疼痛管理培训课程知识体系的构建
|
摘要
目的构建科学、系统的疼痛管理培训课程知识体系,为护士的培训和考核提供依据。方法在查阅文献和小组讨论的基础上,运用德尔菲法对来自江苏、浙江及北京的21名疼痛领域的专家进行2轮专家咨询,分析各指标的均值、变异系数及权重,根据咨询结果筛选指标构建疼痛管理培训课程知识体系。结果经过2轮专家咨询,构建的疼痛管理培训课程知识体系包含7个一级指标和24个二级指标,2轮专家咨询有效问卷的回收率分别为92%、91%,专家权威系数分别为0.83、0.88。结论疼痛管理培训课程知识体系内容设置合理,专家一致性程度较高,对护士的培训具有指导作用和参考价值。
Objective To develop the pain management training curriculum system,and to provide references for the training of nurses. Methods The Delphi method based on literature review and group-discussion was applied for 2 rounds experts consultation among 21 experts. The mean value,coefficient and weight of each indicator were analyzed. The pain curriculum system was developed according to the screening results of the consultations. Results The pain management training curriculum system was made up of 7 first-level and 24 second-level indicators after2 rounds consultations. The response rates were 92.00% and 91.30%,respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.83 and 0.88,respectively. Conclusion The contents of pain management training curriculum system were reasonably set up. The degree of expert consistency was high. The system can provide guidance and reference for training pain specific nurses.
Objective To develop the pain management training curriculum system,and to provide references for the training of nurses. Methods The Delphi method based on literature review and group-discussion was applied for 2 rounds experts consultation among 21 experts. The mean value,coefficient and weight of each indicator were analyzed. The pain curriculum system was developed according to the screening results of the consultations. Results The pain management training curriculum system was made up of 7 first-level and 24 second-level indicators after2 rounds consultations. The response rates were 92.00% and 91.30%,respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.83 and 0.88,respectively. Conclusion The contents of pain management training curriculum system were reasonably set up. The degree of expert consistency was high. The system can provide guidance and reference for training pain specific nurses.
引文
[1] Shepperd JR,Hale SE. Nurse practitioners in the world of pain management:a cautionary tale[J]. JNP,2016,12(2):102-108.
[2]余婕,李小燕,周阳,等.基于格林模式构建以护士为主导的疼痛管理模式[J].护理学杂志,2015,30(19):20-23.
[3]冯艺,张冉.多学科疼痛管理组织构建的专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(1):84-87.
[4]谢晓炜,李乐之.国内疼痛管理课程培训现状[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2013,19(6):370-372.
[5]刘玉平,李瑞,韩秀娟,等.苏北某医院临床护理人员疼痛管理现状和培训需求调查分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(34):4930-4934.
[6]许丽春,李育莲.外科护士疼痛认知和态度的调查分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2017,33(14):1078-1081.
[7]童莺歌,田素明.疼痛护理学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2017.
[8]刘小康,蔡景一,王海俊.应用优序图法确定医学本科生一般能力评价指标体系的研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2017,37(5):749-752.
[9]郭舒婕,杨巧芳,张红梅,等.心血管专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J].中华护理教育,2018,15(4):259-262.
[10]曾光.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994:250-270.
[2]余婕,李小燕,周阳,等.基于格林模式构建以护士为主导的疼痛管理模式[J].护理学杂志,2015,30(19):20-23.
[3]冯艺,张冉.多学科疼痛管理组织构建的专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(1):84-87.
[4]谢晓炜,李乐之.国内疼痛管理课程培训现状[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2013,19(6):370-372.
[5]刘玉平,李瑞,韩秀娟,等.苏北某医院临床护理人员疼痛管理现状和培训需求调查分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(34):4930-4934.
[6]许丽春,李育莲.外科护士疼痛认知和态度的调查分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2017,33(14):1078-1081.
[7]童莺歌,田素明.疼痛护理学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2017.
[8]刘小康,蔡景一,王海俊.应用优序图法确定医学本科生一般能力评价指标体系的研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2017,37(5):749-752.
[9]郭舒婕,杨巧芳,张红梅,等.心血管专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J].中华护理教育,2018,15(4):259-262.
[10]曾光.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994:250-270.