区文化、出版属性、测量工具和同源偏差程度4个因素影响下,组织内信任与个体、团队、组织绩效以及组织间信任与组织绩效的相关系数。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700