出版编辑改稿重在“少而准”
|
摘要
从学术层面看,出版编辑改稿重在"少而准",一要"少改",二要改得准确。坚持这一原则,才不会主次不分,顾此失彼;才知道改稿的边界、目标、凭据和典范。"少而准"看似简单,实则要求很高,需要相当的辨别力、判断力和表达力。随意更改,不敢"少改",是一种认识的误区,也折射出编辑人员的不自信。落实"少而准"的改稿原则,亟需扭转认识观念的偏差,谨守《著作权法》的限制与规范,严格区分改稿与审稿职责。
Editor's reversion ought to be less but more accurate, that is, change less but more accurate.Editors would avoid that of no distinction between primary and secondary, that of caring for this and losing that,and know the border, the aim, the basis and the models of modifying only by holding "less and more accurate" principle, which seems to be simple but demands high, needs considerable discrimination, judgment and expressiveness. To be afraid of changing less or being accused of it is a misunderstanding and reflects the diffident of editors. Therefore, editorial quality should be cultivated totally for editors holding the principle and demand of "less and more accurate".
Editor's reversion ought to be less but more accurate, that is, change less but more accurate.Editors would avoid that of no distinction between primary and secondary, that of caring for this and losing that,and know the border, the aim, the basis and the models of modifying only by holding "less and more accurate" principle, which seems to be simple but demands high, needs considerable discrimination, judgment and expressiveness. To be afraid of changing less or being accused of it is a misunderstanding and reflects the diffident of editors. Therefore, editorial quality should be cultivated totally for editors holding the principle and demand of "less and more accurate".
引文
[1][16]凌虚,松秀.编辑改稿,有规律可“寻”[J].中国编辑,2003(3):27,28
[2]潘国彦.编辑改稿“三位”[J].中国编辑,2006(4):38
[3][8][13][15][17][23][30]松秀,凌虚.站在地上的回应:再谈编辑改稿兼及其他[J].中国编辑,2003(6):20,20,19,19,19,20,20
[4][18][20][26][29]倪雅菁.论编辑改稿“四遵循”[J].编辑学刊,2016(6):76,75,75,76,76
[5]范国华.编辑改稿切莫“想当然”[J].编辑之友,1987(5):48
[6]余秋雨.文化苦旅[M].上海:东方出版中心,1992:319
[7]郑一奇.编辑改稿慎用“刀”[J].编辑学刊,2016(2):43
[9][10]刘蕴之.编辑改稿与文责自负:对编辑工作的一点微辞[J].出版广角,2009(1):47
[11]欧庆林.编辑改稿失实记者无辜受责[J].新闻战线,1981(2):15
[12][19][28]金平.编辑改稿中的边界问题[J].出版科学,2011(4):36
[14]陈原.陈原出版文集[M].北京:中国书籍出版社,1995:448
[21][22][24]王栾生.编辑改稿:确保“改对”,尽力“改好”:与凌虚、松秀先生商榷[J].中国编辑,2003(5):33,32,31
[25][27]胡德培.改稿是协助,不可代庖:与年轻编辑谈心之四[J].编辑之友,1988(4):72,75
[2]潘国彦.编辑改稿“三位”[J].中国编辑,2006(4):38
[3][8][13][15][17][23][30]松秀,凌虚.站在地上的回应:再谈编辑改稿兼及其他[J].中国编辑,2003(6):20,20,19,19,19,20,20
[4][18][20][26][29]倪雅菁.论编辑改稿“四遵循”[J].编辑学刊,2016(6):76,75,75,76,76
[5]范国华.编辑改稿切莫“想当然”[J].编辑之友,1987(5):48
[6]余秋雨.文化苦旅[M].上海:东方出版中心,1992:319
[7]郑一奇.编辑改稿慎用“刀”[J].编辑学刊,2016(2):43
[9][10]刘蕴之.编辑改稿与文责自负:对编辑工作的一点微辞[J].出版广角,2009(1):47
[11]欧庆林.编辑改稿失实记者无辜受责[J].新闻战线,1981(2):15
[12][19][28]金平.编辑改稿中的边界问题[J].出版科学,2011(4):36
[14]陈原.陈原出版文集[M].北京:中国书籍出版社,1995:448
[21][22][24]王栾生.编辑改稿:确保“改对”,尽力“改好”:与凌虚、松秀先生商榷[J].中国编辑,2003(5):33,32,31
[25][27]胡德培.改稿是协助,不可代庖:与年轻编辑谈心之四[J].编辑之友,1988(4):72,75