我国财政民生资金支出的农村减贫效应及反贫困策略研究
|
摘要
从资金支出规模、资金支出结构和资金支出地区差异等三个角度分析了我国财政民生资金支出存在的主要问题,发现我国财政民生资金支出具有良好的农村减贫效应,但是财政民生资金支出结构还存在进一步优化的空间,政策在不同区域的效果差异显著。财政资金支持是实现精准扶贫达到全面脱贫目标的重要支撑,要从扩大民生支出规模、优化财政民生资金支出结构、建立财政民生资金支出的区域政策及财政民生资金支出与农村贫困相结合等四个层面推进反贫困事业的进行。
This paper analyzes the main problems of China's fiscal and livelihood expenditures from the perspectives of expenditure scale, expenditure structure and regional differences, This paper analyzes the main problems of China's fiscal and livelihood expenditures from the perspectives of expenditure scale, expenditure structure and regional differences.Based on the existing data, the situation, this paper analyze of the total amount of expenditure, the structure of expenditure and the rural poverty alleviation effect of fiscal and livelihood expenditures in different regions. This paper finds that China's fiscal and livelihood expenditures have a good rural poverty reduction effect, but there is still room for further optimization of the fiscal and livelihood expenditure structure, and the effect of policies in different regions is significantly different. Therefore, the corresponding strategies and suggestions are put forward from the four levels of expanding the scale of people's livelihood expenditure, optimizing the structure of financial livelihood expenditure, establishing regional policies for fiscal and people's livelihood expenditure, and combining rural people's livelihood expenditure with rural poverty.
This paper analyzes the main problems of China's fiscal and livelihood expenditures from the perspectives of expenditure scale, expenditure structure and regional differences, This paper analyzes the main problems of China's fiscal and livelihood expenditures from the perspectives of expenditure scale, expenditure structure and regional differences.Based on the existing data, the situation, this paper analyze of the total amount of expenditure, the structure of expenditure and the rural poverty alleviation effect of fiscal and livelihood expenditures in different regions. This paper finds that China's fiscal and livelihood expenditures have a good rural poverty reduction effect, but there is still room for further optimization of the fiscal and livelihood expenditure structure, and the effect of policies in different regions is significantly different. Therefore, the corresponding strategies and suggestions are put forward from the four levels of expanding the scale of people's livelihood expenditure, optimizing the structure of financial livelihood expenditure, establishing regional policies for fiscal and people's livelihood expenditure, and combining rural people's livelihood expenditure with rural poverty.
引文
[1] 王仁宏,曹昆.中央经济工作会议在北京举行[EB/OL].人民网,2018-12-19.
[2] 徐艳清.2017年我国财政总支出突破20万亿[N].经济日报,2018-04-21.
[3] 李盛基,等.财政教育支出减贫的空间溢出效应分析[J].税务与经济,2016,(6):48-52.
[4] 徐爱燕,沈坤荣.财政支出减贫的收入效应——基于中国农村地区的分析[J].财经科学,2017,(1):116-122.
[5] 刘宏霞,等.农村金融发展、财政支农与西部地区减贫效应分析——基于面板门槛模型的研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2018,(3):52-56.
[6] 方大春.民生投入、门槛效应和经济增长——基于2001—2012年省际面板数据的实证分析[J].当代经济管理,2015,(10):1-6.
[2] 徐艳清.2017年我国财政总支出突破20万亿[N].经济日报,2018-04-21.
[3] 李盛基,等.财政教育支出减贫的空间溢出效应分析[J].税务与经济,2016,(6):48-52.
[4] 徐爱燕,沈坤荣.财政支出减贫的收入效应——基于中国农村地区的分析[J].财经科学,2017,(1):116-122.
[5] 刘宏霞,等.农村金融发展、财政支农与西部地区减贫效应分析——基于面板门槛模型的研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2018,(3):52-56.
[6] 方大春.民生投入、门槛效应和经济增长——基于2001—2012年省际面板数据的实证分析[J].当代经济管理,2015,(10):1-6.