宁波舟山港轮胎吊“油改电”的节能减排效益估算方法研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：A Method to Evaluate Benefits of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction from Shifting Diesel to Electricity for RTG at Ningbo Zhoushan Port 作者：陶学宗 ; 张秀芝 英文作者：Tao Xuezong;Zhang Xiuzhi; 关键词：宁波舟山港 ; 节能减排 ; 排放因子法 ; 绿色港口 英文关键词：Ningbo Zhoushan Port;;Energy saving and emission reduction;;Emission factor method;;Green port 中文刊名：CSGS 英文刊名：Communication & Shipping 机构：上海海事大学交通运输学院;伦斯勒理工学院工程学院; 出版日期：2019-02-25 出版单位：交通与港航 年：2019 期：v.6 基金：国家自然科学基金项目(批准号:71603162);; 上海市自然科学基金项目(批准号:15ZR1420400) 语种：中文; 页：CSGS201901015 页数：5 CN：01 ISSN：31-2096/TU 分类号：76-80

摘要

轮胎吊(RTG)"油改电"是宁波舟山港建设绿色港口的重要措施。该文基于作业活动、能耗强度和排放因子,引入生命周期评价和费效分析理念,建立宁波舟山港RTG"油改电"的节能减排效益评估模型。结果表明,2013～2017年宁波舟山港通过实施RTG"油改电"工程,平均每年节能1.88万t标准煤,减排4.50万t二氧化碳,节省成本0.51亿元。该研究克服了传统方法存在的RTG"油改电"减排效果和经济效益被高估的问题,可为合理评估港口绿色化措施的节能减排效益提供技术支持。
        Replacing diesel with electricity(DTE) for the rubber-tired gantry cranes(RTG) of Ningbo Zhoushan Port is an important measure to construct green port. Based on handling activity, energy intensity and emission factor,an assessment model to estimate the benefits of energy saving and emission reduction from DTE of RTG is developed by introducing life cycle assessment and cost benefit analysis. The results show that the implementation of DTE for RTG at Ningbo Zhoushan Port can annually save 18.8 thousand tons of coal equivalent, reduce 45 thousand tons carbon dioxide, and cut 51 million Yuan cost on average. This study overcomes the problem that both emission reduction effect and economic benefits from DTE of RTG were overestimated by traditional models, and could provide technical support to reasonably evaluate the effect of port greening measures on energy saving and emission reduction.

引文

[1]徐旭丽.轮胎式集装箱龙门起重机“油改电”方案及其效益[J].集装箱化, 2013(7):20-24.
    [2]蒋仑.集装箱堆场RTG“油改电”供电改造及效益分析[J].水运工程, 2014(4):103-105.
    [3]宁波港股份有限公司.宁波港低碳港口建设情况介绍[EB/OL].(2014-04)[2018-09-03].http://www.docin.com/p-1859317082.html.
    [4]索晨.集装箱码头碳排放核算及低碳发展方案研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2016.
    [5]陶学宗,吴琴,尹传忠.国际集装箱内陆段铁路运输链碳排放量估算[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2018,18(2):20-26.
    [6] YANG YC,CHANG WM.Impactsof electric rubber-tired gantries on green port performance[J].ResearchinTransportation Business and Management, 2013(8):67-76.
    [7] QUAH E,HALDANE J. Cost-benefit analysis[M]. London:Routledge, 2007.
    [8]全国港口标准化技术委员会. GB/T 21339—2008港口能源消耗统计及分析方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
    [9]LIL,FANF,MAL,etal.Energyutilization evaluation of carbon performance in public projectsbyFAHPandcloudmodel[J].Sustainability, 2016, 8(7):630-647.